http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=43.98355lon=-77.74038zoom=17layers=M
There seems to be a lot of weird rendering issues around Lake Ontario. Any
one have any ideas what the light green is?
Michael
--
*
G. Michael Carter*
Contact: H: 1-519-940-8935 | W: 1-905-267-8494 | M: 1-519-215-1869
. Michael Carter mi...@carterfamily.cawrote:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=43.98355lon=-77.74038zoom=17layers=M
There seems to be a lot of weird rendering issues around Lake Ontario. Any
one have any ideas what the light green is?
Michael
I finally got the Lake Ontario object reconstructed.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1206310
If anyone starts deleting portions of it again well get the rendering
problems like we've been having. (aka lakes disappearing and islands
sinking) If I could watch the object for changes
I wish they'd updated the Bing high resolution images In Orangeville
there's a new mall, but only one image (of three tiles) has the new mall,
the other has the cleared field from when they started. I can only put in
half the buildings.
Any ideas on how often they update the high res?
On
Any eta on when you'll be finish with the lake Ontario coastline?
Sent from my iPhone
On 2011-09-01, at 12:19 AM, Andrew MacKinnon andrew...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 9:23 AM, G. Michael Carter
mi...@carterfamily.ca wrote:
Andrew,
In addition to the missing lakes and marshes
Andrew,
In addition to the missing lakes and marshes documented on talk-ca here's
another if your keeping a list:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=43.98365lon=-77.7393zoom=17layers=M
Also as another FYI you may have a gap somewhere in the coastline which
could be causing a lot of the rendering
I just loaded the latest data for Ontario.
I noticed my Lake ontario object is missing. Is there a reason or was it
just an oversight?
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
--
*
G. Michael Carter*
Contact: H
OK curiosity is getting the better of me. What's the issue? Why the
sudden panic attack to remove data? (I must probably missed that part :)
What's wrong with CT/ODbL?
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 12:24 PM, john whelan
Barrie area was probably my import before we had OSM files from CanVec.
Can't remember. I think the duplicate is because at the time I couldn't get
an answer on what to do with the coastline. But since the lake is self
contained it can probably be deleted.
Michael
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 4:33
--
*
G. Michael Carter*
Contact: H: 1-519-940-8935 | W: 1-905-267-8494 | M: 1-519-215-1869 | F:
1-519-941-0009
Google Talk: xmpp:mikeycarter1...@gmail.com
http://livedvd.carterfamily.ca/http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=43.9216lon=-80.105zoom=14layers=B000FTF
http://www.openstreetmap.org
Would it be possible to get the Contour Lines as OSM files? I import
them into my GPS from the shp files. Just though it would be nice to
have without the manual conversion step I do.
If not, no big deal. Just thought I'd ask.
Michael
___
For the last month b.tile.openstreetmap.org times out and I get tile
coming soon (aka 404 errors) ... and not the only rogers problem I have
I might add...
When I access it from acanac or bell or rogers 3g network it's fine.
Two questions:
1. Any one on rogers? and if so can you send me
I was importing data in the Georgian Bay area and I noticed
something. If an island is natural=land it renders in mapnik as white,
regardless of the outer multipolygon. if you have natrual=wood or
possibly others, it sinks if it's not role=inner.
This is at least what I've observed so
emove the polygon natural=land and the polygon natural=wood will render properly in the hole created by the inner component of the natural=water multipolygon.
Daniel
-Original Message-
From: talk-ca-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:talk-ca-boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of G. Michael C
.
The second one is much more complex (from my side). Can someone try it
and send me the conclusion?
Daniel
*From:* G. Michael Carter [mailto:mikeycarter1...@gmail.com] *On
Behalf Of *G. Michael Carter
*Sent:* September 23, 2010 10
and natural=coastline for the Great Lakes. I'd like to
have this consistent over the Great Lakes but am not sure which one to
use. Please comment which one would be better/worse and why?
Thanks,
N.
On 9/20/2010 10:20 AM, G. Michael Carter wrote:
It was brought to my attention
points) within the next
year.
