On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 01:00:26PM +, Simon Ward wrote:
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 11:52:04AM +, DavidD wrote:
On 20 December 2010 10:25, Simone Cortesi sim...@cortesi.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 10:00, Stephen Hope slh...@gmail.com wrote:
I must admit, however, that basically
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 11:25:05AM +0100, Simone Cortesi wrote:
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 10:00, Stephen Hope slh...@gmail.com wrote:
I must admit, however, that basically handing the keys to the OSMF,
which is what the new CT's amount to, is not filling me with joy
considering their track
[Also posted to legal-talk, I suggest follow-ups go there.]
In short…
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 11:52:04AM +, DavidD wrote:
On 20 December 2010 10:25, Simone Cortesi sim...@cortesi.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 10:00, Stephen Hope slh...@gmail.com wrote:
I must admit, however, that
David Murn wrote:
So, can you tell from every edit you did, whether you used nearmap as
a reference while doing the edit? If so, you must be one of the very
small percentage of people who tagged 100% every change they made
or one of the very large percentage of people not from Australia.
On 21 December 2010 13:33, Simon Ward si...@bleah.co.uk wrote:
OSMF is asking you to grant them non‐exclusive rights, essentially to do
as they see fit, but you remain the copyright holder (where there is any
copyright). I’m unclear on how copyright can be enforced in this
situation, but the
On 21 December 2010 09:52, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
So, can you tell from every edit you did, whether you used nearmap as a
reference while doing the edit? If so, you must be one of the very
small percentage of people who tagged 100% every change they made,
including even
On 20 December 2010 12:53, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
Because of the impossibility to be able to distinguish whats what, any
user who has ever made a change in this situation will have to have all
their edits removed from the system, to avoid any possibility that one
edit might
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 10:00, Stephen Hope slh...@gmail.com wrote:
I must admit, however, that basically handing the keys to the OSMF,
which is what the new CT's amount to, is not filling me with joy
considering their track record to date. I'm willing to do a certain
amount of work to make
On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 11:25:05 +0100
Simone Cortesi sim...@cortesi.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 10:00, Stephen Hope slh...@gmail.com wrote:
I must admit, however, that basically handing the keys to the OSMF,
which is what the new CT's amount to, is not filling me with joy
considering
Fabio Alessandro Locati schrieb:
On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 9:21 PM, Robert Kaiserka...@kairo.at wrote:
Hmm, is Austria not in Europe any more? Or possibly some problem with your
script that there is no entry for it?
Sorry, forgot to do it. Now I'm extracting Austria and soon will be present :)
On 20 December 2010 10:25, Simone Cortesi sim...@cortesi.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 10:00, Stephen Hope slh...@gmail.com wrote:
I must admit, however, that basically handing the keys to the OSMF,
which is what the new CT's amount to, is not filling me with joy
considering their track
I'll only answer the technical part: no, the tool doe consider all the
edits of a person in the same way (based on their presence in the list
published hourly by the OSMF) ;)
PS: Austria is now proccessing correctly ;)
--
Fabio Alessandro Locati
Home: Segrate, Milan, Italy (GMT +1)
Phone:
On 20 December 2010 20:25, Simone Cortesi sim...@cortesi.com wrote:
this is no way different from GPL released software:
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/why-assign.html
Actually, it's quite different. The FSF tell you upfront what the
requirements are. The OSMF let you spend years working on the
On Mon, 2010-12-20 at 19:00 +1000, Stephen Hope wrote:
On 20 December 2010 12:53, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
Because of the impossibility to be able to distinguish whats what, any
user who has ever made a change in this situation will have to have all
their edits removed from
On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 9:21 PM, Robert Kaiser ka...@kairo.at wrote:
Hmm, is Austria not in Europe any more? Or possibly some problem with your
script that there is no entry for it?
Sorry, forgot to do it. Now I'm extracting Austria and soon will be present :)
Robert Kaiser
Fabio Locati
--
Fabio,
I cannot sign every edit I've ever done over, because I don't have the
rights to do so. I can OK many of them, however, that were based
purely on my own work, and not CC-BY-SA sources. There was some talk
of a tool being made available that would let me specify which were OK
by
I'm probably in the same state. I suspect the only honest thing to do is to
request that all my data be removed. It seems a bit extreme but could that
be done? Yes I did agree to the ODBL change but that was taking advice from
some one who I now realise was bias and I didn't go through the
On Mon, 2010-12-20 at 11:28 +1000, Stephen Hope wrote:
I cannot sign every edit I've ever done over, because I don't have the
rights to do so. I can OK many of them, however, that were based
purely on my own work, and not CC-BY-SA sources.
I suspect this is a big issue. Pretty much any
On 20 December 2010 12:53, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
Because of the impossibility to be able to distinguish whats what, any
user who has ever made a change in this situation will have to have all
their edits removed from the system, to avoid any possibility that one
edit might
Fabio Alessandro Locati schrieb:
Each nation is in it's continent folder, and has two files '_status'
and '_not_accepted'.
Hmm, is Austria not in Europe any more? Or possibly some problem with
your script that there is no entry for it?
Robert Kaiser
20 matches
Mail list logo
