Hi Nicolas,
Dutch is already available for that video. There is no real difference
between written Dutch and Flemish.
Are there other videos that don't have Dutch translations yet?
Polyglot
2011/6/23 Nicolas Pettiaux nico...@pettiaux.be
Dear
I have translated to French the subtitle of
On 23 June 2011 03:55, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 9:01 PM, Markus Lindholm
markus.lindh...@gmail.com wrote:
But there's no need to store them on the client, as all users have to
log in the preferences can be stored server-side. Atleast I throw away
all
I do not have the (dutch) law at hand, do you?, but I believed this
was for tracking cookies and third party cookies only.
I suppose that the full implementation of this
directive/law requires browser interaction and ultimately
intervention by MS/Google/Mozilla and others.
Firefox has a number
On 22/06/2011 21:22, Mike Dupont wrote:
did you see this?
http://www.archive.org/download/SharedMap2/index.html
That's nice. Just a thought: shouldn't there be some sort of attribution?
--
Steve
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
On 23 June 2011 18:41, Steve Doerr doerr.step...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22/06/2011 21:22, Mike Dupont wrote:
did you see this?
http://www.archive.org/download/SharedMap2/index.html
That's nice. Just a thought: shouldn't there be some sort of attribution?
The attribution was put into the JS
The attribution was put into the JS file, but I'm looking into why
that doesn't display.
I'm no expert, but see
http://dev.openlayers.org/docs/files/OpenLayers/Control/Attribution-
js.html
your map seems to be lacking one in the var map declaration.
Ed
On 23 June 2011 18:41, Steve Doerr doerr.step...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22/06/2011 21:22, Mike Dupont wrote:
did you see this?
http://www.archive.org/download/SharedMap2/index.html
That's nice. Just a thought: shouldn't there be some sort of attribution?
I just noticed that osm.org is missing
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 2:29 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
SomeoneElse wrote:
Odd. zoom in to the dizzy heights of 16 (in Denmark WA FWIW) and you get
picture coming soon. I picked Denmark because it's somewhere that I've
been and added stuff (to OSM, but would also
On 23 June 2011 12:50, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23 June 2011 18:41, Steve Doerr doerr.step...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22/06/2011 21:22, Mike Dupont wrote:
did you see this?
http://www.archive.org/download/SharedMap2/index.html
That's nice. Just a thought: shouldn't there be
The license on archive.org and all metadata is in a standard place,
http://www.archive.org/details/SharedMap2
It can be updated at any time, seems that the sources are not stated.
mike
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 10:41 AM, Steve Doerr doerr.step...@gmail.comwrote:
On 22/06/2011 21:22, Mike Dupont
John Smith wrote:
The attribution was put into the JS file, but I'm looking into why
that doesn't display.
You probably need a DG file instead.
cheers
Richard
--
View this message in context:
2011-06-23 John Smith:
On 23 June 2011 18:41, Steve Doerr doerr.step...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22/06/2011 21:22, Mike Dupont wrote:
did you see this?
http://www.archive.org/download/SharedMap2/index.html
That's nice. Just a thought: shouldn't there be some sort of attribution?
I just
On 23 June 2011 21:00, Matt Williams li...@milliams.com wrote:
No it isn't. There's a 'Copyright License' link in the sidebar on the left.
Nice and obscure...
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On 23 June 2011 21:15, Tobias Knerr o...@tobias-knerr.de wrote:
No, it isn't. It has the attribution right there on the Copyright
License link.
Unlike every other map site out there where the main attribution is at
the bottom right side of the map.
The Demo archive.org Tile Hosting map, on
2011-06-23 John Smith:
On 23 June 2011 21:15, Tobias Knerr o...@tobias-knerr.de wrote:
No, it isn't. It has the attribution right there on the Copyright
License link.
Unlike every other map site out there where the main attribution is at
the bottom right side of the map.
Maybe you just
Steve Coast wrote:
80n wrote:
A: We will definitely stop using OSM as soon as OSM switches to ODbL
for it's output.