From: G. Michael Carter
[mailto:mikeycarter1...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of G.
Michael Carter
Sent: September 23, 2010 10:48
To: Bgin, Daniel
Cc: Talk-CA OpenStreetMap
Is there any case where we'd be using natural=land any more?
I've been thinking of taking the osm data in my db and creating a list
of common errors. Something like http://keepright.ipax.at
http://keepright.ipax.at/ but as just a check list. One thing I'm
going to scan for is identical
The way my system identifies which grid changes are in, is based on an
imported text file, and postgresql's spatial engine.
Cache.txt which contains this sort of thing:
030L05.osm -8042.4244862
-79.803944142.5
030L11.osm -79.5
From an observer perspective. In the areas I've entered CanVec v6 seems the
next version of GeoBase.A lot of roads are the similar but CanVect has a
lot more detailed points than the currently imported GeoBase. Ie geobase
import has a winding roads as a set of inverted triangles were
My logic... if it's a new building, it's a new object so the tag
references can go. As for delete or modify... the end result, we want
accurate objects, so in my opinion do what ever is easier.
On 18/08/10 01:57 PM, Louis-Marius Gendreau wrote:
Hi a building here
, Garmin, or TomTom). It is up to
the render engine/converter to improve how it handles the (supposedly)
correct database.
Having said that, check out
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:osmarender:render
Adam
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 2:15 PM, G. Michael Carter
mi...@carterfamily.ca mailto:mi
With the new canvec address data searches like 258 Broadway,
Orangeville, Ontario now return the exact spot for that address.
However, 258 Broadway, Orangeville, ON returns nothing. Is this a
case that we're missing data somewhere or OpenStreetMap.org search is
not handling abbreviations?
-
From: mi...@carterfamily.ca [mailto:mi...@carterfamily.ca]
Sent: July 29, 2010 9:00 AM
To: Ontario Parks - Comments (MNR)
Subject: Copying campsite numbers and features to OSM
Name: G. Michael Carter
Subject: Copying campsite numbers and features to OSM
Park Name:
Comments: Every year I visit
My computer froze last night. I think it missed only the
relationships.How does JOSM save fact there is a change to an object
in the OSM file?
I get the following from my working file:
[mcar...@liandra Changes]$ grep node Working5.osm | wc -l
39261
[mcar...@liandra Changes]$ grep way
Seems JOSM has a tag on the object called action
node id='20266016' action='delete'
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
All of 052A is there except
http://ftp2.cits.rncan.gc.ca/osm/pub/052/A/052A06.zip (Thunder Bay)
Did something happen in that grid?
Michael
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
Short answer yes, I'm taking responsibility! I've put in a temporary join on
on the US side so it's a complete object while I fix up the Canadian side. At
the rate I'm going I should be tomorrow.
As for same level of accuracy... that's why I'm deleting it. ;) The
coastline data is
am not about to go and do the whole "/dirty" thing on all the tiles that
are not rendering correctly. :)
--
G. Michael Carter
Contact: H: 1-519-940-8935 | W: 1-905-267-8494 | M: 1-519-215-1869 | F:
1-519-941-0009
Google Talk: xmpp:mikeycarter1...@gmail.com
I'm currently working on importing CanVec data around Lake Superior...
the coast line was really getting in the way, so I'm deleting it. I'm
actually joining them to the CanVec water corners... but it's probably
creating a coastal hole, not really sure if the join is actually working.
My
02:29 PM, Sam Vekemans wrote:
what im doing is keeping the coastline in tact, and adding in more
detail as i go along, and merging the nodes with the land/water
features edge as i go along.
you might want to message the talk-us list as you go along.
cheers,
sam
On 8/10/10, G. Michael Carter
I'm perfectly fine killing the coastal tag from the Canadian side on
all fresh water lakes... makes more sense to me. Plus it doesn't
import very well into my Garmin GPS anyways... you end up pulling half
the globe just to get the connecting lines, since it's not a single
object.
Michael
Do we have the lat/long boundaries of the new canvec tiles anywhere?
