OSGB has just tweeted it's 10 fascinating facts. I thought it would be fun
to compare with OSM
1. Pylons: 80,517 ; 58,487
(OSMhttp://taginfo.openstreetmap.org.uk/search?q=tower#values
)
2. Post Boxes: 93.728 (OSGB); 42,742
(OSMhttp://taginfo.openstreetmap.org.uk/search?q=post_box#values
Not all of NaPTAN was imported. It was only done in some regions. It still
needs the maintenance, i.e. updating from the updates from NaPTAN too, however
no tools have been built to make this happen yet.
Shaun
On 18 Apr 2013, at 11:41, Barnett, Phillip phillip.barn...@itn.co.uk wrote:
I
On 18/04/2013 10:27, sk53.osm wrote:
OSGB has just tweeted it's 10 fascinating facts. I thought it would be
fun to compare with OSM
1. Post Boxes: 93.728 (OSGB); 42,742 (OSM
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org.uk/search?q=post_box#values)
Excuse ignorance, but what's OSGB? Ordnance
On 18/04/2013 11:59, SomeoneElse wrote:
Shaun McDonald wrote:
Not all of NaPTAN was imported. It was only done in some regions. It
still needs the maintenance, i.e. updating from the updates from
NaPTAN too, however no tools have been built to make this happen yet.
In the other direction
On 18 Apr 2013, at 12:33, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
On 18/04/2013 11:59, SomeoneElse wrote:
Shaun McDonald wrote:
Not all of NaPTAN was imported. It was only done in some regions. It still
needs the maintenance, i.e. updating from the updates from NaPTAN too,
however no tools
On 18/04/2013 12:52, Shaun McDonald wrote:
Updates are a lot harder to do as you have to deal with differences
When you say differences, do you mean within the tags? Does it need to
do that, could it not do a simpler find replace?
Dave F.
___
On 18/04/13 13:16, Gregory wrote:
Which one is approved by OSM London?
Bizarrely it's the Blue Posts:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/97209483
Seems that Derick decided to approve it for us ;-)
Mind he also added food=yes which is a bit hopeful given the somewhat
random nature
On 18 Apr 2013, at 13:01, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
On 18/04/2013 12:52, Shaun McDonald wrote:
Updates are a lot harder to do as you have to deal with differences
When you say differences, do you mean within the tags? Does it need to do
that, could it not do a simpler find
On 18/04/13 14:14, Shaun McDonald wrote:
On 18 Apr 2013, at 13:01, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
On 18/04/2013 12:52, Shaun McDonald wrote:
Updates are a lot harder to do as you have to deal with differences
When you say differences, do you mean within the tags? Does it need to do
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 3:02 PM, Chris Hill o...@raggedred.net wrote:
On 18/04/13 14:14, Shaun McDonald wrote:
On 18 Apr 2013, at 13:01, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
On 18/04/2013 12:52, Shaun McDonald wrote:
Updates are a lot harder to do as you have to deal with differences
On 18/04/13 16:40, Oliver Jowett wrote:
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 3:02 PM, Chris Hill o...@raggedred.net
mailto:o...@raggedred.net wrote:
On 18/04/13 14:14, Shaun McDonald wrote:
On 18 Apr 2013, at 13:01, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com
mailto:dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Chris Hill o...@raggedred.net wrote:
I followed the guidelines in the wiki [1]
That seems to boil down to don't modify naptan: tags except
naptan:verified, so hopefully we won't have to worry about conflicts
between import updates and manual changes there.
Not
Hi all
Comments please on my proposal to upload new data about Neighbourhood Planning
Areas in England. This will involve re-using parish and electoral ward
boundaries across the country.
Proposal is here -
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Neighbourhood_Planning_data_loading_proposal
Hi,
The issue of how to update imports is an important one. For this years SotM
(in Birmingham, September) we have a theme of Change, with one of these
areas of change being how do we go from being map data creators to map data
maintainers.
I would love to see ideas put forward for this in the
On 18/04/13 18:12, Oliver Jowett wrote:
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Chris Hill o...@raggedred.net
mailto:o...@raggedred.net wrote:
I followed the guidelines in the wiki [1]
That seems to boil down to don't modify naptan: tags except
naptan:verified, so hopefully we won't have to
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 7:15 PM, Chris Hill o...@raggedred.net wrote:
On 18/04/13 18:12, Oliver Jowett wrote:
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Chris Hill o...@raggedred.net mailto:
o...@raggedred.net wrote:
I followed the guidelines in the wiki [1]
That seems to boil down to don't
I would not, therefore, support updating OSM with another NaPTAN import in
my local area.
Agreed that a blanket import would be a poor option, but surely a tool that
would show comparisons between the new NaPTAN data and OSM data would be
useful? Or perhaps a comparison between the old and new
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 7:50 PM, Rob Nickerson rob.j.nicker...@gmail.comwrote:
Or perhaps a comparison between the old and new NaPTAN data would be
better?
Do we have the old data around? (I'm not clear whether all the original
imports were from one dataset, or several over time)
Oliver
Maybe we should be advising that for all imports the original files are
kept somewhere safe.
Rob
On 18 April 2013 19:57, Oliver Jowett oliver.jow...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 7:50 PM, Rob Nickerson
rob.j.nicker...@gmail.comwrote:
Or perhaps a comparison between the old and
Hi Steve
It would be good to know how this would impact practically. There are Parish
boundaries are on the map locally and we are developing a Neighbourhood Plan
that covers two Parishes. Would this be a relation joining the PCs that form
the NPA with the additional tags you are suggesting
stephen.pete...@sky.com wrote:
Comments please on my proposal to upload new data about Neighbourhood
Planning Areas in England. This will involve re-using parish and
electoral ward boundaries across the country.
First, perhaps you could explain the steps that you took to follow the
21 matches
Mail list logo
