On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 10:24 PM, Mikel Maron wrote:
>
> > Webpages not hosted by Mapbox that are
> > using Mapbox tiles with
> > OSM-derived data would be responsible for
> > their own attribution, so
> > you'd need to contact them like with any other site.
>
> Actually,
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 10:24 PM, Mikel Maron wrote:
>
> > Webpages not hosted by Mapbox that are
> > using Mapbox tiles with
> > OSM-derived data would be responsible for
> > their own attribution, so
> > you'd need to contact them like with any other site.
>
> Actually,
> Hey -- we've set up a support point for attribution issues on Mapbox
> hosted maps. Let us know if you spot something, and we'll work to fix.
>
> (Note, we won't be handling attribution issues on non-Mapbox hosted maps)
>
>
That's wonderful. All third party mapping providers should have a system
> Hey -- we've set up a support point for attribution issues on Mapbox
> hosted maps. Let us know if you spot something, and we'll work to fix.
>
> (Note, we won't be handling attribution issues on non-Mapbox hosted maps)
>
>
That's wonderful. All third party mapping providers should have a system
As someone who was a developer on a gamification of OSM data, I have
questions about this study...
What are the terms of the study results? Will they be released as Open
Science?
Thank you,
- Serge Wroclawski
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 1:53 PM, Chen Chen <c226c...@uwaterloo.ca> wrote:
&
Michal,
The client code is proprietary, and the browser is just a platform from
which to execute the code.
It's similar to running Skype's proprietary binary on Debian. Running a
proprietary application on a Free operating system does not change the
freedom of the application.
-Serge
Martijn,
I think your approach on this issue is spot on.
I personally think that when a project like OSM supports non-Free software,
especially ones run by external entities, it sends absolutely the wrong
message. Worse still is if we force users to use these gatekeepers to
interface with our
Martijn,
I think your approach on this issue is spot on.
I personally think that when a project like OSM supports non-Free software,
especially ones run by external entities, it sends absolutely the wrong
message. Worse still is if we force users to use these gatekeepers to
interface with our
Indeed, and bringing this back from a meta-discussion to the practical
matters at hand- there are extremely good reasons for human readable
changeset comments, and good (and easy) ways to approach encouraging
them.
The reasons for them are clear- to facilitate the meta-mapping
operation- the idea
Russ,
TIGER wasn't what I was referring to.
Please don't speak on my behalf.
- Serge
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 6:43 AM, Colin Smale colin.sm...@xs4all.nl wrote:
So who decides what is good data and what is bad data?
The community as a whole decides what is good and bad data. That starts
with the local community and moves up to the OSM community as a whole in
terms of whether or
On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 5:19 AM, Volker Schmidt vosc...@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to argue for a general
do-not-remove-if-you-do-not-have-the-original-mapper's-ok-beforehand policy
for these and similar cases.
Then you are (whether or not you intend it) arguing in favor of
dis-empowering
Russ,
Instead of replying to every individual point, I'm going to address your
email as a whole, which is around the idea that deletion is different from
addition.
These discussions are nuanced. Are there going to be things one person can
identify that another can't- yes. But at the same time, I
Brad,
How do I know if there is a razed railway there?
That is, if I'm on the ground and there's a building, how do I know it's a
razed railway?
- Serge
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 11:09 PM, Russ Nelson nel...@crynwr.com wrote:
It's really just a small handful of people who think it's okay not
just to delete things, but to counsel other people to delete
things. I didn't see it, so I deleted it is a reason for a ban, not
an excuse against being
Roland,
replies in-line
On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 2:59 AM, Roland Olbricht roland.olbri...@gmx.de wrote:
Luckily, in the offline database on my device, the object with name=Köln
had a tag name:nl=Keulen. So I know that the sign is referring to my
desired destination.
Depending on the device
I agree with Rich Welty- if you know the area and the CDP boundary
makes no sense, then remove it.
The issue in the past has been where some people wanted to remove all of them.
