Re: [OSM-talk] Affordable 1 CM high precision GPS.

I am used to different procedures, towards the beginning of a construction operation, a publicly appointed surveyor (Öffentlich bestellter Vermessungsingenieur) defines a local coordinate system and marks it on the ground (e.g. marks building outlines, site limits etc.), as well as relates it to

Re: [OSM-talk] Affordable 1 CM high precision GPS.

sent from a phone > On 7 May 2024, at 23:56, john whelan wrote: > > So if you're building something in a remote location and not buried in the > forest it might actually be useful. in remote locations it doesn’t seem very relevant to get cm precision from GNSS. You could just mark any

[OSM-talk-fr] Serveur OSM-FR en vrac ?

Bonjour, Problème avec le serveur de tuiles ? https://{s}.tile.openstreetmap.fr/osmfr/{z}/{x}/{y}.png; n’affiche plus de rendu (site web, QMapShack). @+ ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org

Re: [OSM-talk] recommendation for JSON to CSV converter

On 01.03.24 14:52, Florian Lohoff wrote: > For obvious reasons Essen cant have 2.5 or even 4.4 Mio addresses. Yeah, I had noticed by now that this is Essen only. I don't find any json info for all of NRW, from this year. ___ talk mailing list

Re: [OSM-talk] recommendation for JSON to CSV converter

On 28.02.24 22:58, Florian Lohoff wrote: > For these kind of simple conversions there is no need for programming. > > Its a GeoJSON Featurecollection. So a list of GeoJSON features, > each of them having a "properties" objects with all the attributes > > jq -r ".features[] | >

Re: [OSM-talk] recommendation for JSON to CSV converter

On 28.02.24 17:53, Colin Smale wrote: > Have you looked at "jq"? I had. I got the feeling that I would have to understand the full josm structure first, while other approaches would learn about the data structure and delimiters on their own. ___ talk

Re: [OSM-talk] recommendation for JSON to CSV converter

On 28.02.24 16:43, Mike Thompson wrote: > Hi Martin, > > Could you provide some more detail on what specifically you are > attempting to achieve? Converting a geojson file of points to CSV is > pretty easy, but once you get to linestrings, multi-linestrings, > polygons, etc.

[OSM-talk] recommendation for JSON to CSV converter

roblem here seems to be the nesting of several levels. Thanks, Martin ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

[OSM-talk] GeoJSON download: region, resolution

100 000 inhabitants) within Germany ... with a more or less rough resolution and max 2 MB file size https://download.geofabrik.de/europe/germany.html  is 4 GB and offers slightly more details than expected. Bonus would be some major topography, such as larger rivers TIA Martin

Re: [OSM-talk] software requirements for OSM Editor: Firefox

On 23-10-06 14:24, Tom Hughes wrote: Maybe it would be easy to avoid and maybe it wouldn't but until we know what the actual problem is we can't tell and none of the developers are likely to have such an old browser to reproduce it even if they wanted to so unless you can provide more details

Re: [OSM-talk] software requirements for OSM Editor: Firefox

On 23-10-06 13:41, Tom Hughes wrote: On 06/10/2023 12:12, Martin Trautmann wrote: On 23-10-06 12:55, Tom Hughes via talk wrote: No it was released in June 2020. October 2021 was the last security patches. To answer the original question there have been any deliberate changes that I know

Re: [OSM-talk] software requirements for OSM Editor: Firefox

On 23-10-06 12:55, Tom Hughes via talk wrote: No it was released in June 2020. October 2021 was the last security patches. To answer the original question there have been any deliberate changes that I know but given the error it's entirely possible that FF has fixed something in what CSP rules

Re: [OSM-talk] software requirements for OSM Editor: Firefox

On 23-10-06 12:34, Mateusz Konieczny via talk wrote: Firefox 78 EST has reached end of life over year ago, see https://endoflife.date/firefox It was released in October 2021. I would strongly encourage to update it for security reasons. I know - but there is

