Re: [Talk-GB] Legible London signs - tagging suggestions

2017-01-10 Thread Robert Skedgell
On Tuesday, 10 January 2017 21:46:53 GMT Steve Doerr wrote: > On 10/01/2017 07:54, Robert Skedgell wrote: > > ref=legible_london > > I don't understand the rationale for this as a 'ref'. Refs are normally > unique identifiers for a particular object (unique within a particular > domain, that

Re: [Talk-GB] Legible London signs - tagging suggestions

2017-01-10 Thread Steve Doerr
On 10/01/2017 07:54, Robert Skedgell wrote: ref=legible_london I don't understand the rationale for this as a 'ref'. Refs are normally unique identifiers for a particular object (unique within a particular domain, that is). Thus each sign would have a different ref, if there were

Re: [Talk-GB] Legible London signs - tagging suggestions

2017-01-10 Thread Andy Allan
On 10 January 2017 at 15:55, SK53 wrote: > I was going to say that usually we have the atco code in ref for bus stops > with the more visible stop C in local ref, and thus bus stops aren't the > perfect example. I certainly wouldn't tell someone to wait at bus stop > 3390V1

Re: [Talk-GB] Legible London signs - tagging suggestions

2017-01-10 Thread Dan S
2017-01-10 16:37 GMT+00:00 Andy Mabbett : > On 10 January 2017 at 07:54, Robert Skedgell wrote: > >> ref=legible_london Yeah, I agree this isn't the way "ref=" is normally used > I'd expect to see something like: > >

Re: [Talk-GB] Legible London signs - tagging suggestions

2017-01-10 Thread Andy Mabbett
On 10 January 2017 at 07:54, Robert Skedgell wrote: > ref=legible_london I'd expect to see something like: operator=legible_london or, say: operator=GLA scheme=legible_london -- Andy Mabbett @pigsonthewing http://pigsonthewing.org.uk

Re: [Talk-GB] Legible London signs - tagging suggestions

2017-01-10 Thread Robert Skedgell
;r...@hubris.org.uk> Cc: Talk-GB <talk-gb@openstreetmap.org> Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Legible London signs - tagging suggestions On 10 January 2017 at 07:54, Robert Skedgell <r...@hubris.org.uk> wrote: > ref=legible_london I would only use the ref= tag if there is a refe

Re: [Talk-GB] Legible London signs - tagging suggestions

2017-01-10 Thread SK53
On 10 January 2017 at 15:10, Andy Allan wrote: > > Think of it like bus stops (ref=C) or road numbers (ref=A204). Would > it make sense if I was to render a map with an icon for the > information point, with the reference shown underneath? > > Thanks, > Andy > > I was

Re: [Talk-GB] Legible London signs - tagging suggestions

2017-01-10 Thread Andy Allan
On 10 January 2017 at 07:54, Robert Skedgell wrote: > ref=legible_london I would only use the ref= tag if there is a reference code for each installation, e.g. if the totem has a displayed reference like "A01" designed for users to see. From the pictures I don't

Re: [Talk-GB] Legible London signs - tagging suggestions

2017-01-10 Thread Robert Skedgell
--- Original message From: David Groom <revi...@pacific-rim.net> Date: 10/01/2017 10:59 (GMT+00:00) To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Legible London signs - tagging suggestions Not quite sure what you had in mind by the tags map_type and map_size, but

Re: [Talk-GB] Legible London signs - tagging suggestions

2017-01-10 Thread David Groom
--- Original Message -- From: "Robert Skedgell" <r...@hubris.org.uk> To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org Sent: 10/01/2017 07:54:41 Subject: [Talk-GB] Legible London signs - tagging suggestions Does anyone have any suggestions for tagging nodes for the Legible London signs/map

[Talk-GB] Legible London signs - tagging suggestions

2017-01-09 Thread Robert Skedgell
Does anyone have any suggestions for tagging nodes for the Legible London signs/maps (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legible_London and https:// tfl.gov.uk/info-for/boroughs/maps-and-signs )? Perhaps: tourism=information information=map map_type=street