Hi
I've recently received some emails that are encrypted pgp-inline but
also signed with s/MIME. Clicking the security button shows me the
s/MIME certificate and tells me the signature is valid but gives no
way to decrypt the pgp message. Is that also true of later TB!
versions?
--
Best
Hi,
A small request i've already made a couple of time... just a hope that it
could reach the right people at Ritlabs :)
Could it be possible to manualy select a S/Mime certificate to sign an eMail ?
In Belgium, we use an eID : the electronic identity card, with this card we can
use
Hi
On Tuesday 5 January 2010 at 9:52:56 PM, in
mid:56429591.20100105225...@freenet.be, Stephane Bouvard wrote:
Hi,
A small request i've already made a couple of time...
just a hope that it could reach the right people at
Ritlabs :)
I see you have asked on this list in previous years. Is
Hi
On Thursday 15 October 2009 at 5:22:50 PM, in
mid:102186075.20091015232...@thomas-bkk.my-fqdn.de, Thomas Fernandez
wrote:
So, the S/Mime sigs from this particular customer now
verify fine. I thank all who contributed.
Glad you got it sorted.
--
Best regards
MFPA
Hello Thomas,
On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 22:52:47 +0700 GMT (10/Oct/09, 22:52 PM +0700 GMT),
Thomas Fernandez wrote:
How do I import a new root certificate into TB!? I
communicate with people who sign all their message by
S/Mime but I cannot verify the sigs. I went to the
organisdation's server
Guten Tag Thomas Fernandez,
am Sonntag, 11. Oktober 2009 um 02:22 schrieben Sie:
JF I saw, how much Zertifikates are in the ZIP File, which poorly is
JF another .exe but you could list the certificates with Commandline
JF Switches, maybe you find here, what you need (about 72 inside):
JF
: 21033D1F
Windows XP 5.1 build 2600 Service Pack 2
AMD Athlon Dual Core 4850e 2,50 GHz, 4 GB RAM
Debian Lenny + Windows XP @VirtualBox 3.0.8 r53138 non-OSE
8 POP3 Accounts - 1 IMAP - 170 (Common) Folders - about 10 Messages
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Hi
On Monday 12 October 2009 at 12:39:32 AM, in
mid:875438613.20091012013...@gmx.de, Jens Franik wrote:
Guten Tag Jens Franik,
am Freitag, 9. Oktober 2009 um 12:17 schrieben Sie:
becoming an Assurer for CaCert.org - a free
Certification Instance for X.509, i would like to
know, if my
Guten Tag MFPA,
am Montag, 12. Oktober 2009 um 02:13 schrieben Sie:
Both that and your previous message verified OK
Ok, thanks, so probably the problem did only affect the other
Accounts - thanks for clearification.
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Jens Franik
mailto:je...@gmx.de
The Bat!
Guten Tag Thomas Fernandez,
am Samstag, 10. Oktober 2009 um 04:42 schrieben Sie:
How do I import a new root certificate into TB!? I communicate with
people who sign all their message by S/Mime but I cannot verify the
sigs.
You need to watch the Details of the S/MIME Certificate, there you
Hello Jens,
On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 16:50:08 +0200 GMT (10/Oct/09, 21:50 PM +0700 GMT),
Jens Franik wrote:
How do I import a new root certificate into TB!? I communicate with
people who sign all their message by S/Mime but I cannot verify the
sigs.
JF You need to watch the Details of the S/MIME
Hi
On Saturday 10 October 2009 at 3:42:12 AM, in
mid:1809206101.20091010094...@thomas-bkk.my-fqdn.de, Thomas
Fernandez wrote:
I see. But S/Mime is internal capability?
You have a choice of internal implementation or Microsoft CryptoAPI
which is set at Options | S/MIME
How do I import
On Saturday, October 10, 2009, 17:38:22, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
They don't seem to have it on their website. However, since I have
imported the cert successfully into IE on my office computer, I will
check on Monday whether I have a .crt file on that computer.
Even if you don't, you can
Guten Tag Thomas Fernandez,
am Samstag, 10. Oktober 2009 um 17:38 schrieben Sie:
The cert authority in the email I am
referring to is called DOD EMAIL.
