In Massachusetts osm has state GIS data, and a number of the 1-way ways
are the wrong direction. This is particularly obvious for divided
highways, e.g. Rt 2 inside 128, 495 near Rt 2.
Clearly I could go edit these manually. But I wonder if there is
automated way to fix this, perhaps by going
Christopher Schmidt crschm...@metacarta.com writes:
MassGIS does not encode the direction. Oneways which are potentially
wrong are marked with a FIXME note to fix the incorrect directionality.
(I believe it is 'FIXME: Unconfirmed oneway'.) MassGIS pays NavTeq for
routing data, and does not
(replying to Zeke and Chris both)
I agree that if there is only 1 mile of motorway class road among
trunk-class road that tagging it motorway isn't useful.
The parts of Route 2 that I was thinking of tagging as motorway are
physically indistinguishable from an interstate, and at least 10 miles
Richard Weait rich...@weait.com writes:
On Sun, 2009-04-12 at 16:55 -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
Apollinaris Schoell wrote:
It contains all you need to pick the correct sign. But you need the
whole knowledge about signs for all states, county ...
as an example California uses different
and then what is this info good for? just because someone claims it's
correct? is it correct then? more correct than data with the tag set
to no? can you give a single example where this info is helping?
the tiger data is terrible wrong in some places. it's more important
to fix
Does anybody object to this? If not, I'll look at inserting special
case code which removes tiger:reviewed when the way or any node it
solely includes is edited in any way.
I'm also not in favor of automatic tag removing, for the same reason -
any change does not imply adequately
Richard Weait rich...@weait.com writes:
So currently, I think removing the reviewed:no means, I've improved
this rather than, I've perfected this. To encourage or support more
demanding requirements should surely be backed with a tool that reminds
and suggests how to fix TIGER.
I would
Apollinaris Schoell ascho...@gmail.com writes:
many parks are tagged with
leisure park
Is this really the recommended setting? according to the wiki park is
something more like golden gate park in SF or central park in NY
natural_reserve matches better the main purpose of national parks.
I noticed there seem to be very few streets in gloucester, but rockport
seems ok. Any clues what's up?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=42.6679lon=-70.6467zoom=14layers=B000FTF
pgpz5kSi5ISEd.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Talk-us mailing list
What are the tags for abandoned RR right of way that is NOT a
biketrail, but still visible?
I found
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/detailed_Railway_Network
Someone said railway=abandoned, but there are three separate things --
my opinion is partly from USGS topo maps:
Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org writes:
` On Mon, 2009-07-20 at 08:19 -0400, Bill Ricker wrote:
The Upper Charles Trail was included in the MASSgis import. It has a
note=under construction. As imported and proposed, it slavishly
followed a passenger and freight line straight to the center of
Alex Mauer ha...@hawkesnest.net writes:
On 08/11/2009 06:10 AM, Greg Troxel wrote:
But, is abandoned really in use in other countries to mean what in the
US we call old railroad grade? (Here I am taking USGS norms to be
established practice in the US.)
Probably not; however
I have been trying to make routable garmin maps with mkgmap, and more or
less succeeding. In Mass I have maps that look good but computing
routes over any significant distance totally fails, as in you get a
route apparently from a basemap. I was recently driving to a place
within Stow from
Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org writes:
On Fri, 2009-09-04 at 07:30 -0400, Greg Troxel wrote:
It depends on what the road is like. If it's a decent dirt road that
normal cars routinely drive on, has a street name, is considered a
public or private way by the town, then it's highway
--
Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org writes:
On Fri, 2009-09-04 at 07:30 -0400, Greg Troxel wrote:
It depends on what the road is like. If it's a decent dirt road that
normal cars routinely drive on, has a street name, is considered a
public or private way by the town, then it's highway
Tiger data is not to bad. ways are connected correct for the most
part. in fact motorways are connected to under/over crossing ways
which is incorrect. But routing will be possible. A major problem is
the direction of motorways/motorway_links. they are random. by
default mkgmap sets
Chris Hunter chunter...@gmail.com writes:
I'm afraid I'm going to have to disagree here. Different countries
*do*blur the line between shops and post offices. For example, I've
visited
Canada quite a few times, and quite a few drugstores sell stamps and accept
mail for delivery under the
Dave Hansen d...@sr71.net writes:
On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 18:50 -0500, Greg Troxel wrote:
Dave Hansen d...@sr71.net writes:
roads are disconnected at state boundaries due to being cut with a
non-splitter tool. (splitter has special logic to insert nodes on
ways at tile boundaries
I hate to step into this flamefest, but:
Having traveled around the US, I've been really glad the tiger data is
there. Often it seems like there have not been a lot of edits, and
it's way better than nothing.