[OSM-talk] software requirements for OSM Editor: Firefox

Have there been any changes for a minimum software version to use the openstreetmap editor? I can still browse with my old firefox version 78.15.0esr, but when I try to edit anything, the editor's area remains empty. Inspecting the pages names "The page’s settings blocked the loading of a

Re: [Talk-it-lazio] Richiesta informazione per "mappa sulla accessibilità nel Lazio"

questa pagina nella wiki che potrebbe avere ulteriori riferimenti: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Wheelchair_routing Ho inoltrato la richiesta anche sulla lista nazionale, ma non c'erano ulteriore risposte: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-it/2023-September/074981.html S

Re: [OSM-talk] mapilio? (street-level imagery)

sent from a phone > On 31 May 2023, at 00:09, Niels Elgaard Larsen wrote: > > I often use Wikimedia Commons. > There is an app that can both upload photos already taken and start a > photo-app from the commons app. +1, there is an app for iOS as well

Re: [Talk-it-lazio] Incontro dei mappatori romani e laziali - 3 maggio 2023 ?

sent from a phone > On 3 May 2023, at 09:31, Marcello Pelato wrote: > > Ciao soliti mappatori,  > > a meno che non si decida di spostare l'appuntamento per il meteo, oggi stando > nei paraggi, riuscirei a partecipare. ottimo, allora confermiamo, magari si aggiunge anche qualcun’altro di

Re: [Talk-it-lazio] Incontro dei mappatori romani e laziali - 3 maggio 2023 ?

sent from a phone > On 2 May 2023, at 11:59, Flaminia Tumino wrote: > > Domani l'incontro alle 19.30 a Monti e' confermato? al momento siamo solo 2 dei soliti ad aver confermato la presenza. Purtroppo le previsioni meteo non prospettano gran tempo domani. Vorresti spostarlo un’altra

Re: [Talk-it-lazio] Incontro dei mappatori romani e laziali - 3 maggio 2023

sent from a phone > On 25 Apr 2023, at 11:16, Flaminia Tumino wrote: > > Il mapping party e' spostato di una settimana a mercoledì prossimo, 3 maggio. ottimo, grazie Flaminia, io ci sarò. https://osmcal.org/event/2019/___ Talk-it-lazio mailing

Re: [OSM-talk] bot proposal: shop values cleanup (low use values only, 1 used 250 times, three over 100 times, many used less)

Am Fr., 21. Apr. 2023 um 14:08 Uhr schrieb Andy Townsend : > On 21/04/2023 12:17, Mateusz Konieczny via talk wrote: > We're actually talking about the "long tail" of shop values - genuine, > perfectly descriptive, perfectly valid values, like "shop=whisky" that > someone mentioned on IRC this

Re: [OSM-talk] bot proposal: shop values cleanup (low use values only, 1 used 250 times, three over 100 times, many used less)

Am Fr., 21. Apr. 2023 um 11:19 Uhr schrieb Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>: > > A rendering issue. > > Why not have a generic symbol for 'shop' and use that for any value of > shop that you don't have a specific symbol for? > this is a deliberate decision, because it would provide positive

Re: [OSM-talk] bot proposal: shop values cleanup (low use values only, 1 used 250 times, three over 100 times, many used less)

or details. Rather than just replacing shop=veryrarevalue with shop=moregenericvalue, we should probably also add moregenericvalue=veryrarevalue Cheers, Martin ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [Talk-it-lazio] Incontro dei mappatori romani e laziali - 26 aprile 2023

che non sono stati riportati su > openStreetMap, quindi continuiamo in quella zona. > Appuntamento come al solito ai piedi della fontana in piazzetta alle 19.30 > Qui sotto il link dell'evento: > > https://osmcal.org/event/2019/ > ottimo, grazie Flaminia

Re: [Talk-it-lazio] rete ATAC, dati del comune

nessuno? Perché mi sembrava dalla wiki che qualcuno fosse interessato al trasporto pubblico... ___ Talk-it-lazio mailing list Talk-it-lazio@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it-lazio

Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface values - the third edition (review welcomed!)

Am Mo., 27. März 2023 um 10:32 Uhr schrieb David Haberthür < em...@davidhaberthuer.ch>: > Ciao > > I added > # translating German > 'holz': 'wood', > 'schotter': 'gravel', > 'Gras_Laub': 'grass', > to candidate list for the next one > > > I’m my (Swiss German)

Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface values - the third edition (review welcomed!)

sent from a phone > On 24 Mar 2023, at 22:35, > facebook_140f8d4e-9d8f-4d51-a5a7-320f53afc...@vollbio.de wrote: > > Btw. I saw some German word: holz=>wood, schotter=>gravel, verdichtet=>paved > (it means "compacted"), Gras/Laub=>grass, pflasterstein=>cobblestones verdichtet is actually

[Talk-it-lazio] rete ATAC, dati del comune

ora penso si potrebbero usare queste liste (create con i dati cc-by-sa) per valutare la lcompletezza dei nostri dati, ma non si possono estrarre le informazioni: https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/IT/RM/IT-RM-ATAC-Analysis.html Saluti, Martin ___ Tal

Re: [OSM-talk] proposed bot edit for surface=granite, surface=marble and similar

Am Mi., 15. März 2023 um 14:01 Uhr schrieb Mateusz Konieczny via talk < talk@openstreetmap.org>: > > > > Mar 15, 2023, 10:21 by dieterdre...@gmail.com: > > I'd prefer "surface:material" compared to "material", it is in modest use > (800) https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/surface%3Amaterial >

Re: [OSM-talk] proposed bot edit for surface=granite, surface=marble and similar

//taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/stone_type (false friend, this is about specific stone types (shapes and purposes) rather than material) https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/roof%3Amaterial=stone ... Cheers, Martin ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface=* and shop=* values (review welcomed!)

sent from a phone > On 26 Feb 2023, at 10:19, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Opal is also a gemstone, Australia being a leading source. It is also a fuel > in Australia ... but that would not be sold in shops but petrol stations. in Germany OPAL is the name of a fibre optic

Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface=* and shop=* values (review welcomed!)

Am Sa., 25. Feb. 2023 um 22:07 Uhr schrieb Mateusz Konieczny via talk < talk@openstreetmap.org>: > > So shop = laundromat → shop = laundry + self_service=yes would be needed? > it could be seen as equivalent, personally I would see a case for different main tags because these are quite

Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface=* and shop=* values (review welcomed!)

ood examples, but of course we must be very careful to not iron everything flat when there might be subtle differences. This is why it is important to have many eyes on such bot edits and document the details. Cheers Martin ___ talk mailing list t

Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface=* and shop=* values (review welcomed!)

sent from a phone > On 25 Feb 2023, at 20:13, Mateusz Konieczny via talk > wrote: > > shop=eggs -> shop=food food=eggs > maybe such migration would be a good idea? > having top value for every single shop type specializing in a given food > seems hopeless - we would need shop=pumpkin,

Re: [OSM-talk] Proposed automatic replacements of multiple surface=* and shop=* values (review welcomed!)

iki suggests adding self_service=yes for the former. Cheers Martin ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] replace some obviously mistaken surface values by their clear intended meaning

sent from a phone > On 11 Feb 2023, at 18:49, Mateusz Konieczny via talk > wrote: > > Nevertheless, as result > map data quality will improve. agreed for these cases, the problem is always when people become overeager to fix all kinds of values thereby “normalizing” what should not

Re: [Talk-transit] [OSM-talk] Automated Populate/Update Problem

for things that weren't mapped before. If you haven't yet, read the guidance for automated edits https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits and follow the import guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines Cheers, Martin ___ Talk-trans

Re: [OSM-talk] Should we be mapping transformers and powerlines?

Am Do., 19. Jan. 2023 um 15:33 Uhr schrieb John Whelan < jwhelan0...@gmail.com>: > Someone shoots out a dozen at minus 20c, two can cut off electricity to a > city of a million people. One or two you can replace quickly a dozen at > the same time you're talking months to restore power. > you

Re: [OSM-talk] Should we be mapping transformers and powerlines?

frastructure, it is not relevant to determine whether they can be mapped. The question we ask is: does it exist. Cheers, Martin ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Extending the 'geo:' uri scheme: Adding parameter 'osmid'

sent from a phone > On 6 Jan 2023, at 23:34, Niels Elgaard Larsen wrote: > > Maybe we could maintain a list of tags that are practical permanent unique > identifiers. And then have a tool that for most objects could generate a url > (https or geo) that references that object using that tag.

