Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote:
El Martes, 12 de Mayo de 2009, Bernhard zwischenbrugger escribió:
Is there a possibility to get all new data entered to OSM in realtime?
No, AFAIK. The closest you can get is the minutely diffs (all the changes
done
in the last minute).
It would be cool to get
marcus.wolsc...@googlemail.com wrote:
(When germany is done there are a dozen other countries with TMC
location-codes that have published them openly or may be willing to
do so.)
I wonder how to reverse engineer these codes for areas like the US where
these codes may be otherwise impossible
Lester Caine wrote:
OJ W wrote:
start_date=, end_date=
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features#Properties
http://osmdoc.com/en/tag/start_date/
http://osmdoc.com/en/tag/end_date/
maybe someone could create the tag pages for those on wiki?
2009/5/22 Peter Dörrie
Ivan Garcia wrote:
Hi, could you tell me by looking at this picture [1] how to tag this in
OSM ?
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_8Y0T3EnBVPw/SJcJ13KnOII/BCg/ot4X2My6CvA/s400/vietnam%2Balley.jpg
It's an alley where only people/motorbikes can go.
access=no
foot=yes
bicycle=yes (I assume
Maarten Deen wrote:
I've searched the wiki and I have used the tag myself, but there seems to be
no documentation for restriction= ?
This is, in fact, documented.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Ben Laenen wrote:
On Tuesday 26 May 2009, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 09:56:42AM +0200, Ivan Garcia wrote:
Hi Peter, which your approach, I believe that the render by osm
will be the same than a normal residential street
No, I guess, it will have a red dashed transparent
andrzej zaborowski wrote:
2009/5/26 Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason ava...@gmail.com:
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 7:56 AM, Ivan Garcia capisc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Peter, which your approach, I believe that the render by osm will be the
same than a normal residential street, what highway tag can I use
andrzej zaborowski wrote:
2009/5/26 Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason ava...@gmail.com:
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 7:56 AM, Ivan Garcia capisc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Peter, which your approach, I believe that the render by osm will be the
same than a normal residential street, what highway tag can I use
Greg Troxel wrote:
I'd agree that service isn't quite right, if that's the front of the
buildings. But similarly residential isn't right either (I guess we all
think of that as something with pavements/sidewalks).
highway=unclassified for now (and throw a fixme= tag explaining the
- Zitierten Text ausblenden -
Greg Troxel wrote:
I'd agree that service isn't quite right, if that's the front of th=
e
buildings. But similarly residential isn't right either (I guess we=
all
think of that as something with pavements/sidewalks).
highway=3Dunclassified for now (and
USHAKOV, Sergey wrote:
Hi,
the wiki page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dliving_street
suggests that 'living_street' objects should be attributed with a 'name'
tag. Meanwhile it is not uncommon for residential areas to have unnamed
alleys inside, and the latter may form
Jens Müller wrote:
On 06.06.2009 15:14, Christoph Böhme wrote:
in Germany a living_street is a designated type of street with a
special sign [1]. So, I would only use living_street for this type of
streets.
Living streets are actully _zones_, so any alley at a living street is
itself a
USHAKOV, Sergey wrote:
Hi again,
looks like I have brought a lot of confusion in my previous posts by misuse
of the word 'alley'. The latter seems to have too broad range of meanings,
and many of them are not what I meant. Just compare
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alley (not good as a
Nic Roets wrote:
Hi Russ,
Does http://www.opengreenmap.org/ count ? The only thing that open
about them is that they use FOSS and they are open to accepting pins in
a Google Map. (The same can be said about Google Earth, so they are as
open as the Democratic People's Republic of Korea is
I'm curious if bicycle boulevards would qualify as living streets, given
that a living street would most closely describe a bicycle boulevard in
OSM terms, though a bicycle boulevard might lack pedestrian facilities.
Frequently, these are not streets you would want to let the kids play
in, as the
USHAKOV, Sergey wrote:
Wikipedia isn't the best example making a judgement call on this,
either; our own wiki is much better in this regard. Our wiki has
tagging examples and graphics that seem to make it pretty clear that the
living_street tag applies only to ways that are actually
I'm curious if bicycle boulevards would qualify as living streets, giv=
en
that a living street would most closely describe a bicycle boulevard i=
n
OSM terms, though a bicycle boulevard might lack pedestrian facilities=
=2E
Frequently, these are not streets you would want to let the kids
Karl Newman wrote:
*Avoid duplicate copies of messages?*
When you are listed explicitly in the To: or Cc: headers of a list
message, you can opt to not receive another copy from the mailing list.
