Now mapped from the source to Bristol. Thanks to everyone who did part
of it and especially Steve Brook and Ed Loach for filling the gap near
Bewdley.
cheers
Richard
___
Talk-gb-westmidlands mailing list
Talk-gb-westmidlands@openstreetmap.org
On 08/07/2013 17:45, Andy Robinson wrote:
No schedule but I'd expect it to be a bit of an ad-hoc mapping party before
adjourning to the pub but if something more substantial gets organised
that's cool. We certainly would need:
1. A cake
Banbury Cake!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banbury_cake
On 04/04/2014 11:42, Brian Prangle wrote:
Hi everyone
Just had confirmation from Mike Sanderson of Tysoe Parish Council that
May 31st is the preferred date for their Mapping Party (refreshments
provided!) and publicity will be going out in the Parish Magazine
shortly. So book the date. Tysoe is
OJW wrote:
I'm also penciling-in a week of Devon/North Cornwall exploration in the
weekend of 31 August - 3rd September
Worth alerting Mike tracing NPE maps Calder? He's local:
http://www.guillemotdesign.org/
cheers
Richard
___
Talk-GB mailing
Tom Chance wrote:
I've just noticed someone doing very rapid and cool work around Dulwich Park,
which is cool! It would be good to co-ordinate a bit. Since it was done in
Potlach there are also bits that need cleaning up, which I'm happy to do in
JOSM, but I don't want to step on anyone's
Tom Chance wrote:
Here's the area, just have a look in JOSM:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=51.44551183981207lon=-0.077243376360124zoom=15
Problems I've found include:
1. Adding ways to existing nodes often doesn't work, resulting in two nodes
right next to each other. See, for example,
At the start of September, Simon Berry is cycling from Land's End to
John O'Groats entirely on the National Cycle Network.
He will be taking a GPS and has kindly agreed that OSM can use the
tracklogs. This should be an excellent boost for our NCN coverage.
More at http://www.gpscycle.com/ .
Jonathan Bennett wrote:
Does someone want to own up to mapping the northern Hindhead Tunnel
approach?
You can find out who mapped a section through the API:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/api/0.4/way/4945067/history
My first thought was that it must have been added by our resident
tunnel
Nick Whitelegg wrote:
The second edit was mine (i.e. I added the note) - so why hasn't my
username showed up?
Have you made your edits public?
cheers
Richard
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
(moved to talk-gb)
Andy Allan wrote:
I haven't tackled the concept of not-signed-but-nice-anyway routes -
so far I've been concentrating on routes signed by external agencies
How do you (or anyone else) think I should tag the National Byway?
(http://www.nationalbyway.org)
I'd really like
Andy Allan wrote:
OK, much as I'm loath to propose new tags from past experience on
the list, here's some suggestions.
[...]
Let me know which option you pick, and I'll get it into this week's map.
Thanks for the ideas. I've remembered how much I hate tagging discussions now.
Anyway.
I've
Via CARTO-SoC...
- Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 15:55:18 BST
From: Richard Peace [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello
I have been approached by leading cycle map
cartographers Cycle City Guides (see
www.cyclecityguides.co.uk
for moreinfo) to get
The nights are closing in and the weather's getting lousy... cycle
mapping after work isn't such an appealing option right now. So here's
a mapping project where you can survey with the heater on.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/WikiProject_United_Kingdom_A_Roads
The aim is to
Nick Whitelegg wrote:
The nights are closing in and the weather's getting lousy...
Is it? :-)
It is when you live part of the week on a boat and you only have a
little diesel stove to keep you warm!
cheers
Richard
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Russ (Justec) wrote:
Just want to clarify something - if a road is partially mapped, should it
be listed, with a note of which part is not mapped?
Yes, please do.
Kudos to the mapper who saw an A road on the list and went and mapped
it yesterday (you know who you are :) ).
cheers
Richard
(moved back to talk from talk-gb)
Nick Whitelegg wrote:
TBH I'd prefer highway=unsurfaced kept in - I use it extensively. Even
better though - and this is my own high horse :-) - we really need to sort
out highway for non-roads which at the moment is a mixture of physical
characteristics
Socks on IRC has just spotted Oxford has gone hi-res.
