Re: [talk-au] How to efficiently improve AU address coverage?

Except if something has massively changed, the GNAF data isn"t actually open. Am 2. Oktober 2023 13:05:10 MESZ schrieb Daniel O'Connor : >While OSM doesn't have layers, https://openaddresses.io/ more or less acts >as the address layer. The datasets there aren't all ODBL, but they are >generally

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Jardin Line Renaud à PARIS

___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr

Re: [OSM-talk] mapilio? (street-level imagery)

Am 31.05.2023 um 22:08 schrieb Christian Quest: ... OSM editors integration. That was one of the reasons why I was asking, as I have already done some work on a STAC layer based on the GeoVisio API. OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [OSM-talk] mapilio? (street-level imagery)

Christian, does this relate in some fashion to Geovisio? And a, I suppose, obvious observation: key for adoption in OSM would be an easy to access API for editing apps. Does that exist/are there plans for one? Simon Am 30.05.2023 um 16:01 schrieb Christian Quest: Le 24/05/2023 à 14:31

Re: [OSM-talk] mapboox improve the (proprietary database used as en overlay) map

have a link to the discussion in question? Simon Warning: I am not a lawyer. Apr 7, 2023, 14:21 by marc_m...@mailo.com: Hello, following a discussion on the mailing list talk-fr, mapbox "improve the map" now feeds their proprietary database, the one that is displa

Re: [OSM-talk] Extending the 'geo:' uri scheme: Adding parameter 'osmid'

schemes in use for OSM based tools/editors, and naturally the website object/element browsing support. Simon Am 02.01.2023 um 18:57 schrieb Sören Reinecke: Hey, It came into my mind to get IETF to standardize a parameter explicitly linking to osm objects with their corresponding type and id

Re: [talk-au] 'Named' EV chargers

See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/SimonPoole/diary/397565 while amenity=charging_station is not the worst offender, it is still pretty bad https://github.com/osmlab/name-suggestion-index/blob/main/data/brands/amenity/charging_station.json Am 15.12.2022 um 04:20 schrieb Phil Wyatt: Hi

Re: [OSM-talk] FYI: Board now requires imports list (in)compatibility with OSM CT (& will work on a template)

English law. Simon PS: note on the side: the ODbL doesn't specify EN law. OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] FYI: Board now requires imports list (in)compatibility with OSM CT (& will work on a template)

that the OSMF would require UK law, which might or might not be the case. Simon OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] FYI: Board now requires imports list (in)compatibility with OSM CT (& will work on a template)

hird party sources indirect attribution. You could naturally argue about how much the OSMF is committed to individual sources to keep the chain OSM attribution -> 3rd party source attribution around, but that disruption is not worth it IMHO. Simon Am 29.11.2022 um 00:48 schrieb Tobias Knerr:

Re: [OSM-talk] FYI: Board now requires imports list (in)compatibility with OSM CT (& will work on a template)

Am 29.11.2022 um 03:57 schrieb Minh Nguyen: Vào lúc 15:48 2022-11-28, Tobias Knerr đã viết: On 28.11.22 at Simon Poole wrote: What is "OSM Contributor Terms compatibility" supposed to be? Ok, this is clearly imprecise wording.¹ The context is that we would like to offer d

Re: [OSM-talk] FYI: Board now requires imports list (in)compatibility with OSM CT (& will work on a template)

umentation including contacts. But that was politically always untenable and that particular horse has long bolted. Simon The Board has also budgeted to commission a template that OSMers can use to request that data sources release their data under those terms. That will obv. follow later. However given th

Re: [OSM-talk] Use of "Proprietary" imagery to edit OSM

. Not comparable to not having access to the source at all, in this case we don't even know if the Lyft employee is referring to street level images (which might actually need processing before release), or aerial/sat imagery. Simon On 2022-10-27 00:08, Clifford Snow wrote: On Wed, Oct 26, 2022