I heard about OSM long ago, and I think noticed the map was blank in
mass,
Anthony wikim...@inbox.org writes:
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com wrote:
Anthony o...@inbox.org writes:
But I've come across situations where the unnamed road is not a
roundabout, though. In one of these cases I used
highway=unclassified, because it was just
Please don't take the following as me arguing with you. I'm just
trying to understand.
No problem - it's a useful discussion and a hard question.
I think the bottom line is that one has to understand the actual
legal/use distinctions made by the experts, and then figure out how much
of
Anthony o...@inbox.org writes:
Regarding the apartment complex, the parcel data is not out of date.
That's just the way apartment complexes are parceled here. There's
only one owner. Condominium associations would have a separate parcel
for shared areas, because there's more than one
Alan Mintz alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net writes:
With regard to apartment complexes, condo complexes, mobile home complexes,
and gated single-family-home complexes, I usually tag:
- The ways that cross the boundary line from public street into the complex
are highway=service*** +
I am generally in favor of imports. But EPA superfund site data seems
to be getting close to there should be mashup with this data and osm as
the baselayer as opposed to importing it.
I'm on the light pollution committee in my town, and eventually I'd like
to have a database of issues. I don't
Stellan Lagerstrom lagerst...@blindsight.com writes:
We have a user (mk408) who seems intent on turning 3/4 of all
residential streets in the bay area into tertiary.
This seems excessive to me. Most of these are just residential streets,
not thoroughfares, etc.
Views?
Here's one changeset:
Matthias Julius li...@julius-net.net writes:
Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com writes:
Stellan Lagerstrom lagerst...@blindsight.com writes:
We have a user (mk408) who seems intent on turning 3/4 of all
residential streets in the bay area into tertiary.
This seems excessive to me. Most
This is perhaps appropriate, but I'm not sure if these points are all
monumented.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dsurvey_point
pgpT1UzQbMvTZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
I somewhat glibly asked what should the height spec be and I think the
answer should be orthometric heights based on WGS84 and the current
associated geoid model.
When converting to feet there is the wrinkle of US survey feet vs the
international foot. This matters in state plane systems, but
Mike N. nice...@att.net writes:
b.) All current scripts I know of require significant rework, short of
importing the NHD into a local GEO database, then exporting it to remove
duplicate nodes.
I have been thinking about imports (but not getting around to it, partly
because it's more time
I have the following working diff to polyshp2osm.py to enable handling
types of data other than MassGIS openspace. There is a new --type
argument, and that controls the fixed tags that are added. I'm trying
to deal with Assessor's parcel boundary data and town boundary data.
I realize neither
Katie Filbert filbe...@gmail.com writes:
* Baskin Robbins (fast food?)
This is the missing ice cream shop I think. But if they serve other
food, it's made to order, and they have table service - restaurant.
* Fuddruckers (restaurant or fast food?)
tough call
* Panera Bread (restaurant or
Lars Ahlzen l...@ahlzen.com writes:
On 06/05/2010 07:07 PM, Greg Troxel wrote:
Do you have JOSM WMS urls to put in a josm config file for these?
Well, not really... The example was from a dl:ed GeoTIFF.
There's a link to the WMS capabilities description on this page:
http
Lars Ahlzen l...@ahlzen.com writes:
Linear features imported from MassGIS data have the appropriate source=
and attribution= tags. That makes sense. However, each individual node
has these identical tags as well, including nodes that have no other tags.
For such nodes with no other tags,
Josh Kraayenbrink jakr...@gmail.com writes:
I have been thinking, possibly incorrectly, about attribution on data. The
Tiger import was great, but as you all know, not perfectly accurate. I have
been reviewing and almost all roads, ways, etc that have been imported in
my area are now
Zeke Farwell ezeki...@gmail.com writes:
Classifying by runway length does make some sense to me, but I really have
no idea how Mapnik or any other renderer works. Not sure if this would in
fact be easy or not. It also means a renderer needs the runway tagged as a
way or polygon in order
Bill Ricker bill.n1...@gmail.com writes:
not having to reverse engineer the map since the TIGER was available
(and other sources are coming available some faster some slower Eg,
MASS was loaded from state data not Tiger) results in much more
'studio' work (fixing TIGER overpasses to pass
Val Kartchner val...@gmail.com writes:
On Sat, 2010-06-26 at 06:51 -0400, Greg Troxel wrote:
This is true for roads, but TIGER/massgis did not have hiking trails.
Around Boston there are starting to be a lot of trails mapped - I keep
noticing improvements by others. Plus there's parking
Erik G. Burrows e...@erikburrows.com writes:
Your work on region 3 helped me a lot. Before I read your web post, I
didn't know that gpsbabel had an OSM output function. That, and ogr2ogr
are the only way I know to translate from the BLM shapefiles and CSV files
into OSM format.
See the
Serge Wroclawski emac...@gmail.com writes:
Moving away from discussions of specific imports, I'd like to explore
what people think about a few areas of this discussion:
1) When someone says I want to import X, what should our first response be?
I think your reaction to point out the danger
Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com writes:
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm importing the USFS data for the Ocala National Forest boundary.
There's the actual forest
I'm somewhat hesitant to wade into this, but:
There is debate with the transportation/cycling community about
whether bike lanes are a good thing or a bad thing. Around me there
are some cycle lanes which are entirely within the door kill zone. I
would never ride in them, and their
This discussion, although amazingly lengthy is seeming useful. Someone
already explained that much of New England is different from most of the
United States in terms of not having unicorporated areas, and it might
help to explain details.
In Massachusetts, we have counties. Counties don't do
Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Alex Mauer ha...@hawkesnest.net wrote:
On 10/20/2010 03:14 PM, Anthony wrote:
Only in those 11 states, right?
I'm surprised admin level isn't already handled defined on a state by
state level.
Why treat it
Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com writes:
Read the link you provided: In the remaining nine town or township
states (Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, North Dakota,
Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Dakota, and Wisconsin), there is no
geographic overlapping of these two
Therefor I propose stop signs go on the intersection and save a lot of
hassle with the tag
highway=stop
I think your proposal can work, but you need to show how e.g. to mark 2
out of 5 roads at an intersection.
Also, roads are directional even if 2way so we could allow stop on
Question: what do people think about minimum standards for tagging
something highway=motorway? In other words, would it be reasonable to
tag a highway as trunk rather than motorway because it has no
shoulders or a low speed limit (40 mph)?
In the US, we seem to have what I'd call
Why not
boundary=park
park=*
boundary=forest
forest=*
(parks/refuge/conservartions and forests seem quite different)
pgp3rvUXyaEdm.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com writes:
In the US there are two long federally-maintained roads, the Blue
Ridge Parkway and Natchez Trace Parkway, that were built for the sole
purpose of sightseeing. Since they are surrounded by a narrow strip of
parkland, access is only allowed at
Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com writes:
In the US there are two long federally-maintained roads, the Blue
Ridge Parkway and Natchez Trace Parkway, that were built for the sole
purpose of sightseeing. Since they are surrounded by a narrow strip of
parkland, access is only allowed at
Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com writes:
On 2/24/2011 8:18 AM, Greg Troxel wrote:
On the other hand, some apparently non-local user has messed up tagging
of Route 2 near Boston/Cambridge (from alewife to the science museum)
and made them trunk when they obviously aren't (to anyone who has
Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net writes:
On 5/27/11 9:26 AM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On 5/27/2011 12:32 AM, Nathan Mills wrote:
Would I be correct in stating that tagging an undivided 2 lane (one lane
in each direction) highways would be improper, even if a state calls the
highway a
Kristian Zoerhoff kristian.zoerh...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 10:41 PM, Toby Murray toby.mur...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 4:05 PM, Nathan Mills nat...@nwacg.net wrote:
On Sun, 29 May 2011 12:09:30 -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
I'm thinking the differences between
Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com writes:
The MassGIS import included a condition tag:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/9602415
Presumably this is something in their data, but what use is it to us?
