In message def74e78d2f74302bdf48ad40609a...@redsol
Roger Slevin ro...@slevin.plus.com wrote:
Thomas
You comment that York doesn't appear to be aware of the stoparea principle
... this is widespread. There are no downstream national applications that
make use of stopareas - and no
On 1 Mar 2009, at 21:51, Roger Slevin wrote:
Peter
It would be very misleading to the OSM community for them to take
any notice
of your hope to have stopareas everywhere in the NaPTAN database.
More
than half of the country do not use stopareas at all in the journey
planner
that they
Mapnik now renders in near real time:
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2009-February/033970.html
Not so for coastlines though :(
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 10:10 AM, Ed Garcia eppgar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Was surprised to see Mapnik updated on a non-wednesday. I just added
Wow this is GREAT Got even more excited to add more roads!
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 10:23 AM, maning sambale
emmanuel.samb...@gmail.comwrote:
Mapnik now renders in near real time:
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2009-February/033970.html
Not so for coastlines though :(
On
On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 10:35:21AM +0100, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Simon Ward wrote:
this could mean that
anyone running osm2pgsql importing minutely data updates would possibly
have to make available a ''psql dump of the whole planet'' for any
snapshot time where someone cares to request
Frederik Ramm wrote:
I'm surprised that nobody else seems to see a problem in this. Am I
perhaps barking up some completely imaginary tree?
Not at all; I am still reading through the draft, and have exactly the same
concern.
It may be I have misunderstood how this is intended to apply, but I
2009/3/1 Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com:
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
I'm surprised that nobody else seems to see a problem in this. Am I
perhaps barking up some completely imaginary tree?
Nope, not at all, I'm exceptionally concerned about the
John Wilbanks wrote:
(although I find the idea that freedom can only come from the
barrel of a license deeply depressing).
That's CC Zero out of the running then.
If Big Company decides to run a mechanical turk contest on Amazon to
extract facts from your DB one at a time, do they violate
I am proposing the update the text on the Use Cases page. I intend to
merge some of the different Use Cases and introduce some new ones
based on the problematic areas we are exploring on the list. I will
also tweek the wording to make it clearer for the next legal review
(especially the
(although I find the idea that freedom can only come from the
barrel of a license deeply depressing).
That's CC Zero out of the running then.
Actually no. This is a slightly wonky lawyer debate about semantics, but
we think tools like CC0 should be called *waivers* and not *licenses*.
John Wilbanks wrote:
This is why if you peruse the CC0 site, you'll see it referred to as a
legal tool and not a license. It's a small thing, but an important thing
to remember. Conflating the waiving of rights with the licensing of
rights is what we're trying to avoid in this context.
Rob Myers r...@robmyers.org wrote:
With the GPL, the right to request the source is attached to receiving
and using the binary. Withe the AGPL it is attached to being a user of
the service. You can't just wander by and say hey! please can I have
the source?, you have to be a user of the
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Peter Miller peter.mil...@itoworld.com wrote:
Can we also ensure that any issues that we identify on the list get
onto the Open Issues page on the wiki. In that way we can get the
legal folk to only review the wiki page and not the whole conversation.
I assume
What's the purpose of S5.0 (disclaimer of moral rights), especially
since the plain meaning of that section appears to differ from the
'attribution' element of the current license (not that I think
attribution is a great idea with so many contributors, but some
bulk-data donors include attribution
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 05:34:59PM +, Peter Miller wrote:
Would it be possible for someone to summarise the License Plan thread
on Talk when it has come to a conclusion? Personally I am finding the
intensity of license discussion a bit much the moment and would prefer
to
Hi,
Frederik Ramm wrote:
We need to clarify this once and for all: Where exactly in the following
typical rendering chain does the thing cease to be a database in our
definition?
* download (section of) OSM data
* make changes to OSM data
* render OSM data into vector graphics format
On 1 Mar 2009, at 21:37, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 05:34:59PM +, Peter Miller wrote:
Would it be possible for someone to summarise the License Plan thread
on Talk when it has come to a conclusion? Personally I am finding the
intensity of license discussion a bit
On 1 Mar 2009, at 21:49, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
Peter Miller wrote:
I think these Use Cases are going to end up being twins of an
eventual
FAQ that I imagine will exist.
