Re: [talk-ph] Massive deletion of nodes?

Edits seems legit, but I didn't check everything. Should we discuss this on the user's changeset comment? On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 11:30 AM, Jim Morgan wrote: > maning sambale wrote on Monday, 22 February, 2016 11:48 AM: >> I found this user editing lots of duplicated nodes:

Re: [talk-ph] Massive deletion of nodes?

maning sambale wrote on Monday, 22 February, 2016 11:48 AM: > I found this user editing lots of duplicated nodes: > http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?country=23=96=-1=%3E=1000=d=n#4/-18.52/0.26 Appears to be an automated bot: "I use the botdidier2020 account to make corrections on

Re: [talk-ph] Massive deletion of nodes?

I found this user editing lots of duplicated nodes: http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?country=23=96=-1=%3E=1000=d=n#4/-18.52/0.26 Not sure if vandalism, will dig deeper. On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 1:30 AM, Eugene Alvin Villar wrote: > I was checking out the OSM

[talk-ph] Massive deletion of nodes?

I was checking out the OSM Philippines statistics page from Pascal Neis and I noticed that almost 100,000 nodes were deleted last Friday, Feb 19. Does anybody know what happened? I'm worried if this is vandalism. http://osmstats.neis-one.org/?item=countries=Philippines ~Eugene

Re: [talk-ph] POI names with placenames

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Yes, that string. Thank you! On 西元2016年02月21日 19:42, Rally de Leon wrote: > Hi Terzeus, > Are you referring to (Maysilo)? > I think it's a branch name. It's better to remove it from the name, > and add tag branch=Maysilo > > same rule applies to

Re: [talk-ph] POI names with placenames

Hi Terzeus, Are you referring to (Maysilo)? I think it's a branch name. It's better to remove it from the name, and add tag branch=Maysilo same rule applies to shop=convenience (like 7-Eleven), amenity=fast_food, amenity=pharmacy, and amenity=fuel where: name= (not the official business name)

[talk-ph] POI names with placenames

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi everyone! I have a quick question. While updating the traffic scheme in Maysilo, I came across this node (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/357730055#map=19/14.57715/121.03504) with its placename on the name field. Should the placename stay