Q: Now when will that be?
Personally I hope as soon as possible. I suspect it will be nice to give
you 'no' guys some time to reconsider, as some already have.
On 23 June 2011 21:47, Tobias Knerr o...@tobias-knerr.de wrote:
Maybe you just don't know enough maps - there are plenty that list
attribution elsewhere. This includes lots of maps for mobile devices
(because these happen to have limited screen space), but also maps that
use multiple sources
On Thursday 23 June 2011, John Smith wrote:
The data is rendered from FOSM data.
Which is 100% sourced from OpenStreetMap data.
robert.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On 23 June 2011 21:53, Robert Scott li...@humanleg.org.uk wrote:
On Thursday 23 June 2011, John Smith wrote:
The data is rendered from FOSM data.
Which is 100% sourced from OpenStreetMap data.
I'm told there is at least 500 changesets not from OSM...
Hi,
On 06/23/2011 01:51 PM, Graham Stewart (GrahamS) wrote:
So in theory, while in this interim stage, we could stop providing any new
data as CC-by-SA and instead offer a frozen CC-by-SA planet dump, with all
work since that freeze available as an additional ODbL diff?
Legal subtleties are
Hi,
On 06/23/2011 01:53 PM, Robert Scott wrote:
Which is 100% sourced from OpenStreetMap data.
I understand that it is also possible to upload original content to
fosm.org, so you're probalby talking about less than 100%. 99.999% or so ;)
Bye
Frederik
On 23 June 2011 21:53, Robert Scott li...@humanleg.org.uk wrote:
On Thursday 23 June 2011, John Smith wrote:
The data is rendered from FOSM data.
Which is 100% sourced from OpenStreetMap data.
I find this ironic, if not out right amusing, OSM-F tries to hide any
kind of attribution, yet you
Frederik Ramm wrote:
Legal subtleties are best discussed on legal-talk. If you care to make
your suggestion there, I'd be willing to point out why it doesn't work ;)
Fair enough Frederik, if it's a legal subtlety then I probably don't want to
know! :)
But I do feel slightly uncomfortable
On 23 June 2011 22:20, Graham Stewart (GrahamS) gra...@dalmuti.net wrote:
But I do feel slightly uncomfortable that my edits, which I've now agreed
should be licensed under ODbL, can currently be used by fosm to build a
CC-by-SA competitor project which aims to divide our community.
Erm how is
But I do feel slightly uncomfortable that my edits, which I've now agreed
should be licensed under ODbL, can currently be used by fosm to build a
CC-by-SA competitor project which aims to divide our community.
The community has always been clear that the continuation of OSM
with with a new
ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen wrote:
The rotten thing here is that the ODBL fork has hijacked the domain name
and
servers, because of mainly because a majority let them do it.
That is an odd way of saying the the majority is always right, and if
wrong
they are
Hi,
On 06/23/2011 02:42 PM, ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen
The rotten thing here is that the ODBL fork has hijacked the domain name and
servers, because of mainly because a majority let them do it.
That's half as bad. Imagine that happening after country-wide
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 8:42 PM, ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert
Gremmen g.grem...@cetest.nl wrote:
The rotten thing here is that the ODBL fork has hijacked the domain name and
servers, because of mainly because a majority let them do it.
So I feel it very unfair to call the
ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen wrote:
Regards,
Ing. Gert Gremmen, BSc
Hey, cool. This is fun. Can we all join in?
cheers
Richard Fairhurst, MA (Cantab)
--
View this message in context:
On Thursday 23 June 2011, John Smith wrote:
On 23 June 2011 21:53, Robert Scott li...@humanleg.org.uk wrote:
On Thursday 23 June 2011, John Smith wrote:
The data is rendered from FOSM data.
Which is 100% sourced from OpenStreetMap data.
I'm told there is at least 500 changesets not
On Thursday 23 June 2011, John Smith wrote:
On 23 June 2011 21:53, Robert Scott li...@humanleg.org.uk wrote:
On Thursday 23 June 2011, John Smith wrote:
The data is rendered from FOSM data.