Select /Yes/ to avoid receiving copies from the mailing list; select
/No/ to receive copies.
Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
Mario Salvini wrote:
Even in germany on these roads there are no additional rights-of-way in
comparison to normal cycleways (except that bicycles get the
officially allowance to drive next to each other and not just inline.
buts that's piece of cake ;) ). A
Mario Salvini wrote:
Richard Fairhurst schrieb:
Shaun McDonald wrote:
In my eyes, that road would be simply tagged with highway=cycleway.
plus designation=cycleroad
cheers
Richard
is there a benefit instead of just tagging these ways:
highway=cycleway + motor_vehicle=yes ?
Ed Loach wrote:
In my eyes, that road would be simply tagged with
highway=cycleway.
As per the discussion on the talk page of the proposal.
Alternatively highway=(road type), access=no, bicycle=yes. There are
arguments I believe that in exceptions where cars are also allowed,
having a
Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
2009/6/10 Mario Salvini salv...@t-online.de:
tag both ways as:
highway=cycleway
motor_vehicle=yes
footway=right
parking:right=inline
parrking:left=diagonal
width=13
I won't have it. This feature is a road, not a 20 metre wide cycleway
with parking
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2009/6/10 Mario Salvini salv...@t-online.de:
tag both ways as:
highway=cycleway
motor_vehicle=yes
footway=right
parking:right=inline
parrking:left=diagonal
width=13
the rest you don't like is just a rendering issue but not about data, I
think.
the rendering
Richard Mann wrote:
I think designation is about the legal status of a way, particularly
where that might not be obvious from, or in conflict with the physical
characteristics of the way.
On physical characteristics, you can get a fair way with
highway=residential + maxspeed=(say)30. There
si...@mungewell.org wrote:
Imagine if we scale this OSM and filter gps traces collected by cars, we
have an empirical data on the average traffic speed.
Unfortunately the GPS traces will be 'slow biased' as we all slow/stop to
take pictures of post boxes etc.
Depends; some of us just
Michael Barabanov wrote:
Can we use relations same way as for more complex cycle routes for this one?
Yes, though you're not limited to just a specific kind of way for relations.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
talk mailing
Karl Newman wrote:
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org
mailto:ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
Karl Newman wrote:
*Avoid duplicate copies of messages?*
When you are listed explicitly in the To: or Cc: headers of a list
message, you can
Richard Mann wrote:
This is a request for comments on the proposal for a new
Key:designation. Hopefully it's had it's rough edges removed already,
but I would appreciate your comments.
Richard
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Designation
I'm opposed; this seems like
Ted Percival wrote:
If it's not a through road for vehicles but is for bicycles that could
be a challenge to tag access restrictions on. Perhaps a node with
barrier=* if there is one.
The barriers aren't usually barriers as such, but rather turn
restrictions in place with exceptions for
Mario Salvini wrote:
Martin Koppenhoefer schrieb:
2009/6/10 Shaun McDonald sh...@shaunmcdonald.me.uk:
In my eyes, that road would be simply tagged with highway=cycleway.
there are some main differences though: usually they are normal
streets changed in designation. That is cars are
Cartinus wrote:
But all other cyclestreets I know of in the Netherlands are signposted with
signs that have no legal status at all. Using designation=cyclestreet there
would not be appropriate. Using highway=residential or unclassified plus
cycleway=cyclestreet sounds like a very good idea
On Fri, 2009-09-11 at 14:49 +0100, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Google has a really enlightened guy called the Data Liberation
Front. His role is to make it easy for people to get their data out
of Google - rather than it being locked in.
Notice that signing online petitions to encourage
Dave Hansen wrote:
On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 15:05 +, Andy Allan wrote:
So please, turn away from imports and work on getting mappers in
charge, especially out pounding the streets. The outcome will be much,
much better in the end, and that end will come much, much quicker.
I think TIGER
Ulf Lamping wrote:
Well, the zumo 550 (which is very certainly a somewhat roughetized nuvi)
has no snap to road setting (it has not a lot of options in that
regard at all).
