Re: Mail tracking

2008-05-22 Thread Bill McQuillan
On Wed, 2008-05-21, Tom wrote: Thursday, May 22, 2008, 1:39:58 AM, you wrote: To my knowledge this will only work with HTML mails that load contents from the web. If you stick to plain text or avoid loading content not delivered with the mail, this cannot happen. Please CMIIW. Does

Re: Mail tracking

2008-05-22 Thread Tom
Thursday, May 22, 2008, 3:36:01 PM, you wrote: Tom @ 2008-5-21 9:59:42 PM Mail tracking mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To my knowledge this will only work with HTML mails that load contents from the web. If you stick to plain text or avoid loading content not delivered with the mail, this cannot

Re[2]: Mail tracking

2008-05-22 Thread Mean Drake
Hello Bill, Thursday, May 22, 2008, 11:38:48 AM, you wrote: I believe that TB v3, that you seem to be using, will *not* load content. However, I believe that TB v4 is able to load such content. This is why I am not about to upgrade! The primary reason I started using TB was the fact that I

Re: Mail tracking

2008-05-22 Thread Nick Dutton
Hello, On Wednesday, May 21, 2008, you wrote: RO Another method would be to view everything as plain text only. Another advantage of plain-text viewing is that you can see the real url of links within a mail. In an html message there might be a simple looking link such as: www.somecompany.com,

Re: Mail tracking

2008-05-22 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Mean, On Thu, 22 May 2008 14:44:29 +0530 GMT (22/05/2008, 16:14 +0700 GMT), Mean Drake wrote: I believe that TB v3, that you seem to be using, will *not* load content. However, I believe that TB v4 is able to load such content. This is why I am not about to upgrade! The primary reason

Mail tracking

2008-05-21 Thread Tom
Hello Everyone, I stumbled across this thread at Wilders http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?p=1245802#post1245802 dealing with the issue of some emails having secret coding included to report back to the sender not only when the email was delivered or read but even how long the email

Re: Mail tracking

2008-05-21 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi Tom, on Wed, 21 May 2008 22:26:34 +1000GMT (21.05.2008, 14:26 +0200GMT here), you wrote: T I stumbled across this thread at Wilders T http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?p=1245802#post1245802 T dealing with the issue of some emails having secret coding included to T report back to

Re: Mail tracking

2008-05-21 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Tom, On Wed, 21 May 2008 22:26:34 +1000GMT (21-5-2008, 14:26 +0200, where I live), you wrote: T I stumbled across this thread at Wilders T http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?p=1245802#post1245802 T dealing with the issue of some emails having secret coding included to T report

Re: Mail tracking

2008-05-21 Thread Tom
Thursday, May 22, 2008, 1:39:58 AM, you wrote: Hi Tom, on Wed, 21 May 2008 22:26:34 +1000GMT (21.05.2008, 14:26 +0200GMT here), you wrote: T I stumbled across this thread at Wilders T http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?p=1245802#post1245802 T dealing with the issue of some

Re: Mail tracking

2008-05-21 Thread Christopher W .
Tom @ 2008-5-21 9:59:42 PM Mail tracking mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To my knowledge this will only work with HTML mails that load contents from the web. If you stick to plain text or avoid loading content not delivered with the mail, this cannot happen. Please CMIIW. Does reading html emails