Which is 100% sourced from OpenStreetMap data.
I find this ironic, if not out right amusing,
On 24 June 2011 01:02, Robert Scott li...@humanleg.org.uk wrote:
Nearly all of the data was generated by OpenStreetMap contributors under the
OpenStreetMap flag, so I think the attribution should be mostly to
OpenStreetMap.
For starters you are confusing OSM contributors with OSM-F who
@Eugene
Please do not extend the discussion with incompatible examples.
My example fits exactly the description of what is called
forking:
Try
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fork_%28software_development%29
http://meatballwiki.org/wiki/RightToFork
@Graham,
My reaction was just against the
On Thursday 23 June 2011, John Smith wrote:
On 24 June 2011 01:02, Robert Scott li...@humanleg.org.uk wrote:
Nearly all of the data was generated by OpenStreetMap contributors under
the OpenStreetMap flag, so I think the attribution should be mostly to
OpenStreetMap.
For starters you
On 24 June 2011 01:27, Robert Scott li...@humanleg.org.uk wrote:
So - what, you're saying we should be doing the whole
list-ten-thousand-names-in-the-corner thing? I don't understand - what's your
point?
My point is, why should other sites be forced into attribution even
OSM-F isn't willing
On Thursday 23 June 2011, ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen wrote:
@Eugene
Please do not extend the discussion with incompatible examples.
My example fits exactly the description of what is called
forking:
Try
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fork_%28software_development%29
2011-06-23 John Smith:
Which is derived from OpenStreetMap data. Therefore, the tiles are
ultimately derived from OpenStreetMap data, too. Quoting CC BY-SA 2.0:
As you said yourself above it's not reasonable to expect a lengthy
attribution, especially when dealing with small screens, such as
On 24 June 2011 01:41, Robert Scott li...@humanleg.org.uk wrote:
So because people have decided to start a voluntary project, they have to be
answerable to absolutely everybody... everywhere... ever? No matter how
unreasonable or logically warped they are (no names mentioned)? Everyone gets
On 24 June 2011 01:49, Tobias Knerr o...@tobias-knerr.de wrote:
2011-06-23 John Smith:
Which is derived from OpenStreetMap data. Therefore, the tiles are
ultimately derived from OpenStreetMap data, too. Quoting CC BY-SA 2.0:
As you said yourself above it's not reasonable to expect a lengthy
John Smith:
On 24 June 2011 01:49, Tobias Knerr o...@tobias-knerr.de wrote:
2011-06-23 John Smith:
Which is derived from OpenStreetMap data. Therefore, the tiles are
ultimately derived from OpenStreetMap data, too. Quoting CC BY-SA 2.0:
As you said yourself above it's not reasonable to
On 24 June 2011 02:00, Tobias Knerr o...@tobias-knerr.de wrote:
There are two plausible legal interpretations:
- the original author is OpenStreetMap
- the original author are a lot of individuals
You left off companies that have donated data.
No matter which interpretation you choose, your
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Op 23-06-11 17:41, Robert Scott schreef:
Yet people somehow still know what Linux is and where to get it,
because it tends to center itself around where all the competent
people are.
Now think this in BSD perspective. And ask yourself how your
2011-06-23 John Smith:
I'm not interested in talking about OSMF's legal choices with you.
Oh so it's a case of do as I say, not as I do...
No, it's a case of don't feed the troll.
If someone else still reads this thread and is honestly interested in
related legal matters, I suggest to open
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 11:22 PM, ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert
Gremmen g.grem...@cetest.nl wrote:
@Eugene
Please do not extend the discussion with incompatible examples.
My example fits exactly the description of what is called
forking:
Try
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 11:49 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
Every open source project I can think of has a fixed set of principals
by which the code will be licensed under, and the license defines the
sort of people that will join and help out, those requiring you to
sign
On 24 June 2011 02:36, Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com wrote:
1. Signing your rights away is not necessarily a bad thing. (The FSF
asks you to do exactly that when contributing to GNU software
projects, for good reasons, though others may rightfully disagree.)
