Ah thank you, that explains it!
Although I couldn't find any previous talk on the matter, but did find the
relevant potlatch commit diff
Looks fine to me
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/57.1752/-2.1234=G
A cock-up in JOSM? Report it to them.
On 14/11/2018 17:09, Silent Spike wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm editing this area
(https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/57.17591/-2.12320) in JOSM and
the GPS data in the area contains
No that's the effect of us (correctly) anonymising the order of points
in private and public traces.
Potlatch has been fixed to handle it but JOSM hasn't (yet).
See previous talk thread for more.
Tom
On 14/11/2018 17:33, Paul Berry wrote:
It could be obfuscated Strava logs or something like
It could be obfuscated Strava logs or something like that. Would explain
the deliberate lack of timestamps and a high use of footpaths/towpaths (for
those out running) rather than roads.
Regards,
*Paul*
On Wed, 14 Nov 2018 at 17:11, Silent Spike wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm editing this area (
>
Hi folks,
I'm editing this area (
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/57.17591/-2.12320) in JOSM and the
GPS data in the area contains some traces uploaded which look like spam
(loads of horizontal lines which seem to form the shape of the river and
other features).
I'm unsure of the extent of
5 matches
Mail list logo