Resources: Installing DoD Root Certificates
from searching
Hello Jernej,
On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 17:45:58 +0200 GMT (10/Oct/09, 22:45 PM +0700 GMT),
Jernej Simončič wrote:
They don't seem to have it on their website. However, since I have
imported the cert successfully into IE on my office computer, I will
check on Monday whether I have a .crt file on
Hello MFPA,
On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 16:43:21 +0100 GMT (10/Oct/09, 22:43 PM +0700 GMT),
MFPA wrote:
I see. But S/Mime is internal capability?
M You have a choice of internal implementation or Microsoft CryptoAPI
M which is set at Options | S/MIME
I never saw that before. What different does
Hi
On Saturday 10 October 2009 at 4:53:12 PM, in
mid:1004758652.20091010175...@gmx.de, Jens Franik wrote:
Resources: Installing DoD Root Certificates from
searching
http://www.google.de/#q=dod+email+root+certificatebtnG=Google-Suchemeta=aq=foq=dod+email+root+certificate
and watching
Hello Jens,
On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 17:53:12 +0200 GMT (10/Oct/09, 22:53 PM +0700 GMT),
Jens Franik wrote:
The cert authority in the email I am
referring to is called DOD EMAIL.
JF Resources: Installing DoD Root Certificates
JF from searching
JF
Hello MFPA,
On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 17:15:44 +0100 GMT (10/Oct/09, 23:15 PM +0700 GMT),
MFPA wrote:
M Possibly try something like http://crl.disa.mil/getsign?DOD%20CA-21
M I googled 'DOD EMAIL certificate' and selected the first result,
M which was an FAQ page on portal.navfac.navy.mil. Firefox
Hi
On Saturday 10 October 2009 at 5:40:59 PM, in
mid:878417541.20091010234...@thomas-bkk.my-fqdn.de, Thomas Fernandez
wrote:
This is very useful, thank you. NAVFAC is actually my
customer, so you are right on the spot.
Completely by accident (-;
--
Best regards
MFPA
Guten Tag Thomas Fernandez,
am Samstag, 10. Oktober 2009 um 17:38 schrieben Sie:
I will
check on Monday whether I have a .crt file on that computer.
Or you could export from the Browser.
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Jens Franik
mailto:je...@gmx.de
The Bat! 4.2.10.14 + AntiSpamSniper 3.2.1.5 +
Guten Tag Thomas Fernandez,
am Samstag, 10. Oktober 2009 um 18:24 schrieben Sie:
Believe me,
the DOD has so many different departments with different approval
procedures
I saw, how much Zertifikates are in the ZIP File, which poorly is
another .exe but you could list the certificates with
Hello Jens,
On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 19:46:59 +0200 GMT (11/Oct/09, 0:46 AM +0700 GMT),
Jens Franik wrote:
Believe me, the DOD has so many different departments with
different approval procedures
JF I saw, how much Zertifikates are in the ZIP File, which poorly is
JF another .exe but you could
3.2.1.5 + Gaijin XMP Makro Plugin 1.2
Windows XP 5.1 build 2600 Service Pack 2
AMD Athlon Dual Core 4850e 2,50 GHz, 4 GB RAM
Debian Lenny + Windows XP @VirtualBox 3.0.8 r53138 non-OSE
8 POP3 Accounts - 1 IMAP - 170 (Common) Folders - about 10 Messages
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic
Dear Jens,
@9-Oct-2009, 12:17 +0200 (09-Oct 11:17 here) Jens Franik [JF] in
mid:95547564.20091009121...@gmx.de said:
JF becoming an Assurer for CaCert.org - a free Certification Instance for
JF X.509,
Good plan - now that Thawte has announced that it is getting out of
the free personal WOT
Hello Jens,
Friday, October 9, 2009, 12:17:44 PM, you wrote:
JF i would like to know, if my signed Messages can be verified by
JF anyone, Replys even PM welcome.
Verified
--
Best Wishes,
Mark
using The Bat! 4.2.10.14
281 days remaining in 2009.