2. Anyway, the OSM CT does
On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 20:50 +1000, John Smith wrote:
On 23 June 2011 18:41, Steve Doerr doerr.step...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22/06/2011 21:22, Mike Dupont wrote:
did you see this?
http://www.archive.org/download/SharedMap2/index.html
That's nice. Just a thought: shouldn't there be some
2011/6/23 Tobias Knerr o...@tobias-knerr.de:
If you distribute [...] any Derivative Works or Collective Works, You
must keep intact all copyright notices for the Work and give the
Original Author credit reasonable to the medium or means [...].
-- Tobias Knerr
I understand from this that the
On 24 June 2011 04:14, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
I pointed this out once and the response was that osm.org doesnt need
attribution because there is a logo in the top-left corner.
I guess the same logic could be applied here, since the name
'OpenStreetMap' is on the fosm.org
On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 17:22 +0200, ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert
Gremmen wrote:
@Eugene
Please do not extend the discussion with incompatible examples.
My example fits exactly the description of what is called
forking:
Try
David Murn schrieb:
Now, say half a dozen developers decided to take the GPL codebase, call
it FreeLinux and continue development, while encouraging anyone who ever
contributed to the project under GPL and wants to continue using that
licence, to come over to their project.
If they wouldn't
On 24 June 2011 04:43, Robert Kaiser ka...@kairo.at wrote:
That said, I'm happy about FOSM, if I ever become a resident of the US and
that legal opinion on this matter still holds up, I might pull its data and
provide it under PD myself.
Unlikely, maps were the first thing to be protected
On 6/22/2011 5:16 PM, David Murn wrote:
On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 16:25 -0700, Steve Coast wrote:
Well there's one other aspect which is there are chunks of data only
available to OpenStreetMap and nobody else.
Does the data exclusively available under the ODbL outweigh the data
exclusively
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 5:35 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
You seem to be the one disrupting things, as far as I'm concerned I
attributed to FOSM who in turn attributes their sources.
+1 there is a chain of attribution. All the data is available, fosm includes
osm data so it
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com wrote:
Uh huh. So I suppose if there were a successful plebiscite in a
country wanting to change their form of government from presidential
to parliamentary (or vice versa) then that's a rotten thing unless the
winning side
Nic Roets wrote:
But I also don't know why you three compare the license change
to ordinary democratic processes. It's much closer to what's
been happening in the Arab States this year.
ticks off 'Godwin' on the Hyperbole Bingo card
cheers
Richard
--
View this message in context:
Nic,
Nic Roets wrote:
A modern democratic government would have found a way to defuse the
situation long ago.
I've actually thought about that for quite a while and came to the
conclusion that the problems we're seeing are probably due to OSM being
such an unstructured, little-governed
This discussion makes me sad.
My personal motivation in life is : everybody should live in freedom
. Derived from this:
alternatives are good, monopoly is bad
fosm; I embrace the initiative, but you have a lot of marketing to
do if you want people to come to FOSM. A website with broken links,
2011-06-23 M∡rtin Koppenhoefer:
2011/6/23 Tobias Knerr o...@tobias-knerr.de:
If you distribute [...] any Derivative Works or Collective Works, You
must keep intact all copyright notices for the Work and give the
Original Author credit reasonable to the medium or means [...].
I understand
John Smith schrieb:
On 24 June 2011 04:43, Robert Kaiserka...@kairo.at wrote:
That said, I'm happy about FOSM, if I ever become a resident of the US and
that legal opinion on this matter still holds up, I might pull its data and
provide it under PD myself.
Unlikely, maps were the first thing
Frederik Ramm schrieb:
I've actually thought about that for quite a while and came to the
conclusion that the problems we're seeing are probably due to OSM being
such an unstructured, little-governed project.
