Martin Trautmann wrote:
I do not see any description about the syntax within the proposal - and
I
feel that a population has to be accompanied whenever possible by a
valid
date.
Thus I feel it is not possible to add a pouplation tag directly to a
place. Apart from node, way and area this
Andy Robinson (blackadder) wrote:
(Actually, on checking with a calculator, 7*12*2.54=213.36. So I'm
doing a bit of unconscious rounding already.)
Indeed, the exact conversion is to multiply/divide by 0.3058
Er, you mean 0.3048, right?
(one inch is _defined as_ 25.4mm, and has been for many
Stage 3 - Email all OSM users who have contributed
data with the option of re-licensing their data
If we're going to do this anyway, can we not allow users to mark their
preference as public domain too? It seems a significant number of OSM
participants may be
would anyone like to write a caption ...
JOSM vs Potlatch; the race begins...
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
Ultimately I'm not sure we have a lot of wiggle room here because of the
share-alike license.
We could offer that the main website does nice attributions at the bottom of
the window, but we can't put any such _demands_ on the use of the data. The
reason being that I (speaking as one of many
Things not too important, we are rendering highly visible with the nice
black color. They are also obfuscating tracks:
http://www.informationfreeway.org/?lat=49.455373790593406lon=11.175777321956557zoom=14layers=F0B0F
Er, I think you must have pasted the wrong link? I followed that one
While I understand what you're saying I think it's also important to
recognize that we all have different ways to contribute. Some
potential OSM contributors may not be interested in on-the-ground
surveying, and some aren't interested in chair mapping.
Agreed from my point of view. I only
Often when OS and OSM disagree I will tag this in the OSM database with a note
such as
FIXME=Check name - OSM has Marefield Gardens, OS has Maresfield Gardens
Usually I will also delete the name= tag, so that the street shows up in noname
checks to be resurveyed (and because the correct
I will only tag names for resurveying round my local area where I know that
I'll be able to go out and check them before too long.
Fair enough. If you're always fixing it soon afterwards it doesn't
really matter much.
But in that case why not just go do it - why change the database first?
9 matches
Mail list logo
