2010/4/8 grahamjones...@googlemail.com:
how they have coded it - no SDL or GTK libraries listed etc - they might be
writing directly to the framebuffer with their own code.
maybe I don't get the meaning of this thread, but just in case, are
you aware of this:
2010/4/10 elisabetta ronchi elisabetta.ron...@gmail.com:
My problem is that I'm trying to edit OSM maps in Adobe Illustrator but I
have problems with fonts.
there is also this Perl script by Richard Fairhurst, which converts
OSM to Illustrator 6, but then it's a lot of work to assemble the
2010/4/12 Dmitry Granovsky dima.granov...@gmail.com:
Another issue which surprises me immensely is that in Russia a lot of
open (=not secret) data gathered together and structured may allegedly
result in secret data. Could anyone from, say, Germany or UK comment
on this?
For Germany this is
Am 12. April 2010 22:18 schrieb Felix Hartmann extremecar...@googlemail.com:
Soweit ich das sehe, ist es eben auch prinzipiell so, dass jeder genannt
werden muesste. Wenn ich also Werke / Datenbearbeitungen basierend auf
OSM veroeffentliche, dann kann ich AFAIK sehr wohl verlangen, dass das
I was recently registering for SOTM and was a little bit confused
about some advertisement I find on the page. I can understand that
payments for convenience and security reasons are processed by paypal
(they operate worldwide, ...), but is it really necessary to advertise
facebook? As far as I
2010/4/15 Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk:
Of cause what is missing here is that since this 'vote' was only in Russian
then
the vast majority of us would not even be able to vote anyway. There should
perhaps be a rule about needing all votes to carry an English translation,
since
the
2010/4/20 Sebastian Klein basti...@googlemail.com:
Now, I would like to click on any point in the viewport and select all
the area features that have that clicked point inside (if any).
please take care that those are not accidentially moved, JOSM-users
are not used to have that powerful
2010/4/21 Irene Pucci ipu...@navionics.it:
Ok! Thank you so much!
Do you know if there is a way to know when the updates come out? Like by mail
or other by other nstruments...
If you use Linux there are also scripts available, that check
automatically on startup if there is a new version
2010/4/23 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org:
If having a CCTV in a shop is the norm, should we perhaps start tagging
the exception (surveillance=no)?
wouldn't this still lead to surveillance=yes and surveillance=unknown
to see if this tag is already checked, or simply a missing
information?
please vote:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/isolated_dwelling
cheers,
Martin
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
2010/4/29 Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com:
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
please vote:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/isolated_dwelling
Err... Aren't those called houses?
yes, it could be houses. It could also be a cave or a tent, but mostly
it will be houses. This is a
2010/4/27 colliar colliar4e...@aol.com:
I think we need to expand the values of embankment and cutting as only yes is
not much information and I often have ways with cutting on one and embankment
on
the other side.
I would propose embankment=both/left/right/none and
2010/5/3 Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com:
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Well, OK, but you did use the term 'households'
Why not use the standard landuse=residential?
Because this is about place and not about landuse. I understand place
as a tag for human settlements which vary from very small
2010/5/3 Nic Roets nro...@gmail.com:
Here's one where I used the layer tag. So we can model 3D,
this is not 3D. It is something similar to what some CAD-Programs call
2.5-D. But it's use is very limited (number of layers, no heights, not
to talk about inclining levels, split level, ...)
2010/5/3 Richard Mann richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com:
I think routers would be better served if we identify good through
routes (ie the equivalent of highway=primary for motorists), and
record them as relations, perhaps
network=lcn+status=unofficial+signposted=no. But Andy's a strict
2010/5/4 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com:
Towns and hamlets are usually incorporated in one form or another,
isolated buildings aren't, in any case you can tell how isolated a
building is by comparing features around it, you don't need to
explicitly say it's isolated.
