Martin Koppenhoefer schrieb:
2009/6/17 wer-ist-roger juwelier-onl...@web.de:
Hej Jens,
nice mockup. But I like more the idea of having thumbnails side by side then
this tab-like style.
Yes, it is indeed quite nice, but IMHO not suitable for a large
variety of different Maps (lets
Sorry, falsche Liste.
Gruß
Jonas
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Eric Pritchette...@bitsofclever.com wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I recently donated openmaps.org to the Open Street Map Foundation.
Everyone here is doing a great job with this project and I thought you
could make better use of the domain.
One thing needs to be said
Hi Everyone,
I recently donated openmaps.org to the Open Street Map Foundation.
Everyone here is doing a great job with this project and I thought you
could make better use of the domain. Having said that, the foundation
owns the domain now and has full control on what to do with it and I
trust
Eric Pritchett wrote:
I'm sure there are more advantages,
There is; there is no trade mark on the name :)
Stefan
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On Jun 16, 2009, at 12:30 PM, Eric Pritchett wrote:
* There is often a misconception that OSM is a street focused
project. I think this would be the most important. It's
amazing what a name can do.
Sometimes you pick a name that has drawbacks. But everybody knows
what
SteveC wrote:
On 16 Jun 2009, at 09:51, Stefan de Konink wrote:
Eric Pritchett wrote:
I'm sure there are more advantages,
There is; there is no trade mark on the name :)
There isn't on openstreetmap either.
Ok, the first time they refused it:
On 16 Jun 2009, at 14:15, Stefan de Konink wrote:
SteveC wrote:
On 16 Jun 2009, at 09:51, Stefan de Konink wrote:
Eric Pritchett wrote:
I'm sure there are more advantages,
There is; there is no trade mark on the name :)
There isn't on openstreetmap either.
Ok, the first time they refused
Hi,
Stefan de Konink wrote:
Ok, the first time they refused it:
http://www.ipo.gov.uk/domestic?domesticnum=2500154
But since you tried again in two categories...
http://www.ipo.gov.uk/ohim?ohimnum=E7366859
To the best of my knowledge, community trademarks are somewhat
transactional - if
SteveC wrote:
Wrong again. The ™ was applied for the logo and the name
So 'mark' means to me 'name' so OpenStreetMap was protected if it was
granted, yes?
in the UK and
Europe and the Foundation owns the whole problem, not me.
I thought you did 'something' in the foundation too ;)
On 16 Jun 2009, at 14:27, Stefan de Konink wrote:
SteveC wrote:
Wrong again. The ™ was applied for the logo and the name
So 'mark' means to me 'name' so OpenStreetMap was protected if it
was granted, yes?
If, yes.
in the UK and Europe and the Foundation owns the whole problem, not
On Jun 16, 2009, at 5:09 PM, SteveC wrote:
On 16 Jun 2009, at 09:51, Stefan de Konink wrote:
Eric Pritchett wrote:
I'm sure there are more advantages,
There is; there is no trade mark on the name :)
There isn't on openstreetmap either.
My understanding is that in the US a trademark on
SteveC wrote:
Next I'm going to wake up in the morning and you'll be outside my house,
stalking me :-O
Not to worry, Saturday we started a project to have the Chamber of
Commerce in The Netherlands to be open 24x7 (like your patent office
they close at night).
I have already 1544818 persons
13 matches
Mail list logo
