Hi,
User Gavaasuren has been adding a series of imaginary footpaths over
the last few weeks, each with the changeset comment zwischen
Fußgängerzonen und Straßen Fußweg erstellt. What they seem to be doing
is joining pedestrian islands to random nearby roads in order to
resolve routing
I have already notified tye data working group. The user was contacted, his
imaginary work was not reverted and he was not blocked, he continues to add
complete junk from his armchair. He needs to be stopped.
On 18 August 2014 10:59:22 GMT+01:00, SomeoneElse li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk
wrote:
On 18/08/14 10:59, SomeoneElse wrote:
Whilst the existance of a highway=pedestrian area that isn't connected
is an indication of something, it's usually just an indication of that
mapping in a particular area is not complete.
Considering the longer term problems:
1) There needs to be better
On 18/08/14 11:41, David Woolley wrote:
Considering the longer term problems:
1) There needs to be better guidance to routing software
developers on how to route when there are parallel
features accessible on foot;
Agreed. The things that give our routing engine problems are:
- dual
Hi David,
Most of these problems are issues for a router for interpreting OSM data,
rather than specific problems for the data.
There are plenty of examples of people building routers for people with
restricted mobility using OSM data (for instance wheelchair users, blind
people etc). Most of us
On 18/08/14 12:15, SK53 wrote:
There are plenty of examples of people building routers for people with
restricted mobility using OSM data (for instance wheelchair users, blind
people etc). Most of us will map steps on footways simply because even
one step acts as a barrier to wheelchair users or
6 matches
Mail list logo