- Serge
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 8:35 PM, Clifford Snow cliff...@snowandsnow.us wrote:
I would like to remove
Brad,
Thank you for reminding us of what the Census office says that CDPs are.
I would just add that CDPs are used in some places as de-facto cities
or towns, which is why we've rejected proposals to remove them all.
- Serge
___
Talk-us mailing list
I agree, the historical boundary should be removed, but we need to be
sure to show what's in what state. It's quite a little mess.
- Serge
On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
puzzled about
On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 5:29 AM, Roland Olbricht olbri...@mentzdv.de wrote:
Dear all,
our current pedestrian routers often don't give street names, but instead
only instructions like look for the line on the map.
To improve that I would like to encourage mappers to give separately mapped
Mike,
Have you filed a bug report on their issue tracker?
https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues
I quick search didn't reveal anything.
https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93q=cookie
- Serge
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 10:39 AM, pmailkeey . pmailk...@googlemail.com wrote:
Seeing the ticket, I think that the behavior here is what I'd expect
it to be, and what I think many people would expect as well.
It doesn't seem like this is related to iD ignoring cookies, but about
how you were logged into an account and authorized iD to edit on
behalf of one of them. I'm not
Mark,
You're correct- there's no set standard here. OSM uses folksonomies
which overlap and change over time.
Specifically the question of tagging amenties or shops as buildings or
nodes is one where we as a community don't have complete consensus.
The general feeling in the US from my
Just want to report that the OSM NYC Meetup yesterday went great!
It's a shame that I didn't know the weather today would be a so much
warmer, but there's no way to plan for things like that weeks in
advance...
- Serge
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 3:56 PM, Alex Barth a...@openstreetmap.us wrote:
Eleanor,
I want to clarify some things:
On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 1:06 AM, Eleanor Tutt eleanor.t...@gmail.com wrote:
Paul - If perception of mapping in the US isn't aligning with reality, we
probably *do* need to do a better job as a chapter board of telling the full
story.
I believe that the
Russ,
Replies in-line. I also mention my work in the DWG, but I'm not
representing the DWG here, just reporting on what happened.
On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 12:31 AM, Russ Nelson nel...@crynwr.com wrote:
Brad Neuhauser writes:
So, is the argument here that we should no longer delete features
On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 11:09 AM, Eleanor Tutt eleanor.t...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, Serge.
As a member of the chapter board, I feel a bit erased? misrepresented? by
your email. It hurt, especially because I think you and I share some common
ground about why we map and that it is important to feel
Eleanor,
I don't see a reason not to be public with my reply to you.
I organize mapping parties during the warmer months (have one next
week) and during the colder months, organize indoor mapping events.
The indoor events tend to get less participants than the outdoor ones,
which is surprising.
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 12:15 AM, Russ Nelson nel...@crynwr.com wrote:
But the map *already* doesn't render abandoned railways,
much less razed railways.
C'mon, let's not conflate the renderings with OSM.
I can understand if someone deletes a railway by hitting the wrong
key. I can
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 4:21 AM, Greg Morgan dr.kludge...@gmail.com wrote:
The last thing that I would want to do is involve the Data
Working Group.
I'm sending this mail as a DWG member- but I'm only speaking for
myself, and not on behalf of the DWG.
I don't think most people realize that
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 2:30 AM, Greg Morgan dr.kludge...@gmail.com wrote:
1. Every time this boundary debate or accuracy debate comes up, I image that
I am supposed to have $20,000 of GPS equipment[1]; post process the data so
that it is accurate; before I dare put the data in OSM.
I agree
I agree 100% with Bryce.
- Serge
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com wrote:
The nice thing about mapping a neighborhood name as a point feature is:
a) It helps people locate the neighborhood
b) it completely sidesteps the question of the exact, possibly
Hi Vidun,
Sounds good. If there's anything I can do to help, please let me know.
- Serge
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Vidhun k vidhu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I am Vidhun doing my bachelors in computer science. I have participated in
GSoC last year with PublicLab contributing to the
Folks,
This post doesn't represent the DWG in any way, but as someone who
does DWG work, and closely monitors his local area, I think I have a
bit of expertise in this area.
