Forgive me if I don't go around measuring the true height of each
bridge. (That's before we come to arched bridges.)
Yes, the heights are advisory, but both are useful and I feel both
should be tagged. I don't believe I should be the one making the
decision on how to deal with dual signage; I
On Sun, Jun 07, 2009 at 11:14:47AM +0100, Richard Bullock wrote:
Well that's different. If there genuinely are two different signs - then you
would have to tag both. The legal situation might also be technically
slightly unclear.
So you would have one style of tagging in the UK, and a
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Richard Bullockrb...@cantab.net wrote:
Similarly 40mph is exactly equal to 64.37376 km/h
50mph is exactly equal to 80.4672 km/h
60mph is exactly equal to 96.56064 km/h
etc.
Where there is one sign only - it makes absolutely no difference whether you
tag as
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Richard Bullockrb...@cantab.net wrote:
Similarly 40mph is exactly equal to 64.37376 km/h
50mph is exactly equal to 80.4672 km/h
60mph is exactly equal to 96.56064 km/h
etc.
Where there is one sign only - it makes absolutely no difference whether
you
tag
4 matches
Mail list logo