(that why I don't have to download all of canada to get them)
Mikey
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
Did anyone hear that loud bang last night...? That was my head
repeatedly hitting the table while I repeated the words look before you
leap! :-)
I spent 1 hour updating and processing a CanVec tile. When I was
finished I ran the verification step and fixed duplicates. Then when I
started
Jan, 2010 so it could be possible to scan for all of
Canada.)
I'll have more on Tuesday when I come back from camping thought.
Michael
On 30/07/10 12:20 PM, Tyler Gunn wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 11:06:47 -0400, "G. Michael Carter"
mi...@carterfamily.ca wrote:
I think the s
As my previous e-mail I've been playing around with routing based on
pedestrian and cycling. I'd say, in my area, 1 in 20 trails are
connected to the roads. I checked the Toronto and Brampton area.
Same issue.
Trails that cross roads, need to have a connecting node. Also they
need to join up
these. Getting hold of all the editors in a particular region,
very unlikely some only edit for one session for a start.
Cheerio John
On 29 July 2010 09:24, G. Michael Carter mi...@carterfamily.ca
wrote:
As my previous e-mail I've
been playing around with routing based on
pedestrian
Seems walking routable maps use the trails only if their connected to
the roads.
ie:
http://maps.cloudmade.com/?lat=43.906319lng=-80.13696zoom=16directions=43.902082417856064,-80.13610124588013,43.909333095564016,-80.12887001037598travel=footstyleId=1opened_tab=1
So any ideas how to handle
A few months ago I entered the roads for campgrounds specifically :
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=44.32948lon=-79.3248zoom=16layers=M
It's not complete but a good start. I had two thoughts.
1. If I grab the camp site numbering off the reservations website
and/or campground maps would
er...
Sorry... went on a tangent... :-)
Mikey
On 28/07/10 06:49 PM, Gerald A wrote:
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 6:08 PM, G. Michael
Carter mi...@carterfamily.ca
wrote:
1.
If I grab the camp site numbering off the reservations website and/or
campground maps would that be a violation of copyright?
You have my vote. Just having the inaccurate data will draw more people to the
trail. Higher percent chance of getting more gps data for the area.
Sent from my iPhone
On 2010-07-25, at 10:57 PM, Darryl Shpak dar...@shpak.ca wrote:
Hey all,
A quick question here, since I'm somewhat
sure I understand the problem you describe. Is it a problem with the geometric model?
However, there is something I'm sure of - Nodes must be merged at Canvec tile limits to keep data integrity.
Daniel
-Original Message-
From: talk-ca-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:talk-ca-boun...@openst
I've been noticing some very rare occurrences where the track, park and
campsite objects didn't make sense. Found two causes:
1. When deleting objects, like says woods, if it shares common nodes
with another object like a campsite or rapids there's a 50/50 chance the
delete will delete the
about VReimer's data now (although there's
lots of that to clean up). :)
Tyler
--
G. Michael Carter
Contact: H: 1-519-940-8935 | W: 1-905-267-8494 | M: 1-519-215-1869 | F:
1-519-941-0009
Google Talk: xmpp:mikeycarter1...@gmail.com
___
Talk
I just started selecting things like this:
sed s/node /node version=\'1\'
timestamp=\'2009-08-11T15:16:48Z\' /g $x | \
sed s/relation /relation version=\'1\'
timestamp=\'2009-08-11T15:16:48Z\' /g |\
sed s/way /way version=\'1\'
timestamp=\'2009-08-11T15:16:48Z\' /g |\
, or if there were edits done after the geobase
import.
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 7:25 PM, G.
Michael Carter mi...@carterfamily.ca
wrote:
Since I've had 100%
accuracy to my known areas on CanVec data (well
within 5 metres anyways) I'd tend to trust it, over
I've attached the two examples. Our family goes for a walk around
these streets nightly and I've taken my gps with me. The CanVec data is
bang on. GeoBase is close but as I've said, CanVec is closer.
Mikey
On 13/07/10 09:22 AM, Bégin, Daniel wrote:
Michael,
Yes, the data before and
Anyone have the link for the google chart handy?