In my experience, iD users do not make any more mistakes than any
other editor in relative terms. In other words- if 80%
Mihn,
If we do any en-mass edit, there are a few things I think we want to consider:
1. Before anything else, we need to make sure it's community approved,
source data and code examined and approved by the community.
2. I think that in principle this is a good idea, but we'll also
encounter
Shawn,
My memory is fuzzy but there was a HS class that incorporated OSM in
the curriculum in around 2009/2010.
It was discussed at the first SOTM US in Atlanta.
There were a number of issues with the instructional effort on all
sides of the equation. For the school, they felt our tagging
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 6:28 AM, Edward Betts edw...@4angle.com wrote:
I'm going to continue to refine my results and reduce the number of false
positives. Once I'm happy with the list I'll post it here. When we have
reached consensus I'll add the Wikidata tags to OSM. I won't upload my
I used one briefly. I didn't have the kind where there's an LCD
projection- I had a cheap one.
It was okay but my experience is that I don't do much drawing in
Josm, rather I'm using tools to create objects like boxes and circles,
them modifying them- so the pen was more work than using a mouse.
Olekisy,
I think the point about statistics is like your point about alcohol
free beer- it misses the point. The question before OSM isn't Do OSM
events model the alcoholic consumption trends of the country they're
in? nor is the question Are there beverages which taste similar to
alchol free
Andy,
This is a good question. I'd hoped to write the blog post about the
feature before it went live, but it didn't happen. I did end up
writing it, and in my blog post, I presented several use case
scenarios for it:
https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2014/11/02/introducing-changeset-discussions/
Richard,
Yes, it's quite significant.
There are many events, eg at SOTM-US where I've felt very
uncomfortable both due to alcohol and noise.
It's hard to find public places to hold social events that don't serve
alcohol, though.
While I do drink on occasion (once every 3-4 months), I often
Mikel,
Short answer: Not at this time.
Longer answer:
Yes, that's a good idea for sure. It's something I didn't have on the
roadmap, but after just a day of using the feature in real life, I
already want it.
There are a bunch of other features that would be nice to implement
based changeset
Hi Kate,
Replies in-line.
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 3:24 PM, Kate Chapman k...@maploser.com wrote:
I'd say the size of the board to me is not necessarily the issue. I do think
however having a board elected completely just from the OSMF membership
isn't the best approach. Those elected from
Group, the
Management Team, the Communications Working Group, the Data Working
Group, etc. All of these folks deserve more support and recognition.
- Serge
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 4:15 PM, Serge Wroclawski emac...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Kate,
Replies in-line.
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 3:24 PM, Kate
essentially everybody that he had ever had contact
with and you in discussion suggested that we simply ignore him.
Simon
Am 22.10.2014 22:54, schrieb Serge Wroclawski:
I want to actually apologize for one mis-statement. Michael Collinson
from the MT actually was very good about this and one
and then ignored it as I thought I was supposed to
do. From a human perspective however I should have talked you.
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 2:12 PM, Serge Wroclawski emac...@gmail.com wrote:
Simon,
The DWG gets a lot of abuse thrown at us, and I think something in
Kate's email really spoke
Simon,
That's a great point you make, about talking directly with your
neighbor. But speaking as someone who had some negative experiences in
a similar situation dealing with digitizers (offsite mappers) working
for a company- how does one engage a company vs an account? If you are
seeing
Simon,
So if i understand you right, the answer for a mapper is to find a
company representative and work with them? Do we have a list of such
representatives and their contact, along with the accounts that work
on their behalf?
- Serge
___
talk
I'm not arguing for an exception for unacceptable behavior, but I am
saying that we need to be cognizant of a few issues:
1. Whereas the Code of Conduct presumes that most behavior is done
with full knowledge and intent, we cannot really assume that. We can't
assume that if someone is behaving in
I think the right way forward is to focus on directed efforts, rather
than try to have a single, unified code of conduct at the start.
This is for a few reasons:
1. I tried to create a CoC from the top down in 2010. It didn't work.
People don't like top down things imposed upon them.