Hey, I've been saying this for weeks! (Not in here, though...) ;-)
I indeed believe
John Smith wrote:
Unlikely, maps were the first thing to be protected under copyright
Um, no. The first thing to be protected by copyright was an Old Irish
psalter. Is and gabais Fergus dóib daur mór ro-boí for lár ind liss assa
frénaib, etc.
cheers
Richard
--
View this message in context:
On Thursday 23 June 2011, John Smith wrote:
More importantly, if fosm is so much more legitimate and important than
OpenStreetMap, why are you still over here taking a dump on our list?
You're the one making a big song and dance about things.
I wouldn't say I'm making a song and dance
On 23 June 2011 16:52, Nic Roets nro...@gmail.com wrote:
It's much closer to what's been
happening in the Arab States this year:
There are at least two big difference between revolutions in the Maghreb and
Arab Countries, and the License discussion inside OSM.
In this mailing lists it
Current thinking is to use a separate account for bulk imports.
Occasionally things go wrong and its easier to roll back under a separate
account. Having said that when the import is merged with existing data in
JOSM then uploaded things become not so black and white.
In general with the new CT
Hi all.
OpenStreetMap came through the scheduled maintenance on 23 June in
great shape.
We should all thank the sysadmin team for making the server move
happen. Grant, Andy and Harry were all on site at one or both ends of
the move. Andy's friend Mark helped out as well on site. Tom was
Quick update. The maintenance has been completed. All services are up
and running again.
API + www.openstreetmap.org is running a little slower than normal due
to reduced capacity, but will return to normal late Friday afternoon
(GMT).
/ Grant
On 9 June 2011 21:17, Grant Slater
On 24 June 2011 02:45, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
OpenStreetMap came through the scheduled maintenance on 23 June in
great shape.
Pictures or it didn't happen!
http://www.flickr.com/photos/harrywood/5863059620/in/photostream
I actually have a bone to pick. I was going to try and do some
maintenance on a box here at home while the OSM servers were down in
the hopes that my replication setup wouldn't get so far behind. But
because they got things done quicker than the advertised 12 hours, I
didn't have a chance to get
mappers in NZ have recently imported a lot of grass airstrips into
OSM. it appears the airstrips only render at zoom 10 on the mapnik
render of the map at osm.org, which looks like this:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=-37.243lon=175.014zoom=10layers=M
is there any particular reason for this,
On 24 June 2011 07:39, Robert Kaiser ka...@kairo.at wrote:
Well, it has been stated multiple times that it was a lawyer opinion that
Francis Davey, who also claims to be a lawyer, gave an opposite opinion.
CC-BY-SA didn't apply to our data, and factual databases aren't protected by
Which is a
On 24 June 2011 08:49, Julio Costa Zambelli
julio.co...@openstreetmap.cl wrote:
On 23 June 2011 16:52, Nic Roets nro...@gmail.com wrote:
It's much closer to what's been
happening in the Arab States this year:
There are at least two big difference between revolutions in the Maghreb and
Arab
On 23 June 2011 23:58, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
So you quote one line and fail to point out what falsities I'm making.
So that is what my message was all about? Thanks for clarifying it to me...
___
talk mailing list
On 24 June 2011 14:32, Julio Costa Zambelli
julio.co...@openstreetmap.cl wrote:
On 23 June 2011 23:58, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
So you quote one line and fail to point out what falsities I'm making.
So that is what my message was all about? Thanks for clarifying it to me...
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 11:17 PM, Milo van der Linden m...@dogodigi.netwrote:
fosm; I embrace the initiative, but you have a lot of marketing to
do if you want people to come to FOSM. A website with broken links, no
information about who initiated the fork or any insight about the who,
why
On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 11:28 PM, Zsombor Szabó zsom...@gmail.com wrote:
Wasn't expecting so poor reception on behalf of the OSM community. No
one commented on the idea of sharing and checking into OSM places on
Twitter with OpenMaps for iOS to increase OSM awareness.
Does this mean that you
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Arun Ganesh arun.plane...@gmail.com wrote:
There's some great news, I just received an email from Dr Harish (Scientist
at NRSA) that the WMS service for India's landuse data is now live [1]. I
Excellent!!!
tried it out in JOSM and works great.
