-- Forwarded message --
From: Ross Johnson ros...@hotmail.com
Date: 17 May 2010 16:06
Subject: [Aust-NZ] guide to spatial acronyms
To: aust...@lists.osgeo.org
This is a handy guide for deciphering acronyms used in the spatial industry!
On Mon, 17 May 2010 13:27:56 +0800, Stephen Hope slh...@gmail.com wrote:
Is this what you are talking about?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/basin%3Dinfiltration
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2009-February/034383.html
I had looked at basin=infiltration
On Mon, 17 May 2010, Steve Bennett wrote:
Incidentally, to make sure I'm understanding what we're talking about,
you're talking about an area where water runs *into*, in order to seep
into the soil?
That would be a retention basin I think, and these drains have exits as far
as i understand
On Mon, 17 May 2010, John Smith wrote:
The current tagging scheme for doing transponders don't seem to take
multiple transponders on the same tower:
multiple transponders and transmitters is normal, isn't it?
(puts on ham radio hat)
___
Talk-au
Liz wrote:
On Mon, 17 May 2010, Steve Bennett wrote:
Incidentally, to make sure I'm understanding what we're talking about,
you're talking about an area where water runs *into*, in order to seep
into the soil?
That would be a "retention basin" I think, and these drains
On 17 May 2010 20:12, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
multiple transponders and transmitters is normal, isn't it?
(puts on ham radio hat)
Not always, think older AM radio mast installations, especially in
rural areas...
___
Talk-au mailing list
On Tue, 18 May 2010, you wrote:
On 17 May 2010 20:12, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
multiple transponders and transmitters is normal, isn't it?
(puts on ham radio hat)
Not always, think older AM radio mast installations, especially in
rural areas...
that's this
On Tue, 18 May 2010, Elizabeth Dodd wrote:
On Tue, 18 May 2010, you wrote:
On 17 May 2010 20:12, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
multiple transponders and transmitters is normal, isn't it?
(puts on ham radio hat)
Not always, think older AM radio mast installations, especially in
rural
On 18 May 2010 08:04, Elizabeth Dodd ed...@billiau.net wrote:
around here every mast has heaps of transmitters
tower space can be sold for good money
a single transmitter on a tower is rare, unless we map these ones
Maybe so, but the data the ACMA released only covers TV and radio
stations, it
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 8:29 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 18 May 2010 08:04, Elizabeth Dodd ed...@billiau.net wrote:
around here every mast has heaps of transmitters
tower space can be sold for good money
a single transmitter on a tower is rare, unless we map these
On Tue, 18 May 2010, Alex (Maxious) Sadleir wrote:
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 8:29 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 18 May 2010 08:04, Elizabeth Dodd ed...@billiau.net wrote:
around here every mast has heaps of transmitters
tower space can be sold for good money
a
On Tue, 18 May 2010, John Smith wrote:
On 18 May 2010 09:35, Alex (Maxious) Sadleir maxi...@gmail.com wrote:
The original data source contains all those kinds of things:
http://web.acma.gov.au/pls/radcom/site_proximity.nearby_sites_list?pMODE=
DMSpLAT=-35.13873086pLONG=149.17643464
It
On Tue, 18 May 2010, John Smith wrote:
On 18 May 2010 09:50, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
Interesting, lists commercial licencees only
That's a list of transmission sites, while most are probably
commercial installations, I'm guessing some of the transponders will
be for community radio
On 18 May 2010 10:29, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
FF3 or Konqueror was enough to get a listing of the sites close to a given
area
despite a piece saying xml error
They have a map, but I couldn't get it to work, just the XML errors in frames...
___
on a low zoom map
Tasmania now appears as Hampshire
haven't got time to check it out
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
-- Forwarded message --
From: Bruce Bannerman b.banner...@bom.gov.au
Date: 18 May 2010 11:21
Subject: [Aust-NZ] FW: Request to Participate in GEOSS Survey [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
To: aust...@lists.osgeo.org aust...@lists.osgeo.org
Fyi.
This is a worthwhile survey if you get the time.
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 6:41 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm still after
suggestions on how to tag multiple transponders for the same node, I
don't think tagging multiple nodes on the same spot is a good idea,
using a single node + multiple relations might work I suppose,
On 18 May 2010 13:00, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
Relations should only be used for groups of objects in which each
object may take on a specific role.
Maybe so, but it's often the best way to tag things at present since
you can't have duplicate keys, but in this case you are
Someone had placed a POI in north western Tasmania for the Hampshire
district, but with k=place,v=country, so it was showing up as a
country label. I changed it to a hamlet for now.
Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 11:40:01 +1000
From: Liz ed...@billiau.net
Subject: [talk-au] vandalism?
To:
19 matches
Mail list logo