Re: [OSM-talk] replace some obviously mistaken surface values by their clear intended meaning

On 12/2/23 04:41, Mateusz Konieczny via talk wrote: I propose to replace following surface tags by doing an automated edit: obvious typos: `surface=paving stones` → `surface=paving_stones` `surface=Paving_stones` → `surface=paving_stones` `surface=paving_stones:` → `surface=paving_stones`

Re: [OSM-talk] replace some obviously mistaken surface values by their clear intended meaning

sent from a phone > On 11 Feb 2023, at 18:49, Mateusz Konieczny via talk > wrote: > > Nevertheless, as result > map data quality will improve. agreed for these cases, the problem is always when people become overeager to fix all kinds of values thereby “normalizing” what should not

Re: [OSM-talk] replace some obviously mistaken surface values by their clear intended meaning

On 11.02.23 18:41 Mateusz Konieczny wrote: I propose to replace following surface tags by doing an automated edit I wholeheartedly support this proposal, thank you for your work! ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org

Re: [OSM-talk] replace some obviously mistaken surface values by their clear intended meaning

On Feb 11, 2023, at 9:41 AM, Mateusz Konieczny via talk wrote: > I propose to replace following surface tags by doing an automated edit: > ... To ma dla mnie sens, Mateusz. (Makes sense to me). ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org

Re: [OSM-talk] replace some obviously mistaken surface values by their clear intended meaning

sounds good to me On Sat, Feb 11, 2023 at 1:17 PM john whelan wrote: > Sounds wonderful. > > John > > On Sat, Feb 11, 2023, 12:49 Mateusz Konieczny via talk < > talk@openstreetmap.org> wrote: > >> I propose to replace following surface tags by doing an automated edit: >> >> obvious typos: >> >>

Re: [OSM-talk] replace some obviously mistaken surface values by their clear intended meaning

Sounds wonderful. John On Sat, Feb 11, 2023, 12:49 Mateusz Konieczny via talk < talk@openstreetmap.org> wrote: > I propose to replace following surface tags by doing an automated edit: > > obvious typos: > > `surface=paving stones` → `surface=paving_stones` > `surface=Paving_stones` →

Re: [OSM-talk] replace some obviously mistaken surface values by their clear intended meaning

I agree with the proposed edits. On Sat, Feb 11, 2023 at 12:58 PM Mateusz Konieczny via talk < talk@openstreetmap.org> wrote: > Errata: paragraph 4 from the bottom should be > > "There is no point in manual drudgery here, with values clearly > replaceable by better matches." > > sorry, I copied

Re: [OSM-talk] replace some obviously mistaken surface values by their clear intended meaning

Errata: paragraph 4 from the bottom should be "There is no point in manual drudgery here, with values clearly replaceable by better matches." sorry, I copied wrong bot edit justification template. Feb 11, 2023, 18:48 by talk@openstreetmap.org: > I propose to replace following surface tags by

[OSM-talk] replace some obviously mistaken surface values by their clear intended meaning

I propose to replace following surface tags by doing an automated edit: obvious typos: `surface=paving stones` → `surface=paving_stones` `surface=Paving_stones` → `surface=paving_stones` `surface=paving_stones:` → `surface=paving_stones` different form than standard surface value: