On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Ian Sergeant inas66+...@gmail.com wrote:
As you say, time isn't the only consideration. I wouldn't want to be
navigating anywhere important based on a map merely consisting of vectorised
aerial imagery. IMO OSMers are the ones who should be having the
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 7:13 AM, Ben Kelley ben.kel...@gmail.com wrote:
In general I think it is common that a highway has a different name when it
goes through a town. Here the route continues, and will often be signposted
with the route number.
I'm not sure if that is the case for every road
On 6 September 2011 19:49, Andrew Harvey andrew.harv...@gmail.com wrote:
That reminds me.. I've just updated the name of the Princess Highway
through Engadine based on the signed name via ground survey. I've made
the change in fosm,
http://api.fosm.org/api/0.6/changeset/102770/download
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Ian Sergeant inas66+...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6 September 2011 19:49, Andrew Harvey andrew.harv...@gmail.com wrote:
That reminds me.. I've just updated the name of the Princess Highway
through Engadine based on the signed name via ground survey. I've made
the
On Tue, 6 Sep 2011 12:20:15 +1000
Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
According to Wikipedia, it should extend all the way from Adelaide to
Sydney: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Princes_Highway
according to my personal knowledge, it has run between Adelaide and
Sydney via Melbourne for
On 6 September 2011 13:26, Ian Sergeant inas66+...@gmail.com wrote:
Nearmap is no longer an acceptable source for OSM, since they do not allow
traces from their imagery to be re-licensed. I notice at least one of your
edits sourced nearmap, and that isn't allowed any more. If you were using
On 6 September 2011 12:50, Ian Sergeant inas66+...@gmail.com wrote:
This document tells which roads are RTA funded, and which are local roads,
and does have a Princes Hwy route for the purposes of funding. However, I
really believe we should stick to mapping what is on the ground, else we are
On 6 September 2011 12:20, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
According to Wikipedia, it should extend all the way from Adelaide to Sydney:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Princes_Highway
If memory serves correctly, it changes name through Melbourne.
On 6 September 2011 07:13, Ben Kelley ben.kel...@gmail.com wrote:
In general I think it is common that a highway has a different name when it
goes through a town. Here the route continues, and will often be signposted
with the route number.
I'm not sure if that is the case for every road in
On 6 September 2011 14:10, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
according to my personal knowledge, it has run between Adelaide and
Sydney via Melbourne for decades.
Hi Liz,
This is fine and good, and common knowledge. However, when you start
looking at the road at the micro-level on the ground,
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Ian Sergeant inas66+...@gmail.com wrote:
The RTA in NSW has an internal route that they call the Princes Highway -
which is essentially the main road heading south along the coast (give or
take). They nominate this route because it is the one they maintain as a
There have been some interesting tweets today:
Now on at #smartgov Colin Fairweather on how Melbourne became a smart city
Colin says the City of Melbourne will be making public a large amount
of maps data this month - google on steroids #smartgov
Data will include property business census,
On 7 September 2011 11:55, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
What I'm talking about here is a route relation. I'm arguing that we
don't need a named route relation called the Princes Highway.
But your argument consists of I can't decide which roads should make
up the relation, so
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 12:14 AM, Ian Sergeant inas66+...@gmail.com wrote:
[regarding a relation with gaps]
I have surveyed, it is removed from the relation, and consequently the
relation has a gap.
My understanding is for this relation type - a route - gaps are not
allowed. After all, this
On 7 September 2011 12:27, Ian Sergeant inas66+...@gmail.com wrote:
Princes Highway is part of route 1.
This isn't helpful. National Route 1 and the Princes Hwy diverge at many
points. National Route 1 follows the Southern Freeway south from Sydney for
a start.
So what, how does that make
Hi,
I'm in Charleville, Qld for a couple of days with an iPhone, a garmin oregon
GPS and, from tomorrow, a vehicle.
The place is pretty much unsurveyed, but the DCDB has been used to add streets
so the road geometry is ok.
Will do what I can (street names etc) , but I wondered if there is
16 matches
Mail list logo
