Re: [OSM-legal-talk] [OSM-talk] License update

2008-03-18 Thread Dominic Hargreaves
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 05:38:37PM +, SteveC wrote: Richard, Andy and I just had a conference call to review where we are with the license. Progress is going well. We've engaged Jordan and sent off the changes we suggested to him, he is integrating them and will be releasing a new

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] [OSM-talk] License update

2008-03-18 Thread Richard Fairhurst
Dominic Hargreaves wrote: I haven't been following recent OSM licence debates at all, but why not also offer the choice of licensing contributions under the PDDL[1] also? This does not prevent people from including such contributions in an ODL-licensed dataset. This would effectively

[OSM-talk] License update

2008-03-18 Thread SteveC
Richard, Andy and I just had a conference call to review where we are with the license. Progress is going well. We've engaged Jordan and sent off the changes we suggested to him, he is integrating them and will be releasing a new version. Once released he will consult with other interested