the import on the NaPTAN page [2] or on talk-
transit[3].
[1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NaPTAN/Request_for_Import
[2] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NaPTAN
[3] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
Regards,
Peter Miller
I have created a wiki page for appeals for money for aerial
photography and added a basic FAQ to it.
Is still very raw but I think it is valuable to have one page to
support all the funding appeals wherever they are for in the world and
provide answers to the basic questions.
Feel free
On 14 Sep 2009, at 18:02, Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) wrote:
Peter Miller wrote:
Sent: 10 September 2009 3:29 PM
To: Christoph Böhme
Cc: talk-gb-westmidlands@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-gb-westmidlands] NOVAM Viewer
On 9 Sep 2009, at 22:06, Christoph Böhme wrote:
Hi
he
could help us out or offer us some advice.
Regards,
Peter
Regards
Brian
2009/9/15 Peter Miller peter.mil...@itoworld.com
On 15 Sep 2009, at 09:06, Brian Prangle wrote:
Hi everyone
With all the talk-traffic on GB it's probably time we gave some
thought on how to progress our
will do a 'tidy up' review of NaPTAN when it is done.
Thanks,
Peter
Peter Miller peter.mil...@itoworld.com schrieb:
On 9 Sep 2009, at 22:06, Christoph Böhme wrote:
Hi!
Ciarán Mooney general.moo...@googlemail.com schrieb:
I am trying to merge some bus stops on Penns Lane, Sutton
A new 'moderation' email list[1] has been created to help develop
effective responses to vandalism and mistakes. To avoid spam
subscriber's the first posts will be moderated so don't expect them to
appear immediately. Subsequent posts will not be moderated.
[1]
On 7 Dec 2009, at 17:25, Brian Prangle wrote:
Hi everyone
In order to maximise our funds for satellite imagery I'm going to
ask all the Unis in our region if they'd like to host the images for
us. Please have a look at the following text which is a first draft
of the email I'm going to
On 12 Dec 2008, at 09:13, Steve Hill wrote:
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008, Peter Miller wrote:
I have been working on adding wiki pages for every County and Unitary
Authority in the UK (there are 140 in total) so that we have a
consistent place to add this sort of information. There were articles
On 15 Dec 2008, at 18:20, matthew-...@newtoncomputing.co.uk wrote:
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 12:14:53PM +, Peter Miller wrote:
This list is called 'talk-GB' but in the description it is described
as General discussion for UK users
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo
I think GB
On 15 Dec 2008, at 21:00, Chris Hill wrote:
Peter Miller wrote:
On 15 Dec 2008, at 18:20, matthew-...@newtoncomputing.co.uk wrote:
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 12:14:53PM +, Peter Miller wrote:
This list is called 'talk-GB' but in the description it is
described
as General discussion
On 16 Dec 2008, at 10:08, Steve Hill wrote:
Peter Miller wrote:
We all know about the OS licencing issues and so do councils! There
is a real bun-fight between the OS Google and councils over
licencing.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2008/nov/20/ordnance-survey-google-maps
Ok
On 17 Dec 2008, at 22:03, Steve Chilton wrote:
Bizarely, the day Kaerest released his openrailmap I had rendered a
UK rail network map - purely for visualisation and checking
purposes, but have only just had time to upload it to the server.
It is at:
On 18 Dec 2008, at 11:12, Shaun McDonald wrote:
On 18 Dec 2008, at 10:52, Peter Miller wrote:
Could these maps render the 'lanes' tag, around which there seems to
be an emerging consensus for showing the number of tracks, typically
1 for single track working, 2 and the 4. The rendering
-gb-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:talk-gb-
boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Peter Miller
Sent: 18 December 2008 10:52 AM
To: Steve Chilton
Cc: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [Talk-GB] Yet another rail network map
On 17 Dec 2008, at 22:03, Steve Chilton wrote:
Bizarely, the day
which we should respond to positively.
I (Peter Miller/PeterIto) will make the introduction and will be happy
to be on the
team but am not offering to do the bulk of the technical work.
This work is supported in this work by 'IdeasInTransit' which is a
five year research project funded by the UK
On 10 Feb 2009, at 20:07, Chris Hill wrote:
Brian Quinion wrote:
Should we investigate buying aerial photography for some of these
un-loved
places which would allow us the capture the base road structure and
land-usage prior to any actual visit and speed things up a lot? The
photography
We are planning to give the UK administrative wiki pages a bit of a
spring clean which are all a bit random, not very well linked and
contain quite a lot of duplicated content and some very out-of-date
content.