I agree to this,
2010/5/5 John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.com:
In English usage, a dwelling is a residence. So, a farmhouse would be an
isolated dwelling; a building not used as a residence, such as a restaurant
or train station, would be an isolated building, but not an isolated dwelling.
sorry, I wasn't
2010/5/5 John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.com:
Since the English language defines a dwelling as a place where someone
dwells, I suspect that the UK government is using the term to mean structures
used as residences. The proposed tag, on the other hand, would classify any
isolated building
2010/5/15 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com:
Due to all the potential hazardous waste dumped in past years most
landfills aren't suitable for much else unless they're properly
cleaned up first.
quite close to the residences and the lake ;-)
2010/5/15 Liz ed...@billiau.net:
On Sat, 15 May 2010, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
It's probably the major source of Malware in Windows
Yeah. The major source of drowning in the Atlantic Ocean is water. BAN
water!!11!11o...@wtflolccbysa
don't forget
oxygen is not only poisonous in some forms
2010/5/16 SteveC st...@asklater.com:
As for why this is better, anyone who has printed t-shirts, conference
material or worked in branding will tell you, as I already have that the
current logo:
* has too many colours
* doesn't scale
* is too busy
* isn't brandable to a colour scheme
2010/5/17 Robert Martinez m...@mray.de:
right. that would be the a term.
You don't have to be a designer to use the desaturate button.
The challange is to make it work afterwards.
The current logo does not work monochromatic, mine does.
have you ever seen a monochromatic version of the
2010/5/18 SteveC st...@asklater.com:
You couldn't sort of extrapolate forward from a GIS system to OSM. You
couldn't extrapolate from crappy Nokia phones forward to the iPhone
(without hindsight, of course).
I think you're comparing apples and oranges here. You can't compare a
logo (an
2010/5/18 Pieren pier...@gmail.com:
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 1:01 PM, Jean-Marc Liotier j...@liotier.org wrote:
As someone mentioned earlier in this thread, not all isolated dwellings
are farms.
But all isolated farms are isolated_dwellings, no ?
yes, that's why I marked place=farm as
2010/5/18 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org:
M?rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
yes, that's why I marked place=farm as deprecated and put on a
(temporary) note that it should be changed to isolated_dwelling.
But doesn't that lose information? Why would one want that?
I was implying that you put
2010/5/18 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org:
Oh, I guess I hadn't followed this enough, I thought that isolated_dwelling
was meant to be a node tag.
it is a node or polygon-tag. Up to the mapper. In the end all
place-tags are best on polygons and not on nodes.
Cheers,
Martin
2010/5/18 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org:
Right, but this means you cannot downgrade a place=farm that sits on a node
to a place=isolated_dwelling without loss of information because you could
not attach landuse=farmyard to a node. At least that would be a very unusual
way of tagging.
2010/5/19 jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com:
Well the question came from a new OSMer from Shkoder Albania, who is helping
with the http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/AlbanianFloodingCrisisCamp. The
people in albania dont have much money, it is a very poor country,
2010/5/18 Liz ed...@billiau.net:
On Tue, 18 May 2010, Pieren wrote:
But all isolated farms are isolated_dwellings, no ?
No.
Some isolated farms (called stations) are as large as a hamlet. They are
isolated in terms of tens of kms from their neighbours. Some appear on regular
maps as if they
2010/5/19 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org:
Hi,
M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Some isolated farms (called stations) are as large as a hamlet. They are
isolated in terms of tens of kms from their neighbours. Some appear on
regular
maps as if they were towns
I'm sure that the Argentinians
2010/5/19 Aun Johnsen li...@gimnechiske.org:
How to tag Norwegian named farms making part of a grend which I
would have tagged as hamlet? They are not isolated dwellings as they
are not isolated, just parts of the larger unit.
how much distance there is required to be isolated depends surely
2010/5/20 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com:
On 20 May 2010 08:02, Rob Warren war...@muninn-project.org wrote:
Historical mapping has some problems that are a bit different from
conventional mapping in that 1) everything is a timestamp
While it would be nice for the OSM APIs to natively
2010/5/21 Aun Johnsen li...@gimnechiske.org:
I took the freedom to remove the mark of deprecated on place=farm
and wrote a page with an easy to understand (I hope) definition of
what a farm can be different from isolated dwelling
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dfarm
OK, I made
2010/5/21 Pieren pier...@gmail.com:
No reasons to stop this mess where in the past the place hierarchy was quite
clear:
city town village hamlet locality
this is actually not clear, because locality was long ago (or has ever
been) defined as uninhabited place, regardless the size of the
2010/5/22 Aun Johnsen li...@gimnechiske.org:
population in general cannot combine farming and fishing. Many of
these are so isolated that there exists no cars there.
