Re: [RFC] Ai_ADDRCONFIG^WAIAIAIAIAIAIAEEEEEEEEE tweaks?

2014-05-03 Thread Paul de Weerd
On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 11:20:38PM +0200, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote: | I'm not referring to SLAAC. I'm referring to addresses that are | configured on interfaces without the user even requesting them. | link-local addresses, specifically. | | I was actually answering your question about

Re: [RFC] Ai_ADDRCONFIG^WAIAIAIAIAIAIAEEEEEEEEE tweaks?

2014-05-03 Thread Claudio Jeker
On Sat, May 03, 2014 at 10:03:30AM +0200, Paul de Weerd wrote: On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 11:20:38PM +0200, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote: | I'm not referring to SLAAC. I'm referring to addresses that are | configured on interfaces without the user even requesting them. | link-local

Re: libc: #define to remove support for %n from printf(3)?

2014-05-03 Thread Reyk Floeter
On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 06:50:04PM -0600, Bob Beck wrote: What's their hangup with %n? We normally don't like polluting the world with #ifdef OPENSSL_NO_PERCENT_N... We normally nuke stuff like that Well, it is an evil thing that is rarely used and well-known for some format string

[PATCH] 2 of 2 s3_lib.c KNF cleanup

2014-05-03 Thread Chris Hettrick
Hi tech@ Apply this diff after my previous diff. This diff cleans up the non-whitespace KNF in s3_lib.c --- s3_lib.cThu May 1 21:32:06 2014 +++ /usr/src/lib/libssl/src/ssl/s3_lib.cFri May 2 22:10:24 2014 @@ -1357,7 +1357,7 @@ OPENSSL_GLOBAL SSL_CIPHER ssl3_ciphers[] = {

[PATCH] 1 of 2 s3_lib.c KNF cleanup

2014-05-03 Thread Chris Hettrick
Hi tech@ Some KNF whitespace cleanup in s3_lib.c that can be checked with tr and md5. Another diff will follow for the non-whitespace KNF cleanup. Index: src/ssl/s3_lib.c === RCS file: /cvs/src/lib/libssl/src/ssl/s3_lib.c,v

Re: libc: #define to remove support for %n from printf(3)?

2014-05-03 Thread Marc Espie
On Sat, May 03, 2014 at 11:28:16AM +0200, Reyk Floeter wrote: On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 06:50:04PM -0600, Bob Beck wrote: What's their hangup with %n? We normally don't like polluting the world with #ifdef OPENSSL_NO_PERCENT_N... We normally nuke stuff like that Well, it is an evil thing

Re: libc: #define to remove support for %n from printf(3)?

2014-05-03 Thread Henning Brauer
* Marc Espie es...@nerim.net [2014-05-03 11:50]: On Sat, May 03, 2014 at 11:28:16AM +0200, Reyk Floeter wrote: On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 06:50:04PM -0600, Bob Beck wrote: What's their hangup with %n? We normally don't like polluting the world with #ifdef OPENSSL_NO_PERCENT_N... We

zless is less

2014-05-03 Thread Vadim Zhukov
Hello all. Just run into the following issue with zmore/zless: if you have PAGER envvar set, it's no matter whatever you'll call, zmore or zless - it'll always run $PAGER. The problem is that I have PAGER=/usr/bin/more but sometimes I want to use less. If I run less foo, I get what I requested;

Re: libc: #define to remove support for %n from printf(3)?

2014-05-03 Thread Ted Unangst
On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 15:17, enh wrote: ideally i'd like to have no differences between Android and OpenBSD in the shared source files, because i've seen what a mess things were when we diverged (and how many bugs went unfixed in Android despite having been fixed for years upstream). so

Re: libc: #define to remove support for %n from printf(3)?

2014-05-03 Thread Marc Espie
On Sat, May 03, 2014 at 01:00:28PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote: * Marc Espie es...@nerim.net [2014-05-03 11:50]: On Sat, May 03, 2014 at 11:28:16AM +0200, Reyk Floeter wrote: On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 06:50:04PM -0600, Bob Beck wrote: What's their hangup with %n? We normally don't like

[PATCH] 1 of 2 s3_lib.c KNF retry

2014-05-03 Thread Chris Hettrick
Hi tech@ I was too ambitious with the previous diffs. Here they are again. First diff is whitespace only that can be checked with tr and md5. Second diff is for non-whitespace KNF cleanup. Index: s3_lib.c === RCS file:

Re: [RFC] Ai_ADDRCONFIG^WAIAIAIAIAIAIAEEEEEEEEE tweaks?

2014-05-03 Thread Daniel Ouellet
Everybody does it is an argumentum ad populum. It's not right because all systems do this. All systems do this because some RFC told them to and apparently nobody considered the downsides (or they dismissed them). I'm arguing it should be different since it is unexpected behavior (keep in

Re: [PATCH] 1 of 2 s3_lib.c KNF retry

2014-05-03 Thread Kenneth Westerback
On 3 May 2014 20:29, Philip Guenther guent...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Chris Hettrick ch...@foo.structfoo.comwrote: I was too ambitious with the previous diffs. Here they are again. First diff is whitespace only that can be checked with tr and md5. Second diff is