Re: interfaces and priorities for relayd routers

2015-06-24 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2015/06/22 10:20, Reyk Floeter wrote: The router code was mostly done for something like link balancing, you have two or more uplink gateways and want to select the route based on their availability. I've never really understood how this is meant to work, in real life the usual case is

Re: interfaces and priorities for relayd routers

2015-06-24 Thread David Gwynne
On 24 Jun 2015, at 10:38 am, David Gwynne da...@gwynne.id.au wrote: On 22 Jun 2015, at 18:20, Reyk Floeter r...@openbsd.org wrote: Hi, On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 09:44:22PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote: i want relayd to check teh availability of some services and inject routes when the

Re: pkg_info: print used repos

2015-06-24 Thread Marc Espie
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 08:53:15PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote: - $state-handle_options('cCdfF:hIKLmPQ:qr:RsSUe:E:Ml:aAt', + $state-handle_options('cCdfF:hIKLmpPQ:qr:RsSUe:E:Ml:aAt', Starting to look a lot like ls. What a coincidence. It's used to list things. So is ls.

Re: interfaces and priorities for relayd routers

2015-06-24 Thread Reyk Floeter
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 10:35:26AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote: On 2015/06/22 10:20, Reyk Floeter wrote: The router code was mostly done for something like link balancing, you have two or more uplink gateways and want to select the route based on their availability. I've never really

Remove a #if NCARP hack

2015-06-24 Thread Martin Pieuchot
Time goes by and things must be cleaned. Thanks to claudio@'s work to support multiple connected routes carp(4) now have its own default priority. So I audited the remaining iterations on finet and I couldn't find any good reason to force carp(4) interfaces at a special position in the list of

Re: [diff] trivia: change xorl = xorq

2015-06-24 Thread Alexey Dobriyan
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 12:33 AM, Philip Guenther guent...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 1:18 PM, Mike Larkin mlar...@azathoth.net wrote: On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 09:49:26AM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote: Clearing 32-bit register clears whole register, save REX prefix. I see nothing

Re: pkg_info: print used repos

2015-06-24 Thread Marc Espie
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 11:59:41AM +0200, ludovic coues wrote: 2015-06-24 11:40 GMT+02:00 Marc Espie es...@nerim.net: On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 08:53:15PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote: - $state-handle_options('cCdfF:hIKLmPQ:qr:RsSUe:E:Ml:aAt', +

Re: bridge_output() without m_buf_tag

2015-06-24 Thread Martin Pieuchot
On 17/06/15(Wed) 14:07, Martin Pieuchot wrote: On 08/06/15(Mon) 15:58, Martin Pieuchot wrote: Diff below moves bridge_output() to if_output(). It fixes the case I already described some weeks ago where you have a physical interface in a bridge and a vlan on top of it which is not in the

Re: pkg_info: print used repos

2015-06-24 Thread ludovic coues
2015-06-24 11:40 GMT+02:00 Marc Espie es...@nerim.net: On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 08:53:15PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote: - $state-handle_options('cCdfF:hIKLmPQ:qr:RsSUe:E:Ml:aAt', + $state-handle_options('cCdfF:hIKLmpPQ:qr:RsSUe:E:Ml:aAt', Starting to look a lot like ls. What a

Re: Machine hangs on boot with snapshots 5.8-beta

2015-06-24 Thread Philip Guenther
On Wed, 24 Jun 2015, Pedro Caetano wrote: If case gmail wraps the lines output from dmesg and sendbug is attached Thanks. I believe the issue is that the ACPI APIC table has extra LAPCI/processor entries which are marked as disabled...and which we let overwrite the enabled entry for cpu0.

Re: macppc IPI counter

2015-06-24 Thread Mark Kettenis
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 16:11:08 +0200 From: Martin Pieuchot m...@openbsd.org Use only one ipi counter just like other archs do. ok? Problem is that the event counters aren't really MP safe. By keeping them per-CPU you circumvent any problems with that. Index: dev/openpic.c

Re: macppc IPI counter

2015-06-24 Thread Martin Pieuchot
On 24/06/15(Wed) 16:45, Mark Kettenis wrote: Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 16:11:08 +0200 From: Martin Pieuchot m...@openbsd.org Use only one ipi counter just like other archs do. ok? Problem is that the event counters aren't really MP safe. By keeping them per-CPU you circumvent any

macppc IPI counter

2015-06-24 Thread Martin Pieuchot
Use only one ipi counter just like other archs do. ok? Index: dev/openpic.c === RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/arch/macppc/dev/openpic.c,v retrieving revision 1.81 diff -u -p -r1.81 openpic.c --- dev/openpic.c 24 Jun 2015 11:58:06