On Thursday, December 09, 1999 Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
*.lng file is updated more often, it's just a part of Intpack. It
contains *actual* string resources for the foreign languages
supported (if you understand what I mena:-)). But you'll need
Intpack itself to use *.lng file...
On Thursday, December 09, 1999, Ali Martin wrote:
They fixed a couple problems between the 7th Dec release and the 8th
Dec release. I don't know the specifics though.
I ended up downloading 2 files from different sources, I think, but
anyway, one of the files was dated November 20something,
Douglas Hinds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TF I have jsut downloaded the third official version of 1.38...
Third? I'm downloading now from:
http://www.ritlabs.com/the_bat/beta.html
And the site says: Download The Bat! 1.38 Release second revision
Am I at the wrong site or is the text
Hi Douglas,
on Thursday, December 09, 1999, 4:04:25 PM GMT+0800, Douglas Hinds wrote:
TF I have jsut downloaded the third official version of 1.38...
DH Third? I'm downloading now from:
DH http://www.ritlabs.com/the_bat/beta.html
DH And the site says: Download The Bat! 1.38 Release second
Hi Douglas,
Thursday, December 09, 1999, 7:50:09 AM, you wrote:
DH What's THEBAT.LNG? A Linux / Gnu version?
If only.no it's The Bat's language pack, which allows you to
change the interface language.
--
Best regards,
Mark
Using The Bat! 1.38
under Windows 98 4 10 Build 1998
Hello Mark,
Thursday, December 09, 1999, 3:21:19 AM, you wrote in response to my saying:
DH What's THEBAT.LNG? A Linux / Gnu version?
MA If only.no
I'm told one's in the works.
MA it's The Bat's language pack, which allows you to
MA change the interface language.
Thanks. I use the
Hello Thomas all fellow TBUDL members,
Thursday, December 09, 1999, Thomas wrote:
TF ...Today I downloaded from the official site
TF ftp.ritlabs.com/pub/the_bat/the_bat.exe, ... On the beta site, you
TF get only the executable, whereas the official site has a
TF self-extracting file.
Hi there!
On 9 Dec 99, at 15:25, Douglas Hinds wrote
about "Re[6]: Upgrading, backuping/restori":
TF ...Today I downloaded from the official site
TF ftp.ritlabs.com/pub/the_bat/the_bat.exe, ... On the beta site, you
TF get only the executable, whereas the official site has a
TF
Hello Thomas,
Wednesday, December 08, 1999, 10:55:48 PM, you wrote:
TF Hi Hal,
TF on Thursday, December 09, 1999, 10:05:48 AM GMT+0800, Hal wrote:
N Would like to know if I can upgrade my registered version 1.35 to
N 1.36 without a problem.
DH I would think so. I did.
H BUT when I
Hello Douglas,
Thursday, December 09, 1999, 2:59:07 AM, you wrote:
DH Hello Hal all fellow TBUDL members,
DH Wednesday, December 08, 1999, 8:05:48 PM, Hal wrote:
H Hello Douglas,
DH snip
H ...And your crybaby whiney-assed opinion would be?
DH To whom was that remark addressed?
DH
Hi Douglas,
on Friday, December 10, 1999, 5:25:34 AM GMT+0800, Douglas Hinds wrote:
TF ...Today I downloaded from the official site
TF ftp.ritlabs.com/pub/the_bat/the_bat.exe, ... On the beta site, you
TF get only the executable, whereas the official site has a
TF self-extracting file.
DH
Friday, December 10, 1999
Hello Mark,
Thursday, Thursday, December 09, 1999, you wrote:
Mark Hi Douglas,
Mark Thursday, December 09, 1999, 7:50:09 AM, you wrote:
DH What's THEBAT.LNG? A Linux / Gnu version?
Mark If only.no it's The Bat's language pack, which allows you to
Mark
On Wednesday, December 08, 1999 NDS8nz wrote:
Would like to know if I can upgrade my registered version 1.35 to
1.36 without a problem.
Sure you can. You can either download only the executable file or the
whole distribution (in 1.38 help file is also upgraded!). You can
safely
Hello Douglas,
Tuesday, December 07, 1999, 10:48:03 PM, you wrote:
DH Tuesday, December 07, 1999, NDS8nz wrote:
N Would like to know if I can upgrade my registered version 1.35 to
N 1.36 without a problem.
DH I would think so. I did.
DH DH
BUT when I uninstall The Bat and reinstall (i.e.
structure (was: Re: Upgrade 1.35 1.36)
ST This is fixed in the today's revision of 1.38. Please feel free to
ST download it :-)
I download and installed v. 1.38 (apparently not a beta) yesterday,
Dec. seventh from the ritlabs beta site. Was a revision uploaded on the
eighth or do I have
Douglas Hinds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
I download and installed v. 1.38 (apparently not a beta) yesterday,
Dec. seventh from the ritlabs beta site. Was a revision uploaded on the
eighth or do I have the latest one?
They fixed a couple problems between the 7th Dec release and the 8th
Hi Stefan,
on Thursday, December 09, 1999, 3:49:47 AM GMT+0800, Stefan Tanurkov wrote:
ST This is fixed in the today's revision of 1.38. Please feel free to
ST download it :-)
I have jsut downloaded the third official version of 1.38 - should we
mention download date and when when we report
Hi NDS8nz,
on Wednesday, December 08, 1999, 9:57:24 AM GMT+0800, NDS8nz wrote:
N Would like to know if I can upgrade my registered version 1.35 to 1.36 without a
N problem.
N Thanks,
N Lars O. Brouwer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
There is absolutely no problem. Just put
Tuesday, December 07, 1999, NDS8nz wrote:
N Would like to know if I can upgrade my registered version 1.35 to
N 1.36 without a problem.
I would think so. I did.
DH
--
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To
19 matches
Mail list logo
