Re: plus58.html hrefs

2015-09-04 Thread Ingo Schwarze
Hi Tim, Tim van der Molen wrote on Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 06:05:41PM +0200: > Tim van der Molen (2015-09-04 17:12 +0200): >> The smu(4) link contains a typo (fixed in my diff below), pkg(5) is a >> mere example (and not a real man page), and cpuid(6) does not refer to a >> man page, but to a CPUID

Re: plus58.html hrefs

2015-09-04 Thread Tim van der Molen
Tim van der Molen (2015-09-04 17:12 +0200): > The smu(4) link contains a typo (fixed in my diff below), pkg(5) is a > mere example (and not a real man page), and cpuid(6) does not refer to a > man page, but to a CPUID function. Actually, pkg(5) referring to a Solaris man page would be a more proba

Re: plus58.html hrefs

2015-09-04 Thread Rob
Hey Tim, That all makes se‎nse, thanks! I was not sure so I thought I would pass it along anyway for your consideration. Rob   Original Message   From: Tim van der Molen Sent: Friday, September 4, 2015 11:12 AM To: Rob Pierce Cc: tech Subject: Re: plus58.html hrefs Rob Pierce (2015-09-04 06

Re: plus58.html hrefs

2015-09-04 Thread Tim van der Molen
Rob Pierce (2015-09-04 06:29 +0200): > There is also a reference to smu(4) that appears to be broken, as well as an > unreferenced pkg(5) and cupid(6) that I couldn't resolve. Thanks, Rob! The smu(4) link contains a typo (fixed in my diff below), pkg(5) is a mere example (and not a real man page

Re: plus58.html hrefs

2015-09-03 Thread Rob Pierce
Sorry, an unreferenced cpuid(6) that I couldn't resolve. - Original Message - From: "Rob Pierce" To: "tech" Sent: Friday, September 4, 2015 12:29:50 AM Subject: plus58.html hrefs There is also a reference to smu(4) that appears to be broken, as well as an unreferenced pkg(5) and cupid(