$ export LD_PRELOAD=''
$ sed
sed: can't load library ''
$ env
env: can't load library ''
$ vim
/usr/local/bin/vim: can't load library ''
$
Is this the right way to fix it?
Index: loader.c
===
RCS file:
Daca aveti probleme cu vizionarea acestui email dati [click aici] pentru
a vizualiza varianta online!
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
Newsletter 14.12.2010
[IMAGE]
CaseFaraIntermediari.roUrmariti-ne pe Facebook!Urmariti-ne pe
Twitter!Urmariti-ne pe Blogger!
Ultimele anunturi adaugate
Vezi toate
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Marc Espie es...@nerim.net wrote:
I'm not going to comment on the mail itself, but I've seen a lot of
incredibly
dubious articles on the net over the last few days.
- use your brains, people. Just because a guy does say so doesn't mean
there's
a backdoor. B
Does anyone know if there was an ultimate outcome to the investigation
of side channels supposedly put into DSA by the NSA?
Top Shop
-10% za Vas i Vaše
prijatelje
Ne propustite super prazniD
nu kupovinu po GARANTOVANO najniEim cenama!
Kupite Å¡ta god poEelite uz kupon sa 10% popusta koji vaEi za 1 kupovinu
do 31.1.2011.
Kod Vašeg kupona za
10% popusta je: 84ZEACSKJT
Kliknite ovde i iskoristite odmah svoj
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 04:08:23PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
This made me go nuts for a long time. As soon as you have two interfaces
running dhclient those two will start fighting over /etc/resolv.conf
which is realy bad when short lease times are used and one interface is
not getting new
I kind of disagree with you mark and I think that the diff makes sense.
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 11:48:06AM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 22:43:04 +0100
From: Stefan Sperling s...@openbsd.org
$ export LD_PRELOAD=''
$ sed
sed: can't load library ''
$ env
env:
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Marc Espie es...@nerim.net wrote:
I'm not going to comment on the mail itself, but I've seen a lot of
incredibly
dubious articles on the net over the last few days.
- use your brains, people. Just because a guy does say so doesn't mean
there's
a
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 08:21:05 -0600
From: Marco Peereboom sl...@peereboom.us
I kind of disagree with you mark and I think that the diff makes sense.
FWIW, I feel too strongly about this.
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 11:48:06AM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 22:43:04
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 08:59:13AM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
This is not to point finger at Theo for creating all this commotion, of
course;
this commotion can, however, be, an unintended accident, but the fact that
it came from Theo gave it a lot of credibility.
Whoa, wait a second
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 7:59 AM, Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org
wrote:
[skipped]
I have to say that Perry here is credited with one thing he actually did
not
do -- publish this to the world. There has been talk of alterior motives
here,
but for any of these motives, Perry had to
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 7:59 AM, Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org wr=
ote:
[skipped]
I have to say that Perry here is credited with one thing he actually di=
d not
do -- publish this to the world. There has been talk of alterior motive=
s here,
but for any of these motives,
Theo,
this thread is DEAD. Drop it.
No one believes in backdoors planted into OpenBSD.
I se commits - you dig all over the place.
If backdoor existed, then it is gone cause of this digging.
Without proof its just a plain BS.
P.S.
I lost my interest for a while ago now.
On Dec 17, 2010, at
I agree with Marc - it's hopeless We live in a world where spin is
king. Anything you say can and will be twisted against you.
On 12/17/10 9:39 AM, Marc Espie wrote:
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 08:59:13AM -0700, Theo de Raadt wrote:
This is not to point finger at Theo for creating all this
The reasoning versus changing acpihpet match function to reject
duplicates and forcing acpihpet0 instead of acpihpet* in the kernel
configuration file should really come down to this:
- if acpihpet attaches to a bus which can be enumerated, then the kernel
configuration file should contain
Mark Kettenis wrote:
From: Marco Peereboom sl...@peereboom.us
I kind of disagree with you mark and I think that the diff
makes sense.
FWIW, I feel too strongly about this.
If you want to check it check it properly. For example use stat to
see if LD_PRELOAD contains an existing file or
The below patch is for those using relayd w/ the relay (not redirect)
function.
If you are seeing Address already in use errors with option -d or
performance issues with a lot of traffic, please test and report.
This disables SO_REUSEPORT on connect()'s.
Index: relay.c
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 11:39 PM, Pawel Veselov pawel.vese...@gmail.com wrote:
Whoa, wait a second here. B If you think I gave it credibility, you
need to go back and read my words again. B I called it an allegation,
and I stick with that. B I was extremely careful with my words, and you
Works on ANY Computer
Profiting 112 Minutes From NOW
$4,191 In First 7 Days
$219,249 Last Month
Only 234 Copies Available - If You Don't Get Results, You'll Get A Full Refund
AND $100
Join Now : http://business-page.us/change-your-life-become-rich.html
19 matches
Mail list logo