I am starting to think that perhaps the license should be
accompanied by
a kind of interpretation document
Hi,
Dair Grant wrote:
It may be I have misunderstood how this is intended to apply, but I think
both 4.6a and 4.6b end up making derivative databases (effectively any
mechanical processing of the original content whatsoever, IMO) problematic.
In many cases, generating a file containing all
On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 11:30:41AM -0500, Russ Nelson wrote:
Creative Commons license (by-sa). or under the ODbL. If you choose not to
give us your email address, or your email address stops working, you
waive all right to ownership of your edits.
This needs a safeguard to allow for email
On Mar 1, 2009, at 12:46 PM, Philipp Klaus Krause wrote:
Russ Nelson schrieb:
[...], or your email address
stops working, you waive all right to ownership of your edits.
Probably about as legally binding as posting a note on the site that
says By reading this you agree to sacrifice your
I see your point. Data potentially infringing if removed now could be
recreated now, making later bookkeeping easier.
On Mar 1, 2009, at 7:33 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
Russ Nelson wrote:
I don't see much value in removing the data now on the chance that
we might have
to remove it
Hi,
rich...@weait.com wrote:
I've attempted to illustrate ways to use the OpenStreetMap database under
ODbL and comply with the ODbL obligations.
The box at the end of the Produced Work stream says: Share Alike is
required if database is derivative. Attribution is always required. -
It
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 3:03 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Not so, it turns out; the Produced Work freedom allows us to combine
OSM data *only* with other data whose license does not prohibit the
addition of constraints, because ODbL mandates that we add the reverse
engineering
Hi,
I have been working on doing my own slippy map with mapnik and mod_tile. The
documentation mentions the following steps:
* Download the planet file from planet.openstreetmap.org
* Import into a PostGIS database using osm2pgsql
* Set up mapnik and test using osm.xml and the
... England and Wales specific - not the rest of the UK!
Mike Harris
_
From: Gustav Foseid [mailto:gust...@gmail.com]
Sent: 28 February 2009 09:34
To: osm
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] rights of way and designation=*
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 12:44 PM, Robert Vollmert
Lookup the map creating section in the JS code of your website where
OpenLayers is used. It should look something like this:
map = new OpenLayers.Map(
Then add a new TMS layer pointing to your Mapnik instance. The example
below shows two of the Mapnik instances used on the Dutch tileserver:
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
I'm surprised that nobody else seems to see a problem in this. Am I
perhaps barking up some completely imaginary tree?
Nope, not at all, I'm exceptionally concerned about the implications
on the cyclemap db. I'm
On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 05:59:40AM +, Jukka Rahkonen wrote:
I do regularly import some osm data into PostGIS and reproject it inside the
database. Would it be enough to tell where to download the original OSM data
and what script to run, or should I really make a dump from my imported and
Jukka Rahkonen wrote:
Jochen Topf jochen at remote.org writes:
The OSM database now contains over 1 billion tags on nodes, ways and
relations together. Congratulations all around!
Jochen
Big number really. I guess it is the American billion and not the European
one
(thousand
On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 11:51:24AM +, Dair Grant wrote:
I'm not sure what format a file containing all of the alterations would
take. Does this mean a machine-readable list of the exact transformations
that were performed, or simply a human-readable summary of the
transformations made?
I
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 8:34 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Not on the map per se, but if you use the map to re-create the original
database then - at least that's what I was thinking! - you are not using
your own database but you are (again) using the database compiled by the
On 1 Mar 2009, at 10:19, Andy Allan wrote:
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org
wrote:
I'm surprised that nobody else seems to see a problem in this. Am I
perhaps barking up some completely imaginary tree?
Nope, not at all, I'm exceptionally concerned about
Interoperability of data would be nice, but as far as I am concerned
it’s not a primary aim unless the interoperability is with other
similarly free (freedom) and licensed such that further redistribution
is also free.