The plan is as follows:
Firstly we will create wiki pages for the English and
On 9 Mar 2009, at 12:12, David Earl wrote:
On 09/03/2009 12:04, Peter Miller wrote:
We are planning to give the UK administrative wiki pages a bit of
a spring clean which are all a bit random, not very well linked
and contain quite a lot of duplicated content and some very out
On 9 Mar 2009, at 13:06, Ed Loach wrote:
r. I think
therefore that the towns listed on each district page are probably
more correct than those in the template (though some places are
perhaps open to debate). Since then I've tended to concentrate on
the district page where I live.
The Essex
On 9 Mar 2009, at 15:36, Ed Loach wrote:
There is plenty left to do, but I hope people are happy with
what we
have being doing so far.
Would it make more sense for
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/England
to redirect to WikiProject_England now instead of
WikiProject_United_Kingdom?
to the 'Wales' or 'Scotland' category.
Regards,
Peter Miller
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Firstly, I have copied the table from the boundaries page showing the
hierarchy of administration in Wales to the Wales page and merged it with
the content in the Unitaries table which helps the uniformity of the UK
pages.
Secondly we seem to now be in a position where we are maintaining a
On 29 May 2009, at 15:42, Shaun McDonald wrote:
I'm wondering if someone will be able to implement an efficient
version of the snooker ball visualisation on
http://www.cyclestreets.net/blog/2009/03/26/thats-a-really-odd-route/
That's very useful. Is it possible for anyone to view that
I have been looking at the coverage of maxspeed limit data for
highways in the UK and we seem to have a right mix of styles.
Here is the data for bug chunk of England while avoiding including
anything from France or Ireland (which would include km/hour figure).
We current have over
On 4 Jun 2009, at 12:48, WessexMario wrote:
Isn't all this already specified?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxspeed
If your country uses kilometers tag the value without unit!
If your country still uses miles tag the value and append mph OR
convert to the EXACT kilometers per
The DfT have just published a contract out for the collection and
management of cycle data for St Leonards on Sea
Lot 1. Cycle data collection. Undertaking cycle surveys to extend the
Ordnance Survey Integrated Transport Network to include information
about existing cycling infrastructure
, Jun 4, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Peter Miller peter.mil...@itoworld.com
wrote:
The DfT have just published a contract out for the collection and
management of cycle data for St Leonards on Sea
Lot 1. Cycle data collection. Undertaking cycle surveys to extend
the
Ordnance Survey Integrated Transport
On 4 Jun 2009, at 17:11, WessexMario wrote:
Robert Naylor wrote:
On Thu, 04 Jun 2009 11:13:28 +0100, David Earl
da...@frankieandshadow.com wrote:
I also came across someone tagging maxpeed=NSL yesterday. If it
gives
someone happiness, fine, but I don't really think it should be
On 5 Jun 2009, at 09:06, Peter Childs wrote:
2009/6/4 Peter Miller peter.mil...@itoworld.com:
Makes sense.
Another log... What about trains? Network Rail use mph, so I would
suggest we do the same.
Do they? I've seen quite a few Rail Signs that seam to be in km/h. Not
being a train
On 5 Jun 2009, at 09:35, Peter Miller wrote:
On 5 Jun 2009, at 09:06, Peter Childs wrote:
And also I think the railway lines in london need relations for
each line. Currently the names of lines are encoded in the ways which
just doesn't work. One ends up with ways named as 'Circle
On 5 Jun 2009, at 10:19, Tom Hughes wrote:
Peter Miller wrote:
Fyi, Joss (who works for ITO) is in the process of preparing a
new OSM railway wiki page in his user area which lists lines and
gives relations where they are available.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki
, 5 Jun 2009, Peter Miller wrote:
I am certainly not proposing separate ways for separate lines. I think
there should either be one way for a bunch of parallel tracks or
alternatively one way per track if people are getting nerdy (surely
not!).
Tracing individual tracks might make sense if people
On 11 Jun 2009, at 07:49, Abigail Brady wrote:
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Peter Miller peter.mil...@itoworld.com
wrote:
*UK
*England/Wales/Scotland
*English regions (North East, East of England etc)
*Ceremonial counties/unitaries
*Districts
*Parishes/Wards etc (but lets deal
I have found a number of damaged road and rail links done by this user
who registered on June 2nd and has done a number of edits since then:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/liam123
I removed a spurious railway line in London yesterday and also
corrected the position of a roundabout. I
I guess that when one sees a warning sign for 'Tanks turning' on a UK
road one should tag it as 'tank=yes'!
http://www.flickr.com/photos/peterito/3619361478/
The joy of extensible tagging systems.