How to have it
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 3:04 PM, H.S.Rai h...@raiandrai.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Arun Ganesh arun.plane...@gmail.com
wrote:
There's some great news, I just received an email from Dr Harish
(Scientist
at NRSA) that the WMS service for India's landuse data is now live
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Arun Ganesh arun.plane...@gmail.com wrote:
* Login to http://applications.nrsc.gov.in/query.asp
OK
The site displays:
This site is best viewed in Internet Explorer 5.0 and above. Please do
not use pop-up blocker to access this web site..
Sad ti read.
* Copy
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 4:31 PM, H.S.Rai h...@raiandrai.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Arun Ganesh arun.plane...@gmail.com
wrote:
* Login to http://applications.nrsc.gov.in/query.asp
OK
The site displays:
This site is best viewed in Internet Explorer 5.0 and above. Please
Il 23/06/2011 00:52, Jeawrong ha scritto:
Ho scaricato il file dell'Italia da geofabrik e dato in pasto a Garmux 1.3,
ma (come per le precedenti versioni) mi crea la cartella IMG-OSM-italy ma al
suo interno non trovo nulla.
Non posso effettuare la prova con mkgmap estraendo il file dall'archivio
Direi a questo punto che si tratta di un problema di RAM.
A me capita la stessa cosa con mkgmap (e quindi anche con Garmux) per la
mappa dell'intera Europa. Sopra a mkgmap c'è solo la VM Java, quindi il bug
potrebbe anche essere lì. Ho un PC con 4Gb di RAM ma con Linux a 64 bit (che
quindi
Volevo segnalarvi l'applicazione JSatTrack [1]. E' un applicazione Java per
il tracciamento dei satelliti. L'argomento non sarebbe molto inerente ad OSM
se non fosse per il fatto che può usare le mappe di OpenStreetMap come layer
delle visualizzazioni 3D.
A presto!
Fabrizio
[1]
Da: emmexx
Solo nei nuvi piu' recenti e' stata introdotta la gestione di piu' mappe
sulla sd.
Per la famiglia 2xx (e non solo) viene visto solo il file
Garmin/gmapsupp.img (vedi [1])
Un trucco (quando non si ha un pc a disposizione) per gestire piu' mappe
sulla sd e' quello di usare un palmare o
Willem,
Dat is inderdaad heel eenvoudig, maar je moet het even weten. Bedankt.
Gegroet,
Frank
Op 22 juni 2011 22:37 heeft Willem Sonke willemso...@planet.nl het
volgende geschreven:
Mij lijkt een handige manier: node selecteren, kopiëren met Ctrl+C, shape
selecteren en tags plakken met
Hoi,
Ik heb de shapefiles gedownload en een SLD voor geoserver gemaakt[1].
Als iemand ergens een publieke instantie van Geoserver heeft draaien
dan heb je het zo online.
Martijn
[1] http://www.mvexel.dds.nl/osm/
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 10:30 PM, Frank Steggink stegg...@steggink.org wrote:
From: ZeilDude zeild...@gmail.com
Hoe ben je van plan de vele BaZ's en andere wijzigingen door te voeren?
De lijst van RWS wordt iedere 2 weken bijgewerkt en per jaar zijn er ongeveer
1000 wijzigingen.
Ik heb n.l. ook al een tijdje op e.e.a. zitten broeden (zeilen heeft nu
hogere
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Op 23-06-11 17:12, Erik Oppedijk schreef:
Mooiste zou een database zijn met al de node-id's van OSM van de
vorige import, en dat je vanuit die applicatie kan zien of er changes
zijn.
Gewoon een losse database, en los op de kaart renderen, en ze
Op 23-06-11 17:12, Erik Oppedijk schreef:
Mooiste zou een database zijn met al de node-id's van OSM van de
vorige import, en dat je vanuit die applicatie kan zien of er changes
zijn.