Simon
I understand that, and I'm not trying to reopen the argument
On 1 Mar 2009, at 11:21, Jukka Rahkonen wrote:
Jochen Topf jochen at remote.org writes:
The OSM database now contains over 1 billion tags on nodes, ways and
relations together. Congratulations all around!
Jochen
Big number really. I guess it is the American billion and not the
There's an easier method than this, see:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenLayers_Simple_Example#Extensions
On 01/03/2009, Lambertus o...@na1400.info wrote:
Lookup the map creating section in the JS code of your website where
OpenLayers is used. It should look something like this:
map =
Jochen Topf jochen at remote.org writes:
The OSM database now contains over 1 billion tags on nodes, ways and
relations together. Congratulations all around!
Jochen
Big number really. I guess it is the American billion and not the European one
(thousand millions vs. million millions),
The OSM database now contains over 1 billion tags on nodes, ways and
relations together. Congratulations all around!
Jochen
--
Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org http://www.remote.org/jochen/ +49-721-388298
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
On 28/02/09 12:21, 80n wrote:
What percentage of data would other people feel willing to see
sacrificed in order to move forward with the new license? We should
probably exclude mass donated data as 90% is probably TIGER anyway. So
what percentage of *user contributed* data would other
On Feb 27, 2009, at 4:03 PM, Gustav Foseid wrote:
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 7:00 PM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net
wrote:
I think it's pretty unarguable that, in the UK, your tracing of the
Peruvian
lakes would merit copyright or similar protection (as sweat-of-the-
brow).
Both
On 1 Mar 2009, at 11:44, Gustav Foseid wrote:
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 8:34 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org
wrote:
Not on the map per se, but if you use the map to re-create the
original
database then - at least that's what I was thinking! - you are not
using
your own database but
I'm thinking that we should modify the agreement that people make when
they sign up. It should read something like this:
By creating an account, you agree that all work uploaded to
openstreetmap.org and all data created by use of any tools which
connect to openstreetmap.org is to be
Has the ODbL been finalized yet ? If not it will either need to read
something like ODbL version X or later.
I support you and I would like to go even further. Namely any license
that the OSMF chooses. But at least one of the OSMF members (Mikel?)
was opposed to it because it's so easy to get
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Nic Roets nro...@gmail.com wrote:
Has the ODbL been finalized yet ? If not it will either need to read
something like ODbL version X or later.
The or later seems to be included in the text of ODBL S4.4 (unlike
GPL etc where its a per-project choice) with the
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Nic Roets nro...@gmail.com wrote:
But at least one of the OSMF members (Mikel?)
was opposed to it because it's so easy to get OSMF membership (and as
a consequence a controlling majority on the board).
Did someone calculate how much it would cost to buy the
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Nic Roets nro...@gmail.com wrote:
I support you and I would like to go even further. Namely any license
that the OSMF chooses. But at least one of the OSMF members (Mikel?)
was opposed to it because it's so easy to get OSMF membership (and as
a consequence a
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 5:06 PM, OJ W ojwli...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Nic Roets nro...@gmail.com wrote:
Has the ODbL been finalized yet ? If not it will either need to read
something like ODbL version X or later.
The or later seems to be included in the text
On 1 Mar 2009, at 17:11, OJ W wrote:
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Nic Roets nro...@gmail.com wrote:
But at least one of the OSMF members (Mikel?)
was opposed to it because it's so easy to get OSMF membership (and as
a consequence a controlling majority on the board).
Did someone
The Licensor (as defined below) and You (as defined below) agree as
follows: reads the beginning of ODbL. The Licensor is the natural or legal
person the that offers the Database under the terms of this Licence. Who
will be the licensor (owner) of the database for OSM?
For the factual information
Russ Nelson schrieb:
[...], or your email address
stops working, you waive all right to ownership of your edits.
Probably about as legally binding as posting a note on the site that
says By reading this you agree to sacrifice your firstborn to the OSMF.