Regards,
Peter
___
Talk-GB mailing list
On 13 Jun 2009, at 09:30, Peter Childs wrote:
2009/6/11 Ed Loach e...@loach.me.uk:
And here is the current OSM guidance:-
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:admin_level#admin_level
In order to tie in with NUTS and with guidance for other
countries
within OSM we might want to do the
On 13 Jun 2009, at 18:41, Peter Childs wrote:
2009/6/13 Peter Miller peter.mil...@itoworld.com:
Whats the simplest way of adding a boundary? I notice that Medway
does
not have one, I know ruthley where it should be, but have no idea of
how to go about adding the relevant relation/way
On 22 Jun 2009, at 14:45, Chris Hill wrote:
I'm interested the relations of the boundaries for counties. I notice
that some counties (and recently English Regions) include the way for
the coastline (natural=coastline), and some coastal counties do not.
I think that coastal counties would
On 22 Jun 2009, at 15:14, Matthew Westcott wrote:
On 22 Jun 2009, at 14:45, Chris Hill wrote:
I understand that
councils are responsible for the beach so the county could be said to
extend beyond what we currently mark as the coastline. Does anyone
know
where council boundaries actually
On 22 Jun 2009, at 15:59, Peter Childs wrote:
2009/6/22 Ed Loach e...@loach.me.uk:
The Essex one I traced from the dotted line on NPE. I'm not sure
about 12 miles for county boundaries - I don't think Essex would
want to have to maintain it's own navy to repel Suffolk encroachers
for
On 23 Jun 2009, at 13:08, Chris Hill wrote:
Having looked at this and other counties elsewhere, the coastline in
some places is clearly a poor choice for the county and regional
boundary. Off the Northumberland coast the Farne islands and the very
substantial Holy Island are apparently in
--- Cross posted from Talk West Midlands
On 1 Jul 2009, at 19:39, Brian Prangle wrote:
Hi everyone
I've added a railway relation for the West Coast Mainline as it
runs thoruh New Street - so far I've got as far from Rugby Junction
to Sandwell Dudley station. I've named it as
There is loads of work going on around the country on the boundaries
project which is great to see. Here are a list of all the main
administrative boundaries (for England and Wales) and the status of
those boundaries. Scotland is a blank canvas if anyone feels motivated
to do the work:
On 2 Jul 2009, at 13:29, Ed Loach wrote:
However, Hampshire (England) is not rendering. I have looked at
the
data with various tools and can't see what is wrong.
The best tool for finding errors in boundaries is this one, but
it
fails for Hamphire for some reason:-
On 2 Jul 2009, at 14:27, Ed Loach wrote:
Ed: I notice you have tweeked the 'non-simple' way today. Do
you think
it is now simple? If not do you want to try and sort it.
I checked the way quite a bit. It shares most of its nodes with a
section of a beach area, but that shouldn't be an
from
government has been from the Scottish Government's Sustainable
Transport section
http://www.cyclestreets.net/about/
Possibly they can provide more information. I will forward the thread
to them.
Regards,
Peter
Richard
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Peter Miller peter.mil
funding
from the Cycle Demonstration Towns project for our journey planner
Regards,
Peter
Richard
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Peter Miller peter.mil...@itoworld.com
wrote:
I notice that councils across England are being encouraged to
contribute to the cost of collecting data
So.. where is the coastal boundary of Wales? Is it at the high-water
mark, or somewhere further out. Any ideas?
In order to get something on the map I have created a complete
boundary for Wales using high-water mark and included islands as
exclaves. Happy for evidence that I am wrong and
.
Regards,
Peter
Cheers, Chris
Peter Miller wrote:
So.. where is the coastal boundary of Wales? Is it at the high-water
mark, or somewhere further out. Any ideas?
In order to get something on the map I have created a complete
boundary for Wales using high-water mark and included islands
On 14 Jul 2009, at 20:04, Martin - CycleStreets wrote:
Nice to meet you all at SOTM!