2. There
Peter,
It's great you reached out to the user. The DWG is really the best
place for such complaints/concerns at this point. The email for the
DWG is d...@osmfoundation.org
I've forwarded your email to the DWG and you should receive a reply
about it shortly from a DWG member (most likely
There is... this is something I'd consider a contentious edit but not
*strictly* incorrect.
The author of the changeset should have consulted the US/Canadian
community before making it, and if he had done so, would have seen
that he should have added an operator= or some other tag indicating
that
Alan,
The number of edits a user names is a data point. For some people,
it's an important data point, for others it may not be, but it's an
interesting piece of information.
By analogy, if this were a cyclist organization, I would hope that a
board member had experience as a cyclist. The number
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 2:13 PM, Darrell Fuhriman darr...@garnix.org wrote:
On Oct 3, 2014, at 08:28, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
It is just one lens through which one might view the candidates.
Sure, I get that. I’m just saying it’s at best a meaningless lens, and a
misleading
Pierre,
As the DWG person who is already working on this case, we have said
that we are investigating and will take action after our investigation
is complete.
I will not discuss that investigation on this public forum, but you
knew this and decided to send this letter to talk despite this. I am
on with the research though. Thanks for that.
Cheers,
Rafael.
On 25/08/14 21:40, Serge Wroclawski wrote:
Pierre,
As the DWG person who is already working on this case, we have
said that we are investigating and will take action after our
investigation is complete.
I will not discuss
Dave,
OSM is by far the best free geographic database in the world, but we have
anomalies which need to be addressed. MapRoulette helps address these kinds
of problems and brings to light errors which might not otherwise be seen or
fixed.
Many tasks do require local knowledge, but there are also
I have some questions about this survey.
First of all, you never explain what this survey is for. Is it
academic, is it commercial? You mention names of professors, but not
institutions. You also never explicitly state what you're studying.
Knowing these would put me at ease.
Secondly, you don't
Easy setup? The previous version required nominatim. What about the current one?
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 4:55 AM, Christoph Lingg | komoot
christ...@komoot.de wrote:
Dear all,
we want to let you know that we have just released version 0.1 of photon. It
is a geocoder based upon elasticsearch,
Toby,
Thanks for the pointer. I think you're right that in this case
especially, there's no reason to admonish anyone, but perhaps we can
examine the data and see if there's a safe way to expand it, like we
did the TIGER data.
That may also explain some large portion of the contractions I found.
.
So if you have expertise in Tilemill, I'd love the help in setting up
some tiles that show probable abbreviations.
- Serge
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 3:44 PM, Clifford Snow cliff...@snowandsnow.us wrote:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 9:48 AM, Serge Wroclawski emac...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks
they rendered, so in this case, I'd just look for some
known contractions at the end. We may change that later, but that's
where I'd start.
- Serge
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 8:31 PM, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote:
On 7/30/2014 1:45 PM, Serge Wroclawski wrote:
So if you have expertise
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 9:01 AM, Mikel Maron mikel.ma...@gmail.com wrote:
Here in Washington DC, the street names are all suffixed with the quadrant
(NW, SE, SW, NE) the road lies in. The official names of the streets kept by
the DC city government all use the contraction. Historically, I
Hi all,
After reading about the issues with Scout and problems with name
expansion, I decided to do a little thinking on this issue.
The short answer is that Scout (as well as other text to speech
engines) should not need to be expanding values, ie E - East. The
reason for this is that practice
Thanks to all the folks who've commented on this thread and also to
the folks who contacted me off list about this. A majority of the
feedback I received was very positive, which I'm thankful about. I
attribute much of this to the very conservative approach that was
taken last time, because there
Strainu,
Thank you for your question. The answer to how we handle clones/proxy
accounts/sock puppets is quite straightforward.
Any account that Sorin creates has the same status for us as the
sorein account. How do we determine if an account is a sock puppet?