There's no definition of what 'intolerable' means, and no way to know
what value to
Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com writes:
On 7/15/2011 8:15 PM, Greg Troxel wrote:
Nathan Edgars IInerou...@gmail.com writes:
The MassGIS import included a condition tag:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/9602415
Presumably this is something in their data, but what use
Dave Hansen d...@sr71.net writes:
On Wed, 2011-07-20 at 14:03 -0400, Greg Troxel wrote:
So I'm curious if you are finding that the tracker is working?
The tracker is looking dead at the moment.
Anybody have suggestions for another tracker?
I suspect that the problem with generally open
Do you think it makes more sense to tag the apartment complexes as
access=destination or access=private? The complexes are not usually private.
I can drive into them without a key card (usually); I shouldn't be using
them as a through street, but they are permitted for use if my
Toby Murray toby.mur...@gmail.com writes:
This might be partially a tagging issue but I think it affects rendering
too.
It would be nice to change the zoom level at which cities/towns are rendered
in rural areas. I should not be able to get a map with no place names on it
in western Kansas
Anthony o...@inbox.org writes:
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 8:33 AM, Phil! Gold phi...@pobox.com wrote:
The US doesn't seem to have the strict legal categories for rights-of-way
that the UK does
I'm not sure what you mean by that, as I'm not familiar with UK law.
But the US definitely has a
Alexander Roalter alexan...@roalter.it writes:
Shouldn't county borders always coincide with state borders? In the
case of the Minnesota/Iowa border, there were often differences up to
150 meters. I then used the state borders as the 'better' solution and
extended/capped the county lines.
I would recommend contacting the MN state gis department, which might be
part of the state highway department. There are probably people there
who understand the rules and can point you to them. Someone from
MassGIS was very helpful when I had questions about town lines.
As an example which
Metcalf, Calvin (DOT) calvin.metc...@state.ma.us writes:
As towns are the primary division in MA that peole tend to use I'd
like to add them to osm. From what I can tell a few have been put in
near NH as boundary relations (tyngsborough and dunstable) one has
been put in as a closed way
So how about you post the .osm file with the simplified ways, with
admin8 boundary tags? And maybe admin6 and admin4 if you'd like?
pgpotcIrYjnTZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Richard Weait rich...@weait.com writes:
Starting with Stow, (is this the right Stow?)
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=42.4237lon=-71.5119zoom=13layers=M
you might decide that the existing town border is correct-enough, then
merge the Worcester / Middlesex border to the town line where they
I think the nuke/replace notion is sensible.
So I would suggest that you put up (github seems fine, doesn't really
matter as long as it's broadly accessible) several things:
a pointer to the massgis data, and maybe a copy
exact recipe for going from that to the .osm to upload (as scripts
Charlotte Wolter techl...@techlady.com writes:
In doing the remap in LA, I've run across parks, some schools
and other map features that are marked with both points and outlines.
For La Cienega Park, the park is outlined, coded park and
named. There also is a point for La Cienega
I think it's important to separate there's a way in the db and
there's a line on some render.
Personally, I want to see old railway lines on the map. I find there's
almost always evidence along the line, but not always at some point.
So I think we need tags that are more like the USGS maps,
Fred Gifford fred.giff...@gmail.com writes:
I am starting the process of pulling together a group to focus on updating
and expanding trail data in OSM. The initial focus would be in the US
but we are hoping the model could expand to other areas as well.