Actually it's 83
Hello Marck,
On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 11:34:42 +0100 GMT (09/Oct/09, 17:34 PM +0700 GMT),
Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
JF becoming an Assurer for CaCert.org - a free Certification Instance for
JF X.509,
MDP Good plan - now that Thawte has announced that it is getting out of
MDP the free personal WOT
Dear Thomas,
@9-Oct-2009, 23:05 +0700 (09-Oct 17:05 here) Thomas Fernandez [TF] in
mid:1143694602.20091009230...@thomas-bkk.my-fqdn.de said to Marck:
MDP Good plan - now that Thawte has announced that it is getting out of
MDP the free personal WOT circle.
TF Really? What are they planning to
'Ello Marck,
On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 17:25:57 +0100 (your time) you said:
Checking the mail in my TBUDL folder, the signature was good.
Yes, your PGP sig validates here too!
--
Simon (Privateofcourse)
# 9721. Grow Weens Do Hi? ¶
Auxiliary Information:
• The Bat! Pro 4.2.10.1
• Windows XP Pro
Hello Marck,
On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 17:25:57 +0100 GMT (09/Oct/09, 23:25 PM +0700 GMT),
Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
MDP Good plan - now that Thawte has announced that it is getting out of
MDP the free personal WOT circle.
TF Really? What are they planning to do? I thought the WOT was their
TF
Dear Thomas,
@9-Oct-2009, 23:49 +0700 (09-Oct 17:49 here) Thomas Fernandez [TF] in
mid:1265807397.20091009234...@thomas-bkk.my-fqdn.de said to Marck:
... snip
MDP Do you mean it was invalid? It was PGP - you have to validate my sig
MDP on your keyring. Checking the mail in my TBUDL folder, the
Hello Marck,
On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 18:02:40 +0100 GMT (10/Oct/09, 0:02 AM +0700 GMT),
Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
TF Not here. I clicked on it and wasn't even offered to check any key
TF servers. Just gives a red X instead of a green tickmark. Looks like it
TF could be a TB! problem.
MDP It sounds
Guten Tag Thomas Fernandez,
am Freitag, 9. Oktober 2009 um 18:05 schrieben Sie:
Jens' sig verified over here too, but yours didn't.
Thats equivocating - which Signatur has been good and which not?
If you can not verify my Signature, it would be interesting, if you
have in your Adressbook
Dear Thomas,
@10-Oct-2009, 00:27 +0700 (09-Oct 18:27 here) Thomas Fernandez [TF]
in mid:1032812111.20091010002...@thomas-bkk.my-fqdn.de said to Marck:
... snip
MDP And a PGP configuration issue. If PGP isn't configured to lookup
MDP unknown keys on a keyserver then it can't verify signatures
Guten Tag Thomas Fernandez,
am Freitag, 9. Oktober 2009 um 19:27 schrieben Sie:
I didn't configure any PGP. I am using TB! as is.
So do i and it does not search the keyservers, but it did as i had my
PGP configured recently...
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Jens Franik
mailto:je...@gmx.de
The
some measure of
MDP configuration. Also, if you don't have any PGP installed, TB only has
MDP RSA key support. Mine is certainly a DSA/1024 key and not RSA so
MDP without external PGP support, you won't be able to verify my
MDP signature.
I see. But S/Mime is internal capability?
How do I import
to sign a message from m...@email.com...
In the S/Mime settings of TheBat!, the cryptographic service provider is well
recognised...
I've allready posted this problem before, it seems that it come from the fact
that this certificate does not mention any EMail address : it authenticate my
*name
Hello Stephane,
Friday, June 1, 2007, 12:50:45 PM, you wrote:
SBM i've asked for 3 years now to add this functionality, really important
SBM in belgium to communicate with any legal autorities, but with no luck til
today
You're trying to do something that is simply impossible!
There are no
Hi,
,- - [ Le mercredi 30 mai 2007 vers 14:20 Alto Speckhardt écrivait: ] - -
|
I can't manage to sign a message using S/MIME. I always get a notice
a la no certificate to sign message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] found. Which
isn't
all that surprising since the certificate I want to use carries
Guten Morgen,
I can't manage to sign a message using S/MIME. I always get a notice
a la no certificate to sign message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] found. Which isn't
all that surprising since the certificate I want to use carries an
email address of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How can I use the certificate
Hello Alto,
Wednesday, May 30, 2007, 2:20:29 PM, you wrote:
AS I can't manage to sign a message using S/MIME. I always get a notice
AS a la no certificate to sign message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] found. Which
isn't
AS all that surprising since the certificate I want to use carries an
AS email
Hello Alto,
Wednesday, May 30, 2007, 2:20:29 PM, you wrote:
AS I can't manage to sign a message using S/MIME.