IMHO the isolated in isolated dwelling is about the context, whether
a building is part of a bigger settlement or is isolated
2010/5/22 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com:
On 22 May 2010 20:56, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
IMHO the isolated in isolated dwelling is about the context, whether
So place=farm, isolated=yes ?
actually, what's the point of isolated (or even the meaning
2010/5/23 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com:
On 23 May 2010 01:55, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
actually, what's the point of isolated (or even the meaning: this is
completely relative to context)? You can see that a place is isolated
(given completeness of the map
2010/5/23 Liz ed...@billiau.net:
Ahh, interesting
Station in Au means it has a platform, and implies an office, a permanent
employee and hopefully a toilet as well.
the same in Germany, but permanent employees are less frequent now,
because of cost reduction.
Halt means there is no
2010/5/23 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com:
And the whole thing became one big mess due to cultural differences...
I don't know why. Places where one person, 2 persons, one family live,
are isolated dwellings, if they are not connected to other such
dwellings in the surrounding (and the
2010/5/23 Liz ed...@billiau.net:
I think that I understand that in Germany isolated_place is a defined type of
entity, while in other places it represents a subjective decision.
in some way, many of our tags include subjective decisions. I can find
quite some results for isolated_dwelling and
2010/5/23 Elizabeth Dodd ed...@billiau.net:
isolated dwelling here sounds like it is architect or journalist talk, not any
cartographic or geo-orientated word. That's a decision from the context,
because the phrase does not hold a particular meaning in a geographic sense
Here it
2010/5/23 M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com:
have a look on page 4:
http://www.google.de/url?sa=tsource=webct=rescd=1ved=0CB0QFjAAurl=http%3A%2F%2F202.82.16.155%2Fbss%2Fgeography%2Fs7_ppt%2Fch6.pptrct=jq=settlement+hierarchy+australia+%22isolated+dwelling%22ei=Lvj4S6Avy5SxBsW4saQGusg
2010/5/26 Jean-Marc Liotier j...@liotier.org:
Can a station be an isolated dwelling ? Just kidding...
you might be kidding, but it actually can be, it's one of the cases
for which this place-vakue was introduced.
Cheers,
Martin
___
talk mailing list
2010/5/26 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org:
I think he referred to the Aussie meaning of station which means an
isolated farm and has nothing to do with railways.
OK, I got it, but actually IMHO isolated farms can as well be mapped
with place=isolated_dwelling and a farm-tag aside.
cheers,
2010/5/27 Michael Eric Menk mikem...@yahoo.no:
since I wrote that no motor-vehicle allowed.
access=no
motorcar=private
foot=yes
bicycle=yes
horse=yes(/no)
is quite common in Norway
you should try not to put access=no and then a lot of exceptions, but
instead use motor_vehicle=no (or
2010/5/28 Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com:
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 7:00 PM, Pieren pier...@gmail.com wrote:
Good to see that nobody cares about the wiki inconsistencies of 'locality'.
give us some time, not everybody can read everything within some hours.
at
2010/5/30 Mikel Maron mikel_ma...@yahoo.com:
It really shouldn't be taken as a more general rule. Just for instance,
localised names of places are not very often found on the ground.
+1, we already map stuff that is not found on the ground but still
fits perfectly into our data (e.g. borders).
2010/5/31 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com:
On 31 May 2010 08:56, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
+1, we already map stuff that is not found on the ground but still
fits perfectly into our data (e.g. borders).
Borders isn't a good example, some/many of these are marked
2010/5/31 Claudius claudiu...@gmx.de:
highway=track is for ways that are wide enough to be *potentially* used
by a 4 wheel vehicle.
+1
If it's that wide and has tracks than you should
tag it liek that. If legally only pedestrians are allowed add vehicle=no.
actually the case which is
2010/5/31 John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.com:
This brings up another question. On the tagging list, there is currently a
discussion of whether or not to tag areas that have frequent traffic jams.