Philipp
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 5:20 PM, Russ Nelson r...@cloudmade.com wrote:
I think that the reason that the US only protects creativity and not facts
is because the US doesn't want to give out a monopoly on a set of facts
about the world. I'm unfamiliar with how sweat-of-the-brow works. Does
it
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 10:06 PM, Peter Miller peter.mil...@itoworld.com wrote:
On 1 Mar 2009, at 21:49, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
Peter Miller wrote:
I think these Use Cases are going to end up being twins of an
eventual
FAQ that I imagine will exist.
I am starting to think that perhaps
Annoying... Stop stripping highway = xxx_link
Just because you are smart enough to write a bot doesn't mean you
should. I love my data, don't go f*** it up.
Tiny Snapshot of stupid bot activity...
On 1 Mar 2009, at 22:33, OJ W wrote:
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 10:06 PM, Peter Miller peter.mil...@itoworld.com
wrote:
On 1 Mar 2009, at 21:49, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
Peter Miller wrote:
I think these Use Cases are going to end up being twins of an
eventual
FAQ that I imagine will
Hi all,
I've attempted to illustrate ways to use the OpenStreetMap database under
ODbL and comply with the ODbL obligations.
legal-talk: patches welcome!
talk: perhaps you'll find the illustration instructive without having to
participate in all of the discussion on legal-talk.
Same here in the Philippines. Please stop removing the highway = xxx_link tag.
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 6:39 AM, Grant Slater
openstreet...@firefishy.com wrote:
Annoying... Stop stripping highway = xxx_link
Just because you are smart enough to write a bot doesn't mean you
should. I love my
Hi,
rich...@weait.com wrote:
I've attempted to illustrate ways to use the OpenStreetMap database under
ODbL and comply with the ODbL obligations.
The box at the end of the Produced Work stream says: Share Alike is
required if database is derivative. Attribution is always required. -
It
On Sunday 01 March 2009 17:51:17 Thomas Wood wrote:
There's an easier method than this, see:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenLayers_Simple_Example#Extensions
great! I am all done - thanks to everyone on this list.
--
regards
Kenneth Gonsalves
Associate
NRC-FOSS
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Geodata_Repository#On_Offer_.21
Mooie show case van gratis geo-data sets.
___
Talk-nl mailing list
Talk-nl@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-nl
You ripper!
How long are we looking at for the whole import?
- Original Message -
From: Franc Carter franc.car...@gmail.com
Date: Sunday, March 1, 2009 1:43 pm
Subject: [talk-au] suburb boundaries import
To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Is now running, please
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 11:30 PM, b.schulz...@scu.edu.au wrote:
Wow, that's almost a month. Well, keep us all posted :). This is rather
exciting! Ok, that's nerdy, but we're on OSM so it's allowed, right?
Yeah - the latency from here to the UK is just nasty. I'll send out updates
interesting
Yep,
but I didn't have any luck finding a server to do it from - my inquiry on
the dev list didn't get any response
cheers
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 11:38 PM, Cameron
osm-mailing-li...@justcameron.comwrote:
Could it be interrupted and run on a server in the UK (or even better, on
an OSM server
Could it be interrupted and run on a server in the UK (or even better, on an
OSM server in the same location as the db server?)
~Cameron
2009/3/1 Franc Carter franc.car...@gmail.com
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 11:30 PM, b.schulz...@scu.edu.au wrote:
Wow, that's almost a month. Well, keep us all
On Sun, 1 Mar 2009, Torsten Leistikow wrote:
Eigenschaft in einem speziellen Fall vorangig dargestellt werden sollte.
Dafuer muesste man dann aber Renderer-Kontroll-Tags einfuehren und nicht
die Daten kuenstlich verbiegen, wie z.B. durch falsches Anbringen von
Layer-Tags.
Stellt Dir vor. Das
Hallo,
hat jemand ein funktionierendes Beispiel, wie man WMS in OpenLayers
einbindet?
Mein Versuch (im Anhang) lädt leider nur schwarze Kacheln (auf
Luftbild-Ebene umschalten).