Re: [OSM-talk] Vespucci - Proximity Alerts - Not working

Am 12. Oktober 2022 20:04:42 MESZ schrieb Mike Thompson : >On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 11:42 AM Simon Poole wrote: > ... >> >Thanks. Unfortunately most of the time I will be surveying without a data >connection, so this isn't going to work for me. I would recommend using an o

Re: [OSM-talk] Vespucci - Proximity Alerts - Not working

). Simon PS: osm-talk is not a suitable forum for support questions. Am 12. Oktober 2022 18:29:37 MESZ schrieb Mike Thompson : >I am trying to get Vespucci to give me an audible alert when I travel to >within a certain distance of a OSM map note, or a OSM object with a fixme >tag. I have

Re: [talk-au] Mapping surf breaks

)) I am definitely no surfer, but what about tidal bores? Apparently Australia has some: https://www.australiangeographic.com.au/blogs/tim-the-yowie-man/ 2020/01/surfing-the-mysterious-tidal-bores-of-australia/ -- Simon Slater signature.asc Description: This is a digitally

Re: [talk-au] New OSM Discourse site: community.osm.org

I wouldn't expect much traffic till the existing forum content has been migrated, currently scheduled for the end of the month. That should then give some slightly more definite structure to things than there is now. Simon Am 02.05.2022 um 05:01 schrieb Sam Wilson: It's growing in use, I

[OSM-talk-fr] Atelier Etalab licence ODBL

Bonjour, Etalab organise un atelier sur la licence ODBL https://www.eventbrite.fr/e/billets-openlab-conditions-dutilisation-odbl-323792541207 Cordialement Simon REAU GEOVELO www.geovelo.fr simon.r...@geovelo.fr 1 Impasse du Palais, 37000 Tours <https://osm.org/go/0AU_thgO

Re: [talk-au] Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)

Just to clarify, the OSMF doesn't just requires the waiver because it is being difficult. CC BY has fundamental issues that are widely ignored, the blog post is simply the diplomatic summary that we hammered out together with CC (it says so much in the text). Simon Am 01.12.2021 um 07:54

Re: [talk-au] Suburbs: Nodes, Areas, or both?

Am 06.11.2021 um 10:22 schrieb fors...@ozonline.com.au: Quoting Simon Poole : PS: wondering why Gruyere has that name. Good question. The town is named for a variety of cheese, as the area's history is in the dairy industry. Cahillton Post Office first opened on 20 August 1892

Re: [talk-au] Suburbs: Nodes, Areas, or both?

laces" in a more general sense, that is that allows simple deduplication of the elements. A rather epic discussion on the topic can be found here: https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/pull/2816 Simon PS: wondering why Gruyere has that name. Am 05.11.2021 um 07:53 schr

Re: [talk-au] Lifeguards & "Swim Between the Flags"

se desiring solitude, can preferentially choose alternate locations. -- Regards Simon Slater Registered Linux User #463789 @ http://linuxcounter.net ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

Re: [talk-au] Tagging yellow buoys

On Thursday, 30 September 2021 1:06:31 PM AEST Ben Kelley wrote: > where the oysters grow Oyster leases. -- Regards Simon Slater Registered Linux User #463789 @ http://linuxcounter.net ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org ht

Re: [talk-au] Friend requests from 'Porn Bots'

Am 12.09.2021 um 13:56 schrieb Andy Townsend: It'll hopefully be deleted by the time that anyone gets to read this, so not much point really. Getting their link distributed is exactly what the operators want, so -never- do that. OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [talk-au] Import vs filtering query

Hi Your proposed workflow would seem to be totally OK to me and is clearly not an import. List the government data in the sources used in the changeset and IMHO you are good to go. Simon Am 04.09.2021 um 12:51 schrieb Little Maps: Hi all, my understanding is that the process described

Re: [talk-au] Trouble with routing through an intersection

wy. With this method, will I need to do anything to not disturb Route C274 which uses that segment? -- Regards Simon Slater Registered Linux User #463789 @ http://linuxcounter.net ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.opens

[talk-au] Trouble with routing through an intersection

://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110588330 but now, a few hours later the routing is still wrong: https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions? engine=fossgis_osrm_car=-36.59894%2C143.93811%3B-36.59984%2C143.93824 Can anyone see what is wrong at this intersection in the changeset? -- Regards Simon Slater

Re: [talk-au] Mapping driveways under awnings.

On Wednesday, 11 August 2021 7:27:40 PM AEST Michael Collinson wrote: > Simon, > > Without knowing the nature of the challenge, I assume the apparent > anomaly is a road apparently bulldozing through a building. > Yes the challenge is for road/building intersections. > Me

[talk-au] Mapping driveways under awnings.

/-35.34316/143.56033 Is this something to leave as-is, or should a change be made to either the way or building or both? If a change is needed, what type? -- Regards Simon Slater Registered Linux User #463789 @ http://linuxcounter.net ___ Talk-au mailing

Re: [OSM-talk] Making GPS tracks in Android

Non-open apps will typically use googles play services fused location provider, which as the name implies doesn't just use GNSS data. For generating tracks it is unsuitable in any case so a pure tracker is unlikely going to use it. Simon Am 21.12.2020 um 01:02 schrieb Alan Mackie: I have

Re: [OSM-talk] Making GPS tracks in Android

in to problems as soon as you start building against more recent SDK. Simon Am 20.12.2020 um 20:28 schrieb ipswichmapper--- via talk: In this case simply use Fdroid. Its not hard and the apps on there give you peace of mind. -- 20 Dec 2020, 19:14 by talk@openstreetmap.org: Gps logger

Re: [Talk-GB] What is needed for something to be classified as a 'cycle route' (London)

> On 15 Dec 2020, at 17:39, Andy Allan wrote: > > es. > > * Not all bike paths are part of a larger signed cycling route. > * Not all bike lanes are part of a larger signed cycling route. But any cycle infrastructure that DOES exist - eg short sections of protected cycleway - will be picked

Re: [Talk-GB] What is needed for something to be classified as a 'cycle route' (London)

> On 15 Dec 2020, at 14:35, Robert Skedgell wrote: > > If 1057 is used on a carriageway > rather than on a lane or track, it presumably indicates a route, > although TSRGD 2016 does not elaborate upon this - is there an LTN which > does? Not by any means. 1057’s are the ‘go-to’ way to DO

[Talk-GB] What is needed for something to be classified as a 'cycle route' (London)

See discussion on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/95752985#map=18/51.46201/-0.12146=C There appear to be a large number of sections of road in some areas of London tagged as ‘cycle route’ that are no more

Re: [Talk-GB] Tagging bike ramp/ bike path down steps

I’d agree with your approach and I’ve raised this before, but haven’t had the time to come back to it. From a routing perspective it would be useful to be able to tag ACCESSIBILITY - ie sections of route that are unsuitable for some users - not related to the legality but so that disabled

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Brexit & EU database rights

that states just like the UK governments guidance that the rights will continue on post end of the transition period in the EEA. I suspect clarity on this could only come from the official EU side of things, not that it really matters as in any case action is required by the OSMF. Simon Am 14.12.2020

Re: [Talk-GB] Tagging bike ramp/ bike path down steps

> On 13 Dec 2020, at 19:18, Edward Catmur via Talk-GB > wrote: > On Sun, 13 Dec 2020, 19:14 David Woolley, > wrote: > On 13/12/2020 19:05, Edward Catmur via Talk-GB wrote: > > Also, the steps should have bicycle=dismount, not =yes. This will allow > >

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Brexit & EU database rights

My understanding is that 58.2 covers the rights of UK based entities, with other words it extends the directives article 11 to cover UK residents and entities. Am 14. Dezember 2020 00:11:25 MEZ schrieb Tom Hummel via legal-talk : >Simon, > >sorry for reopening. > >> Th

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Brexit & EU database rights

a long time ago. The additional complication is that I expect (who knows what the OSMF board is thinking) that we would want to create a proper membership based organisation which, using a broad brush here, can't be subsidiaries of other legal entities. Simon On Sun, 13 Dec 2020 at 20:52

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Brexit & EU database rights

Am 13.12.2020 um 20:12 schrieb Tom Hummel via legal-talk: Hi all, Am Sonntag, 13. Dezember 2020, 15:58:48 CET schrieb Simon Poole: The relevant bit of the directive is in article 11. As you can see the rights are dependent on being domiciled in the EU, not on the physical location

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Brexit & EU database rights

including Russia), we rely on conventional copyright for creative works* and contract law. Simon * yes, I'm fully aware of the problematic bit here. Am 13.12.2020 um 10:21 schrieb Edward Bainton: Thank you for the link, now read. All you say on substantial changes makes sense. So

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Brexit & EU database rights

article 10 https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A31996L0009 Simon Am 10.12.2020 um 22:11 schrieb Edward Bainton: A pleasure meeting you all at LWG this evening. I saw Brexit in the minutes for September "At the end of year we won't be losing database rights immedi

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Brexit & EU database rights

Legal talk is not the LWG list if that isn't clear, that is le...@osmfoundation.org Simon Am 10.12.2020 um 22:11 schrieb Edward Bainton: A pleasure meeting you all at LWG this evening. I saw Brexit in the minutes for September "At the end of year we won't be losing database r

Re: [Talk-GB] Tagging of shared use paths

> On 10 Dec 2020, at 14:13, John Aldridge wrote: > > On 12/10/2020 12:41 PM, Ken Kilfedder wrote: >> As a break from 'tagging for the renderer', I'd like to see rendering for >> the tags. > > A long standing grump of mine! And mine. I think the CycleMap render has a lot of issues with

Re: [OSM-talk] Please review "Community attribution advice” wiki page

tributor terms and bring OSM to a screeching halt for effect. Simon So I think there's a lot of benefit in writing out, in my more detail, how you can follow §4.3, rather than speaking in generalities. On Tue, 8 Dec 2020, at 00:08, Christoph Hormann wrote: Rory McCann hat am 07.12.20

Re: [Talk-GB] Bridleway across field

> On 8 Dec 2020, at 14:20, SK53 > wrote: > Personally I do not generally map PRoWs which have no on-the-ground traces > (particularly after my experience > > in Carmathenshire in

Re: [Talk-GB] Bridleway across field

Should be recorded as per the definitive map - lots like that across welsh hilltops etc. I’ve used a gps to follow them in the fog before > On 8 Dec 2020, at 09:36, Mark Lee via Talk-GB > wrote: > > Hello. I've just added a missing public bridleway >

Re: [Talk-de] Flyer "Ihre Öffnungszeiten wurden zu OSM hinzugefügt"

https://osmybiz.osm.ch/#/18/47.18682/8.39773 ist eigentlich genau dazu gedacht Betriebe ihren eigenen Eintrag machen zu lassen, und den auch zu pflegen. Am 15.11.2020 um 08:39 schrieb Markus via Talk-de: Am 14.11.2020 um 22:15 schrieb Frederik Ramm: Als OSM haben wir zwar nur die besten

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Data Portal License CC0 1.0 and OpenStreetMap

Everything relevant has been documented here https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Licence_Compatibility for a long time. Am 6. November 2020 17:47:16 MEZ schrieb "Pierre Béland via legal-talk" : > 2020-10-06 , Mateusz Konieczny wrote via legal-talk : >> For example Wikidata is CC0 but

Re: [OSM-talk] id Editor auto-converts split polygons into MP relation

a a "split polygon"). That it is typically unnecessary in the case of a building doesn't make it invalid. Simon The correct solution to split polygons with tags on the ways is to rejoin those ways, not create a MP. As I pointed out, the question is -when- to rejoin those ways

Re: [OSM-talk] id Editor auto-converts split polygons into MP relation

efault for all objects. See above. Simon DaveF On 27/10/2020 08:11, Simon Poole wrote: Its done that essentially since day one. As Bryce points out doing so keeps the object a valid "area" (and iD makes a valiant effort to stop you from breaking that). It is also one of my favour

Re: [OSM-talk] id Editor auto-converts split polygons into MP relation

s finished with it and you could simplify, particularly when you are trying to get the user to save often and early. So the simplification for the iD user comes at the expense of wtf's of everybody else. Simon Am 27.10.2020 um 02:05 schrieb Dave F via talk: Hi I don't use iD editor much, but I've just

Re: [OSM-talk] User deleting many roads in Brazil

You need to take this up with the DWG (d...@osmfoundation.org) once direct contact with the mapper in question has failed. Posting to this and the tagging list is not going to achieve anything except that you will receive pointers to the DWG. Simon Am 24.10.2020 um 17:54 schrieb Erick de

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Is listing at Contributors page qualifying as waiver for CC BY 4.0?

Just as a note, prior to the review of CC BY 4.0 compatibility by the LWG (and CC fwiw), we were very clear that 4.0 licensed material should -not- be imported, the importers knew this and were ignoring it at their own risk. Simon Am 23.10.2020 um 10:43 schrieb Mateusz Konieczny via legal

Re: [talk-au] Microsoft Australian building footprints

been modified. Simon PS: lives in an area which had 10s of 1000s of buildings mapped already in 2009 from mushy misaligned yahoo imagery. Am 20.10.2020 um 11:12 schrieb Andrew Harvey: On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 at 18:39, Daniel O'Connor mailto:daniel.ocon...@gmail.com>> wrote: and after

Re: [OSM-talk] Doocracy | Re: Idea for improving mapping system

Am 18.10.2020 um 16:49 schrieb Colin Smale: On 2020-10-18 15:04, Simon Poole wrote: Am 18.10.2020 um 11:07 schrieb Rory McCann: Like mnany things in OSM, the reason it hasn't been done is because no-one has actually done it  yet. It looks like other people find your idea of "l

Re: [OSM-talk] Doocracy | Re: Idea for improving mapping system

Am 18.10.2020 um 11:07 schrieb Rory McCann: Like mnany things in OSM, the reason it hasn't been done is because no-one has actually done it yet. It looks like other people find your idea of "levels" and "badges" interesting, so you should try attempt it yourself. Like many things in OSM,

Re: [talk-au] vine row tagging

dily available as FOSS if that is a requirement. -- Regards Simon Slater Registered Linux User #463789 @ http://linuxcounter.net ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

Re: [OSM-talk] Face and license blurring (GDPR territories)

remove any colour of the blurred object too in particular to make cars even less identifiable. Simon PS: why handbags are important for OSM is a bit of a mystery though :-) OpenPGP_0x4721711092E282EA.asc Description: application/pgp-keys OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital

Re: [OSM-talk] Face and license blurring (GDPR territories)

your own counsel). Simon OpenPGP_0x4721711092E282EA.asc Description: application/pgp-keys OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Tracé GPX lignes trains Intercités ?

Bonsoir, peut-être filtrer sur le tag usage ? Usage = main ? Gaël Le 29 sept. 2020 à 19:25, Gilles a écrit :  J'ai déjà essayé via une relation, mais c'est pas terrible : par exemple, on récupère toutes les ways qui représentent des voies dans les gares (et dans une grosse gare, ça fait un

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Asso: Prochain CA mardi 08 septembre - Compte rendu

Bravo pour ces avancées. Gaël Le 15 sept. 2020 à 15:27, Frédéric Rodrigo a écrit : Bonjour, Le compte rendu du dernier CA de l'association est disponible sur le Wiki : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/France/OSM-FR/CA_2020-09-08 Prochain CA prévu le 6 octobre et comme toujours ouvert

Re: [Talk-GB] Brexit and OpenStreetMap

numerous discussions and material on the subject here https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/index.php?search=brexit=Special%3ASearch=default=1 Simon Am 14.09.2020 um 14:51 schrieb Tony Shield: Saw this subject in WeeklyOSM 529  https://www.weeklyosm.eu/en/archives/13734/ Has someone analyzed

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Prendre les escaliers à vélo

Bonjour, Chez Geovelo nous interprétons de la même manière que toi. Escalier interdit sauf si bicycle=yes ou ramp:bicycle=yes. Peut être peux tu les contacter pour qu'il modifie leur algo. Simon REAU GEOVELO www.geovelo.fr simon.r...@geovelo.fr Tél : 06 77 15 59 86 1 Impasse du Palais, 37000

[Talk-GB] London's COVID infrastructure and Low Traffic Neighbourhoods

A couple of blog posts on London Cycling Campaign that may be of interest finding-your-way-on-londons-cycle-infrastructure-1 signage-and-wayfinding Low

Re: [OSM-talk] Cannot find address ringvegen 45 Sørkjosen in nominatim

/import-address.style), if none match it is not going to work. Given that this is in Norway, I wouldn't be surprised if it is due to a difference between //Bokmål and Nynorsk. tl;dr version fix the street tagging and it will work . Simon Am 23.08.2020 um 21:41 schrieb Maarten Deen: > Node 3117603

Re: [OSM-talk] New API suggestion: Allowing contributors to easily track their OSM-objects over time

As, independent of any other concerns, a matter of good form, I would want to point out that there is no such thing as ownership of OSM-objects, and discussing a concept of "their OSM-objects" is starting the discussion on the wrong foot. Am 22.08.2020 um 11:08 schrieb pangoSE: > Hi > > I would

Re: [OSM-talk] Use of OSM data without attribution

default to access=private, but here and say in DE, in general would always have public access except if signposted differently or gated. Simon Am 22.08.2020 um 00:33 schrieb Martijn van Exel: > Curious anecdote: some AllTrails user apparently looked up a phone > number for OSM US and cal

Re: [Talk-GB] New Bing Imagery

There is even a (never merged and now likely really stale) PR: https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/pull/4166 SImon PS: and an issue too Am 19.08.2020 um 11:20 schrieb Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-GB: > Have you checked whatever > there is an open issue proposing to > support image

Re: [Talk-GB] National Cycle Network removal/reclassification

> On 14 Aug 2020, at 20:44, David Woolley wrote: > > On 14/08/2020 19:14, Simon Still wrote: >> I’m not sure that’s actually a legal status that changes anything - >> pedestrians have priority on all shared use paths so not sure that tag would >> add anything

Re: [Talk-GB] National Cycle Network removal/reclassification

> On 14 Aug 2020, at 16:47, Ken Kilfedder wrote: > > I believe most of the canal towpaths are 'pedestrian priority' too - at least > there are signs to that effect all over the place. Well worth tagging them > to that effect if true. I’m not sure that’s actually a legal status that

Re: [Talk-GB] National Cycle Network removal/reclassification

> On 14 Aug 2020, at 09:31, Robert Skedgell wrote: > > On 13/08/2020 15:41, Simon Still wrote: >> >> In my view there is definitely scope to look at adding more info to >> cycle routes/tracks/cycleways to give more information to routing >> algorithms about

Re: [Talk-de] Starrflügel-Drohne für Luftbilder

Siehe auch https://bvcp.de/multicopter-news/recht/geltungsbeginn-eu-verordnung/ Am 14.08.2020 um 14:15 schrieb Simon Poole: > Ich gehe davon aus, dass nicht die neue, neue Drohenverodnung ist, > sprich noch keine Anpassung an das neue Europäische Recht beinhaltet. > > Ich würde im Aug

Re: [Talk-de] Starrflügel-Drohne für Luftbilder

Ich gehe davon aus, dass nicht die neue, neue Drohenverodnung ist, sprich noch keine Anpassung an das neue Europäische Recht beinhaltet. Ich würde im Augenblick auch eher davon abraten irgendwas zu kaufen ausser es ist schon nach den neuen Bestimmungen zugelassen. Simon Am 14.08.2020 um 13:48

Re: [Talk-GB] National Cycle Network removal/reclassification

> On 13 Aug 2020, at 11:41, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) > wrote: > > On Sat, 18 Jul 2020 at 14:49, Richard Fairhurst wrote: >> ... However, note that the "removed" > sections mostly won't be reflected on the ground yet. Also, the > dataset isn't perfect, as there's at least one bit near me

Re: [OSM-talk] Roadmap for deprecation of name tags in OSM

The "names" in wikidata are mostly the names of WP pages for the object in question and have little to do with actually existing names (as per the OSM definition) of places. It would be a massive drop in quality if we would do the proposed switch. Simon Am 09.08.2020 um 10:25 schri

Re: [OSM-talk] Funding of three infrastructure projects : Nominatim, osm2pgsql, Potlatch 2

gt; it is to maintain dead libraries. The reason is that the users want to continue to use P2 for now (see discussion in the forum for example). To put this in to perspective we are talking about a one time spend of about 1 € per head, somewhat less than what iD costs per year (every year), and at

Re: [OSM-talk] Funding of three infrastructure projects : Nominatim, osm2pgsql, Potlatch 2

be cool to write one in . Simon Am 04.08.2020 um 16:26 schrieb Matthew Woehlke: > On 04/08/2020 08.10, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: >> On 4. Aug 2020, at 13:58, Matthew Woehlke wrote: >>> but I would practically *kill* for JOSM to have FreeCAD's suite of >>> sketch constrai

Re: [OSM-talk] Funding of three infrastructure projects : Nominatim, osm2pgsql, Potlatch 2

Am 02.08.2020 um 11:31 schrieb mmd: > ... > In a more mid-term, I really like to see a move away from such > proprietary platforms to an editor that runs in a browser > out-of-the-box. ... Don't we already have that? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [OSM-talk] Funding of three infrastructure projects : Nominatim, osm2pgsql, Potlatch 2

emain as iD gains more and more features. Simon signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Funding of three infrastructure projects : Nominatim, osm2pgsql, Potlatch 2

That was a good decade ago, nothing that would factor in to a decision now (because Linux could not be a target platform to start with).  Am 01.08.2020 um 10:16 schrieb Sören Reinecke via talk: > So far as I understood Adobe dropped Linux support for its AIR > plattform. If that is right, then I

Re: [Talk-GB] Electric vehicle charging points

I’ve been adding them in My area. The tagging is established Sent from my iPhone > On 21 Jul 2020, at 12:00, Mark Goodge wrote: > > Do we map electric vehicle charging points? If not, should we? > > None of the ones in my town are on OSM, at the moment. I could add them, but > it seems a

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Désaccord sur un highway=footway

Je pense aussi que c'est la bonne solution pour cette zone difficile. Simon REAU GEOVELO www.geovelo.fr simon.r...@geovelo.fr Tél : 06 77 15 59 86 1 Impasse du Palais, 37000 Tours <https://osm.org/go/0AU_thgO7?m=> Le mer. 15 juil. 2020 à 21:22, Éric Gillet a écrit : > Le 02/06/202

[talk-au] unsubscribe [SEC=OFFICIAL]

Please remove Simon Costello from this mailing list. Nik Nicole Manning  Executive Assistant to Simon Costello | National Location Information Branch Place, Space and Community Division   t +61 2 6249 9277    www.ga.gov.au Part-time hours Mon, Tue, Thur & Friday 9.30 to

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Objet temporairement absent

Bonjour, tu peux remplacer amenity par disused:amenity avec un commentaire indiquant le caractère temporaire Bonne journée Gaël Le 19 juil. 2020 à 13:17, Arnaud Champollion a écrit : Bonjour, À Digne une boîte à livre de type

[OSM-talk-fr] Siège des EPCI

Bonjour, De nombreuses relations EPCI n’indiquent pas leur siège avec le rôle admin_centre. Par contre beaucoup ont un tag wikidata qui indique l’emplacement de ce siège. Ajouter l’admin_center a-t-il alors un intérêt ou ces informations sont-elles redontantes ? Par ailleurs, j’ai fini de

[OSM-talk-fr] API indisponible ?