I did made experiments with the track log. Some of the tracks did
*suspiciously* looked like a snap to road while
Matt Amos wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Brian Quinion
openstreet...@brian.quinion.co.uk wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists)
ajrli...@googlemail.com wrote:
This should be tagged in a different way that uses fact instead of
opinion/fiction.
Mike Harris wrote:
Oh dear - and I thought this was going to be simple! We're back to the
confusion and overlap between the various keys and their values. If the
mode_of_transport=yes/no tags have the same implications as the access= tags
then do we need both?
Yes. Access= sets the default,
kaerast wrote:
Claudius wrote:
Down-grade them to grade4 or grade5. It's not your job to fix the
router's routing in the data.
The wiki suggests that the track grades are for surface type rather than
usability. Yet there does also exist surface=* so I'm not sure. The
grades sound
In Salem, Oregon, I have encountered a ramp that I can't quite seem to
make a restriction that JOSM thinks is valid, so I'm wondering what the
expected way to handle such a situation is. The area in question is
visible at
Tobias Knerr wrote:
Ben Laenen wrote:
The proposal Conditions for access tags allows to alternatively use
oneway=yes + oneway:bicycle=no
which is a bit more flexible because it is not limited to bicycles,
see
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Conditions_for_a
ccess_tags
Ben Laenen wrote:
On Sunday 26 April 2009, Tobias Knerr wrote:
Renaud MICHEL schrieb:
I didn't find an answer in the wiki, how should I tag roads that
are one way for motorized vehicles but two way for bicycle?
The documented and established way to do so is
oneway=yes + cycleway=opposite,
Eddy Petrișor wrote:
Paul Johnson a scris:
Ben Laenen wrote:
On Sunday 26 April 2009, Tobias Knerr wrote:
Renaud MICHEL schrieb:
I didn't find an answer in the wiki, how should I tag roads that
are one way for motorized vehicles but two way for bicycle?
The documented and established way
Richard Mann wrote:
Why not tag it as a cycleway? Then it will display as a cycleway. How is
it different from anything else that might be tagged as a cycleway?
At least when I'm trying to decide, I ask two questions: 1) Does it
allow bicycles, and 2) Is it wide enough for two cyclists going
Richard Mann wrote:
It comes down to what you think is meant by highway=cycleway. If you
think that it means a cycle superhighway, then obviously you don't want
to apply that to a shared-with-pedestrians route.
Depends on jurisdiction, of course. One problem OSM has with handling
Oregon and
Jacek Konieczny wrote:
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 01:10:13PM +0200, Mario Salvini wrote:
If such paths are designated for foot ans bicyle as well, why don't you
tag them both as designated?
highway=path foot=designated bicycle=designated ( or footway
+bicycle=designated or
Mike Harris wrote:
Be careful with dogging - it has a quite different meaning in British
English (;) - on the other hand, I think you did mention it was in Oregon,
so maybe ...
I wasn't entirely unaware of the connotation... it does successfully
screw over cycle traffic, especially if they
Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Adam Schreiber wrote:
We don't know where the wikipedia users sourced their cooridinates from.
Oh yes we do: Google Maps.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Obtaining_geographic_coordinates#Google_tools
There is absolutely no way that Wikipedia-derived
Russ Nelson wrote:
On May 6, 2009, at 2:02 PM, Dair Grant wrote:
Russ Nelson wrote:
TeleAtlas data is copyrighted, and when licensed is licensed under an
incompatible copyright.
The data you're proposing taking from Wikipedia is probably derived,
via
Google, from that same TeleAtlas
N are known to contain easter eggs (though I don't recall which of the
two denies this publicly).
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Just a heads up to everyone, Metro DRC is holding a staff meeting on
Monday regarding moving to a crowdsourced model to maintain the map. I
contacted the Bike There lead yesterday, who informed me this morning
that my timing was impeccable, and my expressed interest in merging this
data in OSM
Greg Troxel wrote:
I just mapped a CVS, which is a store that sells lots of personal
hygiene stuff and has a real pharmacy (with a licensed pharmacist, who
can fill prescriptions signed by doctors). I used amenity=pharmacy
dispensing=yes, but find the description on the tag page confusing. I
A few weeks ago, I contacted Oregon GEO to see if I could get the
official GIS data for Oregon relicensed for OpenStreetMap. After a
three-week delay from my initial contact, I got a response to check the
website again: They had updated it so all their data is in the public
domain.