If something is only verifiable part of the time, such as having traffic jams
or being the
2010/5/31 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
If they are not marked, how do the locals know what and where they are?
They look at a map!
No, they don't have to look at a map, that's the point: they simply
_know_ it, they use the name
2010/5/31 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
2010/5/31 Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com
I don't think anyone has suggested that we leave out things I'd they
aren't signposted.
Nathan, who started this thread, has done exactly that, and he's gone around
removing route relations where the routes were not
2010/6/1 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
The road should simply be marked as having no pavement/sidewalk.
Something like pavement=yes/no is a start at least. It's best to avoid
subject assessments like how dangerous a road is.
Hmm, is shoulder a fairly universal term? Because shoulder=no would be
2010/6/2 John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.com:
With many high-speed highways (such as Interstate Highways in the USA,
Autobahn in Germany, etc.) you may have wide shoulders, but pedestrian use on
the shoulders is inadvisable and/or illegal, because crossing to the other
side means having to
2010/6/7 Peter Körner osm-li...@mazdermind.de:
John Smith schrieb:
Currently I've been making a proposal for OSM to adopt an UUID tagging
scheme so that third parties wishing to directly refer to OSM objects
can do so without the current problems of using internal database
reference
2010/6/6 Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com:
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
Off the top of my head I'm thinking of a line within the area that
defines the direction. it would have to be linked to the boundary by
using relations(?)
Yup that is how I
2010/6/7 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
Interesting problem. Seems related to the general how to map a street
as an area without sacrificing the properties of streets problem. Use
an area, and a relation, with the relation specifying which way(s) are
the top and bottom?
+1, as long as
2010/6/13 Tristan Scott trs...@gmail.com:
Now, the images are taken at quite a low angle, so I'll need to recify
them using software
you will always need to rectify and align / project them, but if
they're taken from a very low angle that's a bad basis for our needs.
Good luck,
Martin
2010/6/14 Maarten Deen md...@xs4all.nl:
Cloudmade calculates both routes as expected, so I would exclude data
error (e.g. non-connected roads) from the problem.
Don't know how often cloudmate refreshes it's routing data, but if
it's the same they use for their renderings it is quite old, so
Hi,
recently on the Italian ML arose the question, whether to use farm or farmland.
Checking the wiki popped up this recently (12 days) created page that
stated landuse=farmland to be obsoleted.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Farmoldid=482025
the same user set
2010/6/16 Bernhard R. Fischer b...@abenteuerland.at:
Hi!
Several months ago I added some farms (place=farm) in my region. I also added
names (name=... + place_name=...) as well as addresses using the addr:*=
You might also want to look at place=isolated_dwelling (and probably a
subtag for
2010/6/16 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
OSM does need to think more carefully about what exactly is in and out
of scope.
The scope is IMHO the worldmap drawn with the knowledge of locals,
that's why I'd consider these informal neighbourhoods precious to our
data, even more as they are not
2010/6/16 Tobias Knerr o...@tobias-knerr.de:
Imo, it is. They name OSM as a data source directly below the image and
let you access osm.org when you click on the image. They also give more
detailled attribution (with the license abbreviation and another link to
osm.org) on the Source
2010/6/18 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org:
your display with them when you are outside. Other bugs require checking
things on the ground, so they are useless to display in your editor at
home. Etc.
unless you know it. If it's about names, a local could probably solve
the issue without
2010/6/21 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
So we are going to retag all
highway=primary|secondary|tertiary|unclassified
to highway=road and then tag the number of lanes and their width and
surface
in stead?
That would probably piss people off. Would be fine with me, though.
this discussion (and
2010/6/22 Paul Houle p...@ontology2.com:
get hit by cars. Meanwhile there is a contingent of idiots in a city
near me that are continuously complaining that the city is not bicycle
friendly but that won't speak out about absurdly dangerous bicycling
behaviors that go on all the time.. Even
2010/6/23 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
I figured it would be footway=* (a la cycleway=*), but apparently that was
proposed years ago and never adopted
(http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Footway).
do you suggest to set it to abandoned? Features in OSM are (mostly)
not introduced
2010/6/23 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
The alternative would be to have three different ways.
