I'm not sure the source tag is enouh to identify a derived work.
If person A adds a way by tracing (for example) Nearmap data which gets
rendered as a map, and person B adds a nearby street based on what they saw on
the map plus what they know of the area (source=local_knowledge), all are
I'm curious about the legal position on tracing as a derived work
(probably different in different countries). Perhaps Microsoft saying it
does not consider tracing to be a derived work does not stem from their
largess but their reading of the legal position. Amongst artist friends
I've heard
Sure if we can convince them to use more liberal licensing it would be
great. Personally I would use it for areas not covered by nearmap.
I'm not sure how we can be heard from them though. I supposed we could
try emailing bob.he...@lands.nsw.gov.au as it says on the page...
I could also attend
On Mon, 2011-05-02 at 19:33 +1000, Andrew Harvey wrote:
Sure if we can convince them to use more liberal licensing it would be
great. Personally I would use it for areas not covered by nearmap.
While not necessarily beneficial for future new OSM, it could be
beneficial to any forks if they
It seems to me that there is a common sense solution to all the angst
about changing CTs, licencing etc.
Those who believe that OSM should transmogrify into something different
should fork a new project, leaving those who desire the status quo with
(obviously) the staus quo. To expect those
On 05/02/2011 09:06 PM, John Smith wrote:
On 2 May 2011 20:55, Ian Callahanigcalla...@gmail.com wrote:
I realise that if OSM is to continue in its previous guise, then the time
and effort expended on projects like FreeOSM will be wasted. But isn't that
the best outcome?
Those
On 2 May 2011 22:03, Ian Callahan igcalla...@gmail.com wrote:
Those pushing for changes might have expected things to result in a
fork as a result of what's happened but that isn't what has happened,
instead the OSM community are on the verge of splintering into many
various projects
7 matches
Mail list logo