On 5/29/2012 1:09 AM, Alan Mintz wrote:
I used to agree with you, but in terms of minimum labor, updates are
best performed by retaining the original upload data, then doing a
conflation between the original data and a later update. That will
highlight only changes from the original source,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 27/05/12 20:40, Ian Dees wrote:
Worst Fixer wrote
Hi
I want know why importer uses following tags:
* chicago:building_id (314 330 objects, used by 2 users).
I sent letter to importer, and he said he will not import this tag any
more.
Ian Dees wrote:
Worst Fixer wrote:
It is absent from following web page:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue
There are dozens of imports absent from the Import Catalog.
If you'd like to add it to the catalog, be my guest.
Without wanting to validate Worst Fixer (though I'm
On 5/27/2012 2:53 PM, Alan wrote:
As I discussed with you, I am no longer uploading data with the tag and will
go back to remove the tag from the existing data.
I object.
An ID tag is highly useful for future reconciliation and/or synchronization
later.
I used to agree with you, but in
At 2012-05-28 05:02, Mike N wrote:
On 5/27/2012 2:53 PM, Alan wrote:
As I discussed with you, I am no longer uploading data with the tag and will
go back to remove the tag from the existing data.
I object.
An ID tag is highly useful for future reconciliation and/or
synchronization later.
Hello.
There is on going import of Buildings in city Chicago.
Import is held by following account:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/chicago-buildings
I found no discussions of this import. No announcement. I searched bad?
It is absent from following web page:
On 27/05/2012 17:54, Worst Fixer wrote:
Hello.
There is on going import of Buildings in city Chicago.
Import is held by following account:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/chicago-buildings
I found no discussions of this import. No announcement. I searched bad?
It is absent from following
On 27 May 2012 18:11, Colin Smale colin.sm...@xs4all.nl wrote:
On 27/05/2012 17:54, Worst Fixer wrote:
Hello.
There is on going import of Buildings in city Chicago.
Import is held by following account:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/chicago-buildings
I found no discussions of this
Worst Fixer writes:
I want know why importer uses following tags:
* chicago:building_id (314 330 objects, used by 2 users).
Very likely it's the database number in the source database.
This is Yet Another import from a database being maintained by someone
else. This is why we need a
I guess the data source is
https://data.cityofchicago.org/Buildings/Building-Footprints/w2v3-isjw . It is
nice and rich data, but certainly importing this way is wrong.
Jaak
On May 27, 2012, at 6:54 PM, Worst Fixer worstfi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello.
There is on going import of Buildings
On 27/05/2012 17:11, Colin Smale wrote:
On 27/05/2012 17:54, Worst Fixer wrote:
I want know why importer uses following tags:
* chicago:building_id (314 330 objects, used by 2 users).
I sent letter to importer, and he said he will not import this tag any
more. But, he continues to. No
On 27/05/2012 18:21, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
On 27 May 2012 18:11, Colin Smalecolin.sm...@xs4all.nl wrote:
On 27/05/2012 17:54, Worst Fixer wrote:
Hello.
There is on going import of Buildings in city Chicago.
Import is held by following account:
Worst Fixer wrote
Hello.
There is on going import of Buildings in city Chicago.
Import is held by following account:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/chicago-buildings
I found no discussions of this import. No announcement. I searched bad?
I discussed it with people in Chicago
On May 27, 2012, at 11:40 AM, Ian Dees wrote:
Worst Fixer wrote
I want know why importer uses following tags:
* chicago:building_id (314 330 objects, used by 2 users).
I sent letter to importer, and he said he will not import this tag any
more. But, he continues to. No justification of
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Alan grunthos...@yahoo.com wrote:
On May 27, 2012, at 11:40 AM, Ian Dees wrote:
Worst Fixer wrote
I want know why importer uses following tags:
* chicago:building_id (314 330 objects, used by 2 users).
I sent letter to importer, and he said he will
On 27-5-2012 20:58, Ian Dees wrote:
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Alan grunthos...@yahoo.com
mailto:grunthos...@yahoo.com wrote:
I object.
An ID tag is highly useful for future reconciliation and/or
synchronization later. And the chicago: namespace is, in my
opinion,
This is Yet Another import from a database being maintained by someone
else. This is why we need a closedstreetmap.org, which publishes, in
OSM format using the OSM API, data which cannot be sensibly edited.
I disagree that buildings can't be sensibly edited. I trace them, add
addresses to
17 matches
Mail list logo
