On 20 Sep 2009, at 00:18, Matt Williams wrote:
2009/9/18 Matt Williams li...@milliams.com:
If at any point someone wants the statistics, just ask me.
Now that just over 95% of the images have been tagged (with about 4/5
of those rated by more than one person), I'm providing the ratings for
2009/9/18 Matt Williams li...@milliams.com:
It will be quite slow the first time a person views any particular as
I have to fetch the image from the server but this will only be done
once for each image. John, if you'd rather I'd do this a different way
just tell me. Especially if it's hitting
2009/9/18 Matt Williams li...@milliams.com:
If at any point someone wants the statistics, just ask me.
Now that just over 95% of the images have been tagged (with about 4/5
of those rated by more than one person), I'm providing the ratings for
each image in an easy format. The link for the file
2009/9/18 Matt Williams li...@milliams.com:
2009/9/18 John McKerrell j...@mckerrell.net:
On 18 Sep 2009, at 19:44, John McKerrell wrote:
On 18 Sep 2009, at 19:27, Matt Williams wrote:
A random selection of vertical(ish) photos:
113-124 (all of one single area)
127
149
Matt Williams wrote:
2009/9/18 Matt Williams li...@milliams.com:
2009/9/18 John McKerrell j...@mckerrell.net:
On 18 Sep 2009, at 19:44, John McKerrell wrote:
On 18 Sep 2009, at 19:27, Matt Williams wrote:
A random selection of vertical(ish) photos:
113-124 (all of
it's an eliptiacal galaxy viewed edge on with no bulge...
JR
2009/9/18 Matt Williams li...@milliams.com
2009/9/18 Chris Hill o...@raggedred.net:
Does it need a checkbox for sheep?
Damn! I knew I'd forgotten something :)
--
Matt Williams
http://milliams.com
I had a request for adding the points to a map so I've added that at
http://milliams.com/verticalitymetre/map.html.
The stats page can also now be sorted in different ways and is
colourised to make it pretty.
At the moment, about a quarter of the images have been tagged and I'd
guess that easily
7 matches
Mail list logo