It seems to me that there is a common sense solution to all the angst
about changing CTs, licencing etc.
Those who believe that OSM should transmogrify into something different
should fork a new project, leaving those who desire the status quo with
(obviously) the staus quo. To expect those
On 05/02/2011 09:06 PM, John Smith wrote:
On 2 May 2011 20:55, Ian Callahanigcalla...@gmail.com wrote:
I realise that if OSM is to continue in its previous guise, then the time
and effort expended on projects like FreeOSM will be wasted. But isn't that
the best outcome?
Those
On 2 May 2011 22:03, Ian Callahan igcalla...@gmail.com wrote:
Those pushing for changes might have expected things to result in a
fork as a result of what's happened but that isn't what has happened,
instead the OSM community are on the verge of splintering into many
various projects
3 matches
Mail list logo