Re: [OSM-talk] Extending the 'geo:' uri scheme: Adding parameter 'osmid'

hange (if the route does not change/cease to exist), because there is no converting from node to polygon or back. Cheers, Martin ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [Talk-it-lazio] Incontro dei mappatori romani e laziali - 14 dicembre 2022

grazie Flaminia, io ci sarò... ___ Talk-it-lazio mailing list Talk-it-lazio@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it-lazio

Re: [Talk-it-lazio] Porte di Roma: Spostamento WikiData-Link da POINT a MULTIPOLYGON ?

re, forse lo era in passato, ma attualmente non si trova nessuna barriera. Invece tutti gli altri tags si possono (e devono) spostare. Anche se potrebbe sembrare ridondante, cambierei (casomai) il valore di "building" da "yes" a "city_gate", invece "historic=yes" (stato attuale) non ha molto senso e con historic=city_gate sarà solo meglio. saluti, Martin ___ Talk-it-lazio mailing list Talk-it-lazio@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it-lazio

Re: [Talk-it-lazio] Incontro dei mappatori romani e laziali - novembre 2022

sì, entrambi sent from a phone > On 14 Nov 2022, at 15:24, Flaminia Tumino wrote: > >  > Ciao a tutt*, > Martin e Alessandro confermiamo l'appuntamento di mercoledì? > https://osmcal.org/event/1623/ > > Ciao, > Flaminia > _

Re: [OSM-talk] razed railways and other things that don't exist today

lished. Not recognizable for everyone, but clearly visible traces if you knew to read them. Cheers Martin ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] razed railways and other things that don't exist today

mapper) > > - or delete nonexistent sections without traces what is the scale/resolution for determining a “non-existent” section? If you do it too fine grained, it would be like mapping a dashed divider line, with yes/no alternating every 2 meters. Is a former station a trace that is valid

[Talk-it-lazio] incontro mercoledì

Vi ricordo l’incontro mercoledì 18.30 a piazza di Spagna per un mapping party. https://osmcal.org/event/1623/ saluti Martin ___ Talk-it-lazio mailing list Talk-it-lazio@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it-lazio

[OSM-talk] RFC: Two new extensions for the wiki: Log in via openstreetmap.org and vote via a GUI

-f.com/ You can leave your feedback using both extensions on the demo wiki, or alternatively here on the mailing list. Cheers, Martin ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Automated Populate/Update Problem

for things that weren't mapped before. If you haven't yet, read the guidance for automated edits https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits and follow the import guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines Cheers, Martin ___ talk ma

Re: [Talk-it-lazio] Incontro dei mappatori romani e laziali - settembre 2022

io ci sarei, lo facciamo? saluti, Martin ___ Talk-it-lazio mailing list Talk-it-lazio@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it-lazio

[OSM-talk] Regio-OSM und Dietmar Seifert

. wöchentlichen Auswertungen sind auch schon teils Monate alt (März 2022) Schönen Gruß Martin Trautmann ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

[Talk-it-lazio] incontro locale stasera, ore 20.30

vi riccordo l’incontro stasera: https://osmcal.org/event/1405/ Ciao Martin ___ Talk-it-lazio mailing list Talk-it-lazio@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it-lazio

Re: [Talk-it-lazio] Incontro dei mappatori romani e laziali il 22 giugno 2022?

grazie Flaminia… sent from a phone > On 20 Jun 2022, at 14:22, Flaminia Tumino wrote: > > Ciao a tutt*, > ho spostato al 29 giugno per dare la possibilità a Martin di partecipare, > ecco qui il link dell'evento aggiornato. > > https://osmcal.org/event/1405/ &

