Re: [Talk-GB] UK street addressing

2020-12-20 Thread ipswichmapper--- via Talk-GB
The housenumber and street would be tagged on the "building:part=house" Is this housrnumber belonging to the terrace or is it belonging to the street? If it belongs to the terrace, I think even with this tagging software wouldnt recognise this. In that case, this is the tagging O use (its not

Re: [Talk-GB] UK street addressing

2020-12-20 Thread ipswichmapper--- via Talk-GB
What you do is give the outline way "buildong=terrace" and "name=" and all the houses with "building:part=house". The software can then tell that all those houses are part of the terrace called -- 20 Dec 2020, 17:30 by colin.sm...@xs4all.nl: > > On 20

Re: [Talk-GB] UK street addressing

2020-12-20 Thread ipswichmapper--- via Talk-GB
Tag the houses with addr:place maybe? Or, better method is to use the alternative terrace taggong scheme where each house is tagged as building:part=house within a larger building=terrace.  (Terracer plugin lets you do this if you check "keep outline way") IpswichMapper-- 20 Dec 2020,

Re: [Talk-GB] UK street addressing

2020-12-20 Thread ipswichmapper--- via Talk-GB
a clearer solution, that is. IpswichMapper -- 20 Dec 2020, 13:29 by colin.sm...@xs4all.nl: > > On 2020-12-20 14:13, ipswichmapper--- via Talk-GB wrote: > > >> Marking city, town etc is not necessary in UK because Geocoders like >> nominatim can figure those out using

Re: [Talk-GB] UK street addressing

2020-12-20 Thread ipswichmapper--- via Talk-GB
Marking city, town etc is not necessary in UK because Geocoders like nominatim can figure those out using afministrative boundaries. What is important is the housenumber and street: "addr:housenumber=99 addr:street= Postal Street" And postcode: "addr:postcode=XY9 7GY" Note, all postcodes are

Re: [Talk-GB] driveway-becomes-track

2020-12-12 Thread ipswichmapper--- via Talk-GB
Yes, however the reasoning for this is that sometimes someone has drawn every single driveway on a street in a city/town.  Rendering this at low zoom levels would clutter the map. By contrast, tracks are often much more sparsely populated, so they don't clutter the map. I don't know what the

Re: [Talk-GB] Tagging of shared use paths

2020-12-10 Thread ipswichmapper--- via Talk-GB
Just to add by the way, in a country like netherlands "cycleways" are paved paths dedicated to cycles. You can't walk on there because there are also sidewalks to walk on. E.g.: https://i.ytimg.com/vi/pAL4yr927e4/maxresdefault.jpg -- 10 Dec 2020, 14:08 by tonyo...@gmail.com: > > Are there

Re: [Talk-GB] Tagging of shared use paths

2020-12-10 Thread ipswichmapper--- via Talk-GB
Didn't know this tagging scheme existed actually. Every single path that allows both cycling and walking is tagged as "highway=cycleway", "foot=yes" and "segregated=no" in my area (as well as "footway=sidewalk" sometimes) -- 10 Dec 2020, 12:24 by epicthom...@gmail.com: > I've reached a

[Talk-GB] FWD: Re: House number ranges that are only odd or even

2020-12-10 Thread ipswichmapper--- via Talk-GB
Date: 10 Dec 2020, 18:34 From: ipswichmap...@tutanota.com To: mattatt...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] House number ranges that are only odd or even > This issue also came to my mind. addr:interpolation on a building doesn't > seem appropriate. JOSM, for example, renders it as a dotted line

[Talk-GB] FWD: Re: High quality NLS imagery of buildings and HOUSENUMBERS (!) available in London (and Scotland). Create a tasking manger to add this?

2020-12-01 Thread ipswichmapper--- via Talk-GB
-- Sent with Tutanota, the secure & ad-free mailbox: https://tutanota.com Date: 1 Dec 2020, 11:25 From: ipswichmap...@tutanota.com To: robert.whittaker+...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] High quality NLS imagery of buildings and HOUSENUMBERS (!) available in London (and Scotland). Create a

[Talk-GB] FWD: Re: High quality NLS imagery of buildings and HOUSENUMBERS (!) available in London (and Scotland). Create a tasking manger to add this?

2020-12-01 Thread ipswichmapper--- via Talk-GB
-- Sent with Tutanota, the secure & ad-free mailbox: https://tutanota.com Date: 1 Dec 2020, 11:23 From: ipswichmap...@tutanota.com To: scolebou...@joda.org Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] High quality NLS imagery of buildings and HOUSENUMBERS (!) available in London (and Scotland). Create a tasking

[Talk-GB] FWD: Revert the "Felixstowe to Nuneaton" relation

2020-11-21 Thread ipswichmapper--- via Talk-GB
I am forwarding this here because it seems like the "talk-gb-midanglia" mailing list is no longer active. Date: 14 Nov 2020, 17:44 From: ipswichmap...@tutanota.com To: talk-gb-midang...@openstreetmap.org Subject: Revert the "Felixstowe to Nuneaton" relation >