Ciao
--
http://www.dstoecker.eu/ (PGP key available)Title: Test
Mit freundlicher Untersttzung
Hi,
Dirk Stöcker wrote:
hat jemand ein funktionierendes Beispiel, wie man WMS in OpenLayers
einbindet?
wms.geofabrik.de
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09 E008°23'33
___
Talk-de mailing list
Frederik Ramm schrieb:
Hi,
does anyone have a good trick how to select individual roads on the
openstreetmap.org data layer when the whole village is covered by a
freaking landuse polygon? I can only ever select the polygon ;-(
Falsche Liste? ;-)
Hab das selbe festgestellt, manchmal
2009/3/1 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org:
Hi,
does anyone have a good trick how to select individual roads on the
openstreetmap.org data layer when the whole village is covered by a
freaking landuse polygon? I can only ever select the polygon ;-(
What I do is zooming in until the area
Hi,
does anyone have a good trick how to select individual roads on the
openstreetmap.org data layer when the whole village is covered by a
freaking landuse polygon? I can only ever select the polygon ;-(
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09
Hi!
Die OSM-Datenbank enthält jetzt über eine Milliarde Tags an Nodes, Ways
und Relations zusammen. Herzlichen Glückwunsch!
Jochen
--
Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org http://www.remote.org/jochen/ +49-721-388298
___
Talk-de mailing list
Hallo,
Wenn jede Höhenlinie ihr eigenes Konfidenzintervall mitbringt, wird es
natürlich sehr fein. Nicht dass man das in einer Straßenkarte
dargestellt haben möchte :-)
Wie soll ich das machen? 1. Wie bestimme ich die Höhenlinie rechnerisch? 2.
Wie dann das Konfidenzintervall? Spätestens nach
Frederik Ramm schrieb:
does anyone have a good trick how to select individual roads on the
openstreetmap.org data layer when the whole village is covered by a
freaking landuse polygon? I can only ever select the polygon ;-(
Das Problem wurde irgendwann im Forum diskutiert. Manche lösen
On Sun, 1 Mar 2009, Sven Geggus wrote:
Dirk Stöcker openstreet...@dstoecker.de wrote:
hat jemand ein funktionierendes Beispiel, wie man WMS in OpenLayers
einbindet?
Das geht sehr einfach:
http://geggus.net/gmaps/myfsmap.html
Wichtig zu wissen ist, dass Openlayers selbst nicht
Hallo,
Frederik Ramm schrieb:
does anyone have a good trick how to select individual roads on the
openstreetmap.org data layer when the whole village is covered by a
freaking landuse polygon? I can only ever select the polygon ;-(
Klick Manualy select a different area.
Ziehe einen
Dimitri Junker o...@dimitri-junker.de [Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 03:22:50AM CET]:
Hallo,
Wenn jede Höhenlinie ihr eigenes Konfidenzintervall mitbringt, wird es
natürlich sehr fein. Nicht dass man das in einer Straßenkarte
dargestellt haben möchte :-)
Wie soll ich das machen? 1. Wie
On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 11:30:30AM +, Sven Geggus wrote:
Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org wrote:
Die OSM-Datenbank enthält jetzt über eine Milliarde Tags an Nodes, Ways
und Relations zusammen. Herzlichen Glückwunsch!
Welcher Datentyp wird denn für die OSM-ID verwendet? Müssen wir uns
On Sun, 1 Mar 2009, Frederik Ramm wrote:
hat jemand ein funktionierendes Beispiel, wie man WMS in OpenLayers
einbindet?
wms.geofabrik.de
Hmm, nach vielen Probieren bekomme ich WMS hin. Sobald ich aber einen
OSM-Layer als Alternative anbieten will, schaltet der mir für WMS auf
EPSG:900913
On Sun, 1 Mar 2009, Sven Geggus wrote:
Dirk Stöcker openstreet...@dstoecker.de wrote:
Die Frage warum ich für alle Layer gleiche Projektionen brauche bleibt
Deine darstellbare Fläche hat ja eine fixe Begrenzung x1,x2,y1,y2
Naja, für meine Anwendung brauche ich keine fixe Fenstergröße. Das
Hi Torsten.