We work with the admin team to
Dragă comunitatea românească,
Eu cer scuze în avans, în cazul în care acest e-mail sună ciudat. Eu
nu vorbesc limba română și eu sunt, folosind un program de traducere
pentru a traduce acest e-mail (originalul este în partea de jos a
acestui e-mail).
După o deliberare de mult, grupul de lucru de
Martijn,
How often would this be? If it's once every few months, that might not
be so bad, but if it's more frequently, maybe Twitter would be better.
- Serge
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
To elaborate on what Frederik said a bit...
The DWG has seen some what we're calling organized mapping which we
can generally define as a set of mappers being directed or working on
behalf of an organization.
The difference between what OSM experienced and what Wikipedia
experiences regarding
This seems reasonable to me.
With these kinds of objects, there's really no easy way to understand
the editor's intent, and figuring that out would very likely be more
work that re-doing it.
- Serge
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
CDPs in OSM have been an ongoing issue of discussion for a while.
NE2 stated that he would delete them all unless someone could show him
a single example of them being useful.
I pointed out that Bethesda, MD (noted for being where the NIH and the
Naval Medical Academy, along with several other
Clifford,
I do not like your statement in favor of deleting Bethesda from OSM.
- Serge
On Jun 11, 2014 4:21 PM, Clifford Snow cliff...@snowandsnow.us wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net
wrote:
however folks may feel about CDPs, they aren't
Russ,
My opinion is that this is a single data source issue. Unlike other
data that we collect, there is nothing in the ground indicating the
existence of this as a route. There's no sign indicating where the
route is, so there's be no way to collect this data other than by
looking at an external
Steve,
On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 8:34 PM, stevea stevea...@softworkers.com wrote:
After my talk, Serge and Paul (Norman) had lunch with me, and while they
said that they did not represent the DWG, in fact they actually did. Serge
characterized this as If a cop pulls you over and says 'I'm going
Since there is no signage for these routes, this is an import and should be
following the import guidelines.
- Serge
On May 31, 2014 3:19 PM, stevea stevea...@softworkers.com wrote:
OSM's USBRS WikiProject seeks volunteer mappers to help map new APPROVED
United States Bicycle Routes. Please
Ian,
OpenTripPlanner can handle routing, which is a pretty core part of
handling bus data. OpenTripPlanner can also be fed directly from the
GTFS data from the transit authority, which simplifies updates, etc.,
making a really ideal choice for applications where you want to work
with local
The DWG moderators can only block accounts on a temporary basis.
DWG moderators can't make permanent blocks, or delete spam diary
entries, or spam profiles (at least not at this time).
The OSMF has only banned a single user AFAIK; Doing that requires
intervention from the OSMF board.
IME
Kate,
You bring up some really excellent questions.
Like Frederik, the key that differentiates the organizational mapping
is central planning/management.
From your email it seems that HOT is involved in various project, some
of which would qualify as this organizational mapping, while others
Being an American has nothing to do with a really bad data design.
I've been an American 35 years and I think this is really not a good
way to model sidewalks.
The problem (aside from the issue of data clutter) is that the
sidewalk data can't be used for pedestrian routing because the
information
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 7:36 AM, Mike Dupont
jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 4:58 AM, Serge Wroclawski emac...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been an American 35 years and I think this is really not a good
way to model sidewalks.
Ok, serge, well how do you address my
Bill,
You're right that we should map what exists on the ground. I think we
need to really consider a few factors here:
1. Why we map sidewalks at all (in either style)
2. What benefits one mapping method has over another
3. The data as it exists now
1. Why map sidewalks
This is a judgement
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 8:02 PM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
I'm trying to work out how using name=* on the sidewalks isn't the easiest,
most obvious answer.
Because there are walking paths with names, and that's not what you're
talking about.
What you want is essentially a
There are two issues here.
The first is the accuracy of the data and the second is tagging.
For data, we in OSM prefer primary source data That is someone going
to a location and verifying the information. We also allow information
such as satellite imagery to be used, but again, in this case
Andreas,
It sounds to me like then it's menufly which offers bitcoin, and not
the restaurants themselves. If that's the case, we need to remove
these tags.