You should first assess how things
Kevin Kenny kken...@nycap.rr.com writes:
I agree 100%. I have a good bit of data from New York State on trails
that is surely incomplete and imperfect but better than anything we
have in OSM. I've not uploaded any of it because I've not convinced
myself that it's doing no harm. But most of
a search for 'Golden Spike' yields nada. I was about to draw a
boundary=national_park[3] around it with a name tag, so it would be a
little easier to find. But it turns out the NPS has a boundary
shapefile for all National Parks, Historic Sites, Rivers, Parkways,
Lakeshores and more
Kevin Kenny kken...@nycap.rr.com writes:
A few months ago, I tried to get started on trying to resume the NHD
import in my area - and some of the places where I hike. I'm trying
to check results with both P2 and JOSM, and tripping over a lot of
things, which made me put the project back on
Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org writes:
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Jeffrey Ollie j...@ocjtech.us wrote:
Perhaps add a us: prefix to the value?
boundary=us:national_historic_site
boundary=us:national_historic_park
boundary=us:national_forest
I like that idea, in spite of the
10, Park Plaza, Central Square, Bay Village, Middlesex, Massachusetts,
02116, United States of America.
http://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/details.php?place_id=21777524
The Central Square, Bay Village and Middlesex are what are
confusing me as they look to be points and I'm not sure
Metcalf, Calvin (DOT) calvin.metc...@state.ma.us writes:
So basically if we see nodes like that, get rid of them?
No, I think it's:
If there's a node for the place, it's progress to replace it with a
polygon.
Not
Just delete place nodes
pgpaHaOu9jRqT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Serge Wroclawski emac...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 8:25 AM, Metcalf, Calvin (DOT)
calvin.metc...@state.ma.us wrote:
So I'm somewhat confused about how nominatim actually works. A good example
is the building I work in (10 park plaza Boston ma) the version of nominitum
on
Phil! Gold phi...@pobox.com writes:
* Toby Murray toby.mur...@gmail.com [2012-08-14 23:26 -0500]:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=39.117lon=-94.8924zoom=14layers=M
I know there is some disagreement about road classification,
especially when it comes to trunk but I'm pretty sure most
Charlotte Wolter techl...@techlady.com writes:
I'm working on US 50 near Trenton, Ill. Here's the location:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?lat=38.61248lon=-89.68529zoom=16
It looks like, at one point there were plans to turn this into
a motorway. In two spots in a 25-mile
Alan Mintz alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net writes:
At 2012-09-15 16:05, Greg Troxel wrote:
Charlotte Wolter techl...@techlady.com writes:
I'm working on US 50 near Trenton, Ill. Here's the location:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?lat=38.61248lon=-89.68529zoom=16
It looks
Primary highways generally lack stop signs; however, stop signs may
control major intersections in rural areas with low traffic volumes
and occur rarely elsewhere.
The most notable example of this is North Willard Street[2]. It is part
of US Route 7, but as can be seen with Bing
Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org writes:
The newly elected US Chapter board will have its first official
meeting tonight at 5PM PDT / 8PM EDT. We're going to try a Google
Hangout. Everyone is welcome to listen in!
https://plus.google.com/events/c91rctgp4ia8cq3ffqo914lvvus
(I'm not a member,
Given what I've observed and heard about from other mappers, I am not
particularly surprised to hear that the DWG has been getting complaints
(although I have not filed a complaint myself). I think it's helpful to
talk about the general problem, separately from any identities.
My impression is
First, I think Martijn's points have all been right on.
1) I don't think it is a good idea to come up with a code of conduct
as a response to particular cases. When there's an actual dispute on
the table that might be addressed by an as yet imaginary code, we are
in reactionary mode and
The census bureau divided the unorganized borough into 11 census areas.
These have no legal significance but serve to sub-divided the state into
convenient parts. In spite of this they are in many ways like counties. I've
tagged them the same as counties (admin_level=6) but I'm not
MassGIS has parcel data available in a license-ok manner, and I have
been thinking about it, but not getting to it.