So, all of
Adam Schreiber wrote:
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 5:55 PM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
Greg Troxel wrote:
I just mapped a CVS, which is a store that sells lots of personal
hygiene stuff and has a real pharmacy (with a licensed pharmacist, who
can fill prescriptions signed by doctors
Stefan Bethke wrote:
Am 09.05.2009 um 08:59 schrieb Paul Johnson:
Yes, but here in the US you wouldn't call anything where you couldn't
get a prescription filled a pharmacy so the dispensing tag is
redundant. I think that's what he's getting at.
That's not true: I can think of several
Sam Vekemans wrote:
Where the only way i know to map it is to use a relation and call it
route=greenway and dont have it render on the cyclemap. Just map the
sections as appropriate.
Greenway is the US/Canadianism for cycleway.
___
talk mailing
Greg Troxel wrote:
I don't follow this. I think that in the US a cycleway would be called
either a bike path or rail trail, depending on origin.
You'd likely be wrong. Willamette Greenway is a very long, very popular
bicycle arterial in Portland. The only thing it implies is
non-motorized,
On Sun, 07 Feb 2010 13:58:38 -0500, Chris Hunter wrote:
Last night, user NE2 cleaned up the interstate system by merging all
of the states with 2 relations per interstate back into 1 relation with
direction-based roles. I've already requested a roll-back on the area I
was working on, but I
Looked at http://www.mapdust.com/detail/1978573 and noticed there doesn't
seem to be any ways, but the nodes that belonged to the missing ways are
still there. History only indicates Acrosscanadatrails as being the only
person who has touched those nodes. Quite confused as to what happened
here.
On Mar 6, 2012 10:11 AM, Andrew Allison andrew.alli...@teksavvy.com
wrote:
On Sun, 2012-03-04 at 16:43 -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
Looked at http://www.mapdust.com/detail/1978573 and noticed there
doesn't seem to be any ways, but the nodes that belonged to the
missing ways are still
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 3:53 AM, Julio Costa Zambelli
julio.co...@openstreetmap.cl wrote:
The map has the same easter eggs as Waze OSM import did in early 2010
(http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2010-August/053579.html),
so I agree with Richards time frame estimate.
Waze is using
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org wrote:
Thanks for summarizing Richard. Really amazing to see the amount of response
this is generating. Only some of the Apple-specific blogs are catching on to
this, MacRumors among them:
On Mar 22, 2012 5:14 AM, Richard Mann richard.mann.westoxf...@gmail.com
wrote:
Relations are not categories. They are for recording geospatial
relationships between elements, not for putting things in groups.
I agree, this has the real potential to overcomplicate editing routes in
places where
On Mar 22, 2012 7:32 AM, Petr Morávek [Xificurk] xific...@gmail.com wrote:
Paul Johnson wrote:
On Mar 22, 2012 5:14 AM, Richard Mann
richard.mann.westoxf...@gmail.com
mailto:richard.mann.westoxf...@gmail.com wrote:
Relations are not categories. They are for recording geospatial
On Mar 22, 2012 11:29 AM, Robert Scott li...@humanleg.org.uk wrote:
On Thursday 22 March 2012, Spod OSM wrote:
http://www.japantoday.com/category/lifestyle/view/crowds-create-wikipedia-style-maps-of-the-world?utm_campaign=jt_newsletterutm_medium=emailutm_source=jt_newsletter_2012-03-22_AM
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 5:36 AM, Mikel Maron mikel_ma...@yahoo.com wrote:
User chdr (http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/chdr) seems to be running a
script to automatically replace street name abbreviations with the full
word.
so 1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW becomes 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 3:01 AM, Павел Фомин pavel...@yandex.ru wrote:
Arrrgh. We should have rules on mapping disputed areas and partially
recognised countries. Is OSM showing the internationally accepted situation
or is it taking into account every single front line?
Seems to be
On Apr 6, 2012 7:25 AM, Philip Barnes p...@trigpoint.me.uk wrote:
Anyone else try to fix bugs off there? I have tried as I want to improve
OSM.
I do regularly in the Oklahoma, Kansas, Oregon and Washington areas.
