On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 08:17:10PM +0900, Ryan McBride wrote:
> So I've been eying this machine for a while:
> http://www.kingjim.co.jp/sp/portabook/xmc10/
Included below is the dmesg with the previous diff applied.
Besides all the devices that show "not configured", there are
So I've been eying this machine for a while:
http://www.kingjim.co.jp/sp/portabook/xmc10/
Original price was a rediculous JPY 96,000 but it's dropped to a reasonable
JPY 20,000 (about USD 200) so I picked one up.
bsd.rd boots, but GENERIC / GENERIC.MP fail to parse the ACPI AML; it
needs the
On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 04:27:17AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
But it seems people are expected to build a custom bsd.rd if they
want something different so I'll bow out of this conversation.
No, the situation is that less than 1% of the user community
apparently have a secret usage case,
This diff allows us to set net.inet.gre.wccp sysctl to 2, in which
case gre(4) will skip the WCCPv2 redirect header, allowing us to
handle the packet in the same way as WCCPv1.
Squid knows how to set up the WCCPv2 session with the Cisco and
handles transparent HTTP proxying, use PF divert the
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 02:40:57AM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 09:09:03AM +0900, Ryan McBride wrote:
Part of the reason it's there is to make carp work properly for services
listening on the carp interface, in particular so that hosts in the
BACKUP state will reach
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 06:25:59PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
* Alexander Bluhm alexander.bl...@gmx.net [2014-04-24 18:18]:
The carp_setroute() function starts with the encouraging comment
/* XXX this mess needs fixing */.
I didn't change my mind at least :)
1.136(henning
I'm a bit late to the party, I know. But I just wanted to point out that
NIST now requires only the regular 'secure erase' ATA command to
sanitize a drive for anything that wouldn't require the drive to be
pitched into a metal shredder, pulverised, ground into powder, and then
melted into slag.
I agree with this. Others to consider:
- 'tag': we could then replace the nasty 'tagged' keyword with 'tag' and
do proper 'tag != FOO' syntax.
- synproxy and modulate state - could go into 'scrub' also?
On Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 07:24:23PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
so, we have some utter
committed, thanks!
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 02:46:30AM -0300, Christiano F. Haesbaert wrote:
Hi, vlan_start() was increasing packet counts before checking if the
packet was successfully enqueued. I made a hunt for similar errors.
Index: net/if_mpe.c
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 02:04:35PM +0200, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
Ryan McBride mcbr...@openbsd.org writes:
Please try a newer snapshot, this bug was fixed in the following commit:
Latest snapshot (date Jul 31) still loads
match out log on $ext_if inet nat-to ($ext_if)
as
match
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 02:30:05PM +0200, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
Ryan McBride mcbr...@openbsd.org writes:
The interface may have more than one address...
That's probably just me not noticing, but the odd part is that while
this interface has several addresses, it only has one IPv4
Please try a newer snapshot, this bug was fixed in the following commit:
CVSROOT:/cvs
Module name:src
Changes by: mcbr...@cvs.openbsd.org 2011/07/29 04:48:35
Modified files:
sys/net: pf_lb.c
Log message:
Make sure we use the right
If there is anyone out there who disables fragment reassembly (enabled
by default), you need to help testing this diff which folds
pf_test_fragment() into pf_test_rule().
If I don't hear from anyone we may one day decide that nobody actually
does this and remove the ability to disable reassembly
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 09:38:41AM +0100, Janne Johansson wrote:
without a 'hint' (true or fake), where would you start auditing the
code? It's just too much.
Ted Unangst already solved that for all the potential lookers:
Quote from http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-miscm=124413533913404w=2
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 10:44:48AM -0700, Kjell Wooding wrote:
Oh good grief. Yes, ARC4 is being used to stretch a random source. Feel free
to hunt for the distinguisher in the OpenBSD multi-consumer model. There's a
good paper in there. If you can show a distinguisher (even without
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 09:19:21AM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
So our choices are basically lisp or forth. I
assert without proof that forth is the wrong choice.
The first thing I thought when I saw your proposal was Cool. I should
add a Forth interpreter to ed(1).
I'd like to update the PF os fingerprints; I belive that others have
threatened on tech@ to do this, and I'd like to hear from them if they
have any partial diffs or collections of fingeerprints.
-Ryan
I can't speak for everyone, but splitting the clauses of an if statement
with ifdefs makes my eyes bleed.
I would personally prefer to see these replaced with a switch statment,
as used elsewhere in PF; however this would probably need a goto that
points to the end of the main switch() statment
18 matches
Mail list logo