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
OK this is really starting to bother me. Roads are scary!!!
I tried seeing if I could take two CanVec block and merge them with
existing roads. Well I created a mess and ended up deleting the
blocks. CanVec data has many little differences... ie: where the
nodes are, barriers, location of the
Ok I've loaded just my home town into my Garmin 60cx.
If I click on an intersection and say go-to it draws a nice route with
all the canvec data I uploaded.
However, the find isn't working. If I click find - address. There is
no addresses listed. Is this missing data on my part or a
The address interpolation is on either side of the road, and hover over
the road and you do get the street name.
On 13/07/10 12:15 PM, Tyler Gunn wrote:
However, the find isn't working. If I click find - address. There is
no addresses listed. Is this missing data on my
enstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
--
G. Michael Carter
Contact: H: 1-519-940-8935 | W: 1-905-267-8494 | M: 1-519-215-1869 | F:
1-519-941-0009
Google Talk: xmpp:mikeycarter1...@gmail.com
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@op
Sam always says I should let people know what I'm up to. Today I'm
actually going to listen... ;-)
I'm working in three areas currently, outward in circles around:
Orangeville (040P), Pickering (030M), and Rock Point PP (030L). (and
trying to pull in Lake Ontario shore line)
I'm
Now that I have everything from the first priority request... opps I
have a hole in my grid. I forgot to request 041 A. PLEASE. :-D
Thanks,
Michael
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
Could I get a higher priority on:
031 C - Bon Echo PP area
031 D - Barrie
031 E - Algonquin
031 F - Algonquin
041 H - Parry Sound
041 L - Killarney PP area
Thanks,
Michael
--
G. Michael Carter
Contact: H: 1-519-940-8935 | W: 1-905-267-8494 | M: 1-519-215-1869 | F:
1-519-941-0009
Google
. But what about buildings?
Mikey
--
G. Michael Carter
Contact: H: 1-519-940-8935 | W: 1-905-267-8494 | M: 1-519-215-1869 | F:
1-519-941-0009
Google Talk: xmpp:mikeycarter1...@gmail.com
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http
Is there any way to apply a minus on the OSM files? ie: Select a
CanVec grid, and open in JOSM. Then click a download button and it
removes any object which are identical?
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
How close are we to getting these released? I'm anxious to get started.
Will we have the option to get these in 50k blocks? All the current
canvec data I've imported is in the 50k blocks thus the new data should
fit nicely.
___
Talk-ca mailing
I think I may have missed the goal here? Are we evaluating the OSM
files and trying to make the source better or just requesting OSM files
and putting them in?
I'm ready to go if we're just putting them in. ;-)
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Any possibility of getting 041P16 (Orangeville) area as a sample. It's
where I live. Figure local knowledge would be a good way to verify the
area too ;-)
Mikey
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
I know I'm jumping way way ahead... but once we get all the CanVec.osm
files imported for all of Canada... what happens with the next version
of CanVec data?
Are there going to be diff files or is there a program out there to
compare the difference of current OSM data to a new file?
-polygon residential areas don't have any tags same as the
school. I suspect none of the multipolygon's have tags.
That's all I see so far.
But amazing work!
Mikey
--
G. Michael Carter
Contact: H: 1-519-940-8935 | W: 1-905-267-8494 | M: 1-519-215-1869 | F:
1-519-941-0009
Google Talk
measurements. Then have that data
uploaded to OSM.
I've tried three times to draft up a letter to my local MP and the
Minister of Education but can't quite get it right. Do we have any PR
experts which could run with the idea?
Mikey
--
G. Michael Carter
Contact: sip:mikeycar...@fedoraproject.org
Hope I have the right place. I was playing around with the OSM and have
a few suggestions/questions.
1. The Canadian Road Network is freely available from
http://www.geobase.ca/geobase/en/search.do?produit=nrnlanguage=en and
http://www12.statcan.ca/census-recensement/2006/geo/index-eng.cfm
65 matches
Mail list logo