Gewoon een losse database, en los op de kaart renderen, en ze
überhaupt niet in OSM willen inladen. Wijzigen
M∡rtin Koppenhoefer schrieb:
Zu den Laderampen:
Besser wäre wohl railway=disused + disused=stop + passengers=no gewesen.
Könnte man ja mal drüber reden, was du jetzt draus gemacht hast ist auf
jeden Fall kontraproduktiv.
industrielle Bahnen (Laderampen) haben jedenfalls mit public
Hallo,
Am Donnerstag 23 Juni 2011 08:01:00 schrieb Andre Joost:
M∡rtin Koppenhoefer schrieb:
industrielle Bahnen (Laderampen) haben jedenfalls mit public transport
nichts zu tun.
Das stimmt schon. railway=disused impliziert eine stillgelegte
Eisenbahn, was bei aktiv genutzen Laderampen
Hm, ja, in der Tat gab's da auch in meinen (südlichen) Gefilden ein Update. Bei
mir erscheint der Refresh jedoch nur bis Stufe 10 (also von unten gezählt).
Heute hat's hier auf der Zoomstufe 11 ein paar Kacheln neu gerendert (mit
Änderungen die zum Teil gegen 2 Monate alt sind), und wieder
Hier scheint es 8, 9 und 11 neu gerendert zu haben. 10 nicht.
Simon
Am 23.06.2011 09:34, schrieb Dennie Reinhold:
Hm, ja, in der Tat gab's da auch in meinen (südlichen) Gefilden ein Update. Bei
mir erscheint der Refresh jedoch nur bis Stufe 10 (also von unten gezählt).
Heute hat's hier auf
Am 23. Juni 2011 08:01 schrieb Andre Joost andre+jo...@nurfuerspam.de:
M∡rtin Koppenhoefer schrieb:
industrielle Bahnen (Laderampen) haben jedenfalls mit public transport
nichts zu tun.
Das stimmt schon. railway=disused impliziert eine stillgelegte
Eisenbahn, was bei aktiv genutzen Laderampen
Am 22. Juni 2011 18:12 schrieb Manuel Reimer manuel.s...@nurfuerspam.de:
hat jemand schnell die nötige Befehlszeile zur Hand, wie man mit osm2pgsql
eine via API exportierte OSM-Datei in die SQL-DB bekommt?
Alternativ zum API-Download (nicht gern gesehen weil es
Mapping-ressourcen belastet)
Walter Nordmann wrote:
Und bei solchen Aussagen java ist Mist... reagiere ich -leider- etwas
heftig, da ich von einigen Monaten eine sehr schlimme Diskussion mit
jemandem im Forum hatte, der das große Java für absolut unsicher und
gefährlich hielt aber die Verwendung von Java-Script (openlayers)
Zur Info:
Fr. 11. November 2011, PGConf.DE 2011 die deutschsprachige
PostgreSQL-Konferenz, Rheinisches Industriemuseum, Oberhausen.
http://2011.pgconf.de/
12.-13. November 2011, OpenRheinRuhr - Messe und Kongress rund um das
Thema Freie Software, Rheinisches Industriemuseum, Oberhausen (D).
Am Donnerstag, 23. Juni 2011 schrieb Johann H. Addicks:
Am 22.06.2011 23:07, schrieb RalfGesellensetter:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Table_soccer
Hallo Johann,
danke für die fachkundige Nachfrage (dachte ich)...
Gibt's da auch ein Tagging für die
Hallo,
seit gestern 23 Uhr erhalte ich in JOSM keine
Kacheln mehr (Timeout), noch erreiche ich die OLM.
Geht das nur mir so?
Gruß
Ralf
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Hallo Ralf,
es ist Wartung auf der Datenbank:
Die OpenStreetMap-Datenbank ist im Moment wegen wichtiger
Wartungsarbeiten nicht verfügbar.
(von der Startseite www.openstreetmap.org)
Am 23.06.2011 14:15, schrieb RalfGesellensetter:
seit gestern 23 Uhr erhalte ich in JOSM keine
Kacheln mehr
1 - 100 of 161 matches
Mail list logo