I am increasingly finding it a waste of time, too many bugs are labelled
On May 9, 2012 11:27 AM, Cartinus carti...@xs4all.nl wrote:
On 05/09/2012 10:54 AM, Richard Mann wrote:
Obviously, OCM can render what it likes, but I think this neatly
illustrates that OSM tagging of cycle routes is missing a trick or two.
The first map in your mail is the kind of map
On May 29, 2012 1:16 AM, Nick Whitelegg nick.whitel...@solent.ac.uk
wrote:
This is a very one sided argument and assumes that commercial online maps
are accurate. It also completely neglects the fact that you can use OSM
data without a fee andf without someone telling you what you can and cannot
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 2:15 AM, Lambertus o...@na1400.info wrote:
A few recent quotes from OSM Garmin map users who emailed to say thanks:
I travelled for 40 days in 7 different countries in South America abd found
the Garmin Maps very helpful.
I was driving last week through the netherlands
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 5:59 AM, Werner Poppele popp...@hm.edu wrote:
Dont forget that an importer can produce thousands of errors in a very short
period of time. All these must be fixed by humans. In some cases years after
the import
Notorious North American example: TIGER...
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 8:51 PM, Alex Rollin alex.rol...@gmail.com wrote:
I am looking into how to use custom imagery for tracing.
Can anyone point me at a process, and how-to?
I was looking at the Digital Globe site, thinking of buying some images.
What would I do with them to load them
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 6:09 AM, maning sambale
emmanuel.samb...@gmail.comwrote:
Just sharing something that happened during one of my osm session with
newbies.
Using P2, asked one user to zoom in closer. He/she then tried clicking the
big OSM logo in the upperleft corner of the website. ;)
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.netwrote:
Starting this week, we will be 'redacting' the contributions (less than
1%) from the live database that are not compatible with the new Contributor
Terms and Open Database Licence (ODbL) - in other words, they will no
Is there someplace I can find the source for this plugin? I really want to
enable the ability to select multiple bugs at once and tag all the bugs
selected as fixed or invalid with the same comment.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 5:43 PM, colliar colliar4e...@aol.com wrote:
On 16/07/12 01:58, Paul Johnson wrote:
Is there someplace I can find the source for this plugin? I really want
to enable the ability to select multiple bugs at once and tag all the
bugs selected as fixed or invalid
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 2:49 AM, Eric Marsden eric.mars...@free.fr wrote:
people should not read Twitter feeds.
I fixed that for you. At least for those of us not fluent with Chinese,
Japanese, Cherokee, or some other language that uses ideograms or a
syllabary instead of an alphabet,
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Maetma 91 maetm...@gmail.com wrote:
Before I say to my friends Use Openstreetmap it is cool and today
they laugh me and say Openstreetmap is shit, it miss lots roads
So fix it. Also, this could have been prevented in advance by using the
license review tools
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 6:47 AM, SomeoneElse li...@mail.atownsend.org.ukwrote:
Gregory wrote:
I don't have an account on the forum.
Your standard OSM login should work there I think?
There's also the whole forums are a PITA factor that mailing lists lack
entirely.
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Thomas Davie tom.da...@gmail.com wrote:
On 30 Jul 2012, at 17:26, Maarten Deen md...@xs4all.nl wrote:
What's the joke on the current image of the week? It's a reference to
Harry Potter and the Olympics? Is it a rendering of a real Olympics stadium
or what?
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 11:25 PM, popp...@hm.edu wrote:
I used the remaining nodes to create some highways. You may have to split
them into smaller parts according to the real world. Its best to find a
local mapper to refine the highways.
I tagged the newly created highways as
I'm unable to load certain JOSM plugins (namely: measurement, openvisible,
DirectUpload) on amd64 Debian, using either Sun or OpenJDK. I'm pretty
stumped on how to solve this...any hints? JOSM output follows.
baloo@paddington:~/Downloads$ josm
Using /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/bin/java to
I'm wondering where I would be able to see cache stats for imagery caches
in JOSM, and any settings that might influence caching. At my home here in
Oklahoma, I tend to only have a GPRS connection to the internet, so being
able to maximize the local cache would be quite useful.