Peter Miller wrote:
OSM coverage of cycle demonstration towns is pretty good already
and it
would be truly weird for the Cambridgeshire County Council to pay for
someone to survey Cambridge
On 15 Jul 2009, at 14:13, Abigail Brady wrote:
This is certainly worth pursuing. Unfortunately, the real problem
comes in rural areas where, for example, boundaries are defined to
be the paths of things like hedges that aren't there any more,
previous courses of rivers, etc. There are
/Boundary_Committee_for_England
Regards,
Peter Miller
Councils may indeed have the English written versions - it would be
worth asking them
I have had more success with the Crown estates who were very
helpful, but once again their GIS system is based on licenced OS
data and therefore
On 16 Jul 2009, at 11:31, Chris Hill wrote:
David Earl wrote:
Chris Hill wrote:
Since this is a Freedom of Information Act request, and they have
refused to supply me the requested information I'll ask the Office
of the Information Commissioner for a ruling. Not expecting much,
but
On 19 Jul 2009, at 11:54, Chris Hill wrote:
Peter Reed wrote:
Of the authorities I have managed to measure, the following all
show more road mapped than the DfT believes exists:
Having mapped every road in Hull (Kingston-upon-Hull since today is
a Sunday), some are fairly new and may
I am proposing that we get all Liam123's edits removed from OSM.
My reasoning is firstly many of his edits are clearly just plain wrong
and are certainly breaking previously good maps. Secondly that he has
failed to respond to a polite message asking him for an explanation.
Thirdly, given
On 21 Jul 2009, at 10:05, Alice Kaerast wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 10:00:25 +0100 (BST)
Steve Hill st...@nexusuk.org wrote:
If there is a user who (by general consensus) is making nonsense
edits and is continuing to do so after having been
On 21 Jul 2009, at 13:17, Nick Allen wrote:
Hi,
One persons edits have created much talk as we are all worried about
damage to the work that has been put into the project, and rightly so.
When I started editing over a year ago I was worried (rightly on
occasion) that I was damaging rather
I have create a wiki page for reversion requests for GB data and have
added all Liam123s recent changesets to it with a reference to the
discussions of the nature of his edits.
I believe that this will be a suitable interface between mappers and
the people who do the actual reversion
On 22 Jul 2009, at 13:29, Andy Allan wrote:
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 12:52 PM, Peter Millerpeter.mil...@itoworld.com
wrote:
I have create a wiki page for reversion requests for GB data and have
added all Liam123s recent changesets to it with a reference to the
discussions of the nature
On 22 Jul 2009, at 15:18, Andy Allan wrote:
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Peter Millerpeter.mil...@itoworld.com
wrote:
Without going through every edit in the changeset it will be hard to
determine. If we do have to go through every changeset then we
might as well
revert them by
On 22 Jul 2009, at 15:18, Andy Allan wrote:
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Peter Millerpeter.mil...@itoworld.com
wrote:
Without going through every edit in the changeset it will be hard to
determine. If we do have to go through every changeset then we
might as well
revert them by
On 24 Jul 2009, at 00:48, Mark Williams wrote:
Peter Miller wrote:
On 22 Jul 2009, at 15:18, Andy Allan wrote:
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Peter Millerpeter.mil...@itoworld.com
wrote:
snip
So for the future, if there's another changeset that needs sorting
out, please consider
On 27 Jul 2009, at 17:25, Bogus Zaba wrote:
Sorry if this contains some really stupid questions, but i have poked
around the mailing list and the wiki and not been able to answer them
for myself.
1. Given that we are not allowed to use official OS data (many threads
on this topic), how is
On 27 Jul 2009, at 21:03, Bogus Zaba wrote:
Peter Miller wrote:
On 27 Jul 2009, at 17:25, Bogus Zaba wrote:
snip
for me anyway.
There seem to be problems with r and j at present for at least some
boundaries.
Boundaries are created using ways and relations. You can read about
them
Progress on English boundaries has been amazing recently.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_England
. Wales and Scotland seem to need champions and are not so far
advanced for some reason.
What is really good is that we now have people using them for useful
purposes (see Peter
On 28 Jul 2009, at 13:33, Chris Hill wrote:
Why is this 'great'? What is the point of boundary=ceremonial? If
you change a boundary=administrative to boundary=ceremonial what
does this do except break existing renders and tools? If you *add*
boundary=ceremonial then this is available
the import on the NaPTAN page [2] or on talk-
transit[3].
