On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 6:06 PM, Mike Collinson m...@ayeltd.biz wrote:
The next step is introduce dual licensing for *new* OpenStreetMap
contributors as soon as possible. When they register, they will be asked to
license their contributions under both CC-BY-SA and ODbL until and when the
ODbL
On 10 February 2010 23:17, Pieren pier...@gmail.com wrote:
But now, the OSMF should speed-up the transition ! We are many contributors
that are reluctant to modify or improve existing data because of the threat
that many old or minor contributions will disappear - not because people
will
Hi,
John Smith wrote:
If the reason for changing licenses is because cc-by isn't applicable
for geodata doesn't that mean that essentially the current data can
just be converted to ODBL without needing written permission to
change it?
This has been said about 150 times, by various people who
On 10 February 2010 23:45, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Truth is, you can legally be an asshole.
I wasn't comment on the ethics of doing so, merely if it could be done
legally, the sticking point here is people that won't respond and what
to do about their past contributions, not
Michael Collinson wrote:
At the moment, we are trying to address some concerns raised by OSM and
OSMF members about the new Contributor Terms. These have been slightly
modified and the latest version can be seen here
http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/License/Contributor_Terms
This is much
Op 10-02-10 14:57, Richard Fairhurst schreef:
Michael Collinson wrote:
At the moment, we are trying to address some concerns raised by OSM and
OSMF members about the new Contributor Terms. These have been slightly
modified and the latest version can be seen here
On 10 February 2010 14:09, Stefan de Konink ste...@konink.de wrote:
a contributor (whether using a single or multiple accounts) who has
edited the Project in any 3 calendar months from the last 6 months (i.e.
there is a demonstrated interest over time); and
has maintained a valid email
Op 10-02-10 15:19, Grant Slater schreef:
On 10 February 2010 14:09, Stefan de Koninkste...@konink.de wrote:
a contributor (whether using a single or multiple accounts) who has
edited the Project in any 3 calendar months from the last 6 months (i.e.
there is a demonstrated interest over
Hi,
Stefan de Konink wrote:
Does this mean that an active contributor is such without an OSMF
membership?
Of course. There are many in OSMF who would actually like to implement
this the other way round - anyone who is an active contributor is
automatically an OSMF member. But this is not
Hi,
Richard Fairhurst wrote:
This is much better. Really pleased to see this.
I especially like the
you (You)
bit. It sounds so ... legal.
Bye
Frederik
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Stefan de Konink wrote:
Is goes 'edited the project' then as far as 'wrote a
wikipage', 'submitted a bug', 'edited the source'.
Or is exclusively to geo-data?
We're only talking about the licensing of geodata here. There's no reasoning
for a coder to have a say over data which they haven't
On 09/02/10 17:06, Mike Collinson wrote:
At the moment, we are trying to address some concerns raised by OSM
and OSMF members about the new Contributor Terms. These have been
slightly modified and the latest version can be seen here
http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/License/Contributor_Terms
Here is an update from the License Working Group.
We feel we've reached a reasonable community consensus to move forward
carefully based on results from the OSMF member vote and from the general
community poll (below).
At the moment, we are trying to address some concerns raised by OSM and
-- Forwarded message --
From: Mike Collinson m...@ayeltd.biz
Date: 10 February 2010 03:06
Subject: [OSM-talk] New OSM GeoData License Status
To: annou...@openstreetmap.org, t...@openstreetmap.org
Here is an update from the License Working Group.
We feel we've reached
14 matches
Mail list logo