Any other additions?
cheers
Richard
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk-gb
Hello all,
I fancy going to map Worcester on Saturday 23rd Feb. Anyone else up
for it?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Worcester
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?
lat=52.1895lon=-2.2237zoom=13layers=B0FT
(lovely place, one of Britain's smaller cities, mainline trains from
London and
Stephen Coast wrote:
I'd rather not try to herd cats on the list in terms of dates, but
ideas for
locations appreciated.
http://giscussions.blogspot.com/2007/03/intellect.html
Anyone can map the UK, apparently there are 10 companies currently
mapping London (I know one, how many can you
Mike Paley wrote:
I see 'openstreetmap' already exists using 'funny' GPX files. For a
couple
of years now I've been thinking about 'OpenMapSource' - Garmin's
MapSource
type mapping but 'open' and created by Garmin users - or at least
those who
can create and handle GDB files.
Being
I've uploaded NPE tiles at zoom level 14 for the whole of Wales and
the Marches, plus two areas requested individually (Birmingham and
the Chilterns).
You can trace from them in Potlatch by making sure you're at zoom 14
(hover over the 'Edit' tab and check the URL if you're not sure),
Shaun McDonald wrote:
Why not do this for other layers, like Yahoo too?
Yes, there's a wider issue here and it's one I'm (not alone in)
considering at the moment.
Potlatch will before too long automatically add a tag showing what
background layer was in effect when you committed an edit.
Tim Sheerman-Chase wrote:
It may be worth reassembling the NPE map (from tiles or backup)
and retiling, it but it would be a big job! (The potlatch blog
mentioned anchor points and improving alignments...)
I'm plotting anchor points on 5km x 5km squares which is working
pretty well. You
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=55.4258lon=-2.6179zoom=12
...if anyone feels like reverting/deleting some, erm, creative
editing by a user called Applewatch.
Richard
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
80n wrote:
The username is Applewach not Applewatch.
By the look of it he/she/it uses both. Presumably the username
Arsehole was already taken.
cheers
Richard
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
Tom Hughes wrote:
The user in question is a new user, so I imagine this was an accident
rather than a deliberate attempt to annoy you Richard...
Damn, and there goes my conspiracy theory. I was convinced that it was
a deliberate attempt to ruin the area which I spent a week cycling
Andy Allan wrote:
Easy there Richard.
Heh, sorry, maybe I should smilify my e-mails a bit more. I'm not
really cross or vituperative, just in a fairly, erm, sour mood this
morning.
:) ;) :p :o8---- cut out and attach as deemed appropriate
cheers
Richard
Thomas Wood wrote:
Richard Fairhurst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have this really cool, unambiguously out-of-copyright map of London
with street names.
[...]
There's also one linked from [[London]], thats already been scanned
and tile-ified.
Indeed, that's a scan of one of my maps too
- Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Date: Tue, 6 May 2008 12:43:15 BST
From: David McNeill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [CARTO-SoC] 'Mapping London' - Royal Geographical Society
To: Multiple recipients of list CARTO-SOC [EMAIL
Just a quick note to observe that you can now use the OSM cycle map to
travel between the three capitals of Great Britain, give or take a
very few 100-yard lacunae:
- London-Edinburgh via NCN4 (-Reading), NCN5 (-Lichfield), NCN54
(-Derby), NCN68 (-near Berwick), NCN1
- London-Cardiff via
OJ W wrote:
Was that a hint that some bedford people need to start cycling towards
Bletchley?
:) Well, if you're volunteering... easy train transport back too, I
guess!
p.s. where does the other missing bit go approximately? From Sandy is
it north to Huntingdon?
Yes, I think so.
cheers
Andrew Chadwick (list subscriptions) wrote:
Never been there myself, but if it has space... I must do some
research on this, and try to pick somewhere with free WiFi. Didn't
someone on IRC mention another pub on the river that was supposed to
be quite decent (for cider at least)?
That would
Just to alert those who may not have seen it elsewhere - Potlatch now
has rectified NPE coverage (on zoom level 14) for the whole of the
Midlands, East Anglia and Wales, plus Cornwall and the Lakes.
cheers
Richard
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Steve Chilton wrote:
Thanks very much for that, excellent. Is there any particular reason why
there is a strip across the top end of the Lakes not included? Sheet
lines?
