Re: [OSM-talk-be] How we deal with this kind of note

You’re right, I didn’t noticed. > On 4 Oct 2017, at 15:46, Gerard Vanderveken wrote: > > On second view, on the left tree, seems to be a little C1 sign and on the > right tree there seems some text on a panel behind the leaves. > I believe it is private, unless a visit at the

Re: [OSM-talk-be] How we deal with this kind of note

Strange. That’s the link that is provided by their app. Could you try again with this one or go to http://www.ngi.be/topomapviewer/ and then search for Feluy : the path is just nest to the pointer. PS : I know it’s evil but still, have a look of the place on

[OSM-talk-be] Fwd: BeGeo - save the date - 24/04/2018

Pour info… > Begin forwarded message: > > From: eve...@agoria.be > Subject: BeGeo - save the date - 24/04/2018 > Date: 3 October 2017 at 22:46:15 GMT+2 > To: "mgwebm...@fastmail.fm" > Reply-To: eve...@agoria.be > > > Can't read this mail? >

Re: [OSM-talk-be] YES, we can trace the PICC (was: Using SPW PICC layer in josm)

André, I guess Glenn’s point is that the license issue cannot be circumvented, even if the king itself says something different than its contents. You said that Glenn looked at the wrong file, but as far as I can see you didn’t provide any other one. Did you ? From the OSM point of view,

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Traffic jam historical Open data ?

Yeah sure, welcome in the belgian imbroglio :-( Anyway, I’m especially interested in Brussels, guess why :-) Nevertheless there are sources at the federal level - not open though. > On 06 Mar 2017, at 19:31, Wannes Soenen wrote: > > Problem is traffic is a regional

Re: [OSM-talk-be] car sharing

I did a fast check regarding Brussels City (lot of changes since the “piétonnier” and I confirm this dataset is better than ours. > On 24 Feb 2017, at 08:44, joost schouppe wrote: > > I did a few quick checks of the data quality of the Cambio data, and it looks >

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Bounderies Bruxelles Brussel

Je viens de vérifier en les comparant au dataset de Urbis : http://data-mobility.irisnet.be/geoserver/bm_urbis/wms? (toutes les couches WMS disponibles ET open source sont disponibles ici : http://data-mobility.irisnet.be/

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Bewegwijzerde fietssnelwegen

Hey, What about asking/looking other countries to learn how they do it ? We are certainly not pioneer of this kind of cycle way. Provincial looks also pointless to me : that's a "political" border, not meaningful from the OSM point of view in this case. I must admit however that in Belgium

[OSM-talk-be] Fwd: [OpenStreetMap] Avenue Jean Dubrucq

Hello all, What am I supposed to think regarding this email ? Phishing ? Thanks for your insight. Matthieu Début du message transféré : > Expéditeur: Gail Monte Nettles > > Date: 18 mai 2016

Re: [OSM-talk-be] State of the Map Brussels taking shape

Did you already found a venue ? > On 28 Apr 2016, at 08:47, joost schouppe wrote: > > Hi, > > So the old ctrl+enter oh-god-did-that-mail-actually-get-send error happened > again. Here's the entire message. > > As the whole world should know by now, State of the Map

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Beginning with survey new "Fietsknooppunten West-Vlaanderen"

There is also http://osma.vmarc.be which does a great work regarding quality analysis of a node network. > On 11 Mar 2016, at 17:10, Jakka wrote: > > Jo schreef op 11/03/2016 om 13:52: >> It's been a long while since I worked on those cycle and

Re: [OSM-talk-be] road axes in pedestrian areas

Oh ! Right, user AtonX added them some days ago, I didn’t noticed it. Looks the right way of doing it then. Matthieu > On 24 Feb 2016, at 07:26, joost schouppe > wrote: > > Mathieu, what

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Erreur dans la base de donnée

Bonjour Lionel, Quel est ton nom d’utilisateur sur OSM ? As-tu vérifié tes dernières contributions via ta page perso sur openstreetmap.com ? Matthieu > On 03 Jan 2016, at 18:25, lionel bulpa wrote: > > Bonjour, > > Il y a 29 jours, j'ai ajouté tout un quartier de