At 12:32 10/02/2011, Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) wrote:
Henry Gomersall [mailto:h...@cantab.net] wrote:
Sent: 10 February 2011 11:07 AM
To: Peter Miller
Cc: Talk GB
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Incorrect use of OS VectorMap District when mapping?
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 10:30 +, Peter Miller
phillip.barn...@itn.co.uk
WWW.ITN.CO.UK
Please consider the environment. Do you really need to print this email?
-Original Message-
From: Michael Collinson [mailto:m...@ayeltd.biz]
Sent: 09 March 2011 11:57
To: 'Talk GB'
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Incorrect use of OS VectorMap District when mapping
On 09/03/2011 11:57, Michael Collinson wrote:
At 12:32 10/02/2011, Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) wrote:
Henry Gomersall [mailto:h...@cantab.net] wrote:
Sent: 10 February 2011 11:07 AM
To: Peter Miller
Cc: Talk GB
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Incorrect use of OS VectorMap District when
mapping
of OS VectorMap District
when mapping?
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 10:30 +, Peter Miller wrote:
On reflection possibly we should use river-bank as that has more
information in it, but recommend that anyone importing does a 'bridge
cleanup' at the same time.
This is an area I'm actually really
-lists) wrote:
Henry Gomersall [mailto:h...@cantab.net] wrote:
Sent: 10 February 2011 11:07 AM
To: Peter Miller
Cc: Talk GB
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Incorrect use of OS VectorMap District when
mapping?
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 10:30 +, Peter Miller wrote:
On reflection possibly we should
: [Talk-GB] Incorrect use of OS VectorMap District when mapping?
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 10:30 +, Peter Miller wrote:
On reflection possibly we should use river-bank as that has more
information in it, but recommend that anyone importing does a 'bridge
cleanup' at the same time.
This is an area
On 9 February 2011 18:42, Jason Cunningham jamicu...@googlemail.com wrote:
OS VectorMap District is an excellent source of data for features like
streams and woodland, but these layers of data tend to be a bit of a mess
and need to be stitched together as part of a method in importing into
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 10:30 +, Peter Miller wrote:
Personally I would prefer a single linear way for streams rather than
the area 'river-bank' approach which the OS use
The 'river-bank' approach has been exceptionally useful to me at times
when trying to micro-navigate. Why would it ever be
On 10 February 2011 10:35, Henry Gomersall h...@cantab.net wrote:
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 10:30 +, Peter Miller wrote:
Personally I would prefer a single linear way for streams rather than
the area 'river-bank' approach which the OS use
The 'river-bank' approach has been exceptionally
Peter Miller wrote:
however the most important thing is for water features to be
continuous under bridges
Absolutely. Otherwise some of OSM's resident under-bridge-dwellers might be
misled into thinking there was no water, fall in and drown. And we wouldn't
want that!
cheers
Richard
--
Hi,
On 02/10/11 11:35, Henry Gomersall wrote:
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 10:30 +, Peter Miller wrote:
Personally I would prefer a single linear way for streams rather than
the area 'river-bank' approach which the OS use
The 'river-bank' approach has been exceptionally useful to me at times
On 10/02/2011 10:30, Peter Miller wrote:
Personally I would prefer a single linear way for streams rather than
the area 'river-bank' approach which the OS use...
Ideally it should be mapped with both:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Driverbank
Cheers
Dave F.
Henry Gomersall [mailto:h...@cantab.net] wrote:
Sent: 10 February 2011 11:07 AM
To: Peter Miller
Cc: Talk GB
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Incorrect use of OS VectorMap District when mapping?
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 10:30 +, Peter Miller wrote:
On reflection possibly we should use river-bank
On 09/02/2011 20:27, Kevin Peat wrote:
Hi Jason,
I am the mapper (user:devonshire) who imported the woods in your first
example around Dartmouth but it was last May so not exactly recently.
The woods that are there now are a lot better than the NPE traced ones
that we had before. I took the
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 11:32 +, Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists)
wrote:
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 10:30 +, Peter Miller wrote:
On reflection possibly we should use river-bank as that has more
information in it, but recommend that anyone importing does a
'bridge
cleanup' at the same
OS VectorMap District is an excellent source of data for features like
streams and woodland, but these layers of data tend to be a bit of a mess
and need to be stitched together as part of a method in importing into OSM.
eg Streams will end when they meet a bridge, then reappear the other side of
Hi Jason,
I am the mapper (user:devonshire) who imported the woods in your first
example around Dartmouth but it was last May so not exactly recently. The
woods that are there now are a lot better than the NPE traced ones that we
had before. I took the view at the time that importing the
17 matches
Mail list logo