If it's a grey/black horizontal or vertical area between two sheets,
then it's probably an artefact of doing the sheets
Tim Dobson wrote:
Perhaps the people who are nearish the top of OSM, and I feel sheepish
that I don't really know who I'm talking about, might like to put
out a
pressrelease or press statement about how OSM is helping put *real*
maps back on the internet and allow cool mashups etc.
I'm
Richard Fairhurst wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7586789.stm
We're also in the Daily Mail (eek)[1]:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1050408/Is-satnav-turning-dunces-map-reading.html
cheers
Richard
[1] for our overseas readers, this is possibly the most reactionary
Nicholas Barnes wrote:
Am I being overly pedantic, or is there a /proper/ way of doing this?
A roundabout from which motorway slip-roads lead off is not a
motorway. The only exception is if there are no other roads there,
i.e. it's motorway-to-motorway only.
Otherwise, yes, it takes the
Nick Austin wrote:
Potlatch appears to sometimes show he wrong the map tile when I select
the out-of-copyright map as background.
For example looking to the North West of Wick St. Lawrence:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?lat=51.3916lon=-2.9228zoom=14
there is a misplaced tile from nearby
OJ W wrote:
Has anyone done an exporter to convert one of those NCN routes
(relations) to a GPX route that you can put on cheap GPS units for
anyone wishing to cycle a route without having to trust the signage?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Relations_to_GPX
writes it out to a
The Treasury published its review of Ordnance Survey yesterday. It's a
real damp squib.
As has been endlessly debated many times before, there's a lot of
stuff OSM can survey itself - well, most stuff, really - but the real
killer is things like boundary data, which is very difficult or
So how do we get some more publicity for OSM in the UK?
Here's one idea:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/travel/2009/may/24/cycle-holiday-britain-mike-carter
Do you have any tips for Mike about great campsites or interesting
BBs along the coast? Or perhaps you'd like to ride alongside him for
a
SteveC wrote:
Anyone fancy a mapping trip...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/scotland/highlands_and_islands/8175119.stm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St_Kilda,_Scotland http://osm.org/go/e4atZrr1-
The inlaws are going there in a few weeks (armed with binoculars -
it's fantastic for
James Davis wrote:
Whilst the actual junction has been completed, as far as I'm able
to tell the new route is very much 'proposed' and subject to
planning, and no firm route or timescale have been agreed
on. I'm not sure that this makes the sort of feature that should
be included yet. Are
To confirm: double track, southbound freight-only, northbound out-of-use
(there's track there but it's overgrown). I found a message from aforementioned
train driver on some Usenet archive somewhere:
On Nov 7, 8:47=A0pm, allan tracy wrote:
According to Gensheet, ECML rail services are
Peter Childs wrote:
Is it a good idea to remove the Live Change Feature in Potlatch
for everyone.
I'm thinking this is the cause for a lot of our problems.
I can't see why anyone would want it any more anyway. Its a
dangerous feature without a purpose.
*shrugs* You've already made
Frankie Roberto wrote:
Have copied chippy and RichardF in, in the hope that they can help us
connect things up.
Potlatch doesn't do WMS, it only does 900913 tiles (like OSM itself).
You specify them in this format:
http://tiles.mytileserver.org/directory/!/!/!.png
where !, !, ! are
Could someone in the Nottinghamshire area, or other area being edited by
RR8, tell me if his/her changes are still revert-worthy vandalism or has
he/she progressed to useful changes?
cheers
Richard
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
I get a much better alignment for that area with the re-rectified
NPE tiles
from TimSC's space at http://dev.openstreetmap.org/~timsc/wms2/map.php?
Yes, indeed, vastly better (and the images are clearer too, and the
tiles braking up problem isn't there). Even if I pan several tens of
Peter Miller wrote:
At a future meeting I would love to be able to recommend that they
print an OpenStreetMap.
I'm working on a web service that will create a PDF map on demand,
given a MapCSS stylesheet (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/MapCSS)
and a bounding box. It's only in its very
Peter Miller wrote:
I would certainly be interesting to see what they say.
The problem they will have is that we are asking them to release it
CCBYSA which would negate all their rights to it in future - as such
I think they will say 'no'.
It's a really interesting question - well, it is
Ed Loach wrote:
Why do we have to try and get multiple logos rendered on Mapnik,
rather than anyone who wants to use different renderings in a
specific area rendering their own? They have access to the data
after all.
