Ok, it seems like this one didn't show up under the right thread. I moved the talk-gb@openstreetmap.org to the CC section and emailed m...@good-stuff.co.uk directly, but it didn't show up under that thread. The way I originally did it is by clicking on the email in the archive, which loads a mailto link, however it only loads talk-gb@openstreetmap.org . How do you respond to threads that you haven't been emailed properly?
-- Sent with Tutanota, the secure & ad-free mailbox: https://tutanota.com 30 Oct 2020, 20:17 by ipswichmap...@tutanota.com: > This is why I think that a tasking manager is good. Firstly, it is not > exactly "wholesale" in the sense that a lot of data with little checking. > Every square is mapped and then validated as well. > > Secondly, this is why it is imperative to check if the buildings still exist > on Bing. If they do, almost certainly the housenumbers haven't changed. (As > mentioned by spiregrain). If the buildings have changed, then you can mark a > square as "bad imagery", making the tasking manager even more useful (so that > you can discern where the imagery is accurate and where it isn't). > > ---- > > Mark wrote: > > It's out of copyright, so there aren't any licensing issues in deriving data > from it.I would, though, be a little reluctant to use it as a basis for > wholesale numbering without any supporting local knowledge or survey. House > numbers can, and sometimes do, change, particularly when streets are renamed > or rebuilt. So you can't be 100% certain that a house number in the 1950s is > the same number it is now, even if the building is still the same. > > Mark >
_______________________________________________ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
