On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 1:08 AM, Russ Nelson nel...@crynwr.com wrote:
o You don't have users making changes that nobody visiting the
county real property office will fine.
Sounds like a good use for a WMS layer with the current official data
accessible to editors, and vigilant locals
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Brian Cavagnolo bcavagn...@gmail.com wrote:
We really want a nationwide consolidated, standard parcel database to
build upon.
This idea is [obviously] inspired by OSM. And my immediate thought
was, Fun! Let's add parcel data to OSM! How do we do that?
Hey guys,
Thanks for the fantastic feedback. Instead of responding in detail, I
will attempt to organize these thoughts on the Parcel wiki page. In
any case, I think it is safe to say that there is no strong consensus
for uploading parcel data. That said, it sounds like there is strong
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 6:02 PM, Brian Cavagnolo bcavagn...@gmail.comwrote:
Hey guys,
Thanks for the fantastic feedback. Instead of responding in detail, I
will attempt to organize these thoughts on the Parcel wiki page. In
any case, I think it is safe to say that there is no strong
Hey guys,
In my research group (the Urban Analytics Lab at Berkeley's Department
of City and Regional Planning), we use parcel data for land-use
projection, accessibility, and visualization. For example, over the
past couple of years we worked with regional government agencies here
in the Bay
Ha. Totally missed this very recent discussion on the matter:
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2012-December/010017.html
Nonetheless, feel free to respond. I'm going to go do some more homework ;-)
Ciao,
Brian
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Brian Cavagnolo
Brian
Personally I think it's brilliant you're working on this, and I'd love OSM to
work hand in hand to make it happen. Ideally I'd love OSM to be the repository
for this, it helps everybody.
There is speculation (but no actual statistically valid causation data) to
suggest that imports
Before this discussion moves forward we should define what parcel data
is. In my mind it's mostly-abutting polygons representing land ownership.
Usually it comes with metadata about tax information and ownership
information, and sometimes it has address information for buildings built
on that
PS:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Steve Coast st...@asklater.com wrote:
Brian
Personally I think it's brilliant you're working on this, and I'd love OSM
to work hand in hand to make it happen. Ideally I'd love OSM to be the
repository for this, it helps everybody.
+1 to you working on
Hi Brian,
I'd like to ask for some of your time to meet in person to talk more about
this, as I'm the SF Bay Area, and am very interested in discussing this
sort of work.
Please contact me off-list if you're amenable.
Best
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
We can solve the problem by sitting around waiting for it to happen, or forcing
the issue by going and doing this. I suggest the latter is better :-)
Steve
On Feb 14, 2013, at 12:49 PM, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
PS:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Steve Coast st...@asklater.com
On 2/14/2013 3:43 PM, Ian Dees wrote:
Before this discussion moves forward we should define what parcel
data is. In my mind it's mostly-abutting polygons representing land
ownership. Usually it comes with metadata about tax information and
ownership information, and sometimes it has address
From: Brian Cavagnolo [mailto:bcavagn...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2013 12:29 PM
To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [Talk-us] parcel boundaries and associated data in OSM
Is parcel data useful to OSM?
Parcel data in of itself has not found a use in OSM. Parcel data bounds
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Steve Coast st...@asklater.com wrote:
Brian
Personally I think it's brilliant you're working on this, and I'd love OSM
to work hand in hand to make it happen. Ideally I'd love OSM to be the
repository for this, it helps everybody.
I'm with Steve on this.
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote:
Marginal. While this doesn't *always* mean that something shouldn't be
mapped, we're a crowd-sourced map, and including something the crowd can't
improve on seems questionable.
Or it means someone in the crowd nailed it
Hi Brian,
All of your questions are good, and like you mentioned, we had a
debate about this in late December. I don't think we (community and
our software) are ready right now to import all of the parcel data in
the US. However, it does not mean we should sit around and do nothing
either!
One
Brian Cavagnolo writes:
We really want a nationwide consolidated, standard parcel database to
build upon.
Indeed.
Is parcel data useful to OSM?
Yes.
Can parcel data possibly be kept up to date?
No.
Does parcel data meet the on the ground verifiability criteria?
No. Not really.
17 matches
Mail list logo