I know the test with the PGP-signed message was no answer to your question.
I (don't know where my mind was, but) thought I could stop it from sending,
which obviously wasn't the case
Hello all,
Wednesday, May 30, 2007, Alto Speckhardt wrote:
Guten Morgen,
I can't manage to sign a message using S/MIME. I always get a notice
a la no certificate to sign message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] found. Which
isn't
all that surprising since the certificate I want to use carries
Hi Marek,
what implementation do You use? viz Options | S/MIME
I had switched to MS CryptoAPI because with Internal I got two
errors if I sent an email from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - once
for each address
no valid certificate. This is even stranger than the other way where
Hi Alto,
on Wed, 30 May 2007 14:20:29 +0200GMT (30.05.2007, 14:20 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:
AS I can't manage to sign a message using S/MIME. I always get a notice
AS a la no certificate to sign message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] found. Which
isn't
AS all that surprising since the certificate I
Hello Peter,
On 2007-05-30 you wrote:
AFAIK, you can't, or at least, you shouldn't. I was advised by my CA
(Thawte) to create a certificate for each email address.
That's certainly correct.
BTW: It takes a looong time for TB!/Windows trying to validate your signature
... and it fails.
Can
On Wed, 30 May 2007 at 22:12:00 +0200, Uwe wrote:
BTW: It takes a looong time for TB!/Windows trying to validate your signature
... and it fails.
Can you verify this (e.g., any software that creates a valid MID)?
It validated successfully here.
--
Robin
Using The Bat! v3.99.3
Windows
Hello Robin,
It validated successfully here.
Strange, I restarted TB! 3.99.8 and now it validates here successfully, too.
Sorry
Uwe
--
Using The Bat! v3.99.8 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
Service Pack 2
Current version is 3.99 | 'Using
Hi,
,- - [ Le lundi 5 mars 2007 vers 1:00 Roelof Otten écrivait: ] - -
|
Being supported by windows doesn't mean it's a public format. Windows
supports lots of proprietary formats. Is it supported by mac or Linux?
Yes, it's fully supported by Mac and Linux.
But when i say that the reader is
Hi,
,- - [ Le samedi 3 mars 2007 vers 10:07 Roelof Otten écrivait: ] - -
|
HDB Did you import that S/MIME (X.509) certificate into The Bat?
If I understood it correctly, they've got a hardware card, that can be
An identity card is hardware, of course :) But i do not see how to import
Hallo Stephane,
On Sun, 4 Mar 2007 16:18:06 +0100GMT (4-3-2007, 16:18 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
SB Hi,
SB ,- - [ Le samedi 3 mars 2007 vers 10:07 Roelof Otten écrivait: ] - -
SB |
snip
Consider it to be a feature helping TB!-users from doing stupid things!
[moderator on]
Please keep
Hallo Stephane,
On Sun, 4 Mar 2007 16:18:06 +0100GMT (4-3-2007, 16:18 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
read with a special card reader.
SB With a standard electronic card reader, it's not a proprietary
SB one, it's a reader recognised by Windows, integrated with the CryptoAPI of
windows.
Hello Stephane,
This is gettin OT.
Sunday, March 4, 2007, 4:18:06 PM, you wrote:
SBM In Belgium, it's the only legaly accepted way to send official emails to
SBM any official service, an email signed with an EID is equivalent of a
SBM signed snail mail.
Most of this signed snail mail doesn't
my email to the list on 25/02/2007
PN subject : Unable to sign with pkcs#11 or what am I doing wrong ?
PN but there is still no reaction
HDB Did you import that S/MIME (X.509) certificate into The Bat?
If I understood it correctly, they've got a hardware card, that can be
read with a special card
Hello Roelof,
RO If I understood it correctly, they've got a hardware card, that can be
RO read with a special card reader. That's how I understood it in the
RO past. And AAFAIK TB doesn't support that.