Re: [Talk-it-lazio] Incontro dei mappatori romani e laziali - domani

sent from a phone > On 26 Apr 2022, at 18:58, Flaminia Tumino wrote: > > Per me sarebbe meglio, altrimenti se vogliamo fare alle 20 io posso giovedì. in realtà ci sono già altre persone quindi direi di lasciare alle 19.30 per questa volta, poi vediamo. Ci

Re: [Talk-it-lazio] Incontro dei mappatori romani e laziali - domani

sì, nel senso contavo di andarci. Non ho ancora visto altri che contavano di venire. Forse converrebbe spostare alle 21 allora? Voi che dite? Ciao Martin sent from a phone > On 26 Apr 2022, at 16:18, Flaminia Tumino wrote: > >  > Ciao a tutt*, > volevo sapere se domani è co

[Talk-it-lazio] indoor map

Vi segnalo questo sito, sembra carino per vedere dove ci sono dati indoor: https://indoorequal.org/#map=11.53/41.9028/12.489 Ciao Martin sent from a phone___ Talk-it-lazio mailing list Talk-it-lazio@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-it-lazio] ripresa incontri mappatori romani e laziali, ultimo mercoledi del mese

... Ciao, Martin Am Di., 12. Apr. 2022 um 13:46 Uhr schrieb Flaminia Tumino < flaminiatum...@gmail.com>: > Ciao, > come concordato ieri sera ho provveduto ad aggiungere il prossimo evento, > si ritorna ai nostri piccoli incontri orario aperitivo per mappare, una > volta al mese. &

[Talk-it-lazio] Fwd: [Talk-it] Italy outdoor map on www.freemap.sk

, piùttosto al tempo libero, escursionismo, cultura, ecc. Ciao, Martin -- Forwarded message - Von: Martin Ždila Date: Mo., 11. Apr. 2022 um 08:30 Uhr Subject: [Talk-it] Italy outdoor map on www.freemap.sk To: Hello, Our Freemap Slovakia outdoor map has been recently extended to cover

[Talk-it-lazio] stasera incontro mappatori

Vi ricordo il nostro primo incontro "post-pandemico" stasera alle ore 20, FormiCowo, via delle Sette Chiese 186. Al momento siamo in 3, ma se vi aggiungete saremmo di più: https://osmcal.org/event/1287/ Ciao, Martin ___ Talk-it-lazio mailing

[Talk-hr] Freemap Slovakia Outdoor map covering also whole Croatia

://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Freemap_Slovakia. Enjoy Best regards -- Ing. Martin Ždila <http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/*Martin*> OZ Freemap Slovakia tel:+421-908-363-848 mailto:martin.zd...@freemap.sk http://www.freemap.sk/ ___ Talk-hr mailing list T

Re: [Talk-it-lazio] Fwd: incontri dei mappatori romani e laziali

Ottimo, ho inserito l'evento sul sito di OSM: https://osmcal.org/event/1287/ Una buona anima ha fatto un ottimo lavoro a creare un servizio apposita per gli eventi di OSM. Se volete, potete segnalare la vostra presenza lì. Ciao, Martin ___ Talk

[Talk-it-lazio] incontri dei mappatori romani e laziali

presto, ecc. Se la data si conferma metteremo l'evento anche nella wiki. Spero a presto, Martin ___ Talk-it-lazio mailing list Talk-it-lazio@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it-lazio

Re: [Talk-it-lazio] Cercasi qualcuno che vuole presentare OpenStreetMap a volontari

Am Mi., 6. Apr. 2022 um 13:53 Uhr schrieb Flaminia Tumino < flaminiatum...@gmail.com>: > Ciao Martin, > io a fine gennaio 2023 dovrei avere qualche mattinata/pomeriggio libero > anche se è difficile dare conferma della mia disponibilità al 100% con > tanto anticipo, però per i

Re: [Talk-it-lazio] Cercasi qualcuno che vuole presentare OpenStreetMap a volontari

Am Mi., 6. Apr. 2022 um 13:26 Uhr schrieb Alessandro Frigeri < alessandro.frig...@gmail.com>: > Martin, > > grazie del messaggio e dei dettagli, ottima iniziativa. Sono a > disposizione, compatibilmente agli impegni/trasferte di lavoro. > > Alessandro > Ciao A

