Hi all,
Just in case you missed it, there is an article in the Guardian about the
location of Postboxes and post offices in the UK.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2009/sep/16/freedom-of-information-postboxes
It then leads to the place where we can put this info onto openstreetmap
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Bob Kerr
openstreetmapcraigmil...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
Hi all,
Just in case you missed it, there is an article in the Guardian about the
location of Postboxes and post offices in the UK.
Nice article, though I'm sure there is an inaccuracy there as the
Royal Mail don't actually know the exact locations of the post boxes,
instead they have a rough description which was provided through the
FOI.
Shaun
On 17 Sep 2009, at 10:48, Bob Kerr wrote:
Hi all,
Just in case you
Doh, without quote marks I mean, not asterisks! hehe.
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Hi,
Also I've spoken to Draco in the past, and his website does not sync
with OSM. He has tried to get help with a mass import but the
discussion was rat-holed due to supposed problem deriving data from
Royal Mails postbox list.
Ciarán Mooney wrote:
Hi,
Also I've spoken to Draco in the past, and his website does not sync
with OSM. He has tried to get help with a mass import but the
discussion was rat-holed due to supposed problem deriving data from
Royal Mails postbox list.
Two changesets:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/2510163 reverted cleanly
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/2510485 failed to revert
410 gone - I suspect there was a node/way changed in the second
changeset that was also in the first.
The automatic reversion is
On 17 Sep 2009, at 13:23, David Earl wrote:
Two changesets:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/2510163 reverted cleanly
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/2510485 failed to revert
410 gone - I suspect there was a node/way changed in the second
changeset that was also
I've been thinking about this for a while.
Is he doing anything (legally) wrong?
Is he always connecting from the same IP address?
Can the login script be amended to point suspect users to a You've been
dicking about with the map - we're going to let you continue in the hope
that at some point
On 17/09/2009 14:09, Peter Miller wrote:
Who would join a 'talk-counter_vandalism' list or support its creation?
Yes. But can we call it something less judgemental: not all incorrect
changes are vandalism, and people seeing their account names on such a
list would be most depressing.
On 17/09/2009 14:30, Peter Miller wrote:
Possibly a different name would be clearer
talk-Counter_vandalism_tools, but that is getting a bit long. Any other
ideas or feedback?
talk-reversion-tools?
___
Talk-GB mailing list
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 2:40 PM, David Earl da...@frankieandshadow.com wrote:
On 17/09/2009 14:38, David Earl wrote:
On 17/09/2009 14:35, David Earl wrote:
Another one at 13:56, also failed to revert
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/2511524
changeset upload failed: 412
2009/9/17 Peter Miller peter.mil...@itoworld.com:
On 17 Sep 2009, at 14:30, David Earl wrote:
On 17/09/2009 14:30, Peter Miller wrote:
Possibly a different name would be clearer
talk-Counter_vandalism_tools, but that is getting a bit long. Any
other ideas or feedback?
I'd join too -- but I doubt I would be of all that much help.
JR
2009/9/17 Someoneelse li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk
Peter Miller wrote:
The other question though:-
1) Would you support the existence of such a list?
2) Would you join it?
Yes, I'd join.
I'm pretty sure I heard from somewhere that the post code associated with
the post box is actually a post code assosiated with the collection office,
and that a house next to it can have a totally different post code.
JR
2009/9/17 Chris Hill o...@raggedred.net
Ciarán Mooney wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
We seem unable to contact Liam123 via normal channels. This means we
have to think of other ways of contacting members who continually put
mistakes into the dataset.
Is it not possible to put a flag on his account, so when he logs in he
is told what he has been doing and asked to explain
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 5:49 PM, John Robert Peterson jrp@gmail.com wrote:
I'm pretty sure I heard from somewhere that the post code associated with
the post box is actually a post code assosiated with the collection office,
and that a house next to it can have a totally different post
David,
David Earl wrote:
... which also won't revert now its closed (changeset upload failed:
409 Conflict)
I also hear you talk about automatic reversion which gets a failure
rate of about half. Are you sure that you know what you are doing?
Because if not then there's a risk that you make
Ok, just to let you all know, I have the images on my laptop so should
be fine for taking them down to the AGI next week. It's showing as
just over 20GB on my snow leopard base 10 laptop ;-)
I'm tempted to try uploading them to my server but I imagine it'll
take too long so basically I'll
Or even a single operator - during Nottingham City Transports
transition to a fully low floor operation the old buses were cascaded
down too other routes which shared the same stops,
And what about Preston bus station where they had to lower the kerbs
to allow low floor buses to access it ;-)
On
Not a big contributor to the lists, but...
1) Yes I'd support it
2) Yes I'd join (but unlikely to contribute much)
Jeni
http://blog.jennystuff.com
Peter Miller wrote:
The other question though:-
1) Would you support the existence of such a list?
2) Would you join it?
If no one supports it
21 matches
Mail list logo