Thanks for clearing this out.
--
Best regards,
Patrick
Using The Bat! v3.98.1 on Windows
Hello Henk,
HMdB Did you import that S/MIME (X.509) certificate into The Bat?
I Thunderbird it works and there I have to Load a secutity devic in fact
a dll-file.
But I don't see that possibility in The Bat
--
Best regards,
Patrick
Using The Bat! v3.98.1 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service
Hello Roelof,
Saturday, March 3, 2007, 10:07:01 AM, you wrote:
RO If I understood it correctly, they've got a hardware card, that can be
RO read with a special card reader. That's how I understood it in the
RO past. And AAFAIK TB doesn't support that.
Consider it to be a feature helping
Hi,
I've allready asked long time ago, in Belgium we have Electronic Identity
Cards, those cards include a certificate allowing normally to sign emails...
The problem : this certificate only certify my name, of course, and not a
specific email address, as it's an official and legal personnal
Hello Stephane,
SBM I've allready asked long time ago, in Belgium we have Electronic
SBM Identity Cards, those cards include a certificate allowing normally to
sign emails...
I have the same question,
see my email to the list on 25/02/2007
subject : Unable to sign with pkcs#11 or what am I
email to the list on 25/02/2007
PN subject : Unable to sign with pkcs#11 or what am I doing wrong ?
PN but there is still no reaction
Did you import that S/MIME (X.509) certificate into The Bat?
--
grtz,
Henk M. de Bruijn
Hi,
,- - [ Le mercredi 18 janvier 2006 vers 12:23 Christian Bonkowski écrivait: ] -
-
|
on my job we got new S/Mime certificates. One for signing a mail and
one for encrypting. The certificate for signing I can import in the
bat and use it. But I can't import the other.
Is it possible
Hello,
on my job we got new S/Mime certificates. One for signing a mail and
one for encrypting. The certificate for signing I can import in the
bat and use it. But I can't import the other.
Is it possible to work with different certificates? And if so how?
Thanx for help,
Christian
Dear Christian,
@18-Jan-2006, 12:23 +0100 (18-Jan 11:23 here) Christian Bonkowski [CB]
in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to TBUDL:
CB on my job we got new S/Mime certificates. One for signing a mail and
CB one for encrypting. The certificate for signing I can import in the
CB bat and use
Hello Henk,
On Tuesday, July 26, 2005 at 12:21:10 AM Henk [HMdB] wrote:
As I intended to finally use it I changed S/MIME configuration to use
Microsoft Crypto API.
Sadly I wasn't able to sign any e-mail, most probably because I choose
the wrong settings. All I get (after selecting
On 26-7-2005 9:14 Peter Palmreuther wrote:
Hello Peter,
On Tuesday, July 26, 2005 at 12:21:10 AM Henk [HMdB] wrote:
...snip
Sorry I can not help you with this :-(
Seems I don't get only TB! to behave this way, it's just I don't want
to use Outlook or Outlook Express for sending mails
Maybe Thunderbird is an alternative ;-)
HMdB It is for me when the Bat! does not behave with PGP/GPG as I want.
It confuses me even more with it's S/MIME / security settings, iow: I
couldn't get it to work either. I didn't even see my MS Crypto API
stored certificates, not to talk about signing
On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 18:22:15 +0200GMT (26-7-2005, 18:22 +0200, where I
live), Peter Palmreuther wrote:
Hello Peter,
On Tuesday, July 26, 2005 at 9:34:26 AM Henk [HMdB] wrote:
HMdB Sorry I can not help you with this :-(
No problem.
It confuses me even more with it's S/MIME / security
Hello List,
seems it's time I need a little help.
I own a class three card reader (ReinerSCT) and an appropriate chip
card. This card includes, among others, an e-mail certificate, which
can be used to S/MIME sign e-mail-messages.
As I intended to finally use it I changed S/MIME configuration
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 19:51:38 +0200GMT (25-7-2005, 19:51 +0200, where I
live), Peter Palmreuther wrote:
Hi Peter,
...snip
As I intended to finally use it I changed S/MIME configuration to use
Microsoft Crypto API.
