The wiki is also not the only truth.
Peter - you get all sorts of rendering issues when you attach layer
tags to objects that are typically drawn over-size (eg roads). So if
someone has gone to the trouble of putting something that is typically
below street level (eg a stream) to a consistent
Peter Miller peter.miller@... writes:
It it is in a cutting the the 'cutting' tag would be appropriate. because the
layer tag saying nothing about relative height to a parallel way, only about
the z ordering at crossing points.
This is the problem - there are two different conventions for the
Andy Allan just asked me a question privately about changes I have made to
layers in Wandsworth which has prompted me to do a post here saying what I
have been up in order to rationalise use of the layers in East Anglia,
London and now Kent.
The ITO Map 'Layers' view highlighted a huge amount of
On 19/04/2011 14:31, Peter Miller wrote:
... railways at layer=1 or -1
Well, that might be correct if they're at layer -1 or +1 relative to a
feature that hasn't been mapped yet. A conversation with the original
mappers (or a visit) should be able to resolve that easily.
In the process
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Peter Miller peter.mil...@itoworld.com wrote:
Andy Allan just asked me a question privately about changes I have made to
layers in Wandsworth which has prompted me to do a post here saying what I
have been up in order to rationalise use of the layers in East
On 19/04/11 14:50, Andy Allan wrote:
He's
also removed the layer tags from stretches of the railway, for example
at
http://osm.org/go/euunor2Ku--
which again, those of us who know that area know the railway is on a
On 19 April 2011 15:50, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm assuming his map layers view has some logic that layers tags only
apply to ways that cross but I don't believe that to be true.
Actually, that's exactly how I understood the layer tag to be used. It
is simply there to
On 19 April 2011 14:49, SomeoneElse li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk wrote:
On 19/04/2011 14:31, Peter Miller wrote:
... railways at layer=1 or -1
Well, that might be correct if they're at layer -1 or +1 relative to a
feature that hasn't been mapped yet. A conversation with the original
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Matt Williams li...@milliams.com wrote:
On 19 April 2011 15:50, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm assuming his map layers view has some logic that layers tags only
apply to ways that cross but I don't believe that to be true.
Actually, that's
On 19 April 2011 14:50, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Peter Miller peter.mil...@itoworld.com
wrote:
Andy Allan just asked me a question privately about changes I have made
to
layers in Wandsworth which has prompted me to do a post here saying
On 19 April 2011 15:20, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Matt Williams li...@milliams.com wrote:
On 19 April 2011 15:50, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm assuming his map layers view has some logic that layers tags only
apply to ways
On 19/04/2011 15:26, Peter Miller wrote:
That is not what the wiki says (and said before my edits). Before my
edits it said: ...
It really doesn't matter what the wiki says. What matters is that
someone's mapped something and recorded some information and you're
removing that
12 matches
Mail list logo
