On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 08:22:38PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
I think both sthen@ and I have mentioned before that we really like
how FreeBSD has the revision in a separate PORTREVISION variable
that is much easier and less error prone to increment than pX
suffixes in PKGNAME.
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 10:16 AM, Marc Espie es...@nerim.net wrote:
On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 08:22:38PM +, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
I think both sthen@ and I have mentioned before that we really like
how FreeBSD has the revision in a separate PORTREVISION variable
that is much easier and
I remember why I did not do it before... there is a technical.
The way we build FULLPKGNAMEs with the interaction with flavors makes this
rather awkward.
Anyways, my make-fu did improve markedly since last time I tried, so this
ought to do the trick.
If you get a headache while reading this,
each time xenocara farts, we get new libs (or less libs).
in order for updates to work, we *should* propagate those changes to
@wantlib in each port.
This currently isn't done automatically... check-lib-depends is sloooww
(needs to check every file before packaging) and not even flawless.
I'm
On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 12:03:47PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2010/07/08 11:50, Marc Espie wrote:
each time xenocara farts, we get new libs (or less libs).
in order for updates to work, we *should* propagate those changes to
@wantlib in each port.
This currently isn't done
On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 11:50:39AM +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
each time xenocara farts, we get new libs (or less libs).
in order for updates to work, we *should* propagate those changes to
@wantlib in each port.
For the base and xenocara libs, wouldn't it make sense to have some
modules
On Thursday 08 July 2010 02:03:41 pm Matthieu Herrb wrote:
On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 11:50:39AM +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
each time xenocara farts, we get new libs (or less libs).
in order for updates to work, we *should* propagate those changes to
@wantlib in each port.
For the base and
On Thu, 8 Jul 2010, Marc Espie wrote:
On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 02:03:41PM +0200, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 11:50:39AM +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
each time xenocara farts, we get new libs (or less libs).
in order for updates to work, we *should* propagate those changes to
Marc Espie es...@nerim.net wrote:
Briefly, the only info that changes is
- p* numbers (e.g., PKGNAME = somethingpN)
- WANTLIB for the affected package.
As much as I don't like adding, as naddy would put it, more magic, I think
the p* numbers could live in a separate file, along with most