Torsten Leistikow wrote:
Bei dem Beispiel mit dem Park sehe ich das Problem, dass sich in meinen
Augen Wald und Park eigentlich ausschliessen. Fuer Wald haben wir zwei
allg. akzeptierte Tags: landuse=forest steht fuer forstwirtschaftlich
genutzte Flaechen und natural=wood steht
Dirk Stöcker openstreet...@dstoecker.de wrote:
hat jemand ein funktionierendes Beispiel, wie man WMS in OpenLayers
einbindet?
Das geht sehr einfach:
http://geggus.net/gmaps/myfsmap.html
Wichtig zu wissen ist, dass Openlayers selbst nicht umprojizieren
kann, d.h. Dein WMS muss Simple
On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 12:55:58PM +0100, Dirk Stöcker wrote:
On Sun, 1 Mar 2009, Dirk Stöcker wrote:
Wichtig zu wissen ist, dass Openlayers selbst nicht umprojizieren
kann, d.h. Dein WMS muss Simple Mercator (Google Projektion
EPSG:900913) anbieten, was die meisten WMS-Server eher nicht
Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org wrote:
Die OSM-Datenbank enthält jetzt über eine Milliarde Tags an Nodes, Ways
und Relations zusammen. Herzlichen Glückwunsch!
Welcher Datentyp wird denn für die OSM-ID verwendet? Müssen wir uns
da Sorgen machen?
32-Bit unsigned sind nämlich nur
Dirk Stöcker openstreet...@dstoecker.de wrote:
Die Frage warum ich für alle Layer gleiche Projektionen brauche bleibt
Deine darstellbare Fläche hat ja eine fixe Begrenzung x1,x2,y1,y2
Wenn Du nun eine Andere Projektion wählt, sagen wir mal zum Beispiel
lat/long WGS84, was ja eine völlig
Johannes Huesing schrieb:
Wenn diese Punkte 40 m entfernt auf einem Track liegen, erregen schon
10 Höhenmeter Differenz Verdacht.
In Dortmund-Hörde haben wir an einem Punkt 10 Höhenmeter auf 2 Meter
(Bahnstrecke) und etwas weiter an der Schnettkerbrücke das Z-fache
(Grund: Emschertal):
Johannes Huesing schrieb:
http://www.file-upload.net/download-1481299/GPX_Aachen.zip.html
Ich weiß ich war nciht angesprochen, aber er macht 'nen 404 hier.
Habe es auf den Uni-Server gelegt. Lebt für 1 Woche ab jetzt:
http://depot.tu-dortmund.de/get/wemq8z
Hallo Community,
aus älterem Projekt-Bestand zur Errechnung von Solarpotential
in Wohnbebauung habe ich noch Daten, die ich für OpenStreetMap
verwenden könnte.
Hinterlegt sind:
- Dachfläche (teilw. Modulfläche)
- Dachform
- Dachneigung
- Dachexposition
- Dachverschattung
Viele Teile lassen sich
Hallo Community,
ich frage mal hier, um die ORS-Leute nicht von der Entwicklung
abzuhalten :-)
Ist generell schon ein Routing über Plätze möglich, auf denen
keine Wege vorhanden, sondern uneingeschränktes Bewegen für
Fußgänger möglich ist?
Wichtige Plätze hier in Dortmund werden umgangen,
Gerrit Lammert schrieb:
landuse=park und natural=wood schließen sich nicht aus (auch logisch, es
sei denn man ist der Meinung in einem Park dürfe es keine Bäume geben).
Das haben hier ein paar Leute so formuliert, ein paar fanden das gut,
ein paar nicht. Ich bin ein bisschen konservativ und
Dirk Stöcker openstreet...@dstoecker.de wrote:
So, jetzt brauche ich nur noch die Methode, wie man GPX-Spuren darstellen
kann.
Das kann Openlayers.
http://geggus.net/gmaps/radtour-ausflug2008.shtml
Gruss
Sven
--
Software is like sex; it's better when it's free
Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org wrote:
Bei http://tools.geofabrik.de/mc/ muss ich das auch machen, wenn
man zwischen Google- und OSM-Layern wechselt.
