Re: [Talk-us] Map spam

Hi, On 07/10/2016 09:45 PM, Mike N wrote: > I have seen a number of these - at first there was some app generating > invalid OSM tags, but excellent geolocation (to OSM standards, center of > main business building). Side note on "we place you on the map" businesses - they often don't have

Re: [Talk-us] Map spam

On 7/10/2016 3:30 PM, OSM Volunteer stevea wrote: It is just not that big of a problem. I am weirdly impressed by the odd combination of "quite well-formed data tagging, yet I can still (nearly always) determine that the node is spam." In other words, they are trying hard to fly in under our

Re: [Talk-us] Map spam

> Circa 07/10/2016 08:28 PM, Jack Burke and Frederik Ramm > wrote: >> Is anyone else starting to see map spam popping up in their areas? and > DWG here. We see lots, but not to a degree that would concern us. Thank you to Jack for bringing this up and

Re: [Talk-us] Map spam

Hi, On 07/10/2016 08:28 PM, Jack Burke wrote: > Is anyone else starting to see map spam popping up in their areas? DWG here. We see lots, but not to a degree that would concern us. Occasionally individual IP numbers from Asia were blocked for signups because they would create account after

[Talk-us] Map spam

Is anyone else starting to see map spam popping up in their areas? Over the past few months, I've seen 3 OSM entries that I'm calling map spam for lack of a better term. I know that doesn't seem like a lot, but it could be a new trend. Specifically, what I'm finding is a well-formed node for a