[1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NaPTAN/Request_for_Import
[2] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NaPTAN
[3] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
Regards,
Peter Miller
On 5 Aug 2009, at 12:30, David Earl wrote:
David Earl wrote:
David Earl wrote:
liam123 has been active again this morning - the first changeset
for a
while:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/2043351
I have no idea whether this represents valid data or rubbish. It
seems
On 5 Aug 2009, at 14:28, Andy Allan wrote:
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Peter Millerpeter.mil...@itoworld.com
wrote:
Can I suggest that you (David) immediately add this to the GB Revert
Request log (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/
GB_revert_request_log) , send Liam123 asking him
3 more changesets today from Liam123 for reversion.
I have added them to the revert page and have copied this email the
Andy.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GB_revert_request_log
I will send him another message, not that this seems to help really.
Thanks Andy,
Regards,
Peter
This is an interesting category of tools and resources available for
maintaining Wikipedia against vandalism.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Wikipedia_counter-vandalism_tools
Regards,
Peter
___
Talk-GB mailing list
On 7 Aug 2009, at 13:32, Andy Allan wrote:
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 8:21 PM, David
Earlda...@frankieandshadow.com wrote:
Peter Miller wrote:
3 more changesets today from Liam123 for reversion.
I have added them to the revert page and have copied this email the
Andy.
http
On 8 Aug 2009, at 11:11, Simon Ward wrote:
On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 01:11:02PM +0100, Nick Barnes wrote:
To my mind, nobody ought to be able to edit live map data unless:
1 - They have uploaded n tracks,
2 - They have had m edits approved by a moderator
3 - They are vouched for by somebody
.
One small suggestion - you might like to use a 'thermal' colour range;
currently I am not able to guess which colour is associated with the
highest coverage and the lowest etc. Feel free to use colours used by
OSM Mapper in the 'thermal' range if that is useful.
Regards,
Peter Miller
On 10 Aug 2009, at 23:09, Bogus Zaba wrote:
I have been working on these two relations. Wrexham is finished and
the
entries on the WikiProject Wales are complete, because somebody
already
put them there - I just fixed the relation (137981) and some of its
members.
It is great that you
On 11 Aug 2009, at 07:43, Shaun McDonald wrote:
On 11 Aug 2009, at 06:41, Peter Miller wrote:
On 10 Aug 2009, at 23:09, Bogus Zaba wrote:
With Denbighshire however I made a new relation (192442) and am
slowly
adding various ways that will make up this boundary. Not sure
however
On 18 Aug 2009, at 14:08, Nick Whitelegg wrote:
My main comment was that the proposal didn't 'sit' well with the
government regional structures.
I do have to make the comment though that the government regional
structures are rather arbitrary and do not reflect real cultural
regions.
On 20 Aug 2009, at 13:21, Thomas Wood wrote:
2009/8/17 Thomas Wood grand.edgemas...@gmail.com:
I'll start the imports tomorrow. I think it'd be wise to spread them
around the country so one group of people aren't entirely swamped
with
several counties.
As such, I'll start with Hull,
On 22 Aug 2009, at 12:03, Chris Hill wrote:
Well I'm pleased that they agree with me, but I'm not the oracle!
This is another source quoting the same general information. Do the
Scottish and Northern Irish counties generally extend to the low
water mark too? Drawing from the NPE maps
On 23 Aug 2009, at 15:52, Bogus Zaba wrote:
Peter Miller wrote:
On 22 Aug 2009, at 12:03, Chris Hill wrote:
Well I'm pleased that they agree with me, but I'm not the oracle!
This is another source quoting the same general information. Do
the Scottish and Northern Irish counties
On 23 Aug 2009, at 15:50, Chris Hill wrote:
Peter Miller wrote:
On 22 Aug 2009, at 12:03, Chris Hill wrote:
Well I'm pleased that they agree with me, but I'm not the oracle!
This is another source quoting the same general information. Do
the Scottish and Northern Irish counties
On 26 Aug 2009, at 10:08, Chris Hill wrote:
The orange (maybe brownish) roads can be secondary, tertiary or
unclassified. I've compared the NPE roads to some roads that I know
well and they cover what I would say are secondary, tertiary or
unclassified. Secondary have reference numbers.
On 20 Aug 2009, at 13:21, Thomas Wood wrote:
2009/8/17 Thomas Wood grand.edgemas...@gmail.com:
I'll start the imports tomorrow. I think it'd be wise to spread them
around the country so one group of people aren't entirely swamped
with
several counties.