Huch? Ich dachte Google und OSM würden die selbe Projektion
verwenden?
Sven
--
The American news-media is no longer a news source; it is a
Tobias Wendorff schrieb:
Gibt es schon einen roof-Key? Attribute wären z.B.:
- flat (Flachdach)
- gable (Satteldach)
- hip (Walmdach)
- mansard (Mansardendach)
- monopitch (Schleppdach)
- shed (Pultdach)
Dann noch Optionen, wie dormers (Dachgauben).
Es gibt das ältere Proposal zu
Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org wrote:
64-Bit unsigned sollte etwas länger reichen: 18446744073709551615
Die MySQL nimmt 64Bit Ints. Aber nicht alle Software, die die Daten
nutzt macht das auch...
Signed int?
Das wäre dann 9223372036854775807 mögliche Nodes.
Die gesamte Landfläche der Erde
Am 1. März 2009 16:10 schrieb Tobias Wendorff tobias.wendo...@uni-dortmund.de:
Hallo Community,
aus älterem Projekt-Bestand zur Errechnung von Solarpotential
in Wohnbebauung habe ich noch Daten, die ich für OpenStreetMap
verwenden könnte.
Hinterlegt sind:
- Dachfläche (teilw. Modulfläche)
Tobias Knerr schrieb:
Durch die sich abzeichnenden 3D-Verwendungen könnte inzwischen der
Antrieb für so was da sein, den es zur Erstellungszeit des genannten
Proposals (2006) noch nicht gab.
Allerdings fehlen noch geeignete Editoren. Google hat ja damals
Sketchup gekauft, mit dem man sehr gut
2009/3/1 Tobias Wendorff tobias.wendo...@uni-dortmund.de:
Tobias Knerr schrieb:
Durch die sich abzeichnenden 3D-Verwendungen könnte inzwischen der
Antrieb für so was da sein, den es zur Erstellungszeit des genannten
Proposals (2006) noch nicht gab.
Allerdings fehlen noch geeignete Editoren.
Martin Koppenhoefer schrieb:
eher uninteressant da ableitbar
Wie ich bereits schreiben.
- Dachform
komplexes Thema. Wie willst Du beispielsweise die Ausrichtung angeben?
Die Ausrichtung ist sehr wichtig, weil wenn sie nicht stimmt, das
ganze Dach schlechter ist als gar nicht drin.
Da ich
Am 28. Februar 2009 16:01 schrieb Ulf Möller use...@ulfm.de:
Sascha Silbe schrieb:
Gab es tatsächlich Fälle, wo die Daten _explizit_ ohne jegliche
Einschränkungen zur Verfügung gestellt wurden?
Ja. Die TIGER-Daten sind PD; die Strassendatenbank NRW wurde zur freien
Nutzung ohne
Am 1. März 2009 16:49 schrieb Tobias Wendorff tobias.wendo...@uni-dortmund.de:
Google hat es mit Sketchup optimal gelöst, finde ich.
Du weißt als Architekt selber, was für Kombinationen möglich
sind.
als Architekt weiss ich, dass ich ALLES machen kann, solange es dicht
ist und nicht einstürzt.
On Sun, 1 Mar 2009, Sven Geggus wrote:
So, jetzt brauche ich nur noch die Methode, wie man GPX-Spuren darstellen
kann.
Das kann Openlayers.
Ja, ist mir bewusst. Ich hatte ja schon ein schönes Beispiel dafür.
http://geggus.net/gmaps/radtour-ausflug2008.shtml
Und ich glaube, das hier war
Am 28. Februar 2009 23:56 schrieb Patrick Kolesa patrick.kol...@web.de:
malenki schrieb:
Die dort verlinkte Karte dürfte sehr wahrscheinlich mit OSM-Daten
erstellt worden sein, ein Hinweis darauf fehlt.
Unten links im Kartenausschnitt kann man noch ein eetMap erkennen. Ist
meiner Meinung
1 - 100 di 148 matches
Mail list logo