Sadly I wasn't able to sign any e-mail, most probably because I choose
Hi all,
after writing in the German list and getting no reply I decided to post
this issue also here... Maybe I have more luck...
I'm looking forward to optimize my S/MIME and PGP configuration.
At the moment I use S/MIME (as you also see in this mail) only for signing
every outgoing mail. I
Hi,
In Belgium, we have now an electronic identity card... this card include a
certificate allowing us to digitaly sign a document/email...
The problem is : this certificate is used to authenticate our name, not a
temporary or a specific email address... it means that this certificate does
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
***^\ ._)~~
~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Fri, 29 Apr 2005,
@ @ at 14:19:53 +0200, when Stephane Bouvard [ML] wrote:
In Belgium, we have now an electronic identity card... this card
include a certificate allowing us to
BEGIN REPOSTED MESSAGE
Hi
I'm using TB! Pro v3, and when I try and generate a digital certificate
for myself (using the generate button in TB!) I get the following error
messages:
Token driver is not installed or PKCS#11 API is missing
(this error only shows up the
Hello Marck,
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 18:23:52 +0100 GMT (09/10/2004, 00:23 +0700 GMT),
Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
TF Found it. I don't have a Certification Path tab, though.
MDP Hmmm .. Then you may not have gone deep enough.
Correct. Found it.
MDP You have to View INVALID certificate, click the
Hello Marck,
On Thu, 7 Oct 2004 11:48:30 +0100 GMT (07/10/2004, 17:48 +0700 GMT),
Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
MDP You have to View INVALID certificate,
Where do I do that? I have imported the cert. I went to the AB, there
are Root CAs and Trusted CAs, many of them, which one is the INVALID
one?
Dear Thomas,
@8-Oct-2004, 22:14 +0700 (08-Oct 16:14 UK time) Thomas Fernandez [TF]
in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck:
MDP You have to View INVALID certificate,
TF Where do I do that? I have imported the cert. I went to the AB, there
TF are Root CAs and Trusted CAs, many of them, which one
Hello Marck,
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 16:29:35 +0100 GMT (08/10/2004, 22:29 +0700 GMT),
Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
MDP You have to View INVALID certificate,
MDP The button that is the X marker on the signed message. That was my
MDP start point for the instructions. Go back there and follow the
MDP
there and follow the
MDP instructions again.
TF Found it. I don't have a Certification Path tab, though.
Hmmm .. Then you may not have gone deep enough.
TF I have a Certificate tab, but that offers no path. Maybe that's
TF because I'm using an older version of TB.
Nah - it's been there since v1 S/MIME
Hi Marck,
on Fri, 8 Oct 2004 18:23:52 +0100GMT, you wrote:
MDP You have to View INVALID certificate, click the View button at the
MDP bottom of the certificate view dialog, click to the Certification
MDP path tab in the View dialog, select Henk's authority certificate
MDP there and click the Add
Hello Peter,
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 19:57:33 +0200GMT (8-10-2004, 19:57 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
...snip
PM I came late in this thread, but this works to have Henk's previously
PM invalid sig turn to valid.
It is not always necessary to do so much trouble to valid a S/MIME
sig
__
:tbflag: The Bat! Natural Email System v3.01 RC4 Professional on Windows XP SP2
PGP Key Request: See Headers or send email with subj.: send HenksKeyID
Gossamer Spider Web of Trust http://gswot.webhop.info/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Hello Marck,
On Wed, 6 Oct 2004 00:38:28 +0100 GMT (06/10/2004, 06:38 +0700 GMT),
Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
TF Not here: Big red X on Hank's message.
MDP Yes - until I approved Henk as a certification authority.
I wouldn't know how to do that. But don't worry, this is probably a
question for
, this is probably a
TF question for pgp-beginners.
It's not because we're talking about S/MIME, not PGP. So this is the
correct forum. S/MIME is an integral function in The Bat, completely
self-contained.