Indeed. We shouldn't even be thinking of adding the LU roundel to the
andrew wrote:
The site where I downloaded my last one is not available. Where is
the most up to date source of the garmin gmapsupp.img with contours
available?
I used to have it on my dev.osm.org account, but the dev server changed
over and I haven't had chance to generate and upload a new
brenda cameron wrote:
The A495 runs from Oswestry to a junction with the A525 a mile or so
west of Whitchurch and is tagged as 'trunk'.Can anyone confirm that
this is correct?
Surprisingly so:
http://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/1478776 (note the end of a green sign)
brenda cameron wrote:
Having confirmed that the A495 is correctly tagged as 'trunk' I propose
adding another tag, 'bicycle=yes'.
The reason involves openmtbmap and perhaps other bicycle oriented maps. It
currently blocks all trunk roads to autorouting, while allowing primary
roads. The
It's at http://richard.dev.openstreetmap.org/garmin/gmapsupp.img
and it's a 271Mb file (including contours, etc. etc.). Freshly updated
from the latest Geofabrik planet excerpt.
How to install:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_Map_On_Garmin/Download
Technical details:
I haven't had chance to write my own response yet but am hoping to do
so this week.
It mostly looks promising and I'm delighted to see the suggested
vector releases. However IMO OS _shouldn't_ release 1:25k and 1:50k
colour rasters - better known as Explorer and Landranger respectively.
Hi all,
As threatened I've finished a response to the Ordnance Survey consultation:
http://www.systemeD.net/documents/os_consultation.pdf
For those without the appetite to read five pages of PDF, the summary is:
- Good news generally
- Releasing 1:25k and 1:50k rasters is not necessary and
Dave F. wrote:
I've had a quick look through your document in the limited time I've got.
The availability of raster cartography is not a barrier to innovation.
Could you expand on what you mean by that? Do you mean the availability
now, or after the consultation?
Availability now.
People
SteveC wrote:
Basically you're shamelessly protecting your own pretty small industry
What, magazine publishing? :p
Looking forward to your, and others', response to DCLG.
cheers
Richard
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
I wouldn't for a moment expect everyone to agree on the 1:25k and
1:50k stuff. That's ok, you have the right to be wrong grins, ducks
and runs
But, more seriously, I would draw your attention away from that and to
the point about the Ordnance Survey's aerial imagery:
- OS has good aerial
Steve Chilton wrote:
two nodes with waterway=lock_gate at either end of a way tagged
waterway=canal;lock=yes
and
single node with waterway=lock OR lock=yes (with lock-gates not
mapped)
These are definitely sensible. (I have a preference for the latter on
the UK canal system.)
I
Robert (Jamie) Munro wrote:
['oh' versus 'zero']
I agree that it's kind of wrong, but it is what is generally used in
road numbers, probably because it saves a syllable.
And because it can't be mistaken for 'seven'.
A few local ones:
A3400 = A three four-hundred
A6003 = A six double-oh three
On 05/03/2010 17:17, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 05/03/10 16:54, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
A3400 = A three four-hundred
I would probably say thirty four hundred for that.
It's an interesting question (well, ish). The three four hundred is
the most useful road from round these parts up towards
Gregory wrote:
On 8 March 2010 02:23, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
- *To complete the C2C*: Forest section near Keswick - the one gap in
our coverage of the NCN's most popular route!
The end of the mapped route is marked on the ground by some blood and
ambulance track marks
Someoneelse wrote:
Another North Midlands one that could do with checking is NCN54:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?relation=37545
OSM has the northern section of it marked as going all the way up
the High Peak Trail to meet the Tissington Trail and NCN68 as well
as turning left down
[posted to both talk-gb and josm-dev]
I'm a bit exasperated to see that the relation for National Cycle
Network route 4 has been broken _yet_ again:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/relation/2204
http://www.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/relation/2204/720
NCN 4 does of course
For those who don't live on Twitter:
The UK Government has just announced its decision on freeing Ordnance
Survey data. Full document is at
http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/corporate/pdf/1528263.pdf
Quick summary of what'll be released:
- medium-resolution vector data (Meridian2),
For anyone wanting to hack the OS data released today, I've posted a
very brief tutorial on extracting data from Meridian2 with Perl:
http://www.systemeD.net/blog/?p=182
cheers
Richard
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
We're generating StreetView tiles at the moment and some people have
already been tracing. :) Small hiccup in the generation process meant
that we've just had to restart (there were a couple of blank areas
appearing at 'sheet' boundaries) but it's going well.
