Re: 4.2.44.2 to 5.0.8

2011-04-18 Thread Arjan de Groot
On Sun, 17 Apr 2011 14:36:00 +0200, Viktor Kabelac wrote: Funnywise this reminds me on all the GFs I tried to teach the same: speak up on time, Which has been done, numerous times, for at least five (5), if not ten (10) years. Incessantly. don't silently expect and be disappointed later.

Re: 4.2.44.2 to 5.0.8

2011-04-18 Thread Dwight Corrin
On Saturday, April 16, 2011, 7:08:49 PM, Richard Newman wrote: 1) Forward a message and the cursor starts in the body of the message text rather than To it's at To here -- Dwight A. Corrin 316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax dcorrin at fastmail.fm photo galleries at

Re: 4.2.44.2 to 5.0.8

2011-04-18 Thread Richard Newman
Hello Dwight, Monday, April 18, 2011, 3:30:33 PM, you wrote: DC it's at To here And 5.0.81 fixed it here. -- Best regards, Richardmailto:newmangro...@gmail.com -- Using The Bat! v5.0.8.1 (BETA) on Windows XP6 Build 7601 Service Pack 1

Re: 4.2.44.2 to 5.0.8

2011-04-17 Thread Alto Speckhardt
Hi, R It is a beta test group in order to FIND these issues so they R can be fixed. They have fixed a TON of issues and rewritten the program. And came up with _this_? I think once and for all it has been proven that at least one of the following is true: - You can't write a complex program

Re: 4.2.44.2 to 5.0.8

2011-04-17 Thread Viktor Kabelac
dear Alto, Sunday, April 17, 2011, 12:21:50 PM, you wrote: And came up with _this_? - RIT can't maintain a program of TheBat's complexity. We don't want to write it ourselves. And RIT obviously can't handle the job either. Maybe you better watch in your face attitude and stop knocking

Re: 4.2.44.2 to 5.0.8

2011-04-17 Thread Alto Speckhardt
Hi, VK Maybe you better watch in your face attitude and stop knocking Ritlabs VK down like this. Does it look to you that RIT would be up to the job? This is not an insult. It's an observation. VK Ritlabs do a terrific job, they still have a terrific program around. I see, that answeres

Re: 4.2.44.2 to 5.0.8

2011-04-17 Thread Mark Partous
Hello Alto, Sunday, April 17, 2011, 1:44:26 PM, you wrote: AS My playing days are over. Good. Now you could try to improve the way you communicate. Did it ever occur to you that insulting seldom leads to getting what you want? -- Best Wishes, Mark using The

Re: 4.2.44.2 to 5.0.8

2011-04-17 Thread Feli Wilcke
Hello Richard, On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 20:12:07 -0400GMT Richard Newman wrote: RN Add #4 to my gripes and inconveniences: RN 4) The filter to move and mark as read, does not mark as read. I cannot confirm this, here such a filter works as expected. -- Regards, Feli:de-bb: The Bat! 5.0.8 on

Re: 4.2.44.2 to 5.0.8

2011-04-17 Thread Viktor Kabelac
Hello Alto, Sunday, April 17, 2011, 1:44:26 PM, you wrote: You did realize that I hardly wrote a single mail during the whole v5 beta phase? I intentionally held back even though what had been presented was of abysmal quality. It was work in progress, maybe clear that they actually intended

Re: 4.2.44.2 to 5.0.8

2011-04-17 Thread Alto Speckhardt
Hi, VK Maybe, just *maybe* and *sometimes* it's better to speak up when you just VK get the hint of a suspicion that things may not be going [...] Just prior to the release of v5, many voices did. Voices in much better standing with RIT than me, and they still were ignored. -- MfG, Alto

Re:4.2.44.2 to 5.0.8

2011-04-17 Thread David Elliott
Hello Rick, On Sat, 16 Apr 2011, at 20:47:02 [which was on Sunday at 01:47 where I live] you wrote: DE And frankly I am disappointed. There are lot's of us who are disappointed ... It is a beta test group in order to FIND these issues so they can be fixed. Ok this is a beta list. But

Re: 4.2.44.2 to 5.0.8

2011-04-16 Thread Roger Phillips
Hello David, Saturday, April 16, 2011, 6:46:52 AM, among other things, you wrote: DE Since there was going to be no more developmet of Ver 4 as quoted in DE mid:274287867.20110408225...@ritlabs.com I decide to move to 5. DE I have taken the version publicly available from the web and installed

Re: 4.2.44.2 to 5.0.8

2011-04-16 Thread Dwight Corrin
On Friday, April 15, 2011, 11:46:52 PM, David Elliott wrote: As far as I am concerned the only reeal difference between the last beta version of 4 and the first public version of 5 is the number of bugs that I encounter has gone up. It takes me back to the days of ver 1.3x when I first

Re:4.2.44.2 to 5.0.8

2011-04-16 Thread David Elliott
Greetings Dwight, On Sat, 16 Apr 2011, at 07:37:59 [which was on Saturday at 13:37 where I live] you wrote: On Friday, April 15, 2011, 11:46:52 PM, David Elliott wrote: As far as I am concerned the only reeal difference between the last beta version of 4 and the first public version of 5 is

Re: 4.2.44.2 to 5.0.8

2011-04-16 Thread Richard Newman
Hello David, Saturday, April 16, 2011, 12:46:52 AM, you wrote: DE And frankly I am disappointed. There are lot's of us who are disappointed and I'm in the process of going back to 4.2. Too many inconveniences exist and are being ignored to date by the developers. In particular, my gripes and

Re: 4.2.44.2 to 5.0.8

2011-04-16 Thread Richard Newman
Hello David, Add #4 to my gripes and inconveniences: 4) The filter to move and mark as read, does not mark as read. -- Best regards, Richardmailto:newmangro...@gmail.com -- Using The Bat! v5.0.8 on Windows XP6 Build 7601 Service Pack 1

Re: 4.2.44.2 to 5.0.8

2011-04-16 Thread Rick
Hello David, Saturday, April 16, 2011, 12:46:52 AM, you wrote: DE And frankly I am disappointed. There are lot's of us who are disappointed and I'm in the process of going back to 4.2. Too many inconveniences exist and are being ignored to date by the developers. I'm going back to 4.2

4.2.44.2 to 5.0.8

2011-04-15 Thread David Elliott
Hello All, Since there was going to be no more developmet of Ver 4 as quoted in mid:274287867.20110408225...@ritlabs.com I decide to move to 5. I have taken the version publicly available from the web and installed straight over the 4.2.44.2. And frankly I am disappointed. 1 So far it has