Stupid question, you guys importing addressing too?
On 31 May 2009, at 21:38, Michael Barabanov wrote:
It is nice to see more people importing the GeoBase data. Are you
going to be doing more areas in BC?
Yes, starting with adjacent areas to south and east.
Michael.
On Sun, May 31,
On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 11:08 +0100, SteveC wrote:
Stupid question, you guys importing addressing too?
The Canadian government data does not include addressing information for
all jurisdictions. This area (British Columbia) has no addressing
available[1].
The earlier import in Alberta does
I think that'd be super cool.
On 1 Jun 2009, at 13:27, Richard Weait wrote:
On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 11:08 +0100, SteveC wrote:
Stupid question, you guys importing addressing too?
The Canadian government data does not include addressing information
for
all jurisdictions. This area (British
On Mon, 1 Jun 2009, SteveC wrote:
Stupid question, you guys importing addressing too?
Not yet.
A few provinces have address data as part of GeoBase (but most don't).
However the StatsCan data does include block face addresses for all the
provinces.
We've talked about importing offset
- Michael Barabanov arranged a host of electrons thusly: -
[snip]
I've also captured my notes at
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/More_details_on_GeoBase_import_processand
fixed minor details in
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Geobase_NRN_-_OSM_Map_Feature. If people
think the
On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 14:36 -0700, Sam Vekemans wrote:
(Argh! For some reason i don't get the talk-ca mailing list messages as
they happen, only when the build list arrives with 10 or so messages,
anyone know how to fix that)
Sam, this is usually called digest mode. You should be able to
Hi all,
if anyone happens to be Cranbrook, BC area from wednesday to sunday,
i'll be their mapping as well as learning all about trailsBC at the
AGM.
My plan is to physically find the 3 surface type connecting to along
the -local; regional; provincial ; federal routes.
As well as (cautiously)
7 matches
Mail list logo