Neither solution is particularly nice, though. I'm actually hoping someone
will come up with something better :).
use three ways and connect them with area relations ;-)
cheers,
Martin
2010/6/24 Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com:
views or oppose them, but certainly the main point of this discussion
is that should we want to change it you can't just change the wiki and
declare it done!
I completely agree to this and think it also applies to many other
wiki edits. Sadly, as
2010/6/24 Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com:
highway=*
link=yes
actually I like this, but it's not the first time it is proposed here,
and I think you can hardly change tags used as often and for so long
time as this. It would probably end up in a similar mess than path and
footway.
cheers,
2010/6/28 yvecai yve...@gmail.com:
Today, the polygons tagged with leisure=nature_reserve are rendered on the
slippy map in the leisure layer, thus overlapping and hiding other landuse
(like 'wood' for instance: http://osm.org/go/0CAfHX7).
These polygons should be rendered in the
2010/7/2 Nic Roets nro...@gmail.com:
I made a demonstration of how the yournavigation.org website can be
embedded inside osm.org. Check it out:
http://nroets.dev.openstreetmap.org/demo/?lat=52.32796lon=5.62046zoom=15layers=B000FTFT
That's great. I like the integration in the plus, but think
2010/7/3 Mike Collinson m...@ayeltd.biz:
At 10:12 AM 2/07/2010, Mike Collinson wrote:
Europeans, why sit at home and watch your team get beaten by the Brazilians?
Switch off the TV and immediately follow these steps:
Well of course what I meant to say was the Argentines,
You might try to
2010/7/3 Dermot McNally derm...@gmail.com:
Our arbitrary decision is to decide whether a moderately crappy
country lane might just be significant enough to call tertiary
I'd say this is up to the individual mapper / situation. It will never
be possible to satisfyingly resolve this for all
2010/7/4 John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.com:
True, but paper maps are usually not printed at a scale where including
street numbers are practical.
There are actually paper maps that include housenumbers (city scale)
--- not all of them, but if you put them in intervalls it's usually
good
2010/7/4 Oliver (skobbler) osm.oliver.ku...@gmx.de:
exclusive. I just say that the more projects there are, the longer it takes
to achieve a specific goal.
if one is a cyclist with interest in cycling, she/he will not go out
mapping parking lots or petrol stations just because someones
2010/7/5 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com:
On 5 July 2010 19:29, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
actually I don't understand why so many people complain about mapping
trees. Trees have generally a longer life cycle than buildings. I like
trees and I like to have them
2010/7/5 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
Okay. How do you use speed limit tags when only 8% of the roads are tagged
with them?
Actually it doesn't matter at all, how many percents of the planet are
tagged with a certain tag, it is sufficient that the tags are present
in the area you are interested
2010/7/5 Pieren pier...@gmail.com:
So you ask people to not join the nodes just because you make the assumption
that this person is contributing in US and that a majority of US boundaries
have errors...
I could also say that if the boundary is really following the road, then
there is no harm
2010/7/7 Pieren pier...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 2:56 AM, John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.com
So, what happens in your region if the road planners decide to alter the
position of part of a road,
Most probably the boundary will not move. But we also have many cases where
boundaries
2010/7/7 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org:
sense. I think in many cases the boundary definition does not exist
independently of the feature.
yes, of course if this is the case (and boundary mapping depends on
the feature and not on an import), it is perfectly right to do it,
otherwise it's
2010/7/12 Alan Mintz alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net:
For gas stations, the name of the supplying oil company would be properly
described as the brand (e.g. Shell, Mobil). If someone asked me for the
operator of the station, I would take this to be synonymous with owner,
and it would be unlikely
2010/7/13 Chris Fleming m...@chrisfleming.org:
A common statement by those on the inside.
Membership of OSMF costs money. I have enough money for that sort of
expense
but not everyone does.