- Serge
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 10:59 AM, Andreas Goss andi...@t-online.de wrote:
Update:
/u/dansfloyd (Reddit) who works at Menufy
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 3:20 PM, john whelan jwhelan0...@gmail.com wrote:
Or possible tag accepts payment from menufly, (menufly=yes?)there is some
added value in the information here.
We don't tag any other business information that way. We don't say
delivery=grubhub, for example.
If we went
I have to say that I have very mixed feelings about Burning Man being in OSM.
While I think that it's interesting because the event is so large and
there's potential utility, there are two things that bring me a bit of
concern:
1. Based on past years, the data is added but not deleted. The event
As much as I love when people use MapRoulette, OSM NYC will be holding
a mapping party this upcoming weekend.
- Serge
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 8:40 PM, Alex Barth a...@openstreetmap.us wrote:
This weekend the annual OpenStreetMap spring #editathon takes place in the
US.
Are you planning to
Maning,
Are you concerned about a specific issue in particular? Is there
something that you've complained about that the DWG hasn't acted upon,
because I haven't seen any mail from you to the DWG.
If there's a specific issue you're concerned about, I think the best
step would be to contact the
It's not an app but POIPond is a great tool for making/editing POIs
quickly and easily.
It's a mobile application that runs on pretty much any phone (Android,
IOS, Windows Mobile, etc.)
- Serge
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
Alex (or anyone else),
If you find vandalism like this, please do not email DWG members
individually, but instead, you should:
1. Free free to revert it. You do not need permission to do so.
2. Message the user through the OSM message system
3. If you want help, please email
On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Steve Coast st...@asklater.com wrote:
Why don't we focus on the substance raised, rather than framing everything as
Steve sitting around sending volumes of flak your way which let's face it
isn't very accurate.
I find this statement a bit hard to understand.
Richard asked me to start the hangout.
The URL is:
https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/7acpifm4a9c1h4a4l7ef511218?hl=en
- Serge
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
The DWG has an OSMF approved process for handling political disputes.
There's no reason to start a flamewar about this.
- Serge
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 11:28 AM, Clifford Snow cliff...@snowandsnow.us wrote:
I'm curious how OSM handles this dispute. I expect Russia's parliament
ratify the
Alex,
Some of the points you continue to make are patently false.
1. There is more open data coming online by the day and we are not compatible
Let's take this apart. If the data is open, by which you mean that
it would fall into something like the definition of
freedomdefined.org, then there
Alex,
Some of the points you continue to make are patently false.
1. There is more open data coming online by the day and we are not compatible
Let's take this apart. If the data is open, by which you mean that
it would fall into something like the definition of
freedomdefined.org, then there
Indeed, almost no license violation cases make it to court. In the 20
years since the GPL was created, it has gone to court only a handful
of times, yet there have been hundreds (maybe thousands) of license
violations which have been settled out of court.
A court case benefits neither side. It's
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 2:44 PM, moltonel 3x Combo molto...@gmail.com wrote:
On 15/03/2014, Tobias Knerr o...@tobias-knerr.de wrote:
On 14.03.2014 23:21, moltonel 3x Combo wrote:
There's one fairly obvious to me : the share-alike requirement is
necessary to enforce the attribution requirement
Norbert,
1. Yes, it would be fair to say that ODbL is much closer to LGPL than
it is to GPL. The ODbL does not require Share-Alike merely on
combining two datasets, but only if you modify the data that's in OSM
in addition to adding your own.
2. Using GPG is good. Using GPG without MIME
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 7:43 AM, o...@k3v.eu wrote:
On the flip side of this, if share alike is so great where are the
examples of organisations contributing back to OSM because of it?
We see this already. I've spoken to companies and orgs who have said
specifically that they would not
I saw smoke from my apartment, but I was going to wait to go over there
until the smoke cleared and they'd handled any hazards.
- Serge
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Russell Deffner russdeff...@gmail.comwrote:
Anyone want to individually figure out the building and update in OSM?
=Russ
1 - 100 of 486 matches
Mail list logo