An idea is to have a common schema or schemas for non-imported parcel
data in osm format. Then people can write converters for their
state/whatever and publish the data, and
the Old Topo Depot oldto...@novacell.com writes:
If it is feasible to have a (mostly) unified parcel schema, a MapRoulette
challenge can be created to task the conversion work to the community.
I was thinking about just having a node with an address which is the
centroid of the parcel, and
Jason Remillard remillard.ja...@gmail.com writes:
I am not sure if anybody is actually working on importing the tiger address
ranges or not. Just in case somebody is ... The Massachusetts mapping
department (MassGIS) just this week released data for all of the buildings
in the state!
I have few meta comments and then actual comments.
Meta:
In this case, the discussion has been entirely reasonable. But, in
general, I feel there's an unwarranted hostility to imports. I think
this comes from fear (often justified) that people who don't care about
following community norms
Jason Remillard remillard.ja...@gmail.com writes:
Hi,
I would like to start a new thread to talk about merging building data.
My town Groton has mostly hand drawn buildings from bing. Like was
suggested previously, dumping them all and replacing them with the MassGIS
buildings would be a
Jason Remillard remillard.ja...@gmail.com writes:
I would like start a new thread, to talk about the user account situation
for the import, but no policy discussion please!
Given that this is a distributed/community import, we will simply ask each
user to make their own import account and
Jeff Meyer j...@gwhat.org writes:
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 7:50 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
2. If you cannot be bothered to fix problems then why should others be?
What is your plan for growing the community to a point where it can
maintain the data you plan to dump onto
Jeff Meyer j...@gwhat.org writes:
Paul - I've added a few comments and questions about changeset size and
revert policies on the Import Guidelines Plan Outline wiki pages.
Are there any recommended changeset size limits and/or revert plan
practices?
Tools support for reverting is a fair
Based on reaction to the mass buildings import (perceived as way too
fast, and I agree), I would suggest that you have a 2 week review period
From the latest time that there is either
- a change in the processing script
- new data being available
- a substantive change in the procedure
I
The result is that folks like myself and others are frustrated by the
import process, and folks who have good, useful datasets are frstrated
by the import process.
[import/mechanical-edit committee proposal]
I agree with your broad sentiments.
Having observed some recent discussion, I
Or if you'd like to join, and Google+ is a problem, please drop me a line.
I object to the use of google anything. That requires people to agree
to their privacy policies in order to participate in OSM, and I think
OSM should have a policy against such requirement or encouragement.
(That
Kathleen Danielson kathleen.daniel...@gmail.com writes:
Hi Greg,
That's an interesting point. What alternatives would you suggest for
virtual meetings?
KD
I do not know of alternatives. In open source groups I participate in,
it's email and IRC. At work, we pay for phone bridges (audio
Russ Nelson nel...@crynwr.com writes:
Michal Migurski writes:
Also, what's the deal with the Massachusetts TIGER import?
Massachusetts had already made an improved version of the TIGER data,
so the decision was made to import that instead.
I'm not sure it's a version of the TIGER data,
Serge Wroclawski emac...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Brian May b...@mapwise.com wrote:
And as Phil said, sometimes it doesn't make sense to follow the
parcel lines exactly, such as if the parcel boundary extends into a
road and it makes more sense to draw the boundary
Nathan Mixter nmix...@gmail.com writes:
For instance an open space parcel probably isn't that useful because
it is not represented in OSM. It could be broken up into meadow, wood,
scrub, forest, etc.
Jason and I are using 'open space' to mean land that is protected from
development with some
Toby Murray toby.mur...@gmail.com writes:
I think it would be great to make more tools support more external
data sets as opposed to dumping *everything* into OSM. You want county
borders on your garmin? Check a box while creating the file and mkgmap
downloads the most recent county borders
Kevin Kenny kken...@nycap.rr.com writes:
On 01/09/2013 03:24 AM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
While filling in townships in the Greater Cincinnati area, I've also
been working on TIGER's rather artful interpretation of the area's
municipal boundaries, motivated by the Mapnik style's prominent
1 - 100 of 250 matches
Mail list logo