As such, I'll start with Hull,
On 26 Aug 2009, at 18:46, Mark Williams wrote:
Thomas Wood wrote:
[]
Regarding remaining counties, Essex is definitely a priority, we may
as well just upload the remaining counties as and when we can.
(Which'll probably be when the new dev server is up with a sane
python
environment)
On 27 Aug 2009, at 11:12, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 27/08/09 11:05, Tom Hughes wrote:
In fact I can't find any map which shows either the tunnel or the
approach roads as the A102(M) - they all shown as the A102 for the
whole
length from the junction with the A12/A13 to the north to the
://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NaPTAN/Import#Rights_to_NaPTAN_data
Regards,
Peter Miller
ITO World Ltd.
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
/Village]searchp=ids.srf
[6] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peterborough-Lincoln_Line
Regards,
Peter Miller
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
On 28 Aug 2009, at 12:12, Peter Childs wrote:
2009/8/28 Peter Childs pchi...@bcs.org:
2009/8/28 Peter Miller peter.mil...@itoworld.com:
Anyone fancy a bit of detective work on a railway line? Question: Is
there an operating railway line to the east of Sleaford in
Linclonshire and how many
On 28 Aug 2009, at 15:41, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
To confirm: double track, southbound freight-only, northbound out-of-
use (there's track there but it's overgrown). I found a message from
aforementioned train driver on some Usenet archive somewhere:
Very useful thanks.
So I guess I
On 28 Aug 2009, at 16:11, Matt Williams wrote:
2009/8/28 Peter Miller peter.mil...@itoworld.com:
On 28 Aug 2009, at 15:41, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
To confirm: double track, southbound freight-only, northbound out-
of-
use (there's track there but it's overgrown). I found a message from
On 28 Aug 2009, at 20:15, Matt Williams wrote:
2009/8/28 Chris Hill chillly...@yahoo.co.uk:
In many towns and cities in the UK there are small ways behind rows
of
houses. In my part of the world (Yorkshire) we know them as a
tenfoot
(they are traditionally 10 feet wide).
I have not
Liam123 is back, however some of his edits moving bus stops might be
reasonable.
This might be ok (moving bus stop to side of road)
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/469765466
Here he has added goods=yes to a railway line. Is this correct?
On 3 Sep 2009, at 23:15, Mark Williams wrote:
David Earl wrote:
On 03/09/2009 14:53, Peter Miller wrote:
This looks like messing with a street and yahoo photography shows
it as going through a house. This appears to be straight forward
vandalism
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way
a reasonable chance of good weather on
at least one of those days.
Should we offer this as a little way of saying thank you to someone
who has done a lot of work for OSM to date?
If so, the who??? Suggestions please.
Regards,
Peter Miller
ITO World Ltd
[1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki
On 7 Sep 2009, at 00:00, Frankie Roberto wrote:
Thomas wrote:
I'm following the Be Bold motto, and am now uploading the remaining
NaPTAN counties that have been requested.
I'll probably do two or three at a time, following the list
alphabetically, possibly trying to avoid importing counties
Just to let you know that OpenStreetMap is hiring a plane and will be
taking aerial photography of Stratford-upon-Avon on this Thursday 10th
September at 3pm as long as the weather holds good. Is this a first
for the project??
It is of course a bit of an experiment as none of us are
On 10 Sep 2009, at 21:00, Mark Williams wrote:
Peter Miller wrote:
On 7 Sep 2009, at 00:00, Frankie Roberto wrote:
Thomas wrote:
I'm following the Be Bold motto, and am now uploading the
remaining
NaPTAN counties that have been requested.
I'll probably do two or three at a time
I did note there was a call for help with rectifying.
Are there any plans yet for how this will be done and where the
eventual outcome will be hosted?
2009/9/13 Dan Karran d...@karran.net:
2009/9/11 Peter Miller peter.mil...@itoworld.com:
JR is preparing the images at the moment and will start
On 13 Sep 2009, at 22:05, Frankie Roberto wrote:
2009/9/13 John Robert Peterson jrp@gmail.com
I'm not planning to put them all online in the short term -- while
flickr would be able ot hold all 10GB of data, it would be an almost
imposable ot access format.
The photos look great
I was lent 65 first-edition 1:500 OS maps of Ipswich dating back to
1882 a couple of days ago which I have now photographed and uploaded
to Flickr. I was surprised to find that there was no Flickr group of
out-of-copyright OS maps so I created it.
The rules I have created says that all
1 - 100 of 337 matches
Mail list logo