OS have also just announced what
Chris Browet wrote:
I'm not too sure the reprojection from EPSG:27700 (OSGB36) to
EPSG:900913 (Google) went perfect.
If you're tracing from _any_ source without first aligning it with a
trustworthy ground reference (typically an average of existing GPS
tracks), You're Doing It Wrong.
Andrew Chadwick wrote:
I've had a degree of success with
http://search.cpan.org/~toby/Geo-Coordinates-OSGB-2.04/ - I've used
these packages in the past for rectification of OOC OS stuff and
conversion of many-figure OS grid refs with a good degree of success.
Chris knows this already
Andy Robinson wrote:
Might be cool to set up a Saturday mapping party and social combined
somewhere easy to reach and needing some mapping between London and
Birmingham. We could thrash out the bones of a UK chapter and see who's
interested in working on it over a beer or two.
Anyone want to
David Dixon wrote:
Apart from standardising the tagging, this would also add the Byway to
opencyclemap.
In the absence of dissent, I'll update as suggested so shout now if you
disagree!
As someone who's mapped lots of both the National Byway and the NCN -
disagree very very strongly.
The
On 08/05/2010 12:08, Sam Vekemans wrote:
+101 for rendering it brown, so its different than NCN, RCN, LCN
I can use it promote it for the 'Trans Canada Trail' as a 'exact
definition' as a leasure route with 'cycling being 1 activity, but
not designated for that 1 activity' mountain biking /
On 08/05/2010 13:43, Andy Allan wrote:
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 12:19 PM, Richard Fairhurstrich...@systemed.net
wrote:
Really, the National Byway is a fourth category: a leisure/touring
route. There are lots of these in OSM at the moment, but generally
tagged as LCN (for example, the Four
Someone seems to have decided to answer the question about how should
we tag the National Byway by deleting it. :(
In http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/4653538 , a vast number
of relations have been deleted - 66 or so. Among these are a bunch of
cycle routes - the National Byway
Marcus Thielking wrote:
It would be much appreciated if some of you could have a
look at www.skobbler.co.uk/osmbugs and tell us what
should be changed
Couple of thoughts:
It would be good if you were to open up your 'getbugs' API. Editors
could then talk directly to this.
If you were to
Robert Whittaker (OSM) wrote:
My understanding is that the current terms from OS are
incompatible with ODbL (in particular the part that allows
produced works to be released to the public domain).
This is a canard and I wish it would stop coming up. ODbL does _not_ say
that Produced Works
Robert Whittaker (OSM) wrote:
My reading of 4.3 is that you would have to tell people that the
image was derived from OSM and that the OSM database is
available under ODbL.
To comply with ODbL for data obtained from OSM, you have to at least provide
attribution to OSM.
That does not
Philipp Kandal wrote:
We have added the highlight=1 to the URL:
http://beta.skobbler.de/osmbugs/detail/sko-26462
OSM Link:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?lat=51.6178lon=-0.7115zoom=17highlight=1
Brilliant. I'll add something to Potlatch to cope with that later this week.
cheers
Richard
Peter Miller wrote:
I note that the OS data is CCBY not CCBYSA which may be relevant to
the issue, I don't know. I have also noted that the government
clearly wants the data to be used and is unlikely to sue, however the
Foundation have stated that they will remove all data that is
derived
Apologies for thread breakage - the otherwise excellent Nabble has fallen over.
All white-on-red numbered routes are National Routes and should be tagged with
ncn_ref (or the relation equivalent). This includes all the new three-figure
routes.
White-on-blue are Regional Routes. These are being
On 30 Jun 2010, at 19:47, Richard Mann richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com
wrote:
And just to confuse matters, Oxford has it's own local numbering (1-9
on blue backgrounds).
Yep. Several places have local networks (we tag them with lcn_ref) and it is
*really* confusing when they use blue
David Ellams wrote:
With one exception, the routes themselves are not
signed/marked (though they follow waymarked paths).