You have to View INVALID certificate, click the View button, click
to the Certification path tab, select
Unfortunately, it's increasingly looking likely that I'm the only
one (so far) suffering from this problem. I guess it doesn't look
too hopeful I'll be able to resolve it. :(
Phew, I'm sooo glad I'm not the only person with this problem :)
No, I tried generating a self-cert certificate
On Tuesday, October 5, 2004, 11:36:53 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unfortunately, it's increasingly looking likely that I'm the only
one (so far) suffering from this problem. I guess it doesn't look
too hopeful I'll be able to resolve it. :(
No, I tried generating a self-cert certificate and
Pearlstone -- List moderator and fellow end user
TB! v3.0.1 RC3 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 2
'
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Marck,
On 05 October 2004 at 11:18:24GMT +0100 (which was 11:18 where I live)
Marck D Pearlstone wrote and made these points on the subject of 2nd
REPOST: Problems with S/MIME:
This message should be so signed with my Thawte certificate
... snip
A When you say I have done do you mean you were able to generate
A your own certificate using TB! feature without the errors I
A experienced?
I have done. Just did another.
Yes, and it was all present and correct at this end. Thanks.
Now I wonder why it doesn't it work for me?
be done. All in all this means that TB
has to refer to external applications and sources to verify a PGP
signature. Such action requires user permission and control before it
can take place - hence the ? button.
S/MIME keys are held in the TB address book record for the individual
They are different than those with PGP, because they appear already
verified, with no ? The first one had a green check, this comes with
a red sign with a cross.
So those self signed are useless?
Not necessarily. I have a use for them although I agree, that most probably will not.
use an external DLL? Hmmm. I thought the slibeay.dll
had something to do with it - but I'm wrong. I don't even have it and
S/MIME is fully operational here.
It seems to think you're using a token. Have you installed Pro? I
wonder if it's a bug in the Pro version. The Pro version is set up to
use
for :(
snip
Back to the original issue:
Token driver is not installed or PKCS#11 API is missing
Doesn't the API use an external DLL? Hmmm. I thought the slibeay.dll
had something to do with it - but I'm wrong. I don't even have it and
S/MIME is fully operational here.
It seems to think
snip
Try downloading the Home version instead.
I agree, TB! seems to be choking on the token issue. I'm going to try
installing Home version now to see if that helps. Will report back ASAP.
Thanks for your help so far.
Ok, I downloaded and installed the Home version (BTW the Help/About
snip
On a somewhat related note, my email provider has issued a new POP3
certificate today but TB! keeps giving me the error:
TLS handshake failure. Invalid server certificate (The issuer of this certificate
chain was not found).
Now, the certificate was issued by Comodo Group so I know
Request: See Headers or send email with subj.: send HenksKeyID
Gossamer Spider Web of Trust http://gswot.webhop.info/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http
Dear Henk,
@5-Oct-2004, 19:27 +0200 (05-Oct 18:27 UK time) Henk de Bruijn [HDB]
in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
OK, please disregard the above problem. I have now managed to fix it (somehow).
I still have the problem with the self-signed certificates though :(
HDB I am already working with
Hello Marck,
On Tue, 5 Oct 2004 18:40:37 +0100 GMT (06/10/2004, 00:40 +0700 GMT),
Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
HDB I am already working with two X.509 certificates (Thawte and CAcert)
HDB and tried to generate a certificate myself withing the Bat!
HDB Let´s see if it works?
MDP Perfecto.
Not
if it works?
Does that mean something if I see here this:
Message was altered. Signed time 05 okt 2004 19:27:59
This S/MIME Certificate is invalid.
- --
Mica
PGP key uploaded at: http://pgp.mit.edu/ once just before breakfast
[Earth LOG: 34 day(s) since v3.0 unleashing]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE
I still have the problem with the self-signed certificates though :(
I am already working with two X.509 certificates (Thawte and CAcert)
and tried to generate a certificate myself withing the Bat!
Let´s see if it works?
Yep, looked ok here. Thanks for trying.
Unfortunately, it's
Dear Thomas,
@6-Oct-2004, 00:48 +0700 (05-Oct 18:48 UK time) Thomas Fernandez [TF]
in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck:
HDB I am already working with two X.509 certificates (Thawte and CAcert)
HDB and tried to generate a certificate myself withing the Bat!
HDB Let´s see if it works?
MDP
1 - 100 of 450 matches
Mail list logo