True it does cost money; but it's not a massive amount.
this is entirely relative and not true for
2010/7/13 Kai Krueger kakrue...@gmail.com:
If Richard's statement relayed through Frederik of that at least 90% of data
is an absolute minimum becomes binding, (which would still leave a huge
amount of room for wiggeling, after all 10% of data would be still 1 1/2
entire Germanys, or nearly
2010/7/21 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com:
On 21 July 2010 02:02, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
Should we continue to name the osm.org tile layers by the renderers
they use? Is overloading the terms mapnik and osmarender as both a
tile layer, style file and rendering library
2010/7/25 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com:
I'd be happy to just see localised highway shields...
once you have them, you can do whatever other local differentiation you like to.
I wonder what we would need to. For maintenance reasons there
shouldn't be complete different stylesheets, but
2010/7/25 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com:
I started working on this problem:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Custom_Highway_Shields
maybe this could be treated more general? It would be really appealing
to have localized subway/lightrail-station-symbols
cheers,
Martin
2010/7/28 Ulf Lamping ulf.lamp...@googlemail.com:
But for me place=locality is not about the importance or renown of
something. It's about a place that has a name but no significant other
feature - which is not the case here.
place=locality is about uninhabited places with a name, but whether
2010/8/10 Jaak Laineste jaak.laine...@gmail.com:
I like this test because it will make things easy. No fuzzy shades of grey
like
some Richard is suggesting. Can you give an example of a thing that is done
by a
human being and that is not art by this definition?
Humans create many non-art
2010/8/11 SteveC st...@asklater.com:
Specifically, I point to the basics of mailing list etiquette:
...
• No conspiracy theories
...
could this be amended by unless there is a real conspiracy?
Otherwise our hands might be tied in case there is a conspiracy.
cheers,
Martin
2010/8/16 Renaud MICHEL r.h.michel+...@gmail.com:
Are there any empty nodes that make sense, or is a empty always node
nonsense?
I'd say the validators are right, because a node that is neither part of a
way, nor part of a relation, and has no tags is simply useless: we have no
idea why it
2010/8/17 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com:
On 17 August 2010 21:09, Peter Wendorff wendo...@uni-paderborn.de wrote:
Of course there are shops, where you can buy AND rent a bike or a car - but
that's an additional argument to tag it different: shop=car; rent=car;
+1
I would have
2010/8/17 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com:
On 17 August 2010 23:13, Peter Wendorff wendo...@uni-paderborn.de wrote:
It's the same question in other cases, too:
- post offices as service of normal shops
vs. selling office stuff as service of post offices
The primary purpose is handling
2010/8/17 Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com:
It's no more or less factual than recording temperature and other
meteorological data at a weather station.
IMHO it is not comparable at all, because we don't turn simply the gps
on and wait what it registers, but we actively move around on
2010/8/18 Toby Murray toby.mur...@gmail.com:
Interesting. In the past I've just used JOSM to download all the GPS
traces in my area and then taken a screen shot.
I did some visualisations in the past using gnuplot, but not caring
about projections and the like (just used a cartesian grid).
2010/8/20 Peteris Krisjanis pec...@gmail.com:
Anyway, I agree that rendering NR should be more like administrative
zone with special rules, not current green overlay. At least not for
default osm.org map.
+1
maybe also with different linetypes/colours for different protection
grades and light
2010/8/20 Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com:
Well, I actually tag the whole grounds of a church as
amenity=place_of_worship and leave the building(s) as building=yes
ignoring the fact that it looks awful on the Mapnik layer. For example:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/39724055
so
2010/8/20 Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com:
You're being too literal with worship part of place_of_worship. We have
highway=steps and stairways are definitely not highways.
Amenity=place_of_worship is IMO to be taken literally: it is about
worshipping (mosque, church, temple, synagogue,
2010/8/21 John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.com:
The landuse=religious seems like a good compromise. Landuse=institutional
seems a bit too generic, as there are so many different types of
institutions...
...for which we actually don't have landuses either (government, ngos,
international
2010/8/21 NopMap ekkeh...@gmx.de:
Hi!
I am trying to interest new people. But that means sending absolutely
clueless folks here and one wrong click at that point and they can mess up
the area for good without even knowing it.
- Why don't we disable that Live edit feature for good? I vaguely
1 - 100 di 3440 matches
Mail list logo