On Wednesday, October 3, 2012, Dave F. wrote:
This looks like a great resource I'm using it regularly but I'm not sure
edits done in Potlatch should automatically be considered suspicious, and
classifying an edit 'red' because six nodes one way were removed when
134/3 were added seems a
I'd love to reproduce that unofficially here in Tulsa. I was one of the
OSM folks that worked on the data for the TriMet project. I haven't ever
set up OTP before, I suggested it to Tulsa Transit sometime last year, they
said it hadn't occurred to them to try an online trip planner. Then turned
I'm trying to organize one in the Tulsa area, using this Google
eventhttps://plus.google.com/u/0/events/c3ohfbgso96b1ahm1li1hba5aucto
organize and promote it.
On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 5:41 AM, Matthias Meißer dig...@arcor.de wrote:
Hi everybody,
I'd like to announce the fellow of the night of
On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Stephan Knauss o...@stephans-server.dewrote:
As you mentioned StreetView: Using it to create a database is likely a
violation of their TOS and OSM does not want this practice.
In which way Google could have copyright or database rights on factual
data derived
On Saturday, November 3, 2012, Ian Sergeant wrote:
On 04/11/12 07:24, Paul Johnson wrote:
Would it be acceptable to use Street View to aid your memory of local
knowledge of the ground truth? Something that's on the tip of your brain
and you have actually been there, but can't remember what
On Friday, December 21, 2012, Richard Mann wrote:
If there's a way of stopping the API from storing/returning very small
numbers in scientific notation, I'm sure it'll save someone (else) some
heartache in future.
Or at least reserve it for more extreme cases than that...e±10 would be a
Sounds like perhaps highway=pedestrian, vehicle=destination would be closer
to what we're looking for?
On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 6:32 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
wrote:
2012/12/24 Maarten Deen md...@xs4all.nl:
On 2012-12-23 23:53, Chris Hill wrote:
On 23/12/12 15:41,
Not necessarily. Urban blind people probably want to know where there's
likely to be a wall.
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 7:30 AM, Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com wrote:
Gregory nomoregra...@googlemail.com writes:
Why do you want to see outlines autogenerated from aerial imagery, you
could just
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 8:57 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
I think it is ok for us to post stuff to Twitter, and I think we should
make room for such news on our web page (many web sites have a widget that
shows the most recent twitter mentions).
I would dislike a follow us on
On Wednesday, January 9, 2013, Joseph Reeves wrote:
Ok, I'll bite...
I think this would be missing our audience. If you're illiterate (a
group Twitter caters specifically to), what are the odds you're going to
be able to make use of a map, much less contribute constructively to OSM?
How
.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org
Date: Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 9:36 AM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Simple improvement(s) to openstreetmap.org
To: talk@openstreetmap.org talk@openstreetmap.org
On Wednesday, January 9, 2013, Joseph Reeves wrote:
Ok, I'll bite
A little disappointed the alt-text didn't bring up any of the long-term
debates simmering slowly under the lid here...
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Alex Barth a...@mapbox.com wrote:
http://xkcd.com/1167/
___
talk mailing list
What's the best tool to get Garmin devices to show maxspeed on screen?
AFAICT, mkgmap doesn't handle including speed limit data so it appears on
screen during navigation, thus also providing speed limit alerts. This
would not only be useful for navigation, but also for finding incorrectly
tagged
I'm starting to wonder if something could be adapted from the cycleway node
style network tagging.
On Feb 13, 2013 8:41 AM, Joseph Reeves iknowjos...@gmail.com wrote:
The thing with the UK is that you get places named after junctions -
Church Cross, or whatever. That may well be a locality, but
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 7:06 PM, Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com wrote:
My other advice is that you can put osm data on a microsd, and take it
to the store and try it. See the mkgmap docs/wiki, but basically, once
you get the file, call it /Garmin/gmapsupp.img. Just power down the
unit, put in
On Feb 14, 2013 2:54 AM, Kevin Peat k...@k3v.eu wrote:
On 14 Feb 2013 01:10, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org
Annoyingly, most of the cool goodies like on-screen speed limit and
overspeed alert and lane assist aren't available in the mkgmap output as
far as I can tell¹...
I have rolled
On Friday, March 8, 2013, Mario Danelli wrote:
Dear all,
I just released Android country versions of the Master City game
Where can we find out more about this game?
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't access=no implied with any
construction=* value other than minor? At least this is the feel I got
from live use as the way mkgmap interprets things.
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 8:57 PM, Russ Nelson nel...@crynwr.com wrote:
Clifford Snow writes:
How do you tag
1 - 100 of 1503 matches
Mail list logo
