Re: [Talk-us] MO Stare Road Classifications.

2017-03-06 Thread Paul Johnson
On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 12:01 PM, Nathan Mills wrote: > Typically state DOT functional classification freeway and expressway both > imply limited, but not necessarily fully controlled, access, so trunk is a > good first approximation. However, the DOT classification diverges

Re: [Talk-us] MO Stare Road Classifications.

2017-03-06 Thread Nathan Mills
Typically state DOT functional classification freeway and expressway both imply limited, but not necessarily fully controlled, access, so trunk is a good first approximation. However, the DOT classification diverges enough from OSM tagging standards/consensus (such as it is in the US, anyway)

Re: [Talk-us] MO Stare Road Classifications.

2017-03-06 Thread Paul Johnson
On Mar 5, 2017 13:35, "OSM Volunteer stevea" wrote: I would say "almost, but not quite." Interstate and Freeway, both highway=motorway. Expressway, highway=trunk. If it's semi limited access (few to no driveways, a mix of at grade and grade separated junctions), I

Re: [Talk-us] MO Stare Road Classifications.

2017-03-06 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, On 03/05/2017 10:08 PM, Kevin Kenny wrote: > I'm not a vehement anti-importer (there are a few around here I don't know what you are talking about ;) > There are "county > highways" that you'd expect to be highway=tertiary that are in fact > highway=track, for instance. Or the myriad

Re: [Talk-us] MO Stare Road Classifications.

2017-03-05 Thread Kevin Kenny
On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 10:55 PM, wrote: > > > I was thinking of using MODOT Functional classification maps to set roads > to. Basically the following: > > > > MODOT : OSM > > > > Interstate : motorway > > Freeway and Expressway : trunk > > Other Principal Arterial : primary >

Re: [Talk-us] MO Stare Road Classifications.

2017-03-05 Thread OSM Volunteer stevea
> I was thinking of using MODOT Functional classification maps to set roads to. > Basically the following: > > MODOT : OSM > > Interstate : motorway > Freeway and Expressway : trunk > Other Principal Arterial : primary > Minor Arterial : secondary > Major Collector : tertiary > Minor

Re: [Talk-us] MO Stare Road Classifications.

2017-03-05 Thread Richard Welty
On 3/5/17 8:22 AM, Mike N wrote: > Hi, > >Typically, regional classifications do not map into OSM > classification, and often conflict. > > If a freeway / expressway is constructed as an OSM motorway, it > should be motorway. > > If a 'local' road serves an industrial area it should be >

Re: [Talk-us] MO Stare Road Classifications.

2017-03-05 Thread Paul Johnson
On Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 7:22 AM, Mike N wrote: > Hi, > >Typically, regional classifications do not map into OSM classification, > and often conflict. > > If a freeway / expressway is constructed as an OSM motorway, it should > be motorway. > The american concept of

Re: [Talk-us] MO Stare Road Classifications.

2017-03-05 Thread Mike N
Hi, Typically, regional classifications do not map into OSM classification, and often conflict. If a freeway / expressway is constructed as an OSM motorway, it should be motorway. If a 'local' road serves an industrial area it should be unclassified because it doesn't serve

Re: [Talk-us] MO Stare Road Classifications.

2017-03-05 Thread Paul Johnson
On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 9:55 PM, wrote: > > > I was thinking of using MODOT Functional classification maps to set roads > to. Basically the following: > > > > MODOT : OSM > > > > Interstate : motorway > > Freeway and Expressway : trunk > > Other Principal Arterial : primary > >

[Talk-us] MO Stare Road Classifications.

2017-03-04 Thread idnwys
I was thinking of using MODOT Functional classification maps to set roads to. Basically the following: MODOT : OSM Interstate : motorway Freeway and Expressway : trunk Other Principal Arterial : primary Minor Arterial : secondary Major Collector : tertiary Minor Collector : unclassified Local