[Talk-gb-midanglia] Revert the "Felixstowe to Nuneaton" relation

2020-11-14 Thread ipswichmapper--- via Talk-gb-midanglia
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7521925 That is the relation I am talking about. An edit made by user nplath seems to have made this relation into a clone of the "Ipswich To Cambridge-Ely" relation. You can tell this because the number of members went down from ~400 to ~150. If I'm

Re: [Talk-GB] Weight restrictions

2020-11-13 Thread ipswichmapper--- via Talk-GB
Yes. Just added "surface=asphalt" to all the motor-vehicle roads in my area using JOSM, because every single road here (except service roads)  are paved with asphalt... -- 13 Nov 2020, 19:19 by bainton@gmail.com: >  hmm thank you  > > This is probably one more occasion where I should

Re: [Talk-GB] "Survey Me" Tool Update

2020-11-07 Thread ipswichmapper--- via Talk-GB
Thanks for this tool. Very useful -- Securely sent with Tutanota. Get your own encrypted, ad-free mailbox: https://tutanota.com 7 Nov 2020, 12:11 by robert.whittaker+...@gmail.com: > For anyone who's interested, I've just updated my "Survey Me" tool at > https://osm.mathmos.net/survey/ . It

Re: [Talk-GB] High quality NLS imagery of buildings and HOUSENUMBERS (!) available in London (and Scotland). Create a tasking manger to add this?

2020-10-30 Thread ipswichmapper--- via Talk-GB
Oh yes, private streets are always a problem. In fact, I feel uncomfortable even walking down  dead end roads to survey, and so I avoid them. Usually I just record the first number, then guess the rest of the numbers on dead end streets. NLS definately would be better. That being said, who

Re: [Talk-GB] Holes in modern England?

2020-10-30 Thread ipswichmapper--- via Talk-GB
Considering it's called "holes map" I think it is meant to have the gaps. --  30 Oct 2020, 20:52 by mar...@templot.com: > On 30/10/2020 20:34, ipswichmap...@tutanota.com wrote: > >> If this is referring to what I posted earlier, then you have chosen a >> different map to what I linked. >> > >

Re: [Talk-GB] High quality NLS imagery of buildings and HOUSENUMBERS (!) available in London (and Scotland). Create a tasking manger to add this?

2020-10-30 Thread ipswichmapper--- via Talk-GB
How do you reply to an email that wasn't sent to your inbox and still keep the thread structure? ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-GB] Holes in modern England?

2020-10-30 Thread ipswichmapper--- via Talk-GB
If this is referring to what I posted earlier, then you have chosen a different map to what I linked. Here is the London grid map displayed using what you did: https://geo.nls.uk/mapdata3/os/ldn_tile/#ldn_nat_grid/ol3 On the right, it shows background imagery. "OpenLayers3" in a map of OSM,

Re: [Talk-GB] High quality NLS imagery of buildings and HOUSENUMBERS (!) available in London (and Scotland). Create a tasking manger to add this?

2020-10-30 Thread ipswichmapper--- via Talk-GB
Ok, it seems like this one didn't show up under the right thread. I moved the talk-gb@openstreetmap.org to the CC section and emailed m...@good-stuff.co.uk directly, but it didn't show up under that thread. The way I originally did it is by clicking on the email in the archive, which loads a

Re: [Talk-GB] High quality NLS imagery of buildings and HOUSENUMBERS (!) available in London (and Scotland). Create a tasking manger to add this?

2020-10-30 Thread ipswichmapper--- via Talk-GB
This is why I think that a tasking manager is good. Firstly, it is not exactly "wholesale" in the sense that a lot of data with little checking. Every square is mapped and then validated as well. Secondly, this is why it is imperative to check if the buildings still exist on Bing. If they do,

Re: [Talk-GB] High quality NLS imagery of buildings and HOUSENUMBERS (!) available in London (and Scotland). Create a tasking manger to add this?

2020-10-30 Thread ipswichmapper--- via Talk-GB
I have already posted this on reddit, and people brought up this issue there too: https://old.reddit.com/r/openstreetmap/comments/jk8gdr/high_quality_imagery_of_buildings_and/gahyzi Also,

Re: [Talk-GB] High quality NLS imagery of buildings and HOUSENUMBERS (!) available in London (and Scotland). Create a tasking manger to add this?

2020-10-30 Thread ipswichmapper--- via Talk-GB
Sent with Tutanota, the secure & ad-free mailbox: https://tutanota.com 30 Oct 2020, 15:47 by davefoxfa...@btinternet.com: > > > On 30/10/2020 15:28, ipswichmapper--- via Talk-GB wrote: > >> Hello, >> It has come to my attention that the "Town Plan" map

[Talk-GB] High quality NLS imagery of buildings and HOUSENUMBERS (!) available in London (and Scotland). Create a tasking manger to add this?

2020-10-30 Thread ipswichmapper--- via Talk-GB
Hello, As anyone mapping in the UK knows, in most areas housenumber coverage is abysmal. For example, germany has 14 million housenumbers, USA has 10 million and the UK has about 1.6 million as of 2018.[1] Therefore, an open data source of housenumbers would make it significantly easier to