Don't tag them unless they're waymarked, _unless_ either they're proposed to
be waymarked (in which case you could do so with a state=proposed tag on
the relation), or
Phillip Barnett wrote:
Potlatch is still offering Opendata as a layer, with no warning as to the
potential problem vis a vis existing contributions. Shouldn't we be
dropping this rather quickly?
I like the we there - much better than the usual Richard. Really looking
forward to the patch to
Steve Doerr wrote:
No problem: once the bulk import has been done, a bulk delete
of any boundaries not derived from OS Opendata is done, so
there is no potential for conflict/duplication.
Er, no. If people want a carbon copy of OS OpenData, the OS download site is
that way.
Unlike OSM
Dave F. wrote:
I'm trying to understand the new license Contributor Terms and
how they stand when compared specifically with OS OpenData.
I'm after *facts* about the re-license as they're worded at the moment.
Blimey, can't imagine that catching on.
Trying to be as dispassionate as
Hi all,
There seems to be a bit of confusion on which cycle routes are tagged
as RCN (Regional) and which as LCN (Local).
I think, at first, the idea was that the three tags would correspond
to the three types of numbered routes in the UK: NCN for the National
Cycle Network (white
Ed Avis wrote:
Sure (if you accept that the street sign put up by the council is
more authoritative than the Ordnance Survey's database, which
actually I doubt).
A quick glance at the local OS map shows me a street name that anyone in the
town would know was wrong (Crawborough Road, should
Nick Whitelegg wrote:
I do this already to some extent but the only problem is that the
comments are linked to the path's OSM ID. Obviously if the path is
split, or deleted and redrawn, the OSM ID then becomes invalidated
so it's tricky to ensure that comments remain associated with the
Mike Harris wrote:
But bear in mind that a search on highway=footway would
perhaps miss most bridleways and byways that are
often also public rights of way.
Like I said, You'd obviously need to be slightly 'fuzzy' about it.
cheers
Richard
--
View this message in context:
Craig Loftus wrote:
I wasn't suggesting that Oxford was mapped using OpenData licensed
content.
I was actually using the visualisation with the understanding that there
was
a strong OSM community in Oxford and that the visualisation might
therefore
be used as a proxy measure of those who
Dave F. wrote:
It appears that it could be the volume of entities as when I pan in to
the centre from more rural areas it's fine until it reach densely
tagged areas. If I pan quick enough it's fine until the screen has
displayed the vast majority of ways.
Could one of you post a permalink to
Tim Francois wrote:
I case you haven't received one privately yet:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=potlatch2lat=51.46925lon=-2.60749zoom=17
Brilliant - thank you (and Dave) for that. There's some particular
data there which is causing P2 to throw an error. When I open it in
Flash
Dave F. wrote:
Hmm.. FYI as the problem seems to occur over most of Bristol I should
tell you I've been adding the residential areas to a multi-polygon
(Relation 1277566) Their number complexity (inner outer areas) have
grown considerably; maybe by too much.
Having had a brief look at it I
Richard Mann wrote:
But (unless I've missed something) that doesn't deal with the
issue that the CTs reserve the right to switch the data to
(amongst other things) a non-attribution licence at a future date.
Attribution is guaranteed by the Contributor Terms (section 4), which
continue
Richard Mann wrote:
Ah. So maybe I did miss something. Are those now the CTs I'm
agreeing to if I click the magic button?
I believe (I'm not on LWG) that the intention is to give them one more
tidying-up review and then make them live behind the magic button. I don't
think they're there yet.
Chris Moss wrote:
Shouldn't maps allow you to concentrate on whatever you're
interested in? Can someone please explain to me how or if
this can be done with openstreetmap?
It can certainly be done if you're prepared to put the effort in. Bear in
mind that OSM isn't really an end user map
Chris Saunter wrote:
2) Browser based viewer using javascript - this could be a
hybrid bitmap/vector renderer that annotates bitmap tiles
FWIW Potlatch 2's renderer, Halcyon, is fully stylable (using MapCSS) and
also exists as a stand-alone SWF applet that you can simply drop into any
Andy Robinson wrote:
Richard, have you got (or know of) an example of this which is up and
running and accessible somewhere?
There's an old old version at http://www.geowiki.com/halcyon/ . I'll
try and put a new version up this weekend.
cheers
Richard
1 - 100 of 396 matches
Mail list logo