[Talk-it-lazio] Cercasi qualcuno che vuole presentare OpenStreetMap a volontari

più sulla presentazione del progetto e su di una illustrazione delle procedure base di editing. Se vi interessa, fatevi avanti :) Ciao, Martin ___ Talk-it-lazio mailing list Talk-it-lazio@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [Talk-it-lazio] come ottenere le coordinate di "oggetti" da openstreetmap?

puoi trovare nella wiki di OpenStreetMap. In generale dovresti trovare tutte le informazioni nella wiki. Ciao Martin ___ Talk-it-lazio mailing list Talk-it-lazio@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it-lazio

[Talk-it-lazio] Civitas Vaticana

3285 Come lo vedete? Ciao, Martin ___ Talk-it-lazio mailing list Talk-it-lazio@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it-lazio

Re: [Talk-it-lazio] OSMit 2021

sent from a phone > On 15 Sep 2021, at 12:24, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > Manca poco per registrarsi a FOSS4G_IT/OSMit 2021 [1] che si terrà online dal > 19 al 21 settembre! se ho capito bene, a Roma c’è solo il 21 in presenza, piazza Marconi 15

[Talk-it-lazio] OSMit 2021

Vi inoltro questo invito alla conferenza annuale: Ciao a tutte e tutti, Manca poco per registrarsi a FOSS4G_IT/OSMit 2021 [1] che si terrà online dal 19 al 21 settembre! Dati i vincoli legati al COVID-19, quest'anno non è stato possibile organizzare un unico evento in presenza, ma c’è la

Re: [Talk-it] layer con confini comunali per BRouter-web

ono (o almeno, non ricadono esplicitamente) in quanto affermato in > quel passaggio delle FAQ. mi sembra difficile da valutare la differenza tra attività sportiva e motoria, dipende dalla forma di chi la pratica. Comunque, pare che il gover si ha posto questo com

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Warning about not mapping military areas

common to not be able to take photographs. For instance I would guess that mapping the facilities that are blacked out in this image could get you into trouble: https://yorkshirecnd.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/sigint-cryptologic-platform-768x575.jpg Cheers Martin ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk

Re: [Talk-de] OSMyBiz.osm.ch

Google fonts sind frei, man kann sie auch runterladen, konvertieren (weil Google es einem nicht zu leicht machen will), und auf den eigenen Webspace hochladen. Gruß Martin ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de

Re: [OSM-talk] Call to Take Action and Confront Systemic Offensive Behavior in the OSM Community

gh number of women in management positions: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/16/world/europe/paris-too-many-women-fine.html Cheers Martin ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [Talk-it] OT: ortofoto mapbox aggiornate

;-) Ciao Martin ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

Re: [Talk-it] Tags per cycleway

foot=no Per consentire il percorso ai pedoni dovresti aggiungere foot=yes altrimenti è no Ciao Martin ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

Re: [Talk-it] Tags per cycleway

ettere il tag e disegnare la pista con un proprio way (perché si tratta di una carreggiata indipendente). Ciao Martin ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

Re: [OSM-talk] Call to Take Action and Confront Systemic Offensive Behavior in the OSM Community

against groups of people defined by their color skin, origin or gender. Er… Please read this article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reverse_racism This call is not a hate speech against white-people. It’s a call to recognise the issue and respond to it. Regards, Martin Constantino

Re: [Talk-de] Karte vom IFZ ohne Quellangabe

sträubt sich immer noch, und bei Mapbox kann man sich auch streiten. Beim IFZ hatten sie es wohl wirklich nur vergessen/übersehen ;-) Gruß Martin ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de

Re: [Talk-GB] "GPS trace" tracking county boundary

ounds"? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beating_the_bounds Martin. ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-GB] driveway-becomes-track

erton Farm. I have also added the gate at the public road. https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/52.28186/-2.42748 Martin. ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-it] Fonte di toponimi dubbi

ono i comuni). Ciao Martin ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

Re: [Talk-it] Fonte di toponimi dubbi

esistere. sono d’accordo, sia per toponimi che per strade è utile conservare vecchi nomi in old_name Ciao Martin ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

Re: [Talk-GB] driveway-becomes-track

that one feature should have only one entry in the database. Martin. ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-GB] Noverton Farm - driveway-becomes-track

and the state of the crops. Farmers tend not to regard their legal requirement to reinstate footpaths within 14 days as being at the top of their to-do list. cheers, Martin. ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https

Re: [Talk-GB] driveway-becomes-track

entry gates have not been mapped, so adding those to a basic service road may be the best solution, and I will do that. thanks, Martin. ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-GB] driveway-becomes-track

. Andy obviously already has some hosting on a server, and I do too. So funding for small-scale use would not be a problem. Martin. ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-GB] driveway-becomes-track

ot; sign where a public footpath joins a road. But they are not required to provide any safe means of reaching it. cheers, Martin. ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-GB] driveway-becomes-track

leaves the road - this is definitely more than a "track" - note the double gates: https://goo.gl/maps/XEs4XKs5UUHNBt8E8 cheers, Martin. ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-GB] driveway-becomes-track

ll, it's just called a "road" or "lane". cheers, Martin. ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-GB] driveway-becomes-track

by-pass footpath for walkers to avoid the farmyard. The driveway has been broken into 3 sections and given separate pro-ref numbers (not by me). cheers, Martin. ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org

[Talk-GB] Publishing a linked dataset

become unmatched over time, as OSM changes, e.g. a way is split or paths added that add more detail. Martin, ** CycleStreets - For Cyclists, By Cyclists Developer, CycleStreets ** https://www.cyclestreets.net/ ___ Talk-GB mailing

Re: [Talk-GB] driveway-becomes-track

p.s. here's a screenshot of that. It looks silly: https://85a.uk/missing_driveway_zoom15.png Martin. ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

[Talk-GB] driveway-becomes-track

this? thanks, Martin. ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-it] Eliminazioni massive del tratto A31 Nord

a > dell'inserimento dei tratti "construction" che in realtà non sono affatto > in costruzione. Chiedo però a qualcuno più esperto in revert come questo > debba essere gestito per evitare di compromettere edits successivi connessi. > credo "a mano". Ciao Marti

Re: [Talk-it] Creazione di un Diversity and Inclusion Group in OSM Italia

it, oppure al meno pensono che non si potrebbe parlare di inclusione e diversità su questa lista. grazie ancora, Martin PS: Spero sinceramente che questa iniziativa non farà la fine del gruppo internazionale "diversity", che ho deciso di lasciare anni fa, dopo che era diventato campo di ba

Re: [Talk-it] Due punti sulla mappa...

. disused=yes Ci sono 16k disused:building=* ma nell 80% dei casi sono abbinati ad un building=* Il wiki anche suggerisce disused=yes https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Adisused%3Abuilding Ciao Martin ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

Re: [Talk-GB] Tagging of shared use paths

? As they are on most maps. Martin. ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [talk-cz] Fwd: OSM uvitaci skript

On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 4:13 PM Miroslav Suchy wrote: > Dne 08. 12. 20 v 23:19 Martin Ždila napsal(a): > > Ahojte, > > > > Na SotM sme sa bavili o "greeting" sktipte, tak preposielam čo používame. > > Super. Ještě chybí licence? Pod jakou licencí to můžeme

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Open Street Misogynie ?

apaisée ! Au plaisir de continuer cet échange plutôt en présentiel, cela me paraît difficile d'avoir un débat construit par courriel ! Bien à toutes et tous, Martin PS : je m'exprime ici à titre purement personnel et pas au nom de mon employeur (CartONG) On 10/12/2020 13:00, talk-fr-requ.

Re: [Talk-GB] Tagging of shared use paths

public cycleways from which pedestrians are actually banned? cheers, Martin. ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

[OSRM-talk] Comparing routes from different datasets

that. Best regards, Martin ___ OSRM-talk mailing list OSRM-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >