I suspect that a large part of the problem is in the delay between making an
edit and being able to see it rendered on the map.
Maybe if Katie had been able to see the effects of her edits on the map
immediately she would have stopped and reverted them herself.
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 12:37 AM,
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 11:36 PM, David Earl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would it be possible to roll back changes made by user Katie after 17:40
on April 16?
I don't believe that there are any tools available for rollback and
the like beyond those in the editors, so everyone is on an equal
On 27/04/2008 17:25, Andy Allan wrote:
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 11:36 PM, David Earl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would it be possible to roll back changes made by user Katie after 17:40
on April 16?
I don't believe that there are any tools available for rollback and
the like beyond those in
You can convert that file. Just search for 04to05.pl in SVN/TRAC
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 6:41 PM, David Earl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 27/04/2008 17:25, Andy Allan wrote:
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 11:36 PM, David Earl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Would it be possible to roll back changes made
On 26/04/2008 23:36, David Earl wrote:
This user has removed or overlaid quite a few roads around
Trumpington, Cambridge, and replaced several streets with cycleways, run
a tertiary road along the river and across a farm track, and generally
made a complete mess of my careful mapping in
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 5:41 PM, David Earl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't believe that there are any tools available for rollback and
the like beyond those in the editors, so everyone is on an equal
footing when it comes to rolling back.
Oh. I thought this had been done.
It might
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 6:41 PM, David Earl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh. I thought this had been done. So what happens if someone deletes the
whole of Cambridge?
What I used to do was after uploading an area I also saved it to disk.
So I had saved copies of my neighbourhood. If you noticed
David Earl wrote:
If nothing else, Richard, can the apparent bug with the mode
buttons be
fixed and the text make it clearer that live data is being changed
when
you press start?
It's not a bug as such - it's currently intentional that it defaults
to edit the data - but I do agree
On 27/04/2008 17:49, Skywave wrote:
You can convert that file. Just search for 04to05.pl in SVN/TRAC
Thanks!
That almost worked - the conversion left some empty strings in the XML
which JOSM didn't like, but removing those redundant lines got me the
data I needed.#
With copy and paste
On 27 Apr 2008, at 17:52, David Earl wrote:
On 26/04/2008 23:36, David Earl wrote:
This user has removed or overlaid quite a few roads around
Trumpington, Cambridge, and replaced several streets with
cycleways, run
a tertiary road along the river and across a farm track, and
generally
Shaun McDonald wrote:
I see this behaviour in Safari too. Also if you just go and start
working on the data, it assumes start/live mode. I think this should
be made modal, so that you can't accidentally choose the live mode,
when play is the one that is really wanted. It would be nice to have
Hi,
Is the fact that Potlatch does live editing a design decision, or are
there technical reasons behind it (i.e. it would be much more
difficult to have a Flash editor with a save button)?
It's a design decision. If you do buffered editing, you have to a)
do conflict management, b)
Frederik Ramm wrote:
People use Potlatch because it is much quicker to load, learn, and
use. This would not be diminished by a save button
On which point we disagree, I suspect irreconcilably; and
respectfully I suggest the greater cause of OSM usability would be
better served by us each
Richard Fairhurst schrieb:
Frederik Ramm wrote:
Is the fact that Potlatch does live editing a design decision, or are
there technical reasons behind it (i.e. it would be much more
difficult to have a Flash editor with a save button)?
It's a design decision. If you do buffered
Ulf Lamping wrote:
This all sounds you're trying to cure the pain of not using buffered
editing with adding another concept that will add another layer of
confusion ...
Fine. I'm really not going to attempt and convince anyone here - one
has to be a bit of a pig-headed UI fascist to develop
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Richard Fairhurst wrote:
| David Earl wrote:
|
| If nothing else, Richard, can the apparent bug with the mode
| buttons be
| fixed and the text make it clearer that live data is being changed
| when
| you press start?
|
| It's not a bug as such - it's
Richard Fairhurst schreef:
Ulf Lamping wrote:
This all sounds you're trying to cure the pain of not using buffered
editing with adding another concept that will add another layer of
confusion ...
Fine. I'm really not going to attempt and convince anyone here - one
has to be a
17 matches
Mail list logo