Bonjour, Je travaille sous JOSM et depuis quelques minutes j’ai le message Le nom d’hôte api.openstreetmap.org n’a pas pu être résolu. Je suis le seul ? Merci Gaël ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] local copyright law on government data and OSM license

the OSMF ToU and carefully consider your situation. Simon On 16.07.2020 22:59, Eugene Alvin Villar wrote: > Hi Kathleen, all, > > Just as a bit of reference, the original intellectual property law > from 1924, back when the Philippines was a territory of the United > States, didn't have

Re: [Talk-GB] Call to action: Translators needed

> > You might have just had a bad day just like I had a couple of unpleasant > weeks, but I do not understand your reasoning for your reactions. That might > just be me and I might be completely in the wrong here, but I suggest we > leave it at that. > > Kai It is just experi

Re: [Talk-GB] Call to action: Translators needed

any time over the last 5 years if the developers were even remotely interested in cooperating with wider OSM instead of just sapping out some manpower. Simon On 13.07.2020 00:59, Simon Poole wrote: > It's the other way around, I believe you are the victim and have been had. > > Am 12. Juli 2020

Re: [Talk-GB] Call to action: Translators needed

It's the other way around, I believe you are the victim and have been had. Am 12. Juli 2020 21:12:15 MESZ schrieb Kai Michael Poppe - OSM : > >On 12.07.2020 20:58, Simon Poole wrote: > >> The project in question could have naturally joined the OpenStreetMap >transifex organis

Re: [Talk-GB] Call to action: Translators needed

The project in question could have naturally joined the OpenStreetMap transifex organisation and profited from a couple of 100 very experienced translators, but that would be too simple. Am 12. Juli 2020 19:50:43 MESZ schrieb Kai Michael Poppe - OSM : >Good evening list! > >During last week's

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] JOSM assistant relation sans admin_centre

Merci Yves c’est parfait Gaël Le 5 juil. 2020 à 18:41, Yves P. a écrit : ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr

[OSM-talk-fr] JOSM assistant relation sans admin_centre

Bonjour, Dans l’assistant de requête JOSM, comment puis-je récupérer les relations boundary qui n’ont pas de membre avec rôle admin_centre ? Merci pour votre aide Gaël ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-GB] Cycle Track - part/soft protection tags - proposal

Try this - description and photo of each type I’ve identified. Most of these photos are London infra, many COVID emergency meausres https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VL0MmHJoapd4JRgDhow0el2H06IJNsK-8KycxtWSaEw/edit?usp=sharing

Re: [OSM-talk] Facebook acquires crowdsourced mapping company Mapillary

point -if- sustainable funding could be built around the whole thing. Simon PS: naturally the whole reason for OSC was a business dispute that is now moot because Mapillary is opening up its images for commercial use too. > > Those of you looking for 100% FOSS software and who are focused on

Re: [Talk-GB] COVID road changes

COVID-19 tag - or #StreetspaceLDN StreetspaceLondon or some variation could also enable mapping that highlights the temporary infrastructure (I know there is interest in this within the cycling community) Best Simon (Didn’t receive original mail so apologies if this do

[Talk-GB] Cycle Track - part/soft protection tags - proposal

Full disclosure - I’m currently working for London Cycling Campaign on a project to bring data from the Transport For London Cycling Infrastructure Database to OSM. As part of this the question arose as to how to tag cycle facilities that are give more protection and comfort than a painted

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] OSM Data in wikidata

Am 16.06.2020 um 13:51 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer: > Am Di., 16. Juni 2020 um 13:32 Uhr schrieb Simon Poole <mailto:si...@poole.ch>>: > > (not discussing if the material added is even protected > to start with). > > > > As you are mentioning it, are

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] OSM Data in wikidata

(and it is not going to change), CC0 explicitly does not cover third party rights in the licensed material, just those of the entity distributing the work. So adding information from OSM to Wikidata does not create a licence conflict as such (not discussing if the material